Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
So no collusion.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
LOL

Pay attention to why there is denial.  19 Hillary donors, all angry democrats, got millions of documents, unfettered access to everything.  THEY said Trump didn’t collude with Russia.  THEY couldn’t prosecute for obstruction.  

The dems are searching for a crime.  That isn’t how it is done.  Name the crime.  He has been exonerrated by the AG for obstruction and by SC for Russia collusion.

Time has run out.  We need to see why Obama was spying.  It wasn’t Russia.  And we can figure out the Tarnac meeting and those emails.  Bu an honest prosecutor.  

I still don’t want Confused Zanary peeing in the public bathroom  where women pee. Ya weirdo.  
"Confused Zanary"...wow, golly, just like "Crooked Hillary"...spoken by someone that'd likely struggle through Dick and Jane books!

Scarily, there's a prominent politician in our country that is that much of a babbling simpleton and he has a devoted fan club...pretty tragic for all involved.

For all the talk of "no collusion" and "no obstruction", only people in Cheeto-boi's pockets make those proclamations (well, and their paste-eating fan club).  It sounds like the jury, potentially many of them, are still out.

At least we have an honest...oh, whoops, no...OK, a transparent...er...nope, trying to hide info and deny access to his circle...

...I'm sorry, but what kind of trash defends that, again?

On the same topic...it's been $35 million and 2 years...make a fuggin' decision, and maybe get back to the actual governing?

The moron-a-thon continues.
Reply

Piss in your own bathroom, fella.  This bathroom is about No Russian Collusion. 

Ya weirdo.  
Reply

Quote: @A1Janitor said:
Piss in your own bathroom, fella.  This bathroom is about No Russian Collusion. 

Ya weirdo.  
I've never had bathroom confustion...but then, I've never been a GOP senator propositioning men in bathrooms, either.

I'm sure you and Larry Craig would make a dashing couple

In any case, I brought up collusion topics...but you ignored them, as you've just ignored numerous topics in this thread that have pissed all over your strange, neolithic "points".

Anyway, congrats on your "best ever prez" stonewalling infrastructure while he has his latest little bitchy tantrum.  It's kinda easy to see why he has the fans he has.
Reply

Quote: @Zanary said:
@A1Janitor said:
Piss in your own bathroom, fella.  This bathroom is about No Russian Collusion. 

Ya weirdo.  
I've never had bathroom confustion...but then, I've never been a GOP senator propositioning men in bathrooms, either.

I'm sure you and Larry Craig would make a dashing couple

In any case, I brought up collusion topics...but you ignored them, as you've just ignored numerous topics in this thread that have pissed all over your strange, neolithic "points".

Anyway, congrats on your "best ever prez" stonewalling infrastructure while he has his latest little bitchy tantrum.  It's kinda easy to see why he has the fans he has.
And in the end, ya weird fellow, President Trump has more electoral fans than Hillary, Jill Stein, and Gary Johnson combined.  It’s very easy to see because he is the Dear Leader, after all.  

Why do I need to read and respond to a confused bathroom user about Russian collusion?  Mueller was given that task.  He said there was none. 

Ya mentally ill weirdo.  
Reply

Quote: @Zanary said:
At least we have an honest...oh, whoops, no...OK, a transparent...er...nope, trying to hide info and deny access to his circle...

...I'm sorry, but what kind of trash defends that, again?

I'm that kinda trash.  

On this topic, ya gotta be kidding me, Z.  
Trump gave UNPRECEDENTED COOPERATION to Mueller, et al.  
Even giving Don McGahn (sp?), Trump's personal attorney at the time... 30 HOURS of testimony.  

^^ Imagine that!  Trump ( burned by Cohen singing like a canary & not recognizing attorney/client privilege) let  Mueller have 
5 days of unfettered testimony from his attorney of record.  

The recent Presidents that invoked Executive Privilege (on personal investigations) were: (link)
Nixon: 1 (lost invocation @ SCOTUS over the "tapes")
Reagan:  0
GHW Bush: 0
Clinton:  14 (lost invocation at federal court level) 
GW Bush: 0  (well.... 3 ....actually  invoked for Cheney, Bolten and Rove, not himself) 
Obama: 1 (Holder, Fast & Furious)
Trump: 1 
On Trump's 1:  
Trump gave Mueller 1.4 million pages of documents, 20 WhiteHouse witnesses, 8 witnesses from WhiteHouse counsel's office, 
and, again, NOTABLY... unfettered access to Trump's personal attorney (McGahn) .  
MUELLER COULD HAVE CLAIMED INTERFERENCE WITH HIS INVESTIGATION/REPORT.  HE DIDN'T. 
Did Mueller want a "sit-down" with Trump?  Yes.  Did he get it?  No.  
Did Mueller pursue the "sit-down" to the SCOTUS?  No, he didn't.  He would have lost.  

Is Trump NOW invoking Executive privilege vs Congressional subpoena(s)?  Yes. 
Why the hell would a President forgo Executive-branch  balance of power privilege to an opposition (Congressional) party access to your personal  attorney? 
Trump gave PROSECUTOR MUELLER full access to his attorneys, and it was the right thing to do. 

You saying Trump is trying to "hide/deny access" is both tone-deaf wrong (Mueller) and Constitutionally-ignorant (Separation of Powers). 

I agree with Scalia.  The separation of powers doctrine is our most important constitutional distinction.  












On the same topic...it's been $35 million and 2 years...make a fuggin' decision, and maybe get back to the actual governing?

The moron-a-thon continues.

I don't get it.  You stated above, you think Trump is "stone-walling" Congress....with you taking up the Dem "talking points" of "obstruction/COVER-UP" 
Aid & comfort to the House Dems, no?  
And in the next sentence, you're mad at DC for not moving on &  "governing"?  
Pick a fight, bro.  

Reply

Scalia was brilliant.  
Reply

Yet, as so very many reports have stated, Trump himself was all for obstruction...but his people refused to carry out his dumbass orders:

"Mueller report: The President’s efforts to influence the investigation were mostly unsuccessful, but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the President declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests. [Former FBI Director James] Comey did not end the investigation of [Retired Lt. Gen. Michael] Flynn, which ultimately resulted in Flynn’s prosecution and conviction for lying to the FBI. [White House counsel Don] McGahn did not tell the Acting Attorney General that the Special Counsel must be removed, but was instead prepared to resign over the President’s order. [Former campaign manager Corey] Lewandowski and [Trump campaign official Rick] Dearborn did not deliver the President’s message to Sessions that he should confine the Russia investigation to future election meddling only. And McGahn refused to recede from his recollections about events surrounding the President’s direction to have the Special Counsel removed, despite the President’s multiple demands that he do so. Consistent with that pattern, the evidence we obtained would not support potential obstruction charges against the President’s aides and associates beyond those already filed."

So...the King Snowflake needed better people than himself (easily found, that's almost all there are) to keep him from crossing the line into territory that would have been easily prosecuted; as it is, it's his position and NOT his "innocence" that complicates bringing charges against him.

With all the skidmarks he's left in his wake over the years, the lies...fraud...failure to pay employees...pissing away over $1 billion...shameless misogyny...and basically being his own satire in his incredible collection of lies/distortions/full-on stupid statements (all of which are public domain information)...

...I can't understand how anyone can be in that fan club.
Reply

Yet you don’t understand obstruction.  What was the obstruction?

The president has the right to fire Comey or anyone else in the Executive branch and it is not obstruction.  

The president has the right to fire Mueller.  And replace him.  And he didn’t.  He has the right to let off steam that Mueller should be replaced BECAUSE he was conflicted. 

The spying on Flynn was illegal.  Strzok and another assclown interviewed him and said they thought he wasn’t lying.  The 302 report was altered.  The whole investigation of Flynn was a hoax.  

Mueller was not obstructed and found no collusion.  In fact, the whole collusion shit was a hoax.  

Keep watching.   We are getting close.  
Reply

Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@KingBash said:
@A1Janitor said:
LOL what was Alabama thinking passing laws without the blessing of ZanJohnsonsteinLGBQT.

Go piss in whatever toilet you want in California ya weirdo.

Please let’s bring this back to Russia Hoax.  Stop riling the libs. 
Since you love to divert to Hillary so much, were you one of the ones that were furious over the personal email account scandal?
She deleted 33k government emails that were related to her Secretary of State position after a subpoena.  

1.  A private server is illegal for a reason ... it hides what she is doing. 

2.  Deleting government property is a crime - obstruction of justice.  

3.  It is apparent she was involved in oay to play schemes while secretary of state.  We need to see those emails. 

I predict we will find out the Russia Hoax was started chiefly to cover up the role of the deep state in her email scam and to tie up Trump from learning the truth and prosecuting her and them.  

Keep your eye on Biden’s kid and Ukraine and China.  

Keep your eye on the rats turning on each ofher ... Lynch and Comey are blaming each other, as are Comey and Brennan.
A simple yes would've sufficed.

I'm sure you're just as angry over Betsy Devos and other Trump staffers doing the exact same thing down to a T then? Since you're fair, right? Glad we agree on something. I hope we start chanting, Lock her up!" about Devos soon. You can start those war cries.
Reply

Quote: @KingBash said:
@A1Janitor said:
@KingBash said:
@A1Janitor said:
LOL what was Alabama thinking passing laws without the blessing of ZanJohnsonsteinLGBQT.

Go piss in whatever toilet you want in California ya weirdo.

Please let’s bring this back to Russia Hoax.  Stop riling the libs. 
Since you love to divert to Hillary so much, were you one of the ones that were furious over the personal email account scandal?
She deleted 33k government emails that were related to her Secretary of State position after a subpoena.  

1.  A private server is illegal for a reason ... it hides what she is doing. 

2.  Deleting government property is a crime - obstruction of justice.  

3.  It is apparent she was involved in oay to play schemes while secretary of state.  We need to see those emails. 

I predict we will find out the Russia Hoax was started chiefly to cover up the role of the deep state in her email scam and to tie up Trump from learning the truth and prosecuting her and them.  

Keep your eye on Biden’s kid and Ukraine and China.  

Keep your eye on the rats turning on each ofher ... Lynch and Comey are blaming each other, as are Comey and Brennan.
A simple yes would've sufficed.

I'm sure you're just as angry over Betsy Devos and other Trump staffers doing the exact same thing down to a T then? Since you're fair, right? Glad we agree on something. I hope we start chanting, Lock her up!" about Devos soon. You can start those war cries.
It is not the same.  Hillary set up an illegal server to hide her Secretary of State pay to play scam.  The Chinese, among others, got her emails.  There was classified information that was on the server illegally.  The Chinese killed American assets.  When Podesta fell for a fishing scam, those emails ended up with Wikileaks.  Classified emails were found on Weiner’s laptop.   Someone downloaded DNC files and gave them to Wikileaks.  When she was investigated, she was asked for those 33k emails.  she deleted them, destroyed devices, and bleach bit her hard drives, in violation of subpoena.  

The FBI covered it up, and Obama created the Russian Hoax to overthrow Trump to hide all of this.  

Did Betsy delete those emails or turn them over?  Using a personal email and not deleting them is different than Hillary.  

Let’s get the emails.   Let’s see if the 33k was bad.  Let’s see if they were all personal wedding pictures of Webb’s daughter.  

Let’s go after the criminals.  
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.