Quote: @KingBash said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ KingBash said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ KingBash said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ KingBash said:
@ Caactorvike said:
Tonight—dozens of congressmen were asked if they had ever been told to “go back to their country”. Virtually every minority Congressman said yes—and every white congressman said no. I am baffled why posters on this board will torture logic just to defend this petty, stupid bully. He’s not a Republican or a Conservative (if thats what you call yourself) He’s an amoral, vicious little grifter. You have two choices: admit he is not the man you hoped he would be and disavow him, or continue to support this lying cheat and embrace his racism and mendacity as your own.
I've wracked my brain on this. I think people hate being wrong. They'd rather go down with the ship on this one. They hated Obama/Democrats/Hillary so much that they clung to anything that was the opposite.
Well, this is the opposite. A simple-minded, narcissistic, spoiled brat who's made a career out of lies. Except he sold himself as an alpha-male (not sure how they fell for that one) patriot and a business genius. It's gotta be tough to swallow to realize you got duped by this boob. But I have a lot more respect for people that say, "Hey... I wanted change. I thought he'd bring it. Boy, was I wrong, and we can do better."
But no. Most of the posters on this board are so mentally weak they'd rather retreat further and continue to double down. Just wait... soon, he'll create a catastrophe and refuse to leave office if he loses. And they'll go along with it.
Keep talking, stupid.
We actually listen to what Trump actually said ... and don’t rely on the fucking MSM and their fucked partners in Hollywood ... to take ot out of context.
Remember when your business genius was exposed to have inherited hundreds of millions instead of his "small $1 million dollar loan" from daddy? And how he's been a financial failure his entire life?
Remember when he said Mexico would pay for a wall? Remember when you fell for it?
Remember when your Christian president is on his 3rd wife?
Remember when he slandered John McCain?
Most recently, remember when he told US politicians to go back to their original countries simply for disagreeing with how he wants to run the country?
Keep talking, stupid. We're right, you're on the wrong side of history. Pointing out your errors is too easy. You're a pathetic excuse for a man.
I can promise you someday you won’t have the balls to say it to my face.
I can promise you I will do my best to give you the opportunity.
I'll have the balls to tell you what I think of Trump, sure. But no, my internet persona is much more ballsy than me in real life. It's because we're all more free to communicate how we actually feel through the safety of a computer screen.
See how easy that was? I'm not some pussy bitch, but if we were talking face to face I guarantee we'd both be showing more respect to one another. But, typical Trump supporter you are: "I can promise you I will do my best to give you the opportunity." Really? Will ya, big boy?
Awesome. Hopefully we can meet up at a Viking event.
Have a few beers.
Ohhhhhh a thinly-veiled threat. LOOK AT THIS BAD ASS!
Idiot.
What the fuck? If being offered beer is a threat....sign me up!! In fact Id like to be threatened daily. Roughly 5Pm or so.
Quote: @KingBash said:
@ A1Janitor said:
Here you go stupid liberal sheep:
DOJ ATTORNEY SAYS RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT NOT TIED TO TROLL FARMS
A newly released transcript reveals details of a humiliating hearing that took place the day before Robert Mueller’s puzzling press conference.
“Russia interfered in the election” became such an established truth of the mainstream press that expressing skepticism would be labeled a “conspiracy theory.” But now, in open court, an attorney representing the Department of Justice has admitted that the Russian government had nothing to do with the internet troll farm case.
All over the world, private citizens try to influence American politics using Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and any other internet-based application that offers some promise of playing a role in the most important political contests in the world. Is that a bad thing? If you believe in robust free speech, it isn’t.
Should we criminalize foreigners who attempt to out Joe Biden’s son or foreigners who attempt to out Donald Trump’s son-in-law? Does your answer depend on who gets embarrassed by the information?
https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/11/doj-attorney-says-russian-government-nothing-troll-farms/
I didn't bring this up in this thread, so it isn't pertinent.
However, JIMMYINSD: A1 called me a stupid liberal sheep. Where's his reprimand?
EDIT: Just saw you're citing The Federalist. Good work! No wonder you're so incredibly misinformed.
you call him stupid and then when he responds you feel the need to ask for his reprimand... you got it wrong earlier, you are the laughable one.
A1, could you please refrain from using offensive language and respond to others with civility, even when they insist on taking a lower approach with you and your opinions?
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@ KingBash said:
@ A1Janitor said:
Here you go stupid liberal sheep:
DOJ ATTORNEY SAYS RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT NOT TIED TO TROLL FARMS
A newly released transcript reveals details of a humiliating hearing that took place the day before Robert Mueller’s puzzling press conference.
“Russia interfered in the election” became such an established truth of the mainstream press that expressing skepticism would be labeled a “conspiracy theory.” But now, in open court, an attorney representing the Department of Justice has admitted that the Russian government had nothing to do with the internet troll farm case.
All over the world, private citizens try to influence American politics using Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and any other internet-based application that offers some promise of playing a role in the most important political contests in the world. Is that a bad thing? If you believe in robust free speech, it isn’t.
Should we criminalize foreigners who attempt to out Joe Biden’s son or foreigners who attempt to out Donald Trump’s son-in-law? Does your answer depend on who gets embarrassed by the information?
https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/11/doj-attorney-says-russian-government-nothing-troll-farms/
I didn't bring this up in this thread, so it isn't pertinent.
However, JIMMYINSD: A1 called me a stupid liberal sheep. Where's his reprimand?
EDIT: Just saw you're citing The Federalist. Good work! No wonder you're so incredibly misinformed.
you call him stupid and then when he responds you feel the need to ask for his reprimand... you got it wrong earlier, you are the laughable one.
A1, could you please refrain from using offensive language and respond to others with civility, even when they insist on taking a lower approach with you and your opinions?
Sir, I will try my best, sir.
Gee, who would've thought that starting ANOTHER "orange man bad" thread would devolve into this?
Before this gets deleted or "locked"... I wanted to add 3 more things:
1. Maybe we would take accusations of racism more seriously, if they weren't made against everyone whom the Left doesn't like. Chris Pratt... a racist? OK...
2. It is mathematically miraculous that NO Democrat is EVER accused of racism (by other liberals). I've yet to find any of our resident liberals to start a thread about the racism of "one of their own" (which leads me to believe that their REAL issue isn't racism... it's being intolerant of anyone who disagrees with them and using whatever means necessary to attack/silence them). Unfortunately, that word has been thrown around so casually that it has simply ceased to mean anything.
3. Conservatives support / vote for ALOT of women and "people of color" (assuming that that is the PC way of describing them). You'd think that if "we" were racists and sexists, we wouldn't think so highly of people like Candace Owens, Condi Rice, Clarence Thomas, Colin Powell (who only fell out of favor when his ideologies tilted liberal), Herman Cain, Thomas Sowell, Sarah Palin (who was a woman that many conservatives supported- even if she was off her rocker sometimes)... to name just a few. Seems like "we" couldn't care less about skin color. What matters to us- spoiler alert- is the content of their character (i.e. whether or not their values align with our own).
And before it gets mentioned: most of the conservatives I know do NOT support Trump's personal "values". But they do support alot of his policies... and, given a choice between him and Hillary, they chose Trump. Of course, it's not like her closet was skeleton-free either; but since she was a Democrat, her past (and personal values) were never up for discussion.
With all that said, I'm out. This is no longer a discussion (ironic title). It is a 3rd grade play-ground fight: "You're a poopy- head!"... "No, you are!"
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
Sir, I will try my best, sir.
Your son is already a good influence on you. 
Quote: @savannahskol said:
@ A1Janitor said:
Sir, I will try my best, sir.
Your son is already a good influence on you.
LOL that was for your benefit.
After he was inducted, he told me he was scared.
A week later I got a letter saying it is tough but not as tough as he thought it would be.
A few days after that I got my only phone call - he loves it and has made many great friends. Whispered that it is very easy - just do as you are told.
His girlfriend got more letters than me. He told her USNA is awesome and he loves his detailers.
His intital PFT - 38 cadence pushups, 80 situps, mile and a half in 9:34, already passing grades for end of summer.
Today I was given info that he has made the rowing team - my D1 athlete! 
Phone call this Sunday, and I see him Plebe Parent Weekend in August.
Got a ton of pictures ... he already looks tough and a changed person.
I am so proud.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ KingBash said:
@ A1Janitor said:
Here you go stupid liberal sheep:
DOJ ATTORNEY SAYS RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT NOT TIED TO TROLL FARMS
A newly released transcript reveals details of a humiliating hearing that took place the day before Robert Mueller’s puzzling press conference.
“Russia interfered in the election” became such an established truth of the mainstream press that expressing skepticism would be labeled a “conspiracy theory.” But now, in open court, an attorney representing the Department of Justice has admitted that the Russian government had nothing to do with the internet troll farm case.
All over the world, private citizens try to influence American politics using Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and any other internet-based application that offers some promise of playing a role in the most important political contests in the world. Is that a bad thing? If you believe in robust free speech, it isn’t.
Should we criminalize foreigners who attempt to out Joe Biden’s son or foreigners who attempt to out Donald Trump’s son-in-law? Does your answer depend on who gets embarrassed by the information?
https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/11/doj-attorney-says-russian-government-nothing-troll-farms/
I didn't bring this up in this thread, so it isn't pertinent.
However, JIMMYINSD: A1 called me a stupid liberal sheep. Where's his reprimand?
EDIT: Just saw you're citing The Federalist. Good work! No wonder you're so incredibly misinformed.
you call him stupid and then when he responds you feel the need to ask for his reprimand... you got it wrong earlier, you are the laughable one.
A1, could you please refrain from using offensive language and respond to others with civility, even when they insist on taking a lower approach with you and your opinions?
Sir, I will try my best, sir.
thank you very much, that is all I can ask.
Quote: @pumpf said:
Gee, who would've thought that starting ANOTHER "orange man bad" thread would devolve into this?
Before this gets deleted or "locked"... I wanted to add 3 more things:
1. Maybe we would take accusations of racism more seriously, if they weren't made against everyone whom the Left doesn't like. Chris Pratt... a racist? OK...
2. It is mathematically miraculous that NO Democrat is EVER accused of racism (by other liberals). I've yet to find any of our resident liberals to start a thread about the racism of "one of their own" (which leads me to believe that their REAL issue isn't racism... it's being intolerant of anyone who disagrees with them and using whatever means necessary to attack/silence them). Unfortunately, that word has been thrown around so casually that it has simply ceased to mean anything.
3. Conservatives support / vote for ALOT of women and "people of color" (assuming that that is the PC way of describing them). You'd think that if "we" were racists and sexists, we wouldn't think so highly of people like Candace Owens, Condi Rice, Clarence Thomas, Colin Powell (who only fell out of favor when his ideologies tilted liberal), Herman Cain, Thomas Sowell, Sarah Palin (who was a woman that many conservatives supported- even if she was off her rocker sometimes)... to name just a few. Seems like "we" couldn't care less about skin color. What matters to us- spoiler alert- is the content of their character (i.e. whether or not their values align with our own).
And before it gets mentioned: most of the conservatives I know do NOT support Trump's personal "values". But they do support alot of his policies... and, given a choice between him and Hillary, they chose Trump. Of course, it's not like her closet was skeleton-free either; but since she was a Democrat, her past (and personal values) were never up for discussion.
With all that said, I'm out. This is no longer a discussion (ironic title). It is a 3rd grade play-ground fight: "You're a poopy- head!"... "No, you are!"
Whatever poopy head. Im rubber and youre glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you.
St Louis Park democrats thought repeating the pledge was to racist. Thats how stupid we’ve gotten at trying not to offend anyone, ever.
|
