Remmers gone
The reshuffling on Minnesota’s offensive line has begun. The Vikings announced Monday they released offensive guard Mike Remmers, who had three years remaining on his five-year, $30 million deal he signed in 2017. More Vikings coverage
- Vikings release G Remmers, decline 2019 option on Sendejo
- 2019 NFL free agency: Possible fits for the Vikings
- Vikings post-NFL combine 2019 mock draft roundup
- Vikings exercise 2020 option on head coach Zimmer’s contract
- Vikings awarded three 2019 compensatory draft picks
After the moves the Vikings sit at about $10.1M in cap space without accounting for rookie contracts. With rookies that is whittled down to about $7.3M.
That's 10.55 plus the 4.whatever with the two cuts so far.
Dear Lord I hope they don't free up a bunch of money just to ink Richardson and his inability or unwillingness to stop the run.
@"Geoff Nichols" said: After the moves the Vikings sit at about $10.1M in cap space without accounting for rookie contracts. With rookies that is whittled down to about $7.3M.
I thought the Vikings were around $5 mil. before today? Releasing Remmers saves $5 mil and declining Sendejo's option should of saved another $5 mil?
@"ArizonaViking" said:@"Geoff Nichols" said: After the moves the Vikings sit at about $10.1M in cap space without accounting for rookie contracts. With rookies that is whittled down to about $7.3M.I thought the Vikings were around $5 mil. before today? Releasing Remmers saves $5 mil and declining Sendejo's option should of saved another $5 mil?
They ate $1.8M in dead money on Remmers deal. Then you had about $5M in RFA tenders for Harris & Hill.
@"Geoff Nichols" said:@"ArizonaViking" said:@"Geoff Nichols" said: After the moves the Vikings sit at about $10.1M in cap space without accounting for rookie contracts. With rookies that is whittled down to about $7.3M.I thought the Vikings were around $5 mil. before today? Releasing Remmers saves $5 mil and declining Sendejo's option should of saved another $5 mil?
They ate $1.8M in dead money on Remmers deal. Then you had about $5M in RFA tenders for Harris & Hill.Thank you for clearing that up for me.
Unfortunately, a very deep veteran safety class will keep Sendejo's price down.
Vikings approached Mike Remmers about restructuring prior to releasing himWe reported to you earlier today that the Minnesota Vikings were going to release starting guard Mike Remmers, a move that had been widely anticipated (and is now official). However, it doesn’t appear as though that was the first course of action the Vikings wanted to take.
This was just tweeted out by Remmers’ agent, Brett Tessler:
The Minnesota Vikings just informed me they are releasing Mike Remmers who was moved last season from RT to RG... They approached us with the idea of restructuring, but this is the decision that was made and we look forward to our next opportunity.Remmers had three years left on the five-year deal that he signed prior to the 2017 season. In those three seasons, he was set to have cap figures of $6.35 million (2019), $6.7 million (2020), and $7.25 million (2021).
Perhaps Remmers and Tessler think that he can pick up significantly more money as a free agent in this year’s class than they could have made by restructuring Remmers’ deal in Minnesota. Obviously we’re not in the room while these negotiations are happening, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that was part of the reasoning behind turning down a restructure.
It appears that the Vikings wanted to bring Mike Remmers back at a lower price tag, but Remmers and his agent decided against it. So it goes in the world of NFL free agency.
@"Kentis" said: Vikings approached Mike Remmers about restructuring prior to releasing himThat's a little alarming.We reported to you earlier today that the Minnesota Vikings were going to release starting guard Mike Remmers, a move that had been widely anticipated (and is now official). However, it doesn’t appear as though that was the first course of action the Vikings wanted to take. This was just tweeted out by Remmers’ agent, Brett Tessler:The Minnesota Vikings just informed me they are releasing Mike Remmers who was moved last season from RT to RG... They approached us with the idea of restructuring, but this is the decision that was made and we look forward to our next opportunity.Remmers had three years left on the five-year deal that he signed prior to the 2017 season. In those three seasons, he was set to have cap figures of $6.35 million (2019), $6.7 million (2020), and $7.25 million (2021).
Perhaps Remmers and Tessler think that he can pick up significantly more money as a free agent in this year’s class than they could have made by restructuring Remmers’ deal in Minnesota. Obviously we’re not in the room while these negotiations are happening, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that was part of the reasoning behind turning down a restructure.
It appears that the Vikings wanted to bring Mike Remmers back at a lower price tag, but Remmers and his agent decided against it. So it goes in the world of NFL free agency.
In what way? That Minnesota wanted him to take a cut or that he believes he can make more elsewhere?
@"FSUVike" said: In what way? That Minnesota wanted him to take a cut or that he believes he can make more elsewhere?That Minnesota wanted him back at all. I wouldn't mind having an experienced guy like Remmers back as depth, but a "restructure," in my mind anyway, sort of implies an opportunity to continue starting, or at least compete for a starting job. Maybe I'm overly hopeful, but I want to move so far beyond guys like Remmers and Compton that they become just painful memories.
@"MaroonBells" said:@"FSUVike" said: In what way? That Minnesota wanted him to take a cut or that he believes he can make more elsewhere? That Minnesota wanted him back at all. I wouldn't mind having an experienced guy like Remmers back as depth, but a "restructure," in my mind anyway, sort of implies an opportunity to continue starting, or at least compete for a starting job. Maybe I'm overly hopeful, but I want to move so far beyond guys like Remmers and Compton that they become just painful memories.Fully agree with you. What is the status of Compton's contract? Can't we dump him too? Starting two rookies won't make us any worse off than we already are.
@"ArizonaViking" said:@"MaroonBells" said:@"FSUVike" said: In what way? That Minnesota wanted him to take a cut or that he believes he can make more elsewhere? That Minnesota wanted him back at all. I wouldn't mind having an experienced guy like Remmers back as depth, but a "restructure," in my mind anyway, sort of implies an opportunity to continue starting, or at least compete for a starting job. Maybe I'm overly hopeful, but I want to move so far beyond guys like Remmers and Compton that they become just painful memories.Fully agree with you. What is the status of Compton's contract? Can't we dump him too? Starting two rookies won't make us any worse off than we already are.
he was only on a 1 year deal so he is a FA already.
actually I believe we only have 1 player under contract with game experience at OG and that is Isidora.
@"JimmyinSD" said: actually I believe we only have 1 player under contract with game experience at OG and that is Isidora.
Do we still have Jones that we gave up a 7th rounder to the Giants for?
@"ArizonaViking" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: actually I believe we only have 1 player under contract with game experience at OG and that is Isidora.Do we still have Jones that we gave up a 7th rounder to the Giants for?
Yeah. It's a mystery why he didn't get more playing time. I'm actually a little more encouraged by Cornelius Edison.
I can’t imagine there was any real mutual belief that
Remmers would be starting. It would have
been a deal to be a backup swing tackle, which would have been excellent if he’d
have accepted it. That said, I think it
makes a lot of sense for him to try and get another RT gig. He’ll probably get something better than what
Hill got, or at least he should.
@"medaille" said: I can’t imagine there was any real mutual belief that Remmers would be starting. It would have been a deal to be a backup swing tackle, which would have been excellent if he’d have accepted it. That said, I think it makes a lot of sense for him to try and get another RT gig. He’ll probably get something better than what Hill got, or at least he should.
That's how I read it as well. Can't let EVERYBODY walk until you know for a fact you've got some folks coming in and Remmers would have been a decent depth piece at Swing Tackle like you mentioned.
@"ArizonaViking" said:@"JimmyinSD" said: actually I believe we only have 1 player under contract with game experience at OG and that is Isidora.Do we still have Jones that we gave up a 7th rounder to the Giants for?
wasnt it a 5th round pick? or who did we give up the 5th rounder for? anyway...nope, he was a 1 year rental player.
On a related note, we now have the 33rd highest paid offensive line! :s
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.