Oh the mental gymnastics involved.
Refuses to let McGahn testify. Now weaponizes the AG to direct what political enemies to pursue. An AG who is a proven partisan hack with a track record of protecting presidents and pushing to pardon criminals already convicted. A man who has already proven he will only cherry pick information to release that is most damaging to the opposition while completely ignoring any information that puts his side in a bad light.
There goes democracy and justice ... America you had a good run.
And A1 continues to ignore all of Trump's obstructionism and criminal activities in joyful glee that he's going after our own intelligence agencies because they dared to do their jobs, while he fucking lied over and over about his contacts and interests in Russia.
Don't spank your monkey just yet, you're ignoring the half dozen investigations into Donny Fuckups charity abuses, tax evasion and inauguration pay to play schemes.
I find it hysterical that you think you're on the brink of winning something.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
LOL
The fucking pussy doesn’t want access when the info drops soon - he might have to be man enough to admit he is stupid
when I am proven right.
Fuck you. You goddamn stupid simpleton.
It is all coming.
And I can’t wait to see your words.
Pussy.
Someone ban me. I need my snowflake safe place.
Ah, I'm just fuckin' around. Perhaps we got off on the wrong foot.
Trump's Twitter feed this morning, from "the greatest President ever" according to A1:
https://twitter.com/sadmonsters/status/1...53/photo/1
What's more disturbing:
Trump once again supported Kim after the president said he “ fired off some small weapons.” Those were the same weapons tests that National Security Adviser John Bolton warned on Friday violated United Nations Security Council resolutions.
#1. Not giving a shit about a dictator who just murdered a US citizen and is now openly conducting missile weapons testing in plain sight, violating UN resolutions, and knowing Trump will refuse to confront Kim, protect America or our allies ...
# 2 Or the claim that Kim Jong un called "Joe BidAn" ... LMAO ... "low IQ". He can't even fucking spell but he calls other people low IQ. Classic projection by Trump again.
This is the President of the United States ladies and gentlemen.... and yet his supporters somehow don't feel any shame or embarrassment for his teenage girl Twitter attacks, or the fact he can't spell "achomlishments" or even Joe "Bidan" correctly.
And this is why Trump gets openly laughed at by world leaders, and the rest of the world can't comprehend how utterly fucking retarded you have to be to still support the stupidest, most embarrassing piece of shit excuse for a "leader" in the history of the entire world.
Clearly Trump has dementia and his gullible followers are inflicted with Stockholm syndrome and can't admit what an embarrassing trainwreck he is.
No matter how stupid he is, he beat Hillary in his first political race.
No matter, we all can agree that he shouldn’t be spied on.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
No matter how stupid he is, he beat Hillary in his first political race.
No matter, we all can agree that he shouldn’t be spied on.
That speaks volumes to his gullible supporters who are so easily duped by actual "fake news", like birther conspiracy theories, and scream "fake news" about facts that they don't want to believe.
And honestly, if you think it's a good idea to prevent our NSA, CIA and FBI from monitoring our enemies I question your patriotism. If political candidates are reaching out to our enemies, asking for dirt on their opponents, accepting offers for dirt (and most likely giving perks in exchange), and then lying about it ... you're goddamn right we better keep an eye on their corrupt asses - REGARDLESS OF PARTY.
So no, we don't agree apparently.
How do I post a video here? I think some sheep like kingbash will switch sides if he listens to this one video.
Zanary is intellectually dishonest so he won’t listen. It would expose him as a fake libertarian.
SF doesn’t have the mental capacity to understand anything ... so he can ignore it.
Quote: @SFVikeFan said:
@ A1Janitor said:
No matter how stupid he is, he beat Hillary in his first political race.
No matter, we all can agree that he shouldn’t be spied on.
That speaks volumes to his gullible supporters who are so easily duped by actual "fake news", like birther conspiracy theories, and scream "fake news" about facts that they don't want to believe.
And honestly, if you think it's a good idea to prevent our NSA, CIA and FBI from monitoring our enemies I question your patriotism. If political candidates are reaching out to our enemies, asking for dirt on their opponents, accepting offers for dirt (and most likely giving perks in exchange), and then lying about it ... you're goddamn right we better keep an eye on their corrupt asses - REGARDLESS OF PARTY.
So no, we don't agree apparently.
What you are ignoring ... there were no “russians”. They were western intelligence assets. And they pretended they were russian.
Just understand that. THEY WEREN’T MONITORING OUR ENEMIES. THEY WERE MONITORING JUDGES, TRUMP CAMPAIGN, JOURNALISTS, SCOTUS, CONGRESS.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
No matter how stupid he is, he beat Hillary in his first political race.
No matter, we all can agree that he shouldn’t be spied on.
I had an interesting discussion last night with friends about Trump. My buddy, who's very anti-Trump, raised the argument: "If Trump were a Democrat, and he were pushing forward our policies we care about (our biggest concern is environmental regulations), would you support him?"
My answer was, "Yes." Sheepishly, yes. Let's be real, Trump's politics don't mean shit to him. He's interested in people like him. If the DNC had gotten to him decades ago and put this bug in his head, it's very possible he'd be espousing more liberal causes. Because, you know, he's a fucking salesman that certain people fall for.
However, having said that I'd support him if he were pushing causes/legislation I cared about, I'd at least acknowledge how much of a fucking moron the guy is. We're surviving on the competent people that surround him right now. Read Fear. It's Bob Woodward. He's not some MotherJones.com liberal feminist. He's a credible journalist that details what he's witnessed in the Trump White House.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
How do I post a video here? I think some sheep like kingbash will switch sides if he listens to this one video.
Zanary is intellectually dishonest so he won’t listen. It would expose him as a fake libertarian.
SF doesn’t have the mental capacity to understand anything ... so he can ignore it.
What, are you gonna post the video of Pelosi being "drunk?" You fucking retard. That's fake. Everybody knows it's fucking fake. I could literally replicate that video in Adobe Audition in less than 10 minutes. That's my job in video editing. None of that shit is tough. You simpleton fuck.
If you fell for that, you're just as stupid as I hoped you weren't. Cunt.
Why haven't I been banned?
I haven’t followed the Pelosi tapes.
This is a 30 minute tape that lays out the truth about what happened.
Don’t worry about fake news fact checkers and sheep that denounce the source. Listen to the tape and dispute anything they say. I have seen evidence to suggest they are right.
|
