Quote: @KingBash said:
You prolly called me (or A1) a name, then deleted. That's ok... I'm the King of deleted posts.
BTW, you're a cantaloupe. 
Quote: @savannahskol said:
@ KingBash said:
You prolly called me (or A1) a name, then deleted. That's ok... I'm the King of deleted posts.
BTW, you're a cantaloupe.
Correct, it was getting too nasty. I deleted and PM'd A1.
Quote: @savannahskol said:
Well...looky here.
Looks like Trump was vindicated today by none other than buzzfeed regarding a past fake-news event.
https:// twitter.com/JasonLeopold/status/1133391265222025218
tweets don't post here, so can find the link in these stories:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/...e-of-rain/
or
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/05...fake-news/
(sorry for the right wing links.....couldn't find a story to link to from MSM)
We visited this topic, on VF. Here. https://vikefans.com/discussion/#/discus...outrage/p1
Any apologies in order? B)
Oh and btw...there had to be many cancellations of the Gray Lady's subscriptions, with this admission.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/27/opini...lwind.html
If your pay-walled, here's the topic, via Slate.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019...-2020.html
"Fair isn’t the only modeler to see Trump with a clear advantage in 2020. Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics analyzed 12 models and found that Trump comes out on top in all of them. Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics analyzed the Electoral College and came to the same conclusion."
That's gotta hurt. 
LMAO
Big fucking whoop the flight was cancelled by the Navy.
The whole point was there was no backup plan for inclement weather, which is a standard with previous administrations. Funny you left out the fact the Chief of Staff from Trump's administration went by car and made it there with no issues.
And I will repeat EXACTLY what I posted then too:
The same way that John Kelly managed to make the ceremony, along with the other global leaders. It's called a contingency plan in case of rain, something done by every previous administration. You go by car, you carpool with John Kelly who had no problems making it to the ceremony.
And then Trump skipped Arlington Cemetery on Veterans Day for the 2nd year in a row. What's the excuse for that?
And last week Trump was golfing on Memorial Day in Japan - what a patriot! That same Memorial Day weekend Trump lavished praise on an enemy dictator in North Korea who has murdered an American, taking his side to throw shade at Joe Biden accusing Biden of being low IQ - when Trump can't even spell BidAn/BidEN correctly.
Or achomlishments.
Or covfefe.
Or the "oranges" of the investigation.
What a stable genius, can't figure out how to get from Point A to B without a helicopter. That's what we should apologize for??
LOLOLOLOL
And yes it hurts. Tremendously. It hurts my head watching you gullible lemmings grasping at straws making excuses for that piece of shit traitor. The sad part is Savannah you're educated, you should know better ... and yet you continue to find new and creative ways to excuse the incompetent asshole traitor occupying the WH.
And there we have it... straight from Mueller's mouth.
"If we had confidence the president clearly did NOT commit a crime, we would have said so."
Charging Trump was NOT an option because of DOJ policy. Oops!
Russia DID interfere in our election, despite what Trump/the WH says.
Suffice to say... called it!
LOL Whether Russia interfered in 2016 election or any other US election prior to that; or whether the US interferes in other cou tries elections - is a red herring. Mueller said Trump wasn’t involved.
One party paid a foreign national who took disinformation from Russians and used it for the purpose of influencing the election ... it wasn’t the republicans.
Prosecutors don’t declare the innocence of men - its unethical. Either you find guilt and prosecute or you don’t.
That was all a political stunt. They want him impeached. And if we are patient and keep watching ... we will see why.
News broke yesterday that Britain intelligence contacted US and told them Steele is not credible. Let’s see who did what with that.
I think he said it was not the "policy" of DOJ to prosecute a sitting President, so he didn't. Also said it was up to Congress to pursue the next action with the evidence that he has preserved. He also stated “if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.”.
Quote: @BigAl99 said:
I think he said it was not the "policy" of DOJ to prosecute a sitting President, so he didn't. Also said it was up to Congress to pursue the next action with the evidence that he has preserved. He also stated “if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.”.
It is unethical for him to make that comment.
According to Dershowitz, if he found evidence to prosecute, he should state it and make the AG invoke the presidential defense. We don’t care what he didn’t find.
Mueller is in trouble. He will testify. They know he knows there was no collusion back in 2017. He strung this along for politics.
The whole Russian thing was a hoax. And Mueller didn’t address that.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@ BigAl99 said:
I think he said it was not the "policy" of DOJ to prosecute a sitting President, so he didn't. Also said it was up to Congress to pursue the next action with the evidence that he has preserved. He also stated “if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.”.
It is unethical for him to make that comment.
According to Dershowitz, if he found evidence to prosecute, he should state it and make the AG invoke the presidential defense. We don’t care what he didn’t find.
Mueller is in trouble. He will testify. They know he knows there was no collusion back in 2017. He strung this along for politics.
The whole Russian thing was a hoax. And Mueller didn’t address that.
What is this ethical you speak of? Unethical is a non sequitur in this context.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
LOL Whether Russia interfered in 2016 election or any other US election prior to that; or whether the US interferes in other cou tries elections - is a red herring. Mueller said Trump wasn’t involved.
One party paid a foreign national who took disinformation from Russians and used it for the purpose of influencing the election ... it wasn’t the republicans.
Prosecutors don’t declare the innocence of men - its unethical. Either you find guilt and prosecute or you don’t.
That was all a political stunt. They want him impeached. And if we are patient and keep watching ... we will see why.
News broke yesterday that Britain intelligence contacted US and told them Steele is not credible. Let’s see who did what with that.
The party is over. I'll just copy and paste my earlier post:
Quote:And there we have it... straight from Mueller's mouth.
"If we had confidence the president clearly did NOT commit a crime, we would have said so."
Charging Trump was NOT an option because of DOJ policy. Oops!
Russia DID interfere in our election, despite what Trump/the WH says.
Suffice to say... called it!
You were wrong! Sorry, bucko! Hahahaha! God it's the gift that keeps on giving watching you justify this. You're hilarious, my friend.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@ BigAl99 said:
I think he said it was not the "policy" of DOJ to prosecute a sitting President, so he didn't. Also said it was up to Congress to pursue the next action with the evidence that he has preserved. He also stated “if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.”.
It is unethical for him to make that comment.
According to Dershowitz, if he found evidence to prosecute, he should state it and make the AG invoke the presidential defense. We don’t care what he didn’t find.
Mueller is in trouble. He will testify. They know he knows there was no collusion back in 2017. He strung this along for politics.
The whole Russian thing was a hoax. And Mueller didn’t address that.
According to Dershowitz ...
And there's your problem. You only listen to Fox News muppets for Trump.
Mueller has no power to bring charges. Neither does the AG or the DOJ. This is the big issue you fail to understand. Evidence of crimes doesn't matter because they can't bring charges to a sitting President. All they can do is provide information and evidence to Congress and let Congress decide to bring charges for impeachment.
It's amazing if all this was a hoax, why didn't Trump let it play out? Why obstruct justice, which he did repeatedly? Why lie - which he did repeatedly. Why did your campaign staff lie and go to jail for it? Why did you instruct people to lie on your behalf?
This is not the behavior of an innocent man, it's the behavior of a paranoid person that's guilty.
Oh, but Mueller was unethical???
LMAO
The sheer stupidity of the mental gymnastics you're doing here to defend that traitorous piece of shit is impressive. Even the Russian judges would give you a 10!
LOLOLOLOL
|
