Quote: @Sir Viking Bob VWO said:
@ Zanary said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ Zanary said:
@ AGRforever said:
So please take your blind hate for the man and bug off.
Gotta interject, here:
is mentioning facts (fraud payoffs, bankruptcies, an impossible number of lies spanning decades, moronic rhetoric, hypocrisy, and so much more) "blind hate"?
Because, it seems like mentioning things about Cheeto-boi that are referenced facts are labeled as "hate" by his fan club....
In the context of the North Korea post yes. Ive long said Im not his fan. All those things you listed are vey much valid. But there certainly has been positive things he’s accomplished. To come shit on him for being the first president in half a century to at least try dialog with NK seems absurd.
Hate him for resl reasons (like you listed). Give him credit where its due.
OK...paying $2Million for a tortured AMERICAN CITIZEN that was returned near to death...
...I think the family should be able to push impeachment proceedings on that, alone.
I cannot imagine a single, possible way to justify that farce...other than the Cheeto being Kim's bitch. Nothing else computes.
As such, he's a potential traitor at the highest level, and, as a result, all possible penalties should be on the table if he's found guilty.
Seriously Zanary??? THATS what makes you mad??? How did you feel when the REAL TRAITOR Obuma traded 5 high level terrorists for another traitor in Bergdahl?? Or how about the 100 million in cash he sent to Iran in CASH on his last day???
LOL
You seriously didn't know that was Iran's money that was RETURNED from frozen sanctions goibg back to 1979?? How long has that nonsense been spouted and debunked and you still believe it??
Just another debunked conspiracy theory that you dingbats don't bother to do a quick google search to educate yourself about.
http://time.com/4441046/400-million-iran...e-history/
Christ it's like you all have the same brainwashed guidebook to GOP disproven bullshit talking points.
SAD
LMAO
Quote: @Zanary said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ Zanary said:
@ AGRforever said:
So please take your blind hate for the man and bug off.
Gotta interject, here:
is mentioning facts (fraud payoffs, bankruptcies, an impossible number of lies spanning decades, moronic rhetoric, hypocrisy, and so much more) "blind hate"?
Because, it seems like mentioning things about Cheeto-boi that are referenced facts are labeled as "hate" by his fan club....
In the context of the North Korea post yes. Ive long said Im not his fan. All those things you listed are vey much valid. But there certainly has been positive things he’s accomplished. To come shit on him for being the first president in half a century to at least try dialog with NK seems absurd.
Hate him for resl reasons (like you listed). Give him credit where its due.
OK...paying $2Million for a tortured AMERICAN CITIZEN that was returned near to death...
...I think the family should be able to push impeachment proceedings on that, alone.
I cannot imagine a single, possible way to justify that farce...other than the Cheeto being Kim's bitch. Nothing else computes.
As such, he's a potential traitor at the highest level, and, as a result, all possible penalties should be on the table if he's found guilty.
What's more frightening to me is that Trump trusts the word of Kim Jong un and Putin over his own intelligence agencies and generals.
Let that sink in for a moment.
The President's first responsibility is to protect America, and he lies about what countries are developing nuclear weapons and if they are a threat to us. Today he told the world today: "I am with him" after North Korea test fired missiles yesterday.
What happened to Republicans who wanted to defend our country from attack, and knew that Russia, Saudia Arabia and North Korea are not our friends and not to be trusted? Now they don't care Trump refuses to safeguard our elections and welcomes Russian influence? Can you imagine the outrage if the tables were turned, and the Dems refused to stop Russian interference in the next election after finding out Russians helped them win the last one?
Ya'll just threw your morals out the window, rolled over and spread your cheeks for a tiny little orange sausage instead.
Quote: @SFVikeFan said:
@ Zanary said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ Zanary said:
@ AGRforever said:
So please take your blind hate for the man and bug off.
Gotta interject, here:
is mentioning facts (fraud payoffs, bankruptcies, an impossible number of lies spanning decades, moronic rhetoric, hypocrisy, and so much more) "blind hate"?
Because, it seems like mentioning things about Cheeto-boi that are referenced facts are labeled as "hate" by his fan club....
In the context of the North Korea post yes. Ive long said Im not his fan. All those things you listed are vey much valid. But there certainly has been positive things he’s accomplished. To come shit on him for being the first president in half a century to at least try dialog with NK seems absurd.
Hate him for resl reasons (like you listed). Give him credit where its due.
OK...paying $2Million for a tortured AMERICAN CITIZEN that was returned near to death...
...I think the family should be able to push impeachment proceedings on that, alone.
I cannot imagine a single, possible way to justify that farce...other than the Cheeto being Kim's bitch. Nothing else computes.
As such, he's a potential traitor at the highest level, and, as a result, all possible penalties should be on the table if he's found guilty.
What's more frightening to me is that Trump trusts the word of Kim Jong un and Putin over his own intelligence agencies and generals.
Let that sink in for a moment.
The President's first responsibility is to protect America, and he lies about what countries are developing nuclear weapons and if they are a threat to us. Today he told the world today: "I am with him" after North Korea test fired missiles yesterday.
What happened to Republicans who wanted to defend our country from attack, and knew that Russia, Saudia Arabia and North Korea are not our friends and not to be trusted? Now they don't care Trump refuses to safeguard our elections and welcomes Russian influence? Can you imagine the outrage if the tables were turned, and the Dems refused to stop Russian interference in the next election after finding out Russians helped them win the last one?
Ya'll just threw your morals out the window, rolled over and spread your cheeks for a tiny little orange sausage instead.
How was Trump supposed to safeguard our election? He had no power to do so at the time? That happened under Obamas watch.
As far as talking with other nations Ive already said my peace on that.
Did you see Trump cause maximum security to get disqualified from the derby???? Orange man bad!!!!!
Quote: @SFVikeFan said:
What happened to Republicans who wanted to defend our country from attack, and knew that Russia, Saudia Arabia and North Korea are not our friends and not to be trusted? Now they don't care Trump refuses to safeguard our elections and welcomes Russian influence? Can you imagine the outrage if the tables were turned, and the Dems refused to stop Russian interference in the next election after finding out Russians helped them win the last one?
Ya'll just threw your morals out the window, rolled over and spread your cheeks for a tiny little orange sausage instead.
Just a reminder...regarding the DNC and its fan club being the biggest hypocrites imaginable:
The Hildebeast and Obama helped supply Russia with uranium. Compared to that, "Meullergate" is insignificant as a dust mote.
The Hildebeast didn't mind Saudis donating to her foundation while she was butt-surfing the Bernie Sanders followers with help from the DNC...
...and while Trumplestilskin won't directly comment on protecting 2020 (because he's, y'know, both stupid and corrupt), 2016 was under Obama's watch...but blaming him for anything is apparently unthinkable in many circles.
Obama was also Putin's bitch during the Crimea occupation and in the talks with Iran.
No high ground for either "main" trash piles.
I can't comprehend being a fan of either.
I just want a politician to cut a budget. I’ll even settle for a small amount.
Quote: @AGRforever said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
What's more frightening to me is that Trump trusts the word of Kim Jong un and Putin over his own intelligence agencies and generals.
Let that sink in for a moment.
The President's first responsibility is to protect America, and he lies about what countries are developing nuclear weapons and if they are a threat to us. Today he told the world today: "I am with him" after North Korea test fired missiles yesterday.
What happened to Republicans who wanted to defend our country from attack, and knew that Russia, Saudia Arabia and North Korea are not our friends and not to be trusted? Now they don't care Trump refuses to safeguard our elections and welcomes Russian influence? Can you imagine the outrage if the tables were turned, and the Dems refused to stop Russian interference in the next election after finding out Russians helped them win the last one?
Ya'll just threw your morals out the window, rolled over and spread your cheeks for a tiny little orange sausage instead.
How was Trump supposed to safeguard our election? He had no power to do so at the time? That happened under Obamas watch.
As far as talking with other nations Ive already said my peace on that.
I'm talking about the next election in 2020. It is now Trump's job to safeguard us from future attacks. What is he doing to prevent them? Is he strengthening departments, creating task forces to stop it? Is he calling out Russia/Putin, and condemning their actions, is he putting in sanctions or other responses to deter it? No, inexplicably he's doing the fucking EXACT OPPOSITE:
* Trump and John Bolton eliminated the top position for cybersecurity in DHS. Cyber policy experts, lawmakers and former officials had urged Trump to replace Joyce and not to abolish the position. “I don’t see how getting rid of the top cyber official in the White House does anything to make our country safer from cyber threats,” Senate Intelligence ranking member Mark Warner (D-Va.) https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/15/white-house-eliminates-cyber-adviser-post-542916
* Trump has gutted the DHS department charged with safeguarding our elections. https://hillreporter.com/trumps-dhs-has-recently-gutted-two-election-security-task-forces-24421
* Trump has yet to condemn Russia for meddling in the last election and refuses to hold Putin accountable for an attack on our election.
Trump's Helsinki disaster in 2018 - secret meeting with Putin with no press, no ambassadors:
“He just said it’s not Russia. I will say this: I don’t see any reason why it would be,” Trump said. “So I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today. And what he did is an incredible offer. He offered to have the people working on the case come and work with their investigators, with respect to the 12 people. I think that’s an incredible offer.”
The remarks forced Trump’s approval rating, politicians’ pretenses, and jaws to drop. Republicans who’d been reluctant to criticize the president were horrified to see him taking the Kremlin’s word over that of his own aides and the U.S. intelligence community.
Now May 2019: Trump's response when asked about his 90 minute phone call to Putin - he slams the reporter for being rude for daring to ask the FUCKING PLAINLY OBVIOUS QUESTION AMERICANS WANT TO KNOW:
Trump: He sort of smiled when he said something to the effect that it started off as a mountain and it ended up being a mouse. But he knew that, because you knew there was no collusion whatsoever. So that is pretty much what it was—
Reporter: Did you tell him not to meddle in the next election?
Trump: Excuse me. I’m talking. I’m answering this question. You are very rude. So we had a good conversation about many different things. Okay.
Reporter: Did you tell him not to meddle in the next election?
Trump: We didn’t discuss that. Really, we didn’t discuss it. We discussed five or six things.
Didn't discuss it. Didn't discuss it??? That traitorous, spineless piece of shit rolls over like a cheap hooker for Putin.
Trump has done NOTHING to safeguard our next election and is literally doing the complete opposite: eliminating positions and gutting the departments responsible for preventing election interference. He's clearly afraid to condemn Putin for some reason, and is basically encouraging Russia to attack future elections because he knows he needs their help to win. We have a fucking TRAITOR in office that refuses to defend America against attack.
Let all that sink in. Trump is actively dismantling Dept. of Homeland Security's ability to defend our country against attack and refuses to condemn Russia when all of his intelligence agencies and the Mueller report agree Russia clearly attacked our election. Now imagine it was a Democrat in office doing that.
Quote: @Zanary said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
What happened to Republicans who wanted to defend our country from attack, and knew that Russia, Saudia Arabia and North Korea are not our friends and not to be trusted? Now they don't care Trump refuses to safeguard our elections and welcomes Russian influence? Can you imagine the outrage if the tables were turned, and the Dems refused to stop Russian interference in the next election after finding out Russians helped them win the last one?
Ya'll just threw your morals out the window, rolled over and spread your cheeks for a tiny little orange sausage instead.
Just a reminder...regarding the DNC and its fan club being the biggest hypocrites imaginable:
The Hildebeast and Obama helped supply Russia with uranium. Compared to that, "Meullergate" is insignificant as a dust mote.
The Hildebeast didn't mind Saudis donating to her foundation while she was butt-surfing the Bernie Sanders followers with help from the DNC...
...and while Trumplestilskin won't directly comment on protecting 2020 (because he's, y'know, both stupid and corrupt), 2016 was under Obama's watch...but blaming him for anything is apparently unthinkable in many circles.
Obama was also Putin's bitch during the Crimea occupation and in the talks with Iran.
No high ground for either "main" trash piles.
I can't comprehend being a fan of either.
Oh Zanary.
Uranium? You're one of the conspiracy theorists now too?
Russia was never supplied with uranium. A Canadian mine company sold their mining operation to a Russian company. They received an approval where they could ship some uranium to Canada and then ship it back to USA for processing but nothing went to Russia.
Neither Obama nor Hillary can approve a sale of uranium. That's handled by a 9-member panel of CFIUS - Committee of Foreign Investments.
Feel free to read the facts surrounding Uranium One here - LONG BEEN DEBUNKED:
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/
First, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission had to approve the transfer of two uranium recovery licenses in Wyoming from Uranium One to the Russian company. The NRC announced it approved the transfer on Nov. 24, 2010. But, as the NRC explained at the time, “no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.”
As NRC explained in a March 2011 letter to Republican Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming, the Russian company would have to apply for and obtain an export license and “commit to use the material only for peaceful purposes” in accordance with “the U.S.-Russia Atomic Energy Act Section 123 agreement for peaceful nuclear cooperation.”
In a June 2015 letter to Rep. Peter Visclosky, the NRC said it granted RSB Logistics Services an amendment to its export license in 2012 to allow the Kentucky shipping company to export uranium to Canada from various sources — including from a Uranium One site in Wyoming. The NRC said that the export license allowed RSB to ship uranium to a conversion plant in Canada and then back to the United States for further processing.
Canada must obtain U.S. approval to transfer any U.S. uranium to any country other than the United States, the letter says.
“Please be assured that no Uranium One, Inc.-produced uranium has been shipped directly to Russia and the U.S. Government has not authorized any country to re-transfer U.S. uranium to Russia,” the 2015 letter said.
|
