I like what we're doing
As a Cub fan in addition to my suffering years as a Vikes fan, I like when an organization that hasn't seen success sets out in a different direction. I define success as winning the whole thing. It was clear that resigning Cousins was not going to get us over the bump. There was still a significant gap between ourselves and the top teams. Our defense would have been lit up against any formidable playoff opponent.
Flores did a magnificent job mixing and matching to put a competitive D on the field. But good QB's were always going to pick that D apart. Our Run Game simply was not up to par even with a healthy Cousins providing more balance and threats to get the defense out of the box.
Moving on from Cousins allows us to improve at every position but QB, and we're already seeing the windfall from doing so, even with $28MM in sunk cost. Now, you have a place to work from in the draft that I believe gets you to the QB you need. I really am high on McCarthy as a guy you can bring in without having to bankrupt your future and can give a year or two to grow, all while staying semi-competitive. You put a staunch defense in place and an offense with all of our weapons guided by a head coach that should be able to coach up Darnold, you may sneakily be a fringe playoff team this year. Then next year, you open the floodgates and build off that cheap rookie contract.
Is it a sure thing? Most decidedly not, but I do think it puts you in a better situation to possibly be a real factor down the line, unlike the charade that was the last couple of seasons where we pretended we had any chance of having a say come playoff time.
@"minny65" said:@"Vikergirl" said:Kwesi needs to do his job and make some tough evaluations with the help of KOC with the QB draft. They might deem 3,2,1 QB's as franchise altering, assuming Williams goes 1. If it is 1 then we have to go all in to get them. If it is 2 then we might only have to move up a little or play Russian roulette (which I would not want). If it is 3 then we might trade down and still get our guy. We all have no idea how they view or will view things internally.@"Psyched Vike" said: I just hope that we do not give up the farm in order to move up to grab a qb. If one falls to us at 11, great, if not, maybe look at someone later on, but everyone knows we are desperate to land one and the price tag to move up will probably be more for us than any other team, because the league perception, thanks to decision-making up to now, is that we are currently squarely bent over the barrel. And how many other teams are in need of a qb? The Vikings aren't the only ones. Also it's not like was going to be a secret. It's a gamble to stay at 11 at this point. Sure it could be scary to move up but I would rather go all in than half ass it. We'll see how it plays outLet's assume Kwesi hits on the most important position. We will have 5 years of a cheap rookie contract and maybe a decade of SB contending play. It's a whole new direction, I think :)
But what if we pass on all the QB's and wait until next season. That would sting for 2024 but if we extend JJ/Darrisaw and reload with FA's I would not hate that strategy. I want to build a SB contending team and that takes careful planning and not forced decisions.
This is exactly what RS and The Vikings tried to do in that 2015 eraYoung team, ascending, great D and Bridgewater on a Rook contract.
@"purplefaithful" said:@"minny65" said:@"Vikergirl" said:Kwesi needs to do his job and make some tough evaluations with the help of KOC with the QB draft. They might deem 3,2,1 QB's as franchise altering, assuming Williams goes 1. If it is 1 then we have to go all in to get them. If it is 2 then we might only have to move up a little or play Russian roulette (which I would not want). If it is 3 then we might trade down and still get our guy. We all have no idea how they view or will view things internally.@"Psyched Vike" said: I just hope that we do not give up the farm in order to move up to grab a qb. If one falls to us at 11, great, if not, maybe look at someone later on, but everyone knows we are desperate to land one and the price tag to move up will probably be more for us than any other team, because the league perception, thanks to decision-making up to now, is that we are currently squarely bent over the barrel. And how many other teams are in need of a qb? The Vikings aren't the only ones. Also it's not like was going to be a secret. It's a gamble to stay at 11 at this point. Sure it could be scary to move up but I would rather go all in than half ass it. We'll see how it plays outLet's assume Kwesi hits on the most important position. We will have 5 years of a cheap rookie contract and maybe a decade of SB contending play. It's a whole new direction, I think :)
But what if we pass on all the QB's and wait until next season. That would sting for 2024 but if we extend JJ/Darrisaw and reload with FA's I would not hate that strategy. I want to build a SB contending team and that takes careful planning and not forced decisions.
This is exactly what RS and The Vikings tried to do in that 2015 eraYoung team, ascending, great D and Bridgewater on a Rook contract.
Yes and we moved forward there too. They tried and it didn't work out but that doesn't mean you stop trying
@"Vikergirl" said:@"purplefaithful" said:@"minny65" said:@"Vikergirl" said:Kwesi needs to do his job and make some tough evaluations with the help of KOC with the QB draft. They might deem 3,2,1 QB's as franchise altering, assuming Williams goes 1. If it is 1 then we have to go all in to get them. If it is 2 then we might only have to move up a little or play Russian roulette (which I would not want). If it is 3 then we might trade down and still get our guy. We all have no idea how they view or will view things internally.@"Psyched Vike" said: I just hope that we do not give up the farm in order to move up to grab a qb. If one falls to us at 11, great, if not, maybe look at someone later on, but everyone knows we are desperate to land one and the price tag to move up will probably be more for us than any other team, because the league perception, thanks to decision-making up to now, is that we are currently squarely bent over the barrel. And how many other teams are in need of a qb? The Vikings aren't the only ones. Also it's not like was going to be a secret. It's a gamble to stay at 11 at this point. Sure it could be scary to move up but I would rather go all in than half ass it. We'll see how it plays outLet's assume Kwesi hits on the most important position. We will have 5 years of a cheap rookie contract and maybe a decade of SB contending play. It's a whole new direction, I think :)
But what if we pass on all the QB's and wait until next season. That would sting for 2024 but if we extend JJ/Darrisaw and reload with FA's I would not hate that strategy. I want to build a SB contending team and that takes careful planning and not forced decisions.
This is exactly what RS and The Vikings tried to do in that 2015 eraYoung team, ascending, great D and Bridgewater on a Rook contract.
Yes and we moved forward there too. They tried and it didn't work out but that doesn't mean you stop trying
We're in a good spot to grab that QB and we need a guy with a little more arm strength than Teddy had. I think each of the top guys fit that bill. Teddy was a decent QB, but not a guy to build around in retrospect. But, we also know that out of the top six guys, it's likely three will be decent, and three won't. I would say my order for QB's would be Williams, McCarthy, Daniels, Maye, Penix Jr, and Nix in that order. I do think Williams has a big bust factor to him as does Maye. For somebody who hasn't seen a ton of action, I just get the feel that McCarthy is going to be a steal if you can get him at six or seven and I think the Vikes trade there to get him, or they believe in Penix and stay or even move down a little to grab him. Dangerous to do with a QB, though.
If you want to see yet another example of the benefit of having a QB on a rookie contract, look no further than Houston who hit on their QB last season & had enough cap room to sign Hunter.
If Williams, McCarthy, and Daniels are gone before we pick, I say screw it, trade back in the 1st, get a 3rd rd. and a 4th rd. pick back, and go BPA , and take Pratt in the 4th as our QBOTF.
@"Knucklehead" said: If you want to see yet another example of the benefit of having a QB on a rookie contract, look no further than Houston who hit on their QB last season & had enough cap room to sign Hunter.
of course they had to let one of their own free agents walk though in the process. IMO the sign of a rookie contract that is working is when you can have your cake and eat it too. add to the talent you have, not swapping talent for talent.
@"Vikergirl" said:@"purplefaithful" said:@"minny65" said:@"Vikergirl" said:Kwesi needs to do his job and make some tough evaluations with the help of KOC with the QB draft. They might deem 3,2,1 QB's as franchise altering, assuming Williams goes 1. If it is 1 then we have to go all in to get them. If it is 2 then we might only have to move up a little or play Russian roulette (which I would not want). If it is 3 then we might trade down and still get our guy. We all have no idea how they view or will view things internally.@"Psyched Vike" said: I just hope that we do not give up the farm in order to move up to grab a qb. If one falls to us at 11, great, if not, maybe look at someone later on, but everyone knows we are desperate to land one and the price tag to move up will probably be more for us than any other team, because the league perception, thanks to decision-making up to now, is that we are currently squarely bent over the barrel. And how many other teams are in need of a qb? The Vikings aren't the only ones. Also it's not like was going to be a secret. It's a gamble to stay at 11 at this point. Sure it could be scary to move up but I would rather go all in than half ass it. We'll see how it plays outLet's assume Kwesi hits on the most important position. We will have 5 years of a cheap rookie contract and maybe a decade of SB contending play. It's a whole new direction, I think :)
But what if we pass on all the QB's and wait until next season. That would sting for 2024 but if we extend JJ/Darrisaw and reload with FA's I would not hate that strategy. I want to build a SB contending team and that takes careful planning and not forced decisions.
This is exactly what RS and The Vikings tried to do in that 2015 eraYoung team, ascending, great D and Bridgewater on a Rook contract.
Yes and we moved forward there too. They tried and it didn't work out but that doesn't mean you stop trying
sometimes you need to see a plan through. Thats what we’re doing now. Kwesi will be right or wrong, but at least we are executing the plan. I for one was tired of being held hostage by Kirk. He signed an insane contract with Atlanta including a no trade clause. That would have been a huge mistake.
@"mgobluevikes" said: If Williams, McCarthy, and Daniels are gone before we pick, I say screw it, trade back in the 1st, get a 3rd rd. and a 4th rd. pick back, and go BPA , and take Pratt in the 4th as our QBOTF.I don't understand why you would say "screw it". It's a 6-deep QB class. I keep saying Penix or Bo Nix will both be there at #11. I like them both better than Campbell or Maye. I promise whichever QB we don't take, Denver will be waiting at 12. (They were also talking to Darnold BTW, and he accepted the Minnesota offer instead of the Broncos)
@"Montana Tom" sai I don't understand why you would say "screw it". It's a 6-deep QB class. I keep saying Penix or Bo Nix will both be there at #11. I like them both better than Campbell or Maye. I promise whichever QB we don't take, Denver will be waiting at 12. (They were also talking to Darnold BTW, and he accepted the Minnesota offer instead of the Broncos)7) Tennessee Titans 8) Atlanta Falcons 9) Chicago Bears 10) New York Jets 11) Minnesota Vikings 12) Denver Broncos 13) Las Vegas Raiders 14) New Orleans Saints 16) Seattle Seahawks
Vikings are in a tough spot and vulnerable to having at least 1 of the 4 teams behind them trading up to pick 8-10 to draft their QBOTF.
If McCarthy goes in Top 7, and a team behind Vikings does indeed leapfrog Vikings somewhere between 8-10. It'd mean the Vikings get the #6 option at QB with the 11th pick.....
Vikings will have to trade up if they want a QB IMO.
@"Mattyman" said:@"Montana Tom" sai I don't understand why you would say "screw it". It's a 6-deep QB class. I keep saying Penix or Bo Nix will both be there at #11. I like them both better than Campbell or Maye. I promise whichever QB we don't take, Denver will be waiting at 12. (They were also talking to Darnold BTW, and he accepted the Minnesota offer instead of the Broncos) 7) Tennessee Titans 8) Atlanta Falcons 9) Chicago Bears 10) New York Jets 11) Minnesota Vikings 12) Denver Broncos 13) Las Vegas Raiders 14) New Orleans Saints 16) Seattle SeahawksVikings are in a tough spot and vulnerable to having at least 1 of the 4 teams behind them trading up to pick 8-10 to draft their QBOTF.
If McCarthy goes in Top 7, and a team behind Vikings does indeed leapfrog Vikings somewhere between 8-10. It'd mean the Vikings get the #6 option at QB with the 11th pick.....
Vikings will have to trade up if they want a QB IMO.
There’s no doubt in my mind we have backed ourselves into the corner of having to move up to get a QB. It’s just a matter of his much it’s going to cost to go get the one KOC wants. I’m guessing there aren’t more than 2 guys that fit the bill, so there’s no way they’re leaving this to chance or just see who falls to them.Kwesi has absolutely no choice other than to go get our QBOTF at any and all costs. Letting Cousins walk and having Darnold on a 1 year deal basically proves this. If they AT ALL had any faith or hope in Sam Darnold, they would have signed him to a longer deal.
That being said, they better hope they get it right because it’s likely going to cost us multiple firsts. They blow this pick and they’re all fired because they’ll nuke this “competitive” window they’re trying to open.
@"CFIAvike" said:@"Mattyman" said:@"Montana Tom" sai I don't understand why you would say "screw it". It's a 6-deep QB class. I keep saying Penix or Bo Nix will both be there at #11. I like them both better than Campbell or Maye. I promise whichever QB we don't take, Denver will be waiting at 12. (They were also talking to Darnold BTW, and he accepted the Minnesota offer instead of the Broncos) 7) Tennessee Titans 8) Atlanta Falcons 9) Chicago Bears 10) New York Jets 11) Minnesota Vikings 12) Denver Broncos 13) Las Vegas Raiders 14) New Orleans Saints 16) Seattle SeahawksVikings are in a tough spot and vulnerable to having at least 1 of the 4 teams behind them trading up to pick 8-10 to draft their QBOTF.
If McCarthy goes in Top 7, and a team behind Vikings does indeed leapfrog Vikings somewhere between 8-10. It'd mean the Vikings get the #6 option at QB with the 11th pick.....
Vikings will have to trade up if they want a QB IMO.
There’s no doubt in my mind we have backed ourselves into the corner of having to move up to get a QB. It’s just a matter of his much it’s going to cost to go get the one KOC wants. I’m guessing there aren’t more than 2 guys that fit the bill, so there’s no way they’re leaving this to chance or just see who falls to them.Kwesi has absolutely no choice other than to go get our QBOTF at any and all costs. Letting Cousins walk and having Darnold on a 1 year deal basically proves this. If they AT ALL had any faith or hope in Sam Darnold, they would have signed him to a longer deal.
That being said, they better hope they get it right because it’s likely going to cost us multiple firsts. They blow this pick and they’re all fired because they’ll nuke this “competitive” window they’re trying to open.
It’s hardly backing ourselves into a corner with 4-5 good qbs when we’re picking eleven. Lol
@"pattersaur" said:It’s not a big if if they truly like the QBs outside the top 3. What if they feel like someone like Penix is their guy?@"StickyBun" said: If Minnesota can get a guy they really want in this Draft, yes.....its a plan where things are falling into place. Agreed. Big if.
@"Purplewhizz" said:I agree....could be. And a little birdie told me recently that they do in fact like Penix.@"pattersaur" said:It’s not a big if if they truly like the QBs outside the top 3. What if they feel like someone like Penix is their guy?@"StickyBun" said: If Minnesota can get a guy they really want in this Draft, yes.....its a plan where things are falling into place. Agreed. Big if.
@"pattersaur" said:@"HappyViking" said:The man without a plan. This image would've been better at the bottom of Kwesi's statement.The thing is, this whole plan works if he’s able to land the QB. Clear out all the dead cap, get a cheap QB, load the roster around him. It’s a good plan but it hinges so heavily on the QB. Which we don’t have and may never.It’s like KAM wrote the best movie script ever but without getting a star actor attached, it ain’t getting made. Ideally you’d have the star in hand before moving forward with everything else but for whatever reason the Vikes didn’t do that.
So now the table is set. The penthouse is ready. And we’re all sitting around waiting to see if the star QB (who didn’t RSVP and who we haven’t seen in 20 years) is gonna show up.
I said in another thread- it’s a LOT of risk to take on at the most important position in sports. It could work or it could sink us for years. That’s reality. Let’s all hope it works and we land that elusive franchise QB we’ve all coveted for so long. I have hope. But it’s scary.
if it doesnt work its hardly the death nell. You’ll just be back in a couple years. nut you also have to draft wisely which has been a concern. San Fran traded 3 firsts to move up for Lance not long ago. But they made hay in the draft. Same scenario with Philadelphia
@"JimmyinSD" said:@"Knucklehead" said: If you want to see yet another example of the benefit of having a QB on a rookie contract, look no further than Houston who hit on their QB last season & had enough cap room to sign Hunter.
of course they had to let one of their own free agents walk though in the process. IMO the sign of a rookie contract that is working is when you can have your cake and eat it too. add to the talent you have, not swapping talent for talent.Might be just a matter of fit. Hunter may be a better fit in Houston's 4-3 defense.
@"Purplewhizz" said:@"pattersaur" said:@"HappyViking" said:The man without a plan. This image would've been better at the bottom of Kwesi's statement.The thing is, this whole plan works if he’s able to land the QB. Clear out all the dead cap, get a cheap QB, load the roster around him. It’s a good plan but it hinges so heavily on the QB. Which we don’t have and may never.It’s like KAM wrote the best movie script ever but without getting a star actor attached, it ain’t getting made. Ideally you’d have the star in hand before moving forward with everything else but for whatever reason the Vikes didn’t do that.
So now the table is set. The penthouse is ready. And we’re all sitting around waiting to see if the star QB (who didn’t RSVP and who we haven’t seen in 20 years) is gonna show up.
I said in another thread- it’s a LOT of risk to take on at the most important position in sports. It could work or it could sink us for years. That’s reality. Let’s all hope it works and we land that elusive franchise QB we’ve all coveted for so long. I have hope. But it’s scary.
if it doesnt work its hardly the death nell. You’ll just be back in a couple years. nut you also have to draft wisely which has been a concern. San Fran traded 3 firsts to move up for Lance not long ago. But they made hay in the draft. Same scenario with PhiladelphiaOh I'm with you. It's past time we took a shot at a QB and I'm not afraid of whiffing even though it'll be annoying. I just wish Sam Darnold wasn't the guy behind door #2.
@"Waterboy" said:@"CFIAvike" said:@"Mattyman" said:@"Montana Tom" sai I don't understand why you would say "screw it". It's a 6-deep QB class. I keep saying Penix or Bo Nix will both be there at #11. I like them both better than Campbell or Maye. I promise whichever QB we don't take, Denver will be waiting at 12. (They were also talking to Darnold BTW, and he accepted the Minnesota offer instead of the Broncos) 7) Tennessee Titans 8) Atlanta Falcons 9) Chicago Bears 10) New York Jets 11) Minnesota Vikings 12) Denver Broncos 13) Las Vegas Raiders 14) New Orleans Saints 16) Seattle SeahawksVikings are in a tough spot and vulnerable to having at least 1 of the 4 teams behind them trading up to pick 8-10 to draft their QBOTF.
If McCarthy goes in Top 7, and a team behind Vikings does indeed leapfrog Vikings somewhere between 8-10. It'd mean the Vikings get the #6 option at QB with the 11th pick.....
Vikings will have to trade up if they want a QB IMO.
There’s no doubt in my mind we have backed ourselves into the corner of having to move up to get a QB. It’s just a matter of his much it’s going to cost to go get the one KOC wants. I’m guessing there aren’t more than 2 guys that fit the bill, so there’s no way they’re leaving this to chance or just see who falls to them.Kwesi has absolutely no choice other than to go get our QBOTF at any and all costs. Letting Cousins walk and having Darnold on a 1 year deal basically proves this. If they AT ALL had any faith or hope in Sam Darnold, they would have signed him to a longer deal.
That being said, they better hope they get it right because it’s likely going to cost us multiple firsts. They blow this pick and they’re all fired because they’ll nuke this “competitive” window they’re trying to open.
It’s hardly backing ourselves into a corner with 4-5 good qbs when we’re picking eleven. Lol
I don’t think there’s 4-5 QBs out of this group that we like, or that fit our scheme. Unless they want to gamble their jobs and the future of this franchise on someone falling to them at pick 11, they HAVE to trade up
@"Purplewhizz" said:@"pattersaur" said:@"HappyViking" said:The man without a plan. This image would've been better at the bottom of Kwesi's statement.The thing is, this whole plan works if he’s able to land the QB. Clear out all the dead cap, get a cheap QB, load the roster around him. It’s a good plan but it hinges so heavily on the QB. Which we don’t have and may never.It’s like KAM wrote the best movie script ever but without getting a star actor attached, it ain’t getting made. Ideally you’d have the star in hand before moving forward with everything else but for whatever reason the Vikes didn’t do that.
So now the table is set. The penthouse is ready. And we’re all sitting around waiting to see if the star QB (who didn’t RSVP and who we haven’t seen in 20 years) is gonna show up.
I said in another thread- it’s a LOT of risk to take on at the most important position in sports. It could work or it could sink us for years. That’s reality. Let’s all hope it works and we land that elusive franchise QB we’ve all coveted for so long. I have hope. But it’s scary.
if it doesnt work its hardly the death nell. You’ll just be back in a couple years. nut you also have to draft wisely which has been a concern. San Fran traded 3 firsts to move up for Lance not long ago. But they made hay in the draft. Same scenario with Philadelphia
They’re supposedly opening new “competing window” for 2025. If they whiff on a QB this year, it closes unless they go find another free agent QB who they think can help us win a chip (like we did with Cousins). A mishanling like that will probably cost someone their job.
@"CFIAvike" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"pattersaur" said:@"HappyViking" said:The man without a plan. This image would've been better at the bottom of Kwesi's statement.The thing is, this whole plan works if he’s able to land the QB. Clear out all the dead cap, get a cheap QB, load the roster around him. It’s a good plan but it hinges so heavily on the QB. Which we don’t have and may never.It’s like KAM wrote the best movie script ever but without getting a star actor attached, it ain’t getting made. Ideally you’d have the star in hand before moving forward with everything else but for whatever reason the Vikes didn’t do that.
So now the table is set. The penthouse is ready. And we’re all sitting around waiting to see if the star QB (who didn’t RSVP and who we haven’t seen in 20 years) is gonna show up.
I said in another thread- it’s a LOT of risk to take on at the most important position in sports. It could work or it could sink us for years. That’s reality. Let’s all hope it works and we land that elusive franchise QB we’ve all coveted for so long. I have hope. But it’s scary.
if it doesnt work its hardly the death nell. You’ll just be back in a couple years. nut you also have to draft wisely which has been a concern. San Fran traded 3 firsts to move up for Lance not long ago. But they made hay in the draft. Same scenario with Philadelphia
They’re supposedly opening new “competing window” for 2025. If they whiff on a QB this year, it closes unless they go find another free agent QB who they think can help us win a chip (like we did with Cousins). A mishanling like that will probably cost someone their job.Who are the best NFL free agents in 2025?
Quarterbacks
Of these guys I think Tua is the only one with game who might hit FA. The rest are either on the backup track or will get signed/tagged. Maybe Goff too I suppose if Detroit likes Hooker.
- Dak Prescott, Dallas Cowboys (UFA)
- Jared Goff, Detroit Lions (UFA)
- Jordan Love, Green Bay Packers (UFA)
- Trevor Lawrence, Jacksonville Jaguars (UFA)
- Tua Tagovailoa, Miami Dolphins (UFA)
- Justin Fields, Chicago Bears (club option)
- Mac Jones, New England Patriots (club option)
- Zach Wilson, New York Jets (club option)
- Trey Lance, Dallas Cowboys (club option)
@"Montana Tom" said:Because I don't see this as a 6 deep class. Look at the greatest QB draft class in history 1983. Of the 6 QB's (John Elway, Todd Blackledge, Jim Kelly, Tony Eason, Ken O'Brien, and Dan Marino), 3 of them wound up panning out. It's just not worth taking your 4th or 5th choice, just to take a QB in the 1st rd. I won't buy the BS GM PR of "we got our guy"@"mgobluevikes" said: If Williams, McCarthy, and Daniels are gone before we pick, I say screw it, trade back in the 1st, get a 3rd rd. and a 4th rd. pick back, and go BPA , and take Pratt in the 4th as our QBOTF. I don't understand why you would say "screw it". It's a 6-deep QB class. I keep saying Penix or Bo Nix will both be there at #11. I like them both better than Campbell or Maye. I promise whichever QB we don't take, Denver will be waiting at 12. (They were also talking to Darnold BTW, and he accepted the Minnesota offer instead of the Broncos)I wouldn't hitch my wagon to Maye, Nix, or Penix in the 1st rd., and I'm not trading up into the 3 spot to get one of the others. Campbell, McCarthy, or Daniels is going to have to fall out of the top 3 for me to trade up to 5-7. Pratt is my fall back position in the 4th and BPA in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd rds.
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.