Should the Vikings take a QB in the first 4 rounds?
I think its something they should strongly consider if the Draft falls right. Does anyone really believe Minnesota is going to extend Cousins contract beyond the 3 years he signed for? I say absolutely not. Take a shot at his potential successor right now....and again next year if necessary. The Vikings would have no problem signing a veteran band aid, they are available every year in FA at the QB position, but that just kicks the can down the road. The Draft is where they need to go with this.
If the Vikings are mediocre again this year, they'll be in rebuild mode for sure the next offseason. The staff will most likely be fired. The organization needs to prepare for the future at this position regardless. Taking a QB in the 7th round isn't doing anything. Sloter seems to be an afterthought. Draft a kid and let him learn without pressure.
@"JimmyinSD" said: I dont think the decision to go QB in the middle part of the draft is made by how they feel about Cousins, this should be dictated by how they feel about Sloter IMO... I the coaches dont think our project QB is going to pan out... they need to get a new project QB in the mix now.Another option is instead of having a shitty backup like Siemian, have two development guys going at the same time.
@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: I am not as convinced that cousins won't be resigned. Last seasons oline issues were not on him so imo until that is resolved it's really up in the air. I will say if they truly dont think Sloter has a future beyond scout team reps then they need to start thinking QB in even the 2nd or 3rd rounds so if they do move on from KC they have a young guy with a couple years of mentoring under his belt ready to step in instead of these journeyman retreads they try to squeeze a year out of here and there.
As of today if the Vikings had to make a decision on Cousins I would put my money on the front office opting to not resign him. Internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought. Doesn't mean that year two won't be better and change the narrative.
I'm as dumb about these things as the next guy... but I've got an opinion and a keyboard, so here goes:
I blame Zimmer. I have scant evidence to prove it, but I believe he tells his QBs to "not make mistakes"- and he drills that into them so hard (that's what she said) that they are afraid to throw to any receiver beyond the LOS who *might* be covered. Cousins got worse as the year went on. Why is that? I think it's that- when he made some mistakes (which he did)- he got reprimanded for it by Zimmer. Cousins, being a "dutiful" person, did what he was told: he stopped taking chances.Of course, Zimmer would never admit that... just like he'd never admit that his big mouth is hurting our kickers (who are not mentally tough enough to be treated the way they are). He gets all his toys for his defense... and then expects his OC / QB to make beef wellington out of cow pies. Take the muzzle off of Cousins, let him do his thing. And THEN- if he fails- you've got one year to get his replacement ready.
@"pumpf" said:@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: I am not as convinced that cousins won't be resigned. Last seasons oline issues were not on him so imo until that is resolved it's really up in the air. I will say if they truly dont think Sloter has a future beyond scout team reps then they need to start thinking QB in even the 2nd or 3rd rounds so if they do move on from KC they have a young guy with a couple years of mentoring under his belt ready to step in instead of these journeyman retreads they try to squeeze a year out of here and there.
As of today if the Vikings had to make a decision on Cousins I would put my money on the front office opting to not resign him. Internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought. Doesn't mean that year two won't be better and change the narrative.
I'm as dumb about these things as the next guy... but I've got an opinion and a keybso here goes:
I blame Zimmer. I have scant evidence to prove it, but I believe he tells his QBs to "not make mistakes"- and he drills that into them so hard (that's what she said) that they are afraid to throw to any receiver beyond the LOS who *might* be covered. Cousins got worse as the year went on. Why is that? I think it's that- when he made some mistakes (which he did)- he got reprimanded for it by Zimmer. Cousins, being a "dutiful" person, did what he was told: he stopped taking chances.Of course, Zimmer would never admit that... just like he'd never admit that his big mouth is hurting our kickers (who are not mentally tough enough to be treated the way they are). He gets all his toys for his defense... and then expects his OC / QB to make beef wellington out of cow pies. Take the muzzle off of Cousins, let him do his thing. And THEN- if he fails- you've got one year to get his replacement ready.
My gut says there's absolutely some truth in this...One of Zimmer's blind spots has been how poorly the coaching, strategy and staff has been on the offensive side of the ball.With Kubiak and crew in Eagan? I think there's finally enough "kahuna's and cred" to tell Mike to bug off and let us handle this side of things. In a respectful manner of course.
@"Ralphie" said:@"HappyViking" said:@"Ralphie" said: I just wish elite QB's came with a flashing light on their heads that would make them easier to identify come scouting, combine, pro-days, etc. It's easy to say team X needs to get a QB years ago. True, but looking at the draft classes for the past decade or so, how many "elite" QB's were there? By definition elite means rare. For every Rodgers how many Couch's, Manziel's, Carr's, Russell's, Harrington's, et al have come...stunk it up...and left the stage. I know everybody wants the next Mahomes and he'll probably have a good NFL career, but I don't think the Patriots were calling Brady elite when they drafted him. In Eli's case he's only won 2 Super Bowls so he should have been kicked to the curb years ago? That the Vikes, even with Cousins entering year 2 of his deal, needs to prepare for "that day" is undeniable. But many QB's become very good NFL QB's by looking, listening and preparing for the day when they hand over the clipboard for the pigskin. Day one starters are great and exciting...but very, very, very rare. Even Rodgers had to pay his dues before he hit the field. Maybe Sloter is that guy...maybe not. Thinking some guy in the 3rd round this year is going to be Johnny U might be a bit premature. Ask Josh Rosen.
I thought Rick finally had "his" guy when we drafted Teddy. What if the Vikes would've signed Teddy instead of spending $30Mil on Cousins? We were 8-7-1 last season with the "second best QB in Viking's history" stats Cousins gave us. I wonder if the win/loss record would've been much different with Teddy at Qb ? I do know our cap situation would be a hell of a lot better with Teddy at the helm, and we could still be looking for the next young QB to take over.Did the Vikings spend all this money on Cousins only to find out he's not worth it after one season? It's quite possible, and RS had to be held accountable.
Happy, I was one of the many fans who thought that fateful August day in 2016 was dunbar for Teddy. That injury was something no GM could bank on. The die was cast and the team moved on with several other opting in these past 2 1/2 years that now seems infinitely longer.
Could Teddy have replicated Kirk's record? Maybe, but hindsight is always clearer...and cheaper. But just as Kirk was getting pounded thanks to our porous OL, it's just as likely Teddy could be in a wheelchair now.
The one thing we know about Teddy is he can run and move around in the pocket. We found out that Cousins scrambling and pocket awareness aren't his strong suits. Personally I don't think Teddy would've gotten killed any worse than Kirk did.If it sounds like I'm down on Cousins, it's because it's true; I am. Yeah, if we surround him with the best OL, RBs, TEs, and WRs, he can be good enough to win. I wonder how many other NFL QBs could be plugged into that position and do well. My guess would be about 60% of them or more.
Look what Foles and Keenam did when they had blocking and nice playmakers helping them. I'm rooting for Cousins to play well, but I'll believe this team is a playoff contender when I see it.
@"purplefaithful" said:@"pumpf" said:@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: I am not as convinced that cousins won't be resigned. Last seasons oline issues were not on him so imo until that is resolved it's really up in the air. I will say if they truly dont think Sloter has a future beyond scout team reps then they need to start thinking QB in even the 2nd or 3rd rounds so if they do move on from KC they have a young guy with a couple years of mentoring under his belt ready to step in instead of these journeyman retreads they try to squeeze a year out of here and there.
As of today if the Vikings had to make a decision on Cousins I would put my money on the front office opting to not resign him. Internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought. Doesn't mean that year two won't be better and change the narrative.
I'm as dumb about these things as the next guy... but I've got an opinion and a keybso here goes:
I blame Zimmer. I have scant evidence to prove it, but I believe he tells his QBs to "not make mistakes"- and he drills that into them so hard (that's what she said) that they are afraid to throw to any receiver beyond the LOS who *might* be covered. Cousins got worse as the year went on. Why is that? I think it's that- when he made some mistakes (which he did)- he got reprimanded for it by Zimmer. Cousins, being a "dutiful" person, did what he was told: he stopped taking chances.Of course, Zimmer would never admit that... just like he'd never admit that his big mouth is hurting our kickers (who are not mentally tough enough to be treated the way they are). He gets all his toys for his defense... and then expects his OC / QB to make beef wellington out of cow pies. Take the muzzle off of Cousins, let him do his thing. And THEN- if he fails- you've got one year to get his replacement ready.
My gut says there's absolutely some truth in this...One of Zimmer's blind spots has been how poorly the coaching, strategy and staff has been on the offensive side of the ball.With Kubiak and crew in Eagan? I think there's finally enough "kahuna's and cred" to tell Mike to bug off and let us handle this side of things. In a respectful manner of course.
I think that is important. In the beginning, he kind of backed off the offense. When Norv came along, he waited before he got involved. I think he has to find a balance. Same goes for the defense. It's now or never for him to get that right.
I'd love for us to trade for Rosen or take a QB, but I do not think MN will do it.
RS and Zim know (or should know) this year is make or break. They will do everything they can to be good THIS year, and I don't blame them for that one bit. Plus, like someone already said, any potential new GM/Coach combo will want their own QB most likely. Not a 3rd rounder who the old regime was grooming.
I also still have faith that with a better O-line, KC can lead us to the playoffs and beyond.
So while I'd be excited to see us bring in a younger, more mobile QB, I don't see it happening.
@"medaille" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: I dont think the decision to go QB in the middle part of the draft is made by how they feel about Cousins, this should be dictated by how they feel about Sloter IMO... I the coaches dont think our project QB is going to pan out... they need to get a new project QB in the mix now. Another option is instead of having a shitty backup like Siemian, have two development guys going at the same time.
absolutely this... i am all for spending a high to mid round pick every year if necessary to have 3 quality QB option at various stages of development. IMO we should have 1. a quality starter 2. a guy with 2 years on the team that should be ready to move into the starters role if the need arises for what ever reason, and 3. a rookie that is coming in to get groomed to take over the #2 role in a year or 2 if either of the 1 or 2s move on/retire/ get injured/ start sucking/ get greedy....what ever the case may be. Our QB approach has only been marginally better than our approach to fixing the OL.
@"medaille" said:Exactly. Where did I say draft a rookie and start him, lol@"ArizonaViking" said: The Vikings have got more pressing needs this year than a quarterback. Why bring in a rookie quarterback just to watch him get killed on the field? ? You bring in a rookie QB, so he can learn behind Cousins and take over when he's ready. No one would bring in a rookie QB to start day 1.
@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: I am not as convinced that cousins won't be resigned. Last seasons oline issues were not on him so imo until that is resolved it's really up in the air. I will say if they truly dont think Sloter has a future beyond scout team reps then they need to start thinking QB in even the 2nd or 3rd rounds so if they do move on from KC they have a young guy with a couple years of mentoring under his belt ready to step in instead of these journeyman retreads they try to squeeze a year out of here and there.
As of today if the Vikings had to make a decision on Cousins I would put my money on the front office opting to not resign him. Internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought. Doesn't mean that year two won't be better and change the narrative.
Agreed and hence the reason I started this thread. But I'll go one step further: I think its 100 percent solidified after this season in their minds (the front office) that Cousins won't be resigned. A Cousins-style QB is not the future of the NFL.
@"StickyBun" said:@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: I am not as convinced that cousins won't be resigned. Last seasons oline issues were not on him so imo until that is resolved it's really up in the air. I will say if they truly dont think Sloter has a future beyond scout team reps then they need to start thinking QB in even the 2nd or 3rd rounds so if they do move on from KC they have a young guy with a couple years of mentoring under his belt ready to step in instead of these journeyman retreads they try to squeeze a year out of here and there.
As of today if the Vikings had to make a decision on Cousins I would put my money on the front office opting to not resign him. Internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought. Doesn't mean that year two won't be better and change the narrative.
Agreed and hence the reason I started this thread. But I'll go one step further: I think its 100 percent solidified after this season in their minds (the front office) that Cousins won't be resigned. A Cousins-style QB is not the future of the NFL.
This has been said about the position for as long as I can remember. Right now its Mahomes, before him it was newton, before that Kaepernick, Wilson, ..... Vick....cunninghan...
The list goes on, but in the last 30 to 40 years the ones with the most rings are the traditional pocket passers. Now maybe the league will actually change this time, but I will believe it when I see it.
@"purplefaithful" said:@"pumpf" said:@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: I am not as convinced that cousins won't be resigned. Last seasons oline issues were not on him so imo until that is resolved it's really up in the air. I will say if they truly dont think Sloter has a future beyond scout team reps then they need to start thinking QB in even the 2nd or 3rd rounds so if they do move on from KC they have a young guy with a couple years of mentoring under his belt ready to step in instead of these journeyman retreads they try to squeeze a year out of here and there.
As of today if the Vikings had to make a decision on Cousins I would put my money on the front office opting to not resign him. Internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought. Doesn't mean that year two won't be better and change the narrative.
I'm as dumb about these things as the next guy... but I've got an opinion and a keybso here goes:
I blame Zimmer. I have scant evidence to prove it, but I believe he tells his QBs to "not make mistakes"- and he drills that into them so hard (that's what she said) that they are afraid to throw to any receiver beyond the LOS who *might* be covered. Cousins got worse as the year went on. Why is that? I think it's that- when he made some mistakes (which he did)- he got reprimanded for it by Zimmer. Cousins, being a "dutiful" person, did what he was told: he stopped taking chances.Of course, Zimmer would never admit that... just like he'd never admit that his big mouth is hurting our kickers (who are not mentally tough enough to be treated the way they are). He gets all his toys for his defense... and then expects his OC / QB to make beef wellington out of cow pies. Take the muzzle off of Cousins, let him do his thing. And THEN- if he fails- you've got one year to get his replacement ready.
My gut says there's absolutely some truth in this...One of Zimmer's blind spots has been how poorly the coaching, strategy and staff has been on the offensive side of the ball.With Kubiak and crew in Eagan? I think there's finally enough "kahuna's and cred" to tell Mike to bug off and let us handle this side of things. In a respectful manner of course.
Didn't Norv Turner have the kahunas or whatever to tell Mike to bug off? That works until we hit a two-game losing streak and Zimmer starts looking for scapegoats to deflect criticism from his defense - then somebody gets punched in the eye. Kubiak better hope there are plenty of kickers to blame before him.
Re the OP:
One thing Spielman does well is pick defensive players. Draft picks or free agents, more have been good.
A thing he doesn't do so well: pick offensive players. A few nice ones, but heavily outweighed by duds.
But the thing he does worst, utterly abysmally?? Pick quarterbacks. All failures, except s generous grade of "incomplete" for Bridgewater and TBD for Cousins . But if you want to draft Cousins' replacement, he must be a fail too.
And you want Spielman to pick our QB of the future??
@"Jor-El" said: Didn't Norv Turner have the kahunas or whatever to tell Mike to bug off? That works until we hit a two-game losing streak and Zimmer starts looking for scapegoats to deflect criticism from his defense - then somebody gets punched in the eye. Kubiak better hope there are plenty of kickers to blame before him.I don't remember this. Do you have a link or any more information about the context surrounding your statement?
@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: I am not as convinced that cousins won't be resigned. Last seasons oline issues were not on him so imo until that is resolved it's really up in the air. I will say if they truly dont think Sloter has a future beyond scout team reps then they need to start thinking QB in even the 2nd or 3rd rounds so if they do move on from KC they have a young guy with a couple years of mentoring under his belt ready to step in instead of these journeyman retreads they try to squeeze a year out of here and there.
As of today if the Vikings had to make a decision on Cousins I would put my money on the front office opting to not resign him. Internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought. Doesn't mean that year two won't be better and change the narrative.
Geoff--"internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought.". Thats a very intriguing sentence. Can you tell me more about that? What were they hoping for?--and how has Cousins not delivered that? It sounds like you are talking about a locker room presence, but tell me more.
@"StickyBun" said:@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: I am not as convinced that cousins won't be resigned. Last seasons oline issues were not on him so imo until that is resolved it's really up in the air. I will say if they truly dont think Sloter has a future beyond scout team reps then they need to start thinking QB in even the 2nd or 3rd rounds so if they do move on from KC they have a young guy with a couple years of mentoring under his belt ready to step in instead of these journeyman retreads they try to squeeze a year out of here and there.
As of today if the Vikings had to make a decision on Cousins I would put my money on the front office opting to not resign him. Internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought. Doesn't mean that year two won't be better and change the narrative.
Agreed and hence the reason I started this thread. But I'll go one step further: I think its 100 percent solidified after this season in their minds (the front office) that Cousins won't be resigned. A Cousins-style QB is not the future of the NFL.
I would disagree with the latter portion of your post. Cousins can absolutely win in this league. He has all the arm talent he needs to get the job done. Brady, Brees, Goff, and others seem to get the job done just fine in this "modern NFL".
@"Caactorvike" said:@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: I am not as convinced that cousins won't be resigned. Last seasons oline issues were not on him so imo until that is resolved it's really up in the air. I will say if they truly dont think Sloter has a future beyond scout team reps then they need to start thinking QB in even the 2nd or 3rd rounds so if they do move on from KC they have a young guy with a couple years of mentoring under his belt ready to step in instead of these journeyman retreads they try to squeeze a year out of here and there.
As of today if the Vikings had to make a decision on Cousins I would put my money on the front office opting to not resign him. Internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought. Doesn't mean that year two won't be better and change the narrative.
Geoff--"internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought.". Thats a very intriguing sentence. Can you tell me more about that? What were they hoping for?--and how has Cousins not delivered that? It sounds like you are talking about a locker room presence, but tell me more.
Obviously Geoff knows more than me about the internal thinking of the Vikings but I would have to believe changing coordinators after 13 weeks is not good for anyone on the offense.
And Zimmer crying about running the ball did not help either. IMHO.
I know he wants balance and wants things the way he wants them but they were doing very good early on.
Thielen was setting records with all those consecutive games with 100 plus yards.
I actually thought JDF was doing very good considering Cook was out for 6 of the first 8 games and Murray is not exactly a power back even though he is as big as most linebackers.
Continuity may be a good thing.
@"MarkSP18" said:@"Caactorvike" said:@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: I am not as convinced that cousins won't be resigned. Last seasons oline issues were not on him so imo until that is resolved it's really up in the air. I will say if they truly dont think Sloter has a future beyond scout team reps then they need to start thinking QB in even the 2nd or 3rd rounds so if they do move on from KC they have a young guy with a couple years of mentoring under his belt ready to step in instead of these journeyman retreads they try to squeeze a year out of here and there.
As of today if the Vikings had to make a decision on Cousins I would put my money on the front office opting to not resign him. Internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought. Doesn't mean that year two won't be better and change the narrative.
Geoff--"internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought.". Thats a very intriguing sentence. Can you tell me more about that? What were they hoping for?--and how has Cousins not delivered that? It sounds like you are talking about a locker room presence, but tell me more.
Obviously Geoff knows more than me about the internal thinking of the Vikings but I would have to believe changing coordinators after 13 weeks is not good for anyone on the offense.
And Zimmer crying about running the ball did not help either. IMHO.
I know he wants balance and wants things the way he wants them but they were doing very good early on.
Thielen was setting records with all those consecutive games with 100 plus yards.
I actually thought JDF was doing very good considering Cook was out for 6 of the first 8 games and Murray is not exactly a power back even though he is as big as most linebackers.
Continuity may be a good thing.
Continuity will help and obviously their feelings now can change. It's only been a single year. He isn't a rookie QB but look at the progression a lot of those guys take in year 2 & 3. Receiver chemistry, the system, etc.. will all have a foundation vs. a new start.Zimmer crying about running the ball both has some merit but its easy to jump to extremes as well. Although you're paying Cousins top QB $ he is going to be best in a system where he isn't carrying the load unless he has to. Run the ball effectively and everything will open up and be less risky from the QB's standpoint. What Cousins does bring to the table is the ability to comeback in games (e.g. Green Bay week 2). Case doesn't get that game tied.
Time will tell.
@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"StickyBun" said:@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: I am not as convinced that cousins won't be resigned. Last seasons oline issues were not on him so imo until that is resolved it's really up in the air. I will say if they truly dont think Sloter has a future beyond scout team reps then they need to start thinking QB in even the 2nd or 3rd rounds so if they do move on from KC they have a young guy with a couple years of mentoring under his belt ready to step in instead of these journeyman retreads they try to squeeze a year out of here and there.
As of today if the Vikings had to make a decision on Cousins I would put my money on the front office opting to not resign him. Internally he hasn't been exactly what they thought. Doesn't mean that year two won't be better and change the narrative.
Agreed and hence the reason I started this thread. But I'll go one step further: I think its 100 percent solidified after this season in their minds (the front office) that Cousins won't be resigned. A Cousins-style QB is not the future of the NFL.
I would disagree with the latter portion of your post. Cousins can absolutely win in this league. He has all the arm talent he needs to get the job done. Brady, Brees, Goff, and others seem to get the job done just fine in this "modern NFL".
Goff hasn't stood the test of time, too early to put him in there. So its Brady and Brees who now get the 'Michael Jordan' calls of the NFL. I like Cousins, but its not all about arm talent. He's a horrible fumbler in the pocket. And when he wins in the NFL, it'll be the first time. Hope it happens in Minnesota. But if I had to put $100 down on if he'll be a Viking after this contract, I'd say absolutely not. And if I had to lay that same bet on whether Minnesota gets better or worse in 2019, you'd have to say worse.Time will tell. The NFL has a way of being unpredictable and my hope is I'm pleasantly surprised.
Kirk only has 2 years left on the deal. I think what Guru is saying about the Vikings position right now (theoretically) on resigning him is very important because a rookie will have 4 years on a contract, and 5 if we go extreme in the 1st round.
That's 2 or 3 years of potentially starting after marinating for 2 years. That's a great situation for everyone involved if you can find the right player...
It's about preparing for what's ahead on the path we've chosen, not picking a new one. It's not about jettisoning Cousins and eating dead money asap - the writing is on the wall that he isn't getting another 3 year - $80+ million dollar extension when this current one is up.
@"medaille" said:What do you want a link for - the size of Turner's kahunas relative to Kubiak's? Nope!! You must remember that Kubiak is not the first former head coach with great experience and reportedly a tremendous degree of respect from Zimmer.@"Jor-El" said: Didn't Norv Turner have the kahunas or whatever to tell Mike to bug off? That works until we hit a two-game losing streak and Zimmer starts looking for scapegoats to deflect criticism from his defense - then somebody gets punched in the eye. Kubiak better hope there are plenty of kickers to blame before him. I don't remember this. Do you have a link or any more information about the context surrounding your statement?If you're asking what I mean by "punched in the eye"...you could just take it as a euphemism for "relationship broke when stress was applied and both parties visibly upset after a midseason departure". I've heard a story that more happened and it was not a coincidence that Zimmer's detached retina problems started immediately after Turner's departure, but my source for that is "someone who knows someone with the team", and I don't think anyone's "inside sources" care to be identified any further. I understand that bit may be apocryphal..
I do like Kubiak, mostly because he and Dennison are ZBS gurus and the only time an OL ever makes a quick turnaround without significant talent upgrades has been when they adopted a zone scheme and did it well. But no one should be certain that having an experienced offensive mind on the staff will automatically solve all of Zimmer's problems with offense.
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.