So no collusion.

[Guest]

[Guest]

Absolutely stupid shit.  People that are pro-life aren’t trying to control “women’s bodies”.  They want to end the barbaric process of killing babies.  

I once asked a lesbian friend how she would feel if they identified the gay gene ... would she support abortions to kill babies because they were gay.  She was horrified.  That shouldn’t be allowed.

Is this the real reason people are keeping the “russian hoax” going?  To protect women’s right to kill babies?

Promises made.  Promises kept.  Conservative, pro-life judges. 

Lower taxes and regulations.  Great unemployment numbers.   Wages going up.  Prison reform.   

Take your orange cheese Russia racism bullshit and shove it up your fake libertarian progressive ass.   Best president ever.  

[Guest]

@A1Janitor said:
Absolutely stupid shit.  People that are pro-life aren’t trying to control “women’s bodies”.  They want to end the barbaric process of killing babies.  

I once asked a lesbian friend how she would feel if they identified the gay gene ... would she support abortions to kill babies because they were gay.  She was horrified.  That shouldn’t be allowed.

Is this the real reason people are keeping the “russian hoax” going?  To protect women’s right to kill babies?

Promises made.  Promises kept.  Conservative, pro-life judges. 

Lower taxes and regulations.  Great unemployment numbers.   Wages going up.  Prison reform.   

Take your orange cheese Russia racism bullshit and shove it up your fake libertarian progressive ass.   Best president ever.  

Because forcing a woman to conceive the child of her rapist is not barbaric. 

Because allowing her rapist to decide whether she can give up her child for adoption is not barbaric. 

Because giving her rapist custody rights to allow him access to her child  and do God knows what with it is not barbaric. 

Because the same states usually have the death penalty, but electric chair and lethal injection is not barbaric?

Spare us your hypocritical bullshit.  It's 100% about control.  

Mexico won't pay for the wall.  No heatlhcare plan, despite Day 1 promised.  No tax returns released.  Most days golfing in history in only 2 years, despite promise he won't have time.  Still Tweeting, despite promise he'd stop if elected.  

Allows Russians to infiltrate our election, does nothing to safeguard future elections.  Declares North Korea no longer a threat. Too cowardly to do anything about Saudis killing a US resident and father of American children.  

$27 billion in bailouts to farmers, farmers bankruptcies at 10 year high and on verge of becoming worse. 


Not to mention the 10,000 lies, the international embarrassments, the welcoming of Russians to the Oval office with no press ... there's plenty to hate without mentioning Russian collusion.


Fuck you and your fake ass President of failures.

[Guest]

Heh...well, Trumplestilskin doesn't agree with the new anti-abortion laws regarding incest, rape, and the well-being of the mother (the Grumpy Old Protectionists rarely give two shits about mothers), so this should be a fun dumpster fire to watch:

the babbling, lying, deficit-inflating, golf-vacationing, fraudulent, hypocritical, cheez-dusted maximum snowflake (any time confronted with his lies) vs the bible-thumping, non-educating, hypocritical, strongholds of "white nationalism" (known as spineless racists in learned circles)!

Stay tuned, folks, this oughta be messy for some time...!

[Guest]

Apparently you dumb assholes aren’t paying attention to the news on the spying scandal.  You will see. 

And ftr I am anti-dealth penalty.  

[Guest]

Donald Trump in 2000 interview with Advocate magazine:

Last fall Donald Trump shook up the political world by announcing he was joining the Reform Party, a major step in exploring a run for president. The pundits laughed, claiming that the real estate mogul knew more about glamour than politics, but Trump made a number of television and personal appearances that showed his proposed candidacy was no joke. Privately, friends speculated he was bored with the real estate business. In January Trump published The America We Deserve, which outlines his vision for the nation. Anyone who thinks his candidacy is a joke, he says, should read the book. For moderates in the Reform Party, Trump has emerged as their best hope of stopping Pat Buchanan from winning the party’s presidential nomination. With his name recognition and record in business, Trump could prove a wild card in the presidential race, appealing to people tired of politics as usual. Recently I put a wide-ranging set of questions to Trump concerning gay issues, to which Trump responded in writing. His answers might surprise some pundits, both for their thoroughness and for their bluntness.
Are you serious about running? 
Yes, I’m quite serious. Washington is in gridlock, and nothing is getting done. No health care reform, no tax relief, no campaign finance reform. The special interests run the country. I think it will take a nonpolitician to break the logjam. Somebody with a big-picture outlook. I’m someone who has built a billion-dollar business enterprise and created hundreds of thousands of jobs. I have made the tough decisions, always with an eye toward the bottom line. Perhaps it’s time America was run like a business.
Why should gays and lesbians be interested in you as a presidential candidate?
I grew up in New York City, a town with different races, religions, and peoples. It breeds tolerance. In all truth, I don’t care whether or not a person is gay. I judge people based on their capability, honesty, and merit. Being in the entertainment business — that is, owning casinos and … several large beauty pageants — I’ve worked with many gay people. I have met some tough, talented, capable, terrific people. Their lifestyle is of no interest to me.
Would we see gay people in a Trump administration?
I would want the best and brightest. Sexual orientation would be meaningless. I’m looking for brains and experience. If the best person for the job happens to be gay, I would certainly appoint them. One of the key problems today is that politics is such a disgrace, good people don’t go into government. I’d want to change that.
What would you do to combat antigay prejudice?
I like the idea of amending the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include a ban of discrimination based on sexual orientation. It would be simple. It would be straightforward. We don’t need to rewrite the laws currently on the books, although I do think we need to address hate-crimes legislation. But amending the Civil Rights Act would grant the same protection to gay people that we give to other Americans — it’s only fair. I actually suggested this first, and now I see [Democratic presidential candidate] Bill Bradley has jumped on the bandwagon and is claiming the idea as his own. [A bill to amend the Civil Rights Act that would have included protections on the basis of sexual orientation was first introduced in the 1970s. — Ed.] Let me tell you something. Bradley is as phony as a $20 Rolex. He says the president ought to have big ideas. His last big idea — the 1986 [Tax Reform Act] — caused a recession and cost thousands of people their jobs. This guy destroyed the real estate industry, and he tanked the S&Ls. It was a disaster. Bradley walked out of the Senate like he was some kind of statesman declaring that “politics is broken.” The truth is, the voters were going to dump him in New Jersey. He walked away. Now he poses as some kind of outsider. What a joke. Bradley was a member of the Senate Finance Committee and a longtime part of Washington establishment. When I was $900 million and my companies were $9 billion in debt, I didn’t walk away. While others were declaring bankruptcy, I clawed my way back. My businesses are now bigger and better than ever.
Are your gay employees allowed to be out?
Everyone makes a personal choice. Look, it just doesn’t matter to me. I try to treat everybody equal and fairly. Maybe that’s why I can count men like Muhammad Ali, Joe Frazier, and Sammy Sosa as my friends. When you hang with people who are different from you, you get an appreciation for other cultures.

[Guest]

Well, what about Obama and Hillary on gay marriage rights?

Between LGBT Pride Month and the impending Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage, politicians have plenty of opportunities to speak on gay rights this week. Hillary Clinton's campaign is list-building off the upcoming decision...

...while President Obama spoke at an LGBT Pride event at the White House Wednesday, where he noted that the number of states in which same-sex couples can marry has grown from two when he took office to 37 today.
"A decade ago politicians ran against LGBT rights; today, they're running towards them," he said.
What was left unsaid, of course, was that he and Clinton are among those who used to run against same-sex marriage but have since changed their tune.
Obama came out in support of same-sex marriage in 2012, and Clinton in 2013, half a decade after a majority of Democrats already supported it in public polling. But you wouldn't know about that from hearing them talk about just how much the issue means to them today.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/06/26/obama-and-clinton-love-to-celebrate-gay-marriage-now-heres-how-late-they-were-to-the-party/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6615e63d00fc

[Guest]

So Trump came out supporting gay marriage and gay rights in 2000 when both Hillary and Obama were against it. 

What will be lost on Zanjohnsonsteinlbgtq is that Trump was talking about his beliefs supporting gays when he wasn’t running.  Obama and Clinton came out in support decades later based on polling.  

And they will pretend he is racist - when before he ran blacks loved him. 

Good thing Obama passed legislation to fix prison reform to help many blacks unfairly jailed.  Or pardoned black people.  Oh wait - that was Trump.  Obama and Clinton want the black and gay vote.  Trump wants fairness for all.  

RUSSIA ORANGE MAN BAD.   The truth makes you idiot MSM sheeple look stupid.  

[Guest]

@A1Janitor said:
Apparently you dumb assholes aren’t paying attention to the news on the spying scandal.  You will see. 

And ftr I am anti-dealth penalty.  

Sorry I don't tune into Hannity and Judicial Watch.

Don't care either.  You seem completely unaware that it's entirely possible that even if the "oranges" of the investigation were done under false pretenses, it still doesn't excuse Trump's welcoming of Russian assistance, his lying about it, his coercion of witnesses, and his numerous cases of obstruction to stop it.

This is what makes you such colossal dumbass.  You think if Trump's lapdog AG can dig up dirt on the FBI it will somehow excuse all Trump's own misdeeds and crimes.  Because you have such  a gay hard-on for Trump you have this bizarre need to deflect any of his own criminal behavior. 


All this from a guy who we all know has zero education, calling the rest of us stupid.

If only you understood the definition of irony this would be rather comical but I realize you're just a hopeless idiot suffering from Dunning-Kruger. 

[Guest]

LMAO I have probably done something that very few lawyers have done, and probably no non-lawyer has done.  

Judicial Watch is a great orgainzation.  They promote transparency in government.   

Who cares what you think about Russia - Mueller said there was no collusion.  

Who cares what you think about obstruction - Bill Barr said there was no obstruction. 

Now the people who spied on the Trump campaign have to answer why they spied and lied to the FISA court.  

Mifsud was “a russian agent” according the Weissman.  But on Brennan’s payroll. LMAO.

Keep watching.  

Stupid.