What is your nightmare draft scenario?
History and gut feel tells me Trader Rick trades back in Round #1 to get his second round pick back. Who he might pick depends on how far he drops.
My nightmare scenario is that he stays pat in the first round and selects a non-OL. Beyond a nightmare if he does this with Slater on the board, however unlikely. That would mean no OL until round #3, absent a trade.
@"Hawkvike25" said: QB in round 1Interesting. You really would dislike that, Hawk?
I'll just go through my list of TV breakers if we stay at #14 and make a pick:
1. Kwity Paye
Trade Down for a DE with lots of question marks...
#14 for a DE with lots of question marks...
CB with our 1st
Being late and missing the pick (doh!)
Hmm... I guess Devonte Smith at #14 would be very, very scary to me. Waiting until our 3rd round pick or-- God forbid-- even later to address OL would be borderline criminal negligence.
Hopefully this isn't famous last words but thankfully I don't think either of these scenarios is happening.
I think not drafting OLine in the first gives me a WTF type vibe. I have some room of acceptance for DLine and QB, but pretty much everything else is a hard WTF.
Only drafting one OLine that is reasonably expected to start is a WTF.
Absolute nightmare draft would be drafting a 3rd rounder and a 7th rounder on the OLine and a CB in the first.
Pretty simple for me: any pick other than OL or DE and it's raining kittens in Colorado. But I'm pretty convinced Mouschi will be just fine.
@"StickyBun" said:Absolutely. Kirk isn't going anywhere so we are wasting a pick on a guy to sit for a couple years, essentially ignoring OL and DE. That or the pick happens and a QB controversy spews and we have a $40MM QB sitting on the bench. It's a lose lose situation in my mind@"Hawkvike25" said: QB in round 1 Interesting. You really would dislike that, Hawk?
If you're talking "I gotta replay this to believe it happened" level of nightmare:
Trade up from 14 for a CB. Infinitesimal, but certainly a nightmare.
For the "Goddammit, I knew Zimmer would pull this sh!t!!" nightmare:
Trade down from 14, take a DE, then throw the acquired 2nd on a CB, leaving OL until the 3rd round.
Any pick in the back 7, and I'm gonna lose my shit.
CB or moving down out of the top 20 pick up a second
@"purplefaithful" said: Trade Down for a DE with lots of question marks... #14 for a DE with lots of question marks... CB with our 1st Being late and missing the pick (doh!)
All winners in a nightmare competition...
@"BarrNone55" said: Any pick in the back 7, and I'm gonna lose my shit.Yeah, same here... if we take a CB, S, or LB at 14... Spielman better find a good place to hide...
@"Hawkvike25" said:There's never any good options for improving your too good to cut, but not good enough to get you a SB victory QB.@"StickyBun" said:Absolutely. Kirk isn't going anywhere so we are wasting a pick on a guy to sit for a couple years, essentially ignoring OL and DE. That or the pick happens and a QB controversy spews and we have a $40MM QB sitting on the bench. It's a lose lose situation in my mind@"Hawkvike25" said: QB in round 1 Interesting. You really would dislike that, Hawk?We're either going to have to let Kirk go without having a plan B, or we're going to have to bring guys in while he's here. I think the only real option is to figure out how to bring guys in and let them compete, and manage the discomfort.
@"medaille" said:@"Hawkvike25" said:There's never any good options for improving your too good to cut, but not good enough to get you a SB victory QB.@"StickyBun" said:Absolutely. Kirk isn't going anywhere so we are wasting a pick on a guy to sit for a couple years, essentially ignoring OL and DE. That or the pick happens and a QB controversy spews and we have a $40MM QB sitting on the bench. It's a lose lose situation in my mind@"Hawkvike25" said: QB in round 1 Interesting. You really would dislike that, Hawk?We're either going to have to let Kirk go without having a plan B, or we're going to have to bring guys in while he's here. I think the only real option is to figure out how to bring guys in and let them compete, and manage the discomfort.
Never said I dont want to bring guys in to compete, just said QB in Round 1 is stupid, really stupid. Am I open to a QB in round 3 this year if a viable one is there? Sure. Am I open to one next year instead? Absolutely. A QB in round 1 this year, as I mentioned before, means we neglect OL and DE and then it creates unnecessary drama during the season.Lastly, Kirk is good enough to win a Super Bowl, just need his team to be.
@"Hawkvike25" said: Lastly, Kirk is good enough to win a Super Bowl, just need his team to be.Kirk is only good enough to win a SB if his salary is low enough to permit the Vikes to build a great team around him. He can't be paid as a top 5 QB, perform like a top 15 QB and expect to win a SB.
That the draft actually replaces the sport, and any "Vikings news" all year long is limited to dips**ts doing mocks all year long.
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.
