Forum The Longship One QB in the Hand is Worth Two In the Bush

One QB in the Hand is Worth Two In the Bush

HA
Joined May 2013
235 posts
Rep: 0

I won't be surprised to see Case being the only Viking QB getting shiny new contract for the team next year.  With home field advantage at stake, I seriously doubt Teddy sees any meaningful play time this season, if Case stays healthy.

What if Sam proves he's 100% healthy come playoff time?  I think the team would still stick with Case.  He's playing that well, and is way more mobile than Sam.

If the Vikes really wanted a QB battle, then they'd have to sign them to new contracts.  Would they even consider doing that?  I think there's a good chance only one of the three gets a new deal from the Vikes, and the others walk.

The team knows what they have in Case, and are probably just as surprised as us fans that he just keeps improving.  What a strange year, and nobody expected to see Case be the hard earned #1 QB for the team. 

It took awhile for me to believe, and I do now.  He's the real deal, and it looks like the Vikes finally found their starting QB.

Liked:
#1 · Dec 7, 8:51 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I think the team has to sign Case to a multi-year deal at this point.  No way do you let a QB who has had this kind of success just walk out the door.

I think what happens with Teddy is basically up to him.  If he is ok with competing for the starting job and signing an incentive-laden deal, I could see the team bringing him back as well.  However, if he insists on a franchise QB type of contract after not seeing the field for 2 seasons, I think the team's hand will be forced and they'll have to let him walk.  I hope that's not the case.

They could also bring back Sam as the veteran backup but I doubt he would ever sign for that type of money considering what he's been paid so far over his career.  Maybe only if he thought his knee could only hold up for a few games at a time and still had the desire to play.

Once again, it's never boring in Vikings-land, even in the offseason.

Liked:
#2 · Dec 7, 9:01 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I think Sam is done here - I just don't see him next spring competing to start with Case or Teddy. My gut tells me he will retire

Liked:
#3 · Dec 7, 9:07 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I still want to see how Teddy would perform with this O-Line / Offensive scheme. I think he would be excellent. Going to be very interesting off season, wether we win the Super Bowl or not - BIG QB Decisions will be made.

I see either Teddy or Case being our starter next year, with the young guy we picked up, Sloter, as the back up IF he has been showing great promise.

Liked:
#4 · Dec 7, 9:10 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"NorthernCalVike" said: I still want to see how Teddy would perform with this O-Line / Offensive scheme. I think he would be excellent. Going to be very interesting off season, wether we win the Super Bowl or not - BIG QB Decisions will be made.

I see either Teddy or Case being our starter next year, with the young guy we picked up, Sloter, as the back up IF he has been showing great promise.

How much money would that tie up in the QB position to sign them both?  Case is going to get a starting QB salary with the way he's playing, but Teddy may get that too.   I think the Vikes have to go with a proven QB, and I agree.  Teddy might be better, but maybe not.  If Case is playing well, and the team is winning, then who cares if Sam and Teddy leave?  We don't need two starting QBs.

Liked:
#5 · Dec 7, 9:16 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"HappyViking" said:
@"NorthernCalVike" said: I still want to see how Teddy would perform with this O-Line / Offensive scheme. I think he would be excellent. Going to be very interesting off season, wether we win the Super Bowl or not - BIG QB Decisions will be made.

I see either Teddy or Case being our starter next year, with the young guy we picked up, Sloter, as the back up IF he has been showing great promise.

How much money would that tie up in the QB position to sign them both?  Case is going to get a starting QB salary with the way he's playing, but Teddy may get that too.   I think the Vikes have to go with a proven QB, and I agree.  Teddy might be better, but maybe not.  If Case is playing well, and the team is winning, then who cares if Sam and Teddy leave?  We don't need two starting QBs.



I think the past couple of years have shown us that you can never have too many starting-caliber QBs on your roster.  ;)  We are on our 3rd starter in the past 16 months.

Liked:
#6 · Dec 7, 9:23 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"SFVikingFan" said:
@"HappyViking" said:
@"NorthernCalVike" said: I still want to see how Teddy would perform with this O-Line / Offensive scheme. I think he would be excellent. Going to be very interesting off season, wether we win the Super Bowl or not - BIG QB Decisions will be made.

I see either Teddy or Case being our starter next year, with the young guy we picked up, Sloter, as the back up IF he has been showing great promise.

How much money would that tie up in the QB position to sign them both?  Case is going to get a starting QB salary with the way he's playing, but Teddy may get that too.   I think the Vikes have to go with a proven QB, and I agree.  Teddy might be better, but maybe not.  If Case is playing well, and the team is winning, then who cares if Sam and Teddy leave?  We don't need two starting QBs.



I think the past couple of years have shown us that you can never have too many starting-caliber QBs on your roster.  ;)  We are on our 3rd starter in the past 16 months.


I meant you can't sign two starting QBs.  It's great to have valuable backups, like we discovered this year.  We signed Case to a backup contract, and that's the only reason he's a Viking.

Would Teddy or Sam play next season for a backup QB deal similar to Case's?  If so, sign them both up.

Just don't see that happening.

Liked:
#7 · Dec 7, 9:27 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Case needs to win the next 7 games to get a long term deal imo

Liked:
#8 · Dec 7, 9:41 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I don't think Sam even plays a role in this story, except as perhaps a cautionary tale for the team's approach to Teddy Bridgewater.

As I've said before, in my mind, Thanksgiving saw Case Keenum's narrative turn a corner from "rental QB playing well in a very good offense" to "improving QB who might just be better than anyone thought." Thanksgiving indeed. While it's hard to believe anyone could be playing better than Case right now, I still believe that Teddy, too, would be lighting it up if he were playing, as would Sam. 

So, who do we give our money to? With Teddy's knee a question mark, Bradford's knee a caution flag draped over it, and Keenum seemingly improving with each game, I think it's now a legitimate question. Obviously, It would be foolish to do anything money related now, but it's going to be an interesting off season. I'm betting Mike and Rick are merrily flummoxed. That is to say they're giddy at the results, but have absolutely no clue about what they're going to do, other than just watch it play out like the rest of us. 

Liked:
#9 · Dec 7, 9:43 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

It is ironic that we struggled to find a "franchise" QB all these years and now we cannot figure out which one we want to keep.  Strange world.
I just wish we had them all under contract and could trade them off to teams like the Eagles did to us.

Liked:
#10 · Dec 7, 9:44 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"HappyViking" said:
@"NorthernCalVike" said: I still want to see how Teddy would perform with this O-Line / Offensive scheme. I think he would be excellent. Going to be very interesting off season, wether we win the Super Bowl or not - BIG QB Decisions will be made.

I see either Teddy or Case being our starter next year, with the young guy we picked up, Sloter, as the back up IF he has been showing great promise.

How much money would that tie up in the QB position to sign them both?  Case is going to get a starting QB salary with the way he's playing, but Teddy may get that too.   I think the Vikes have to go with a proven QB, and I agree.  Teddy might be better, but maybe not.  If Case is playing well, and the team is winning, then who cares if Sam and Teddy leave?  We don't need two starting QBs.



I think it would have to be north of $30M ($15M each) and probably closer to $40M.  I just can't imagine either QB accepting less at this point.  I don't think either QB would get a $25M/year contract.  

I really think the only way to keep them both is if
something goes real wrong with Keenum this year to drop his value or we
successfully toll Bridgewater’s contract.

I just don’t think we’ll be able to afford to keep both of
them if we have to give them their market value right now.

Liked:
#11 · Dec 7, 9:45 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I *think* we need to treat Case as the starter... with the caveat that he could be beaten out by Teddy... and sign both of them.  Whoever doesn't win the starting job will become trade bait (at some point in the future).  Sloter is our "long-term" #2.

Liked:
#12 · Dec 7, 9:47 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Hidalgo" said: Case needs to win the next 7 games to get a long term deal imo

That would make him better than any QB in Viking history.  I guess he'd earn it then.  B)

Teddy won't get a chance to prove he's worth any contract this season.  Every game has meaning for home field playoff games, so Case has to get the nod. 

"A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" just keeps playing in my mind...

Liked:
#13 · Dec 7, 9:53 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said: I don't think Sam even plays a role in this story, except as perhaps a cautionary tale for the team's approach to Teddy Bridgewater.

As I've said before, in my mind, Thanksgiving saw Case Keenum's narrative turn a corner from "rental QB playing well in a very good offense" to "improving QB who might just be better than anyone thought." Thanksgiving indeed. While it's hard to believe anyone could be playing better than Case right now, I still believe that Teddy, too, would be lighting it up if he were playing, as would Sam. 

So, who do we give our money to? With Teddy's knee a question mark, Bradford's knee a caution flag draped over it, and Keenum seemingly improving with each game, I think it's now a legitimate question. Obviously, It would be foolish to do anything money related now, but it's going to be an interesting off season. I'm betting Mike and Rick are merrily flummoxed. That is to say they're giddy at the results, but have absolutely no clue about what they're going to do, other than just watch it play out like the rest of us. 


Nice post, MB.  Pretty much how I see it too.  Out of nowhere we may have found our starting QB we've been searching for. 

Liked:
#14 · Dec 7, 9:56 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"pumpf" said: I *think* we need to treat Case as the starter... with the caveat that he could be beaten out by Teddy... and sign both of them.  Whoever doesn't win the starting job will become trade bait (at some point in the future).  Sloter is our "long-term" #2.
I wish that were possible. Who knows, maybe we can find a way to do it, but unless he turns back into a pumpkin--and that does not seem likely at this point--Keenum is now likely to command a starter's salary, as will Bridgewater. What a happy mess. I just hope to God we make the right decision. But I fear another '98, where we committed to our Cinderella, who quickly turned back into a pumpkin and traded our starter, who went on to win a Super Bowl. This team CANNOT make that mistake again. One thing that gives me hope is that I think we have smarter people in charge now. 

Edit: And, yes, I'm aware that Teddy, with his knee, could also be the pumpkin. 

Liked:
#15 · Dec 7, 10:02 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

For kicks and giggles, Lets say we are able to keep BOTH Teddy and Case and Sloter next year (in this story line, we lose the NFC championship game, thus the QB decision is made even more difficult -but are able to keep all three). It would make training camp one heck of a story line. TB and CK battling for the starter position throughout camp and preseason (assuming that in this scenario a starter is not named at the beginning of camp). Could only imagine the story lines coming out every single day - And to top it off, we are the team chosen for Hard Knocks! And us being the Vikings (our history of QB Bizarro land), OUT OF NO WHERE Sloter wins the starter position going into 2018 season. Teddy is his back up, and we trade Case for a #2 pick in 2019. Sloter goes on to bring the first SB Trophy to Minnesota and becomes the next Tom Brady. Sloter's story goes on to the become a thing of legend, where his story is told to young ones around the fire.

I know - my mind works in strange ways. 

Liked:
#16 · Dec 7, 10:16 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"NorthernCalVike" said: For kicks and giggles, Lets say we are able to keep BOTH Teddy and Case and Sloter next year (in this story line, we lose the NFC championship game, thus the QB decision is made even more difficult -but are able to keep all three). It would make training camp one heck of a story line. TB and CK battling for the starter position throughout camp and preseason (assuming that in this scenario a starter is not named at the beginning of camp). Could only imagine the story lines coming out every single day - And to top it off, we are the team chosen for Hard Knocks! And us being the Vikings (our history of QB Bizarro land), OUT OF NO WHERE Sloter wins the starter position going into 2018 season. Teddy is his back up, and we trade Case for a #2 pick in 2019. Sloter goes on to bring the first SB Trophy to Minnesota and becomes the next Tom Brady. Sloter's story goes on to the become a thing of legend, where his story is told to young ones around the fire.

I know - my mind works in strange ways. 


Wow, that scenario damn near requires a soundtrack! The truly interesting thing is that while a good half dozen teams struggle to fine ONE QB they can win with, the Vikings appear to have three. Yes, two have injury concerns but that is beside my point. All three have proven capable of very good things, which is another testament to the improvement of the scouting staff. And I didn't even mention Sloter, a good looking prospect Denver would probably KILL to have back right now. The fans here, as passionate as any in the nation, are nearly suicidal over the depressing state of their QB room. Three, count 'em, THREE QBs who can't play in the NFL. And no promising prospect waiting in the wings either. 

Liked:
#17 · Dec 7, 11:31 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I wouldn't be to surprised if Case is the only one that returns.  I'd love to see them lock up Case and Teddy but kind of doubt that happens.  I also believe Sam is going to probably hang up the cleats, just too much uncertainty with his knee.

Liked:
#18 · Dec 7, 11:52 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said: I don't think Sam even plays a role in this story, except as perhaps a cautionary tale for the team's approach to Teddy Bridgewater.

As I've said before, in my mind, Thanksgiving saw Case Keenum's narrative turn a corner from "rental QB playing well in a very good offense" to "improving QB who might just be better than anyone thought." Thanksgiving indeed. While it's hard to believe anyone could be playing better than Case right now, I still believe that Teddy, too, would be lighting it up if he were playing, as would Sam. 

So, who do we give our money to? With Teddy's knee a question mark, Bradford's knee a caution flag draped over it, and Keenum seemingly improving with each game, I think it's now a legitimate question. Obviously, It would be foolish to do anything money related now, but it's going to be an interesting off season. I'm betting Mike and Rick are merrily flummoxed. That is to say they're giddy at the results, but have absolutely no clue about what they're going to do, other than just watch it play out like the rest of us. 


I question whether Teddy would be able to make this offensive line look as good as Keenum has.  Keenum's ability to move around and escape has been one of his biggest strengths.   Bradford did well in the first game because he can get rid of the ball quickly and accurately.  I actually think Teddy may struggle the most of the three, as his decision making may be slower due to rust and his escapability may not be what it was prior to injury.

Liked:
#19 · Dec 7, 12:00 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Purplewhizz" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: I don't think Sam even plays a role in this story, except as perhaps a cautionary tale for the team's approach to Teddy Bridgewater.

As I've said before, in my mind, Thanksgiving saw Case Keenum's narrative turn a corner from "rental QB playing well in a very good offense" to "improving QB who might just be better than anyone thought." Thanksgiving indeed. While it's hard to believe anyone could be playing better than Case right now, I still believe that Teddy, too, would be lighting it up if he were playing, as would Sam. 

So, who do we give our money to? With Teddy's knee a question mark, Bradford's knee a caution flag draped over it, and Keenum seemingly improving with each game, I think it's now a legitimate question. Obviously, It would be foolish to do anything money related now, but it's going to be an interesting off season. I'm betting Mike and Rick are merrily flummoxed. That is to say they're giddy at the results, but have absolutely no clue about what they're going to do, other than just watch it play out like the rest of us. 


I question whether Teddy would be able to make this offensive line look as good as Keenum has.  Keenum's ability to move around and escape has been one of his biggest strengths.   Bradford did well in the first game because he can get rid of the ball quickly and accurately.  I actually think Teddy may struggle the most of the three, as his decision making may be slower due to rust and his escapability may not be what it was prior to injury.


I think that might be true for a
couple of games if he was asked to play this season.  I think by the 2018 season, there wouldn’t be
any more concern about rust compared to any other QB, and he’ll have another
full offseason of recovery time on his knee. 
I think most of my long term question marks on him are purely in his
knee.

While Case’s mobility is a great asset, I don’t think
sticking Bridgewater in there would be any more of a hamper than any other team
with traditional pocket passers for QB. 
We’d probably take a few more sacks, but not a ton more.  More important than Case’s mobility (with
regards to him avoiding sacks) is the speed at which he gets rid of the ball to
the hot read when blitzed.  This is
something I’d expect Bridgewater to also be good at.

Liked:
#20 · Dec 7, 12:16 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"pumpf" said: I *think* we need to treat Case as the starter... with the caveat that he could be beaten out by Teddy... and sign both of them.  Whoever doesn't win the starting job will become trade bait (at some point in the future).  Sloter is our "long-term" #2.
I wish that were possible. Who knows, maybe we can find a way to do it, but unless he turns back into a pumpkin--and that does not seem likely at this point--Keenum is now likely to command a starter's salary, as will Bridgewater. What a happy mess. I just hope to God we make the right decision. But I fear another '98, where we committed to our Cinderella, who quickly turned back into a pumpkin and traded our starter, who went on to win a Super Bowl. This team CANNOT make that mistake again. One thing that gives me hope is that I think we have smarter people in charge now. 

Edit: And, yes, I'm aware that Teddy, with his knee, could also be the pumpkin. 



I'm skeptical that Teddy will get "starters" money.  No one (except the Vikings) have seen him do anything since the injury.  Sure, teams can bring him in and check him out... but, even before his injury, there was more hope for what he could be... than what he actually showed.  At the time of his injury, he was becoming a great "game manager"; he had not shown the ability to take the team on his back and win games for us (single-handedly), like you'd like to see in a starting QB.  Some team... that has everything else in place, except a competent QB, may throw some money at him.  But I don't see any team breaking the bank for Teddy- because he hasn't (yet) shown to be the kind of QB who can win games for you (by himself); but he won't lose them.  How many teams are looking for a QB like that in free agency?  Not many (I don't think... at least not as potential starters)

Look at Cousins in Washington: that guy has been pretty darn good... and there's still questions about him.  I think he'd get alot more money than Teddy.  That's why I think we can sign them both.

Liked:
#21 · Dec 7, 12:34 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship One QB in the Hand is Worth Two In the Bush
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!