Concerning "libtard", which in its usage, shows ignorance:
too many people, especially on the political right, insist on stubborn ignorance of the definition:
"willing to respect or accept behavior or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas"
(If that scares anyone, they're already life's b***hes).
"relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise"
In a "free country", I cannot see the harm here.
There are the other variants, including "generous amounts", and parties specifically named with the term in other countries...but, especially in any legit PoliSci course, the definition combines the two I've shared here. This is VERY different from "leftist authoritarianism", which is known for its "mental inflexibility, prejudiced beliefs, and holding of grievances". As many will note, authoritarianism from either "side" looks awfully similar.
I think this talks about it effectively:
"LWA attitudes are characterized by favoring punishment of those who dissent from group opinion, desiring to overturn existing hierarchies, expecting everyone to hold the same left-wing views, believing there is only one correct moral perspective, focusing solely on one’s own norms and boundaries, and needing rigid certainty. In other words, people high in LWA may struggle with skills like perspective taking, flexible thinking, and engaging with others of varying moral or personal beliefs systems."
That sure sounds like Stalinism, Maoism, and the exact attitudes that fail the current dnc...at least, to me.
Oh, the "-tard" bit? As classless as the earlier syllable ends up being ignorant.