Forum The Longship Draft behind the scenes

Draft behind the scenes

supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,533 posts
Rep: 1,438

Lots of high fiving and it sounds like they worked the draft exactly how they wanted it. I found the part with the Lions trade down being his "dream scenario." The Packers trade down wasn't covered but them moving up to get Booth was as well as their Combine interview with Booth 

Liked:
#1 · May 18, 7:29 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Yep, saw this Supa.  It definitely felt like Kwesi, O'Connell, and the rest of the front office folks were all in on trading with Detroit to get a pick cluster in that range they liked.  Sounds like they felt the talent was deep there at positions they were targeting.

This made me feel better about how things went down, but Kwesi is a smart guy and I think he'll look back and realize he should have gotten more from Detroit.  Even if Cine, Booth, and company pan out.

Liked:
#2 · May 18, 8:29 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Wetlander" said: Yep, saw this Supa.  It definitely felt like Kwesi, O'Connell, and the rest of the front office folks were all in on trading with Detroit to get a pick cluster in that range they liked.  Sounds like they felt the talent was deep there at positions they were targeting.

This made me feel better about how things went down, but Kwesi is a smart guy and I think he'll look back and realize he should have gotten more from Detroit.  Even if Cine, Booth, and company pan out.


It's interesting that almost universaly this was thought of as not a very deep draft with about 15 blue chippers who carried a legit 1st round grade, yet Kwesi's "dream scenario" was to trade down and accumulate more picks in that second to third round range. We'll see how many serious contributors we get out of this draft but I thought the smart money was to take the blue chipper who fell in your lap, and use your later picks to maneuver around to add depth if they wanted. 

Liked:
#3 · May 18, 10:31 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Wetlander" said: Yep, saw this Supa.  It definitely felt like Kwesi, O'Connell, and the rest of the front office folks were all in on trading with Detroit to get a pick cluster in that range they liked.  Sounds like they felt the talent was deep there at positions they were targeting.

This made me feel better about how things went down, but Kwesi is a smart guy and I think he'll look back and realize he should have gotten more from Detroit.  Even if Cine, Booth, and company pan out.


It's interesting that almost universaly this was thought of as not a very deep draft with about 15 blue chippers who carried a legit 1st round grade, yet Kwesi's "dream scenario" was to trade down and accumulate more picks in that second to third round range. We'll see how many serious contributors we get out of this draft but I thought the smart money was to take the blue chipper who fell in your lap, and use your later picks to maneuver around to add depth if they wanted. 


I think Kwesi decided well before the draft that they were going to try to move outside of that blue chip talent for more draft capital. This was not some out of the blue idea either, since many of us mocked up similar trades down. 

The calculation is that while there might be 15 blue chippers in the draft, once you get past them, the vein of talent remains strong through 80.

We'll see if they made the right decision or not (I don't think it's outside the realm of possibility that Cine end up better than Hamilton), but I still think we should've held out for the '23 1st rounder. The LIONS 1st rounder, too. Man that's gonna burn for a while. 

Liked:
#4 · May 19, 6:53 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I find it interesting the way coach O’Connell and Kwesi collaborate and discuss the
players during the draft.  I don’t recall
ever seen Spelly and Zim working together so closely.  It almost seemed like it was RS’s job to get
Zim some players he could coach.   I truly believe Kwesi wants input from everyone
around him to help build this team.   I
really think KOC and Kwesi worked this draft very closely together and our
coach was on board and had input with each pick.  I’m not so sure that happened as much when
Spelly was running the draft.

Liked:
#5 · May 19, 7:54 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Wetlander" said: Yep, saw this Supa.  It definitely felt like Kwesi, O'Connell, and the rest of the front office folks were all in on trading with Detroit to get a pick cluster in that range they liked.  Sounds like they felt the talent was deep there at positions they were targeting.

This made me feel better about how things went down, but Kwesi is a smart guy and I think he'll look back and realize he should have gotten more from Detroit.  Even if Cine, Booth, and company pan out.


It's interesting that almost universaly this was thought of as not a very deep draft with about 15 blue chippers who carried a legit 1st round grade, yet Kwesi's "dream scenario" was to trade down and accumulate more picks in that second to third round range. We'll see how many serious contributors we get out of this draft but I thought the smart money was to take the blue chipper who fell in your lap, and use your later picks to maneuver around to add depth if they wanted. 


I think Kwesi decided well before the draft that they were going to try to move outside of that blue chip talent for more draft capital. This was not some out of the blue idea either, since many of us mocked up similar trades down. 

The calculation is that while there might be 15 blue chippers in the draft, once you get past them, the vein of talent remains strong through 80.

We'll see if they made the right decision or not (I don't think it's outside the realm of possibility that Cine end up better than Hamilton), but I still think we should've held out for the '23 1st rounder. The LIONS 1st rounder, too. Man that's gonna burn for a while. 



I agree. It appears this trade with Detroit was agreed upon before the draft even started contingent upon the player the Lions wanted still being on the board, which he was. They certainly had a plan and executed it exactly how they wanted. Whether it was a wise plan remains to be seen 

Liked:
#6 · May 19, 10:01 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"HappyViking" said: I find it interesting the way coach O’Connell and Kwesi collaborate and discuss the players during the draft.  I don’t recall ever seen Spelly and Zim working together so closely.  It almost seemed like it was RS’s job to get Zim some players he could coach.   I truly believe Kwesi wants input from everyone around him to help build this team.   I really think KOC and Kwesi worked this draft very closely together and our coach was on board and had input with each pick.  I’m not so sure that happened as much when Spelly was running the draft.


I found it interesting seeing OConnell explaining the trades to the Wilfs...who looked absolutely befuddled..

Liked:
#7 · May 19, 10:03 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

KAM will learn. He is smart and he is getting experience. I do like how he is working with KOC. It is a good change. I know there are going to continue to be bumps along the way but it is better seeing something different. It is also going to take time for the full impact to show.

Liked:
#8 · May 19, 11:57 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I am impressed with KAM & KOC so far. They had a draft plan and stuck to it. I know a lot of people here hated the Kitties trade, personally I will wait to see how it and the rest of the draft pan out. 

Liked:
#9 · May 19, 1:02 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"1VikesFan" said: I am impressed with KAM & KOC so far. They had a draft plan and stuck to it. I know a lot of people here hated the Kitties trade, personally I will wait to see how it and the rest of the draft pan out. 
I was surprised they traded out of 34 because it appeared they gave up great value to get there. If they targeted Booth as has been rumored, then the secod trade was a thing of beauty.   We did not have a need at WR and thats how the board fell. 
Liked:
#10 · May 19, 3:20 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"1VikesFan" said: I am impressed with KAM & KOC so far. They had a draft plan and stuck to it. I know a lot of people here hated the Kitties trade, personally I will wait to see how it and the rest of the draft pan out. 
It's pretty obvious KAM doesn't use the traditional draft value charts. I think he may have been able to get more for the trade, but he got the extra pick in the range he wanted, and improved the team. We won't know until they play. But I'm on board with the changes I have seen so far. The old ways didn't get a lot of success. Time for a new approach.
Liked:
#11 · May 19, 8:17 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"jargomcfargo" said:
@"1VikesFan" said: I am impressed with KAM & KOC so far. They had a draft plan and stuck to it. I know a lot of people here hated the Kitties trade, personally I will wait to see how it and the rest of the draft pan out. 
It's pretty obvious KAM doesn't use the traditional draft value charts. I think he may have been able to get more for the trade, but he got the extra pick in the range he wanted, and improved the team. We won't know until they play. But I'm on board with the changes I have seen so far. The old ways didn't get a lot of success. Time for a new approach.
Well we don't know that we improved the team yet. I'm not a believer in quantity being more beneficial then quality, and I suspect we are going to get more of the same from Kwesi as the years go on. It's hard, and takes luck to hit on players the later the rounds go on. We'll see if he's got all the answers like he thinks he does 
Liked:
#12 · May 19, 8:56 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"jargomcfargo" said:
@"1VikesFan" said: I am impressed with KAM & KOC so far. They had a draft plan and stuck to it. I know a lot of people here hated the Kitties trade, personally I will wait to see how it and the rest of the draft pan out. 
It's pretty obvious KAM doesn't use the traditional draft value charts. I think he may have been able to get more for the trade, but he got the extra pick in the range he wanted, and improved the team. We won't know until they play. But I'm on board with the changes I have seen so far. The old ways didn't get a lot of success. Time for a new approach.
Well we don't know that we improved the team yet. I'm not a believer in quantity being more beneficial then quality, and I suspect we are going to get more of the same from Kwesi as the years go on. It's hard, and takes luck to hit on players the later the rounds go on. We'll see if he's got all the answers like he thinks he does 
In a crap shoot the more rolls of the dice you have the better. Spielman believed it. Kwesi obviously believes it. Because that's what the data tells you. Doesn't always work out, obviously, but over time it's a good strategy.
Liked:
#13 · May 20, 6:20 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Davis, Hamilton one of the remaining wide-outs? Could very well have helped the team as much or more than what they got trading down.

Time will tell

What these guys haven't earned from me yet, is the trust to make the call of getting a good player on the board now (or a very good one who meets a need) vs trading down.

Liked:
#14 · May 20, 8:15 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said: I found it interesting seeing OConnell explaining the trades to the Wilfs...who looked absolutely befuddled..
The Wilfs have been part of more draft trades than most other owners, so I am sure they fully understood the trade, what they were confused about was why anyone would make that trade, which was the same look that most people had when they announced the trade.  
Liked:
#15 · May 20, 8:31 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"jargomcfargo" said:
@"1VikesFan" said: I am impressed with KAM & KOC so far. They had a draft plan and stuck to it. I know a lot of people here hated the Kitties trade, personally I will wait to see how it and the rest of the draft pan out. 
It's pretty obvious KAM doesn't use the traditional draft value charts. I think he may have been able to get more for the trade, but he got the extra pick in the range he wanted, and improved the team. We won't know until they play. But I'm on board with the changes I have seen so far. The old ways didn't get a lot of success. Time for a new approach.
Well we don't know that we improved the team yet. I'm not a believer in quantity being more beneficial then quality, and I suspect we are going to get more of the same from Kwesi as the years go on. It's hard, and takes luck to hit on players the later the rounds go on. We'll see if he's got all the answers like he thinks he does 
In a crap shoot the more rolls of the dice you have the better. Spielman believed it. Kwesi obviously believes it. Because that's what the data tells you. Doesn't always work out, obviously, but over time it's a good strategy.
Yeah but it's tier'd and as the talent pool dwindles over the course of the draft, your chances of hitting on a Pro Bowl level player also dwindles as you reach the mid to later rounds. Yes it's a crap shoot all together, that goes without saying, but having more rolls of the dice really doesn't mean shit. We had four, that's right four, 3rd round picks last year and none of them played a down for us. Spielmans desire to add picks was based on his philosophy that instead of competing for undrafted free agents after the draft, he'd rather just have the extra picks to draft the guys he wanted. As one GM put it, at one point Kwesi looked like he was trading just to trade without any real rhyme or reason to anything he was doing. 
Liked:
#16 · May 20, 8:45 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"jargomcfargo" said:
@"1VikesFan" said: I am impressed with KAM & KOC so far. They had a draft plan and stuck to it. I know a lot of people here hated the Kitties trade, personally I will wait to see how it and the rest of the draft pan out. 
It's pretty obvious KAM doesn't use the traditional draft value charts. I think he may have been able to get more for the trade, but he got the extra pick in the range he wanted, and improved the team. We won't know until they play. But I'm on board with the changes I have seen so far. The old ways didn't get a lot of success. Time for a new approach.
Well we don't know that we improved the team yet. I'm not a believer in quantity being more beneficial then quality, and I suspect we are going to get more of the same from Kwesi as the years go on. It's hard, and takes luck to hit on players the later the rounds go on. We'll see if he's got all the answers like he thinks he does 
In a crap shoot the more rolls of the dice you have the better. Spielman believed it. Kwesi obviously believes it. Because that's what the data tells you. Doesn't always work out, obviously, but over time it's a good strategy.
Yeah but it's tier'd and as the talent pool dwindles over the course of the draft, your chances of hitting on a Pro Bowl level player also dwindles as you reach the mid to later rounds. Yes it's a crap shoot all together, that goes without saying, but having more rolls of the dice really doesn't mean shit. We had four, that's right four, 3rd round picks last year and none of them played a down for us. Spielmans desire to add picks was based on his philosophy that instead of competing for undrafted free agents after the draft, he'd rather just have the extra picks to draft the guys he wanted. As one GM put it, at one point Kwesi looked like he was trading just to trade without any real rhyme or reason to anything he was doing. 
Don't be so sure that just because RS and Kwesi both use trading back as a tool to get more players that they would pick the same players.  You can look at the Spelly picks now and judge them, but you don't know the results of the Kwesi draft.
Liked:
#17 · May 20, 8:59 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"purplefaithful" said: Davis, Hamilton one of the remaining wide-outs? Could very well have helped the team as much or more than what they got trading down.

Time will tell

What these guys haven't earned from me yet, is the trust to make the call of getting a good player on the board now (or a very good one who meets a need) vs trading down.


That's where I'm at. I just haven't been in agreement with anything this new front office has done to "improve" the team. I think there's been missed opportunities and some questionable moves from the new GM, to the coaching staff, to personnel. They are supposedly smarter then everybody else so we'll see how it turns out but like I said, they'll either be the smartest guys in the league or the dumbest in 3 years and we all sit and wait until then to see which one it is. 

Liked:
#18 · May 20, 9:00 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Hamilton and Davis were not great picks at 12. Williams may be the next Desean Jackson, but he is a stick that looks like would snap with some pressure applied. 

Ingram is the pick that worries me, but we have to keep Kirk ckean or we become mediocre in O 

Liked:
#19 · May 20, 9:18 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Bullazin" said: Hamilton and Davis were not great picks at 12. Williams may be the next Desean Jackson, but he is a stick that looks like would snap with some pressure applied. 

Ingram is the pick that worries me, but we have to keep Kirk ckean or we become mediocre in O 


I think Reed is the insurance that Ingram or Davis don't pan out.  With Reed, I believe you have at worst NFL AVERAGE production at RG, which would be an upgrade at the position.

Liked:
#20 · May 20, 9:34 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Very interesting watch.  All this new access is fascinating.  Kwesi's approach is making this more entertaining for fans which frankly is why we're here. 

Liked:
#21 · May 20, 10:32 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Draft behind the scenes
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!