Kirk to SF tomorrow, work it out
@"jargomcfargo" said: Cousins is fools gold! He has an arm that can make all the throws and great accuracy. But he is slow to make his decisions and ends up holding the ball too long. That doesn't help a poor offensive line get any better. He is also risk averse and will take the check down rather than take a risk at times. This leads to good QB stats but not always wins. He can't carry or elevate the team. The team has to be great around him to be successful. I think he is a good QB; but not championship caliber. I thought picking up Cousins was a mistake. Especially, considering the salary impact. I realize they would have to of spent a lot of draft capital to snag a QB in the draft, but I wish they had. Now they are stuck with this mess primarily due to the Cousins contract. I hope they prove me wrong, but I just can't see it working out. And if it doesn't, Zimmer and Spielman should both follow Cousins out the door.Pretty spot on.
Has anyone ever counted all the QBs the Vikings have brought in after they played (often their best years of their careers) for other teams? I am thinking back even before Spielman and the Wilfs were involved, so it really seems like we have some franchise penchant to bring in QBs drafted and developed elsewhere: Cousins, Bradford, Favre, Donovan McNabb, Jim McMahon, Randall McDaniel, Jeff George, Josh Freeman...I'm forgetting a bunch, no doubt.
In contrast, I think we have only drafted 4 QBs in round 1: Kramer, Culpepper, Ponder, and Bridgewater. Any others? I think the only other relatively high picks were Tarvaris Jackson in the (late) 2nd and Tarkenton in the 3rd. Has any other team spent so few high draft picks at QB??
@"Jor-El" said:Has anyone ever counted all the QBs the Vikings have brought in after they played (often their best years of their careers) for other teams? I am thinking back even before Spielman and the Wilfs were involved, so it really seems like we have some franchise penchant to bring in QBs drafted and developed elsewhere: Cousins, Bradford, Favre, Donovan McNabb, Jim McMahon, Randall McDaniel, Jeff George, Josh Freeman...I'm forgetting a bunch, no doubt.In contrast, I think we have only drafted 4 QBs in round 1: Kramer, Culpepper, Ponder, and Bridgewater. Any others? I think the only other relatively high picks were Tarvaris Jackson in the (late) 2nd and Tarkenton in the 3rd. Has any other team spent so few high draft picks at QB??
Warren Moon and Gus Frerotte are two from other teams that come to mind, although they played well for the most part. As for our own drafted QB's? Hard to remember asides from those you already mentioned.
@"PurpleCrush" said:@"Jor-El" said:Has anyone ever counted all the QBs the Vikings have brought in after they played (often their best years of their careers) for other teams? I am thinking back even before Spielman and the Wilfs were involved, so it really seems like we have some franchise penchant to bring in QBs drafted and developed elsewhere: Cousins, Bradford, Favre, Donovan McNabb, Jim McMahon, Randall McDaniel, Jeff George, Josh Freeman...I'm forgetting a bunch, no doubt.In contrast, I think we have only drafted 4 QBs in round 1: Kramer, Culpepper, Ponder, and Bridgewater. Any others? I think the only other relatively high picks were Tarvaris Jackson in the (late) 2nd and Tarkenton in the 3rd. Has any other team spent so few high draft picks at QB??
Warren Moon and Gus Frerotte are two from other teams that come to mind, although they played well for the most part. As for our own drafted QB's? Hard to remember asides from those you already mentioned.How could I forget Warren Moon?? Frerotte, Matt Cassell...Joe Kapp was a CFL vet, even Rich Gannon was originally drafted by the Patriots.
We drafted only 6 QBs in high rounds in 60 years?? That's some organizational attitude. Think about it, 2 of the 1st round QBs were picked in the last decade alone, so prior to Ponder in 2011 the Vikings picked a QB in round 1 only twice in half a century.
I read this in a column somewhere recently. The Vikings took Mike Hughes in the 1st round a couple years ago, when Lamar Jackson was still on the board. Instead of picking Hughes and signing Cousins, the Vikings could have traded for Alex Smith and drafted Jackson as his understudy. Man, how different things could have gone.
@"PurpleCrush" said: I read this in a column somewhere recently. The Vikings took Mike Hughes in the 1st round a couple years ago, when Lamar Jackson was still on the board. Instead of picking Hughes and signing Cousins, the Vikings could have traded for Alex Smith and drafted Jackson as his understudy. Man, how different things could have gone.of course hindsight is always 20/20... although if they had gone that route, we could be here cursing our OL for getting Jackson so gun shy that he is a bust and wishing we had a corner that could cover somebody.
@"PurpleCrush" said: I read this in a column somewhere recently. The Vikings took Mike Hughes in the 1st round a couple years ago, when Lamar Jackson was still on the board. Instead of picking Hughes and signing Cousins, the Vikings could have traded for Alex Smith and drafted Jackson as his understudy. Man, how different things could have gone.
That's like my endless wish that we had drafted Russell Wilson instead of CB Josh Robinson in 2012. But I guess the QB position was locked down by Christian Ponder at that point.
@"Jor-El" said:I would say most successful teams.In contrast, I think we have only drafted 4 QBs in round 1: Kramer, Culpepper, Ponder, and Bridgewater. Any others? I think the only other relatively high picks were Tarvaris Jackson in the (late) 2nd and Tarkenton in the 3rd. Has any other team spent so few high draft picks at QB??
You don't want to be a team who's drafting a QB in the first round every couple years. That means you're drafting busts and you probably suck. Browns (Mayfied, Kizer, Manziel, Weeden); Jags (Bortles, Gabbert, Leftwich); Jets (Darnold, Hackenberg, Geno Smith, Sanchez, Pennington). Patriots haven't drafted a QB in the 1st round in 27 years (Bledsoe). Seahawks, 27 years (Mirer). Cowboys have drafted one in the 31 years since they drafted Troy Aikman (Quincy Carter).
Vikings are somewhere in the middle of that, which is what you'd expect, considering that of the 4 you mention, 3 were hits, 2 of which had career altering injuries.
The key to success is to either get lucky in the 1st, about a third of which turn out. Or get lucky later in the draft (Wilson, Brady, Prescott, Romo), or nail a free agent (Tannehill, Brees). Every single team in the NFL has tried all three of these routes with varied success.
Bottom line is you need to get lucky.
@"Jor-El" said:I don't think the Vikings are asking for a high draft pick? Where did you get that information? The Vikings might be forced to cut Cousins this offseason just to save the over 40 mil of guaranteed money for 2022.When I read articles or theories about the 49ers or any team trading for Cousins, I think of Andy Dalton. They are the same age, very similar careers in terms of stats, wins, and playoff wins (or lack).If a team could pick up Dalton as a waiver / free agent, as the Cowboys did...why would anyone give the Vikings a high draft pick for Cousins?
Cousins new deal gives the Vikings a bit of an out if he is cut before the 3rd day of the league year this offseason (when his huge 2022 salary becomes fully guaranteed). The Vikings negotiated this for a reason???
There are cheap options out their in free agency (Matt Schaub, Ryan Fitzpatrick, A.J. McCarron, Jacoby Brissett, Blake Bortles for example) that can give the Vikings just as much of a chance to win as Cousins, and also allow them to get out from under that huge 2022 hit.
Why @Jor-El do you want to keep paying him if the Vikings are not a win now team?
Kubaik has had great results with Matt Schaub in the past. So, for an extra bag of chips, the Vikings could have Schaub over Mannion "almost" dollar for dollar. And the kicker is the Vikings could be just as competitive with Schaub over Cousins in 2021.
Yes, if the Vikings are not a win now team, I'm suggesting that the Vikings consider cutting Cousins in the offseason and pay him his salary for 2021... sign Matt Shaub (or a cheap veteran of choice) and roll with Schaub or that veteran.
So, unloading Cousins to the 49ers might not take much of an offer? If the Vikings are not a win now team, is the front office moving closer to wanting out of the Cousins' contract?
Call up Kaep. Sign him, Kubiak was the last coach to want him. He can't be worse than this bum, and his legs would give us a chance.
Well, Kirk’s doing his share to pave his way out of town, wtf... :s
@"Carl Knowles" said:@"Jor-El" said:When I read articles or theories about the 49ers or any team trading for Cousins, I think of Andy Dalton. They are the same age, very similar careers in terms of stats, wins, and playoff wins (or lack).If a team could pick up Dalton as a waiver / free agent, as the Cowboys did...why would anyone give the Vikings a high draft pick for Cousins?
I don't think the Vikings are asking for a high draft pick? Where did you get that information? The Vikings might be forced to cut Cousins this offseason just to save the over 40 mil of guaranteed money for 2022.
Well, in a post on this same thread, earlier this week you proposed we may soon swing a 3-team deal with the 49ers and Panthers which would bring the Vikings not only Teddy Bridgewater but a 2nd round pick. That would be an amazing deal for the Vikings IMO. The OP suggested we could trade Cousins to the 49ers for a 1st, maybe even better. I think these, and the articles in sites like Fansided, are just amateur imaginings.As for what the Vikings are "asking"? I don't know but I have seen no indications they are shopping Cousins around. Ever since they signed him, my belief has been that Spielman promised the Wilfs that, even though he spent 1st round picks on Ponder, Bridgewater, and Bradford, and had better results with a cheap FA not intended to start (Keenum), he had finally identified a franchise QB in Cousins and he practically guaranteed a Super Bowl if they would outbid the Jets and anyone else who wanted him.
I think Spielman is totally committed to Cousins, and it may be a case where if Cousins goes down (proves a failure), Spielman goes down with him. IDK, the Wilfs may let Spielman try his hand at finding a new franchise QB, but he's already had a fair number of chances.
But I raised Dalton because he - not to mention Cam Newton - was available for the waiver fee. What would make Cousins more attractive to any team, even the 49ers, than those castoffs? Because if the Vikings decide he can't win here, Cousins is a castoff, and there is no market for failed QBs in the NFL .
@"Carl Knowles" said:Why @Jor-El do you want to keep paying him if the Vikings are not a win now team?
When did I ever say I want to keep paying Cousins? I've said multiple times on this board that I think the Vikings should rebuild with new GM, HC, and QB. But you and others in this thread have been talking about trades that could happen this season, or that the Vikings may be done with him, and I see no support for that being real. Even your question suggests the possibility that, "the Vikings are not a win now team" - what do you base that upon? They gave Cousins an extension less than 7 months ago, signed Cook to a big contract, and traded a high future draft pick for a defensive player who is only under contract for 2020. Do any of those actions seem like a team giving up on 2020 for a full rebuild?There are 2 types of posts here:
1. Discussion and interpretation of what the Vikings are doing or may do, based on what we actually observe.
2. Fantasies which should be called, "If I ran the Vikings" - what a fanMy comments are usually about #1, and I try to make it pretty clear if I'm dishing out #2.
So, whatever you or I may think or wish, I see nothing to indicate the Vikings plan to stop paying, and playing, Cousins. It all could change Monday morning, but not yet.
@"StickyBun" said: This please:
No way the Vikings are picking #12 lol!
@Jor-El said: Well, in a post on this same thread, earlier this week you proposed we may soon swing a 3-team deal with the 49ers and Panthers which would bring the Vikings not only Teddy Bridgewater but a 2nd round pick.
I appreciate you as Viking fan more than you know! Yes, I would love to see Teddy back in Purple, and yes I would love to get our 2nd round pick back!
I am guilty as charged!
I would love to hear your opinion on how to fix this mess! This is a blog, your opinions are welcome.
Carl, all I would propose is:
1. Fire Spielman. He can't find a winning QB and has had too many attempts to et him try again. Whatever else Spielman has done well, if a GM can't fill the QB spot, get rid of him. Hire someone who has picked at least one good QB.
2. Fire Zimmer. New GM needs to pick his own HC anyway, but Zimmer was never a bright light. He made his reputation by being part of those '90s Cowboy teams, where a DC just had to keep the opponents from outscoring Emmitt and Troy, and then longevity as a DC. I don't know why the Wilfs ever thought "he's been passed over for head coaching jobs more than anybody" was some kind of positive qualification.
Then those guys have to rebuild the team. Very doubtful that will include Kirk Cousins.
@"Carl Knowles" said: @Jor-el: When do you fire those 2?.If they lose against the Bears in Chicago. My reasoning... 1. At GB. I think they lose. Big picture: LeFleur would have swept Zim in two years. 2. Detroit. We should win but very well could lose too 3. At Chicago. I think we lose. Bigger picture: Nagy would retain his dominance over Zim.
We can't have a coach that can't beat two teams in the division. That means we have very little chance of winning the division going forward thus playoff chances will be hard to come by. That will warrant a clean house in my book.
@"rf54" said: It aint happeningAgreed, too many factors for the Wilfs to can Zimmer or Spielman this season. Viking fan hysteria is here.
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.