Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
So no collusion.
Russia was a hoax?  

Oh Boy, even Donny admitted it today for the first time:


“Russia, Russia, Russia! That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax,” the president tweeted. “And now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected.”


"I had nothing to do WITH RUSSIA HELPING ME GET ELECTED."

Stable genius himself!!!  Even Trump finally admits Russia helped Trump get elected!!!!!!!!


So much for the hoax!   A1 and Trump humpers meltdown in 3...2...1...


LOLOLOLOLOL 


Reply

Quote: @KingBash said:
And there we have it... straight from Mueller's mouth.

No wonder you like stand-up comics so much.  Mueller's stand-up yest.  was hilarious, if not so tragic.  
First off, he gave nothing new; no new 'facts' to add to his report.  
Oh and I love how he "will not answer any questions."  lmao.  
Lindsey, haul his ass in front of Senate Judiciary committee... we got plenty o' questions, and he (Mueller) knows it. 

"If we had confidence the president clearly did NOT commit a crime, we would have said so."

As A1 said above.... that's not what prosecutors do.  "exonerate". 
They investigate and present to a grand jury... and "charge" or they do "not charge".  
For decades, that's been the American legal system modus operandus for prosecutors, at every level. 
(more to say on this topic on my reply to BigAl, below) 

Charging Trump was NOT an option because of DOJ policy. Oops!

You were surprised by that revelation?  You thought "we" were?   I said so/predicted that in this thread on here 6 months ago.  
My first post in.  https://vikefans.com/discussion/#/discussion/7545/impeachable-does-this-change-anyones-lens-probably-not/p1

Russia DID interfere in our election, despite what Trump/the WH says.

OF COURSE they interfered... no one is debating that.  Did Trump ever say that?  If he did, my bad... and I'd agree he'd be wrong.  
Now then.... feeble "interference" is a far cry from effectively "influencing" the election.  And that's an important distinction. 
It's obvious the losers of the last Prexy election would love to confuse the public about that distinction.  
Russia and others have been 'interfering' in our elections for years... and us to them.  (I'll give examples, if you want)
Obama tried to influence an Israeli election.  

Suffice to say... called it!

lol.  Kinda cute ya'll think something profound happened with Mueller's stand-up routine.  
Btw, thanks for the new tone.  I disagree with a lot of ya'll on here, but I respect ya'lls opinions. 
If'n I didn't, I wouldn't even respond.  




Reply


Quote: @BigAl99 said:
@A1Janitor said:
@BigAl99 said:
I think he said it was not the "policy" of DOJ to prosecute a sitting President, so he didn't.  Also said it was up to Congress to pursue the next action with the evidence that he has preserved.  He also stated  “if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.”.  
It is unethical for him to make that comment. 

According to Dershowitz, if he found evidence to prosecute, he should state it and make the AG invoke the presidential defense. We don’t care what he didn’t find.  

Mueller is in trouble.  He will testify.  They know he knows there was no collusion back in 2017.  He strung this along for politics.  

The whole Russian thing was a hoax.   And Mueller didn’t address that.   
What is this ethical you speak of?  Unethical is a non sequitur in this context.  
No, very pro sequitur.  Smile  
Not only is A1 right about unethical, I'd add it's un-Constitutional.  At least, extra-Constitutional, imo.    

Why?  
Our legal system gives broad latitude to law enforcement & prosecutors to build a case for indictment before a grand jury.  
In grand jury proceedings, as I hope you know, witnesses and those 'suspected' DO NOT HAVE attorney-counsel present.  
Therefore... not cross-examination, no rebuttals, no objections.  It isn't a trial.  
It's a ONE-SIDED affair.  By design.  Prosecutors are trying to determine IF they have a case (for indictment/trial). 

PROSECUTORS NEVER (if you can give me another example, I'm all ears) "NOT CHARGE"... AND THEN "CHARGE" IN THE COURT OF 
PUBLIC OPINION.  IT'S NOT DONE.  IT'S GROSSLY UNFAIR.  IT'S A ONE-SIDED STORY, UN-CHALLENGED. 

Is the President above the law?  No.  He's not below it, either.  He's afforded the same Constitutional protections as any 
other citizen.  
The 5th Amendment (the right to plead) of the Constitution was violated by Mueller, via his report/stand-up routine.  
The 6th Amendment (jury trial rights)  of the Constitution was violated by Mueller. 
Most importantly: 
The 14th Amendment (equal protection/innocent until proven guilty) of the Constitution was UTTERLY TRAMPLED UNDERFOOT
BY MUELLER.  

Don't even get me started on the fact that, according to the Special Counsel statute, that says that A PREDICATE CRIME HAS TO BE 
ESTABLISHED BEFORE THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL COUNSEL.   
(No such crime was ever specified).  = no legitimate special counsel.  

Mueller could have provided (in volume 2 of his "special" report... it was "special", all right) and included "probable cause" evidence to 
indict.... but for our DOJ guidelines.  He didn't even go that far. 

Also, Mueller was asked (by Barr)... "Would your 'no obstruction' decision -- deferred to Barr/Rosenstein-- HAD BEEN DIFFERENT, if not for 
our "no indictment of sitting POTUS" department guidelines?"  
His answer..."no".  3 times.  


People we hate still should be afforded their rights.  Yes? 
After all, even newspapers use the word "alleged" before conviction.  Except, for Trump.  

Reply

Quote: @KingBash said:
 Read Fear. It's Bob Woodward. He's not some MotherJones.com liberal feminist. He's a credible journalist that details what he's witnessed in the Trump White House. 
And Woodward said last Sunday (on FAUX NEWS, no less) .... no collusion, no obstruction.  No Trump comparisons (to Nixon) to Watergate. 
Here.  https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10153895563122168
(not on you-tube, for some reason)






Reply

Quote: @SFVikeFan said:
Russia was a hoax?  

Oh Boy, even Donny admitted it today for the first time:


“Russia, Russia, Russia! That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax,” the president tweeted. “And now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected.”


"I had nothing to do WITH RUSSIA HELPING ME GET ELECTED."

Stable genius himself!!!  Even Trump finally admits Russia helped Trump get elected!!!!!!!!


So much for the hoax!   A1 and Trump humpers meltdown in 3...2...1...


LOLOLOLOLOL 
You take aid and comfort in odd places. 

"I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected"  << your Trump pull-quote.
(total mis-representation of  anything Trump said) 

The complete quote? 
"and now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected." 

Key phrase omitted in your "gotcha"...."and now Russia has disappeared"
Poor phraseology by Trump?  for sure.  But in the full quote, he negated Russia before he empowered them (Russia). 
Yet...this is dispositive proof Trump is POTUS only because....Russia?
 
That that was an admission of anything substantive?  LMAO.

When Obama stated "corpse-man" and not "core-man" I didn't pile on.  I'm consistent.  Smile




Reply

Quote: @savannahskol said:
@SFVikeFan said:
Russia was a hoax?  

Oh Boy, even Donny admitted it today for the first time:


“Russia, Russia, Russia! That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax,” the president tweeted. “And now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected.”


"I had nothing to do WITH RUSSIA HELPING ME GET ELECTED."

Stable genius himself!!!  Even Trump finally admits Russia helped Trump get elected!!!!!!!!


So much for the hoax!   A1 and Trump humpers meltdown in 3...2...1...


LOLOLOLOLOL 
You take aid and comfort in odd places. 

"I had nothing to do with Russian helping me to get elected"  << your  pull-quote.
(equally as mis-represented as anything Trump said) 

The complete quote? 
"and now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected." 

Key phrase omitted in your "gotcha"...."and now Russia has disappeared"

Poor phraseology by Trump?  for sure.  

That that was an admission of anything substantive?  LAUGH MY FUCKING ASS OFF. 




It looks like they got us.  

Trump was able to hide Russia for two years and countless subpoenas and 19 angry democrats, and investigations by house and senate.  

And now with one careless twitter he has finally admitted his guilt.

Now I feel like I trusted him.  And now he admits RUSSIA!

HE ADMITTED RUSSIA!  LIAR!  TREASON!  RUSSIA!
Reply

Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@savannahskol said:
@SFVikeFan said:
Russia was a hoax?  

Oh Boy, even Donny admitted it today for the first time:


“Russia, Russia, Russia! That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax,” the president tweeted. “And now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected.”


"I had nothing to do WITH RUSSIA HELPING ME GET ELECTED."

Stable genius himself!!!  Even Trump finally admits Russia helped Trump get elected!!!!!!!!


So much for the hoax!   A1 and Trump humpers meltdown in 3...2...1...


LOLOLOLOLOL 
You take aid and comfort in odd places. 

"I had nothing to do with Russian helping me to get elected"  << your  pull-quote.
(equally as mis-represented as anything Trump said) 

The complete quote? 
"and now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected." 

Key phrase omitted in your "gotcha"...."and now Russia has disappeared"

Poor phraseology by Trump?  for sure.  

That that was an admission of anything substantive?  LAUGH MY FUCKING ASS OFF. 




It looks like they got us.  


You know, they didn't. lol.   

As you've said... Barr retribution is clearly on the horizon. 

Wanna be here, when it happens.  Smile




Reply

Nope! Proven right!

You support Trump = you're pro-Russia/anti-America.

But keep changing your story hahahaha
Reply

Quote: @savannahskol said:
@SFVikeFan said:
Russia was a hoax?  

Oh Boy, even Donny admitted it today for the first time:


“Russia, Russia, Russia! That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax,” the president tweeted. “And now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected.”


"I had nothing to do WITH RUSSIA HELPING ME GET ELECTED."

Stable genius himself!!!  Even Trump finally admits Russia helped Trump get elected!!!!!!!!


So much for the hoax!   A1 and Trump humpers meltdown in 3...2...1...


LOLOLOLOLOL 
You take aid and comfort in odd places. 

"I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected"  << your Trump pull-quote.
(total mis-representation of  anything Trump said) 

The complete quote? 
"and now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected." 

Key phrase omitted in your "gotcha"...."and now Russia has disappeared"
Poor phraseology by Trump?  for sure.  But in the full quote, he negated Russia before he empowered them (Russia). 
Yet...this is dispositive proof Trump is POTUS only because....Russia?
 
That that was an admission of anything substantive?  LMAO.

When Obama stated "corpse-man" and not "core-man" I didn't pile on.  I'm consistent.  Smile




Stop being a dumbass.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/11/politics/...index.html

"I asked Vlad, he said he didn't do it"

He said he didn't meddle. He said he didn't meddle. I asked him again. You can only ask so many times," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he flew from Da Nang to Hanoi in Vietnam. Trump spoke to Putin three times on the sidelines of summit here, where the Russia meddling issue arose.
"Every time he sees me, he says, 'I didn't do that,' " Trump said. "And I believe, I really believe, that when he tells me that, he means it."


https://www.theatlantic.com/internationa...ck/565445/



As the controversy grew, Trump acknowledged during a September 2016 presidential debate with Clinton, then the Democratic presidential nominee, that “it could be Russia,” but he immediately added: “But it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds, okay?” This is a theme he repeated in a subsequent presidential debate, saying that Clinton had “no idea whether it is Russia, China, or anybody else.”



Soon after his election, Trump said it “could” be Russia or China, “and it could be some guy in his home in New Jersey.” Several times during his presidency, Trump has said he thinks Russia was behind the hack, but has then immediately added a statement like, “And I think it could have been other people and other countries. It could have been a lot of people interfered.”





The first stage is denial, the second is acceptance. 


Trump was making progress, until he tweeted 30 minutes later and walked back his previous acknowledgment that Russia helped his campaign. 


How the fuck do you guys justify him siding with Russians over Americans, let alone keep up with  his flip flopping??
Russia didn't do it ... ok they helped my election ... no wait no they didn't.   
LOLOLOLOL 


SO FUCKING GULLIBLE IT HURTS
Reply

LMAO 

A for effort.  
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.