Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
So no collusion.
Well.

It appears that asking a Trump supporter to actually explain/defend one of his bigger blunders without immediately changing the subject to something years gone on Obama's watch was too much to ask.

Reply

My guess is they will show his tangible assets are over leveraged and what he boasted about owning are just branding agreements.  It would also be good to know who he owes the money to.  I suspect the Trump empire is a Potemkin village, literally and figuratively. 
Reply

Quote: @Zanary said:
Well.

It appears that asking a Trump supporter to actually explain/defend one of his bigger blunders without immediately changing the subject to something years gone on Obama's watch was too much to ask.
I'm a "mehh" on Trump but I'll take a swing.  Was your question about protecting elections?  That seems to be your last question that I could find?


There are certainly things the federal government could do to "secure" elections.  They could work to get international money out of elections.  They could pass laws to undo Citizens United.  They could pass term limits for congress critters.  They could pass a national ID program.  The problem is no elected offical on the right or left wants this done because it cuts off the golden goose. 

OR they could supply money to the States to raise their game.  It seems to me that most of the actual election integrity and vote counting on election day are done on a state by state basis and there in lies the problem.  You've got 50 different systems (plus DC & territories) held by 50 different standards.  Without some sort normalization of the process I'm not sure what the Feds could do for election day without just throwing money at it.
As far as what could be done prior to elections?  I'm not sure I want my .gov telling facebook etc what is "propaganda" and what isn't.  That seems to be the rub this last time right?
Trump did do an executive order that gave authority to levee sanctions on individuals who meddle in the election process. I'm not sure if its worth the paper its written on but its something? 

Trump’s New Executive Order Is a Positive Step for Securing Electionshttps://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/trumps-new-executive-order-positive-step-securing-elections


Reply

Also when you just allow states to throw money at problems you end up with MN's DMV $140M blunder:
https://www.twincities.com/2019/02/14/mn...-services/

Reply

Actually, I was asking how he could pay $2Million for an American that was wrongly jailed, tortured, and returned terminally broken?

That's...horrific.  It's a good thing that I DON'T run the country, because that would've likely led to the kind of tensions/showdown that the world fears if I'd been behind the desk.


Reply

Oh look, Donnie used executive privilege for the "entirety of the subpoenaed materials" in the Mueller Report.

A totally transparent, innocent man with nothing to hide!
Reply

Quote: @Zanary said:
Well.

It appears that asking a Trump supporter to actually explain/defend one of his bigger blunders without immediately changing the subject to something years gone on Obama's watch was too much to ask.
Haha A1 has no arguments left so he's resorted to simply downvoting facts.

It takes a long time to back Trump supporters into a corner where they're forced to shut up because they're out of arguments, but this is what it looks like: the "thumbs down" when they've lost.
Reply

Quote: @KingBash said:
Oh look, Donnie used executive privilege for the "entirety of the subpoenaed materials" in the Mueller Report.

A totally transparent, innocent man with nothing to hide!
Funny, the document that "totally exonerates" Trump is being held hostage by Trump himself.  If he was so innocent you know he'd be broadcasting it on a billboard you could view from space.

Just like he's a stable genius who had his grades hidden.  

Just like he's a billionaire who refuses to show his taxes.


Dear Trump supporters, can you still not see a pattern of behavior emerging yet from the man of 10,000 lies?
Reply

Quote: @SFVikeFan said:
Dear Trump supporters, can you still not see a pattern of behavior emerging yet from the man of 10,000 lies? I can't speak for the Trump-niks, but I can point out that the Hildebeast has, similarly, been decried as a cosmic-level liar for ages...

...just like her hubby...

...so, while I don't excuse Emperor Cheeto's fan club, I similarly have no idea why his main opponent in 2016 has any fans that think they can judge anyone.
Reply

Quote: @KingBash said:
@Zanary said:
Well.

It appears that asking a Trump supporter to actually explain/defend one of his bigger blunders without immediately changing the subject to something years gone on Obama's watch was too much to ask.
Haha A1 has no arguments left so he's resorted to simply downvoting facts.

It takes a long time to back Trump supporters into a corner where they're forced to shut up because they're out of arguments, but this is what it looks like: the "thumbs down" when they've lost.
Nah.  give it time.  

I will be back to laugh at you idiots.  The truth is coming out. 

Indictments of Obama officials.  Watch.  They are treasonous scumbags. 
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
9 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.