Quote: @SFVikingFan said:
@ A1Janitor said:
Nothing makes me sadder than to see the notifications ... and they are all from SFVikingFan!
LOL Z I liked TJ. I’m just pointing out how you treat people when you lose. TJ didnt live up to what we wanted. Trump’s performance has been stellar. Especially in light of the deep state hoax attack.
LMAO Obama’s 8 year poor economy sucked because he inherited it from
Bush. And Trump’s success is continuing Obama’s foundation. Except the abrupt change in everything.
Good news for you then, because there are two of us! =)
BTW my previous post was my first one on this thread.
LMAO
Sorry!
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
Nothing makes me sadder than to see the notifications ... and they are all from SFVikingFan!
LOL Z I liked TJ. I’m just pointing out how you treat people when you lose. TJ didnt live up to what we wanted. Trump’s performance has been stellar. Especially in light of the deep state hoax attack.
LMAO Obama’s 8 year poor economy sucked because he inherited it from
Bush. And Trump’s success is continuing Obama’s foundation. Except the abrupt change in everything.
Y'know...it's funny...
...when I first got to Scout, I spoke in favor of TJack, hoping he'd do well. I was immediately berated as stupid/gay/clueless/possibly a member of the Taliban, you name it.
Assuming the moronic, chronic misspelling, babbling jock itches could take what they dealt out...I responded in kind.
WOW, the whining! I'd have half a dozen doing at me, also holding me responsible for things, Marlon, not me, posted (hence the many times I repeated DEBATE WHAT I ACTUALLY POST)...
...but, yeah, it was "how I treated others".
Stupid bitching then, still stupid today.
I'll never agree that I "lost" anything...because I wasn't a "Vikings fan" spending years ripping on a Viking player.
Each one of those people, without any exception I can think of, was a spineless half-wit. Sadly, they worked to keep that moron-a-thon going years after I'd basically forgotten about it.
Kinda like you, today...
...so, fail to debate my point further, make some pithy little comment, and post the devil emoji in a studly fashion, or whatever it is...?
Oh no. Someone thinks you are sophomoric for calling him cheeto etc. Who wants to debate you?
Vote Jill Stein! Orange man bad! RUSSIA!
Quote: @SFVikeFan said:
So much useless info I'm not going to address.
Okay. I'm used to being belittled...but I really only made one point. Whatevs.
You think because Trump had complained about Sessions for months prior to Barr's memo, that makes his firing un-relateable and mis-characterized??? LOL
No no no wait .... LMAO LMAO
??
With the recent POTUS history of AG's being "wing-men" for the POTUS... can you blame Trump for being chagrined that Sessions RECUSED HIMSELF
"Mr. Sessions’s decision to recuse himself was one of his first public acts as attorney general." (link)
Sessions' recusal didn't lead to a Trump loyalist next in charge. It led to Obama holdovers (dgaf if some were Repubs) Rosenstein & McCabe at the
top of the DOJ. Dems NEVER go out like that... they'll take a bullett like " contempt of Congress" before they'll recuse themselves. (google Holder)
BTW, the Mueller report concludes Sessions did nothing wrong (collude) to recuse himself.
And to defend Barr as some neutral, unbiased AG? Barr already defended one Presidential cover-up by pushing to have 6 convicted criminals pardoned, all of whom were found guilty.
Because of this and Barr's unwillingness to appoint an independent counsel to look into a second scandal known as Iraqgate, iconic New York Times writer, William Safire, began to refer to Barr as "Coverup-General Barr."[46]
Yes, because a man who already been dubbed "Cover-up General Barr" from his pardons of convicted criminals from a previous Republican presidential cover-up means nothing to you Republicans and he's a straight shooter alright. LMAO you can't make this shit up. You know damn well If this was the Dems what you'd have to say about it, you just can't admit it.
Iran-Contra. That was the "scandal" that made Col. Oliver North an American hero, right?
Independent Counsel, Lawrence Walsh, what a POS. https://www.lawliberty.org/2014/03/24/la...-of-power/
Man, I love Dershowitz these days:
“And the best precedent for that is George H.W. Bush, who pardoned Casper Weinberger and five other people on the eve of the trial,” Dershowitz said. “The special prosecutor said he obstructed justice, but he couldn’t be charged with it. And they never mentioned the Bush case in the Mueller report. Mueller was in the Bush administration. Barr was in the Bush administration. And they deliberately omit as the leading precedent, which would preclude a president from being charged with obstruction for simply exercising his constitutional authority.”
And just this morning, we find out Barr handed Trump's lawyers the Mueller report TEN HOURS ahead of time, then gave a press conference 90 minutes prior to Congress seeing the Mueller report. WHY??? Because Barr is AG of Trump, not the US, and you know damn well he is ... again if this was the Dems you'd be screaming cover-up.
TEN HOURS. That's a lot, isn't it? 480 pages, ten hours.
A1 just told you DEFENSE COUNSEL (their first foray into a Prosecutor's one-sided report) is afforded the opportunity to redact for 6e sources/methods/innocent witnesses. 4.8 pages per hour (which was reversible) CONSPIRACY!
Obviously you don't care because he's a fluffer cheerleader for your team. It's all good. Congrats. Like I said, there's no amount of bullshit you can't swallow and spin for your team.
You infer so much. Like A1, pumpf, greediron, (& agr , BM7 and medaille, I think) and some others... Trump was not my first choice (in the primaries). I was a Cruz guy. Am I "team Trump!" now? Yes. He was clearly the better choice vs HRC.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
BTW, liberal Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, on the subject of "obstruction".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doo193ngU8c
According to Dershowitz, the president was within his authority to fire the FBI director and would have been justified, under the unified executive theory, to shut down the investigation.
"The position I've taken from day one is for the president to obstruct justice, he has to go beyond his own permissible constitutional authority and engage in conduct that would be a crime for anyone else, like tampering with witnesses, obstructing a witness, paying witnesses, telling them to lie. None of that is charged against President Trump," Dershowitz said.
In more than 200 pages, the Mueller report details President Trump's actions after firing Comey including "public attacks on the investigation, non-public efforts to control it, and efforts in both public and private to encourage witnesses not to cooperate with the investigation." Mueller concluded that those actions did not meet the threshold of criminal, but the president was also not exonerated of wrongdoing.
The public is left with a "very unflattering portrait of presidential actions that don't rise to the level of criminal conduct," Dershowitz noted.
He compared the special counsel's "devastating" portrayal of Trump's actions to James Comey characterizing Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server as "extremely careless." Comey announced the decision not to prosecute Clinton but at the same time described her actions in legally ambiguous terms, which helped fuel speculation from political opponents that she had committed a crime.
"My question is whether it's the proper role of the report to present a one-sided picture, which this does, obviously...whether it's ever proper for a prosecutor to do what Comey did," Dershowitz continued. "That is the question that I think has to be asked of the Mueller report."
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
Oh no. Someone thinks you are sophomoric for calling him cheeto etc. Who wants to debate you?
Vote Jill Stein! Orange man bad! RUSSIA!
I forgot about the unassailable maturity found in years of devil emojis... (eyeroll)
You went after my post, then drug in the Kennedys instead of staying anywhere near the point...and now, babbling about the Green Party's failed candidate (whom I don't think I've ever mentioned), and Russia (again, not something I've mentioned)...
...are you mixing medications right now? You're random as Sanders' hair...!
Quote: @Sir Viking Bob VWO said:
@ Zanary said:
@ Sir Viking Bob VWO said:
@ Zanary said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ Zanary said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ Zanary said:
The report is...well, junk...and exposes everyone involved to be classless s**t.
The investigations in Trumplestilskin's campaign by Obama-na...the ongoing behavior of our blathering, lying, spineless filth of a cheez-dusted assclown...the press dividing the country along imaginary lines...
...could you main-party voters PLEASE skip the next election, and quit butt-surfing the country? PLEASE?
Doesn’t it get tiring for you to hold such sophomoric hatred?
Anyone with half a brain would look at his campaign promises and look at his results.
Idiotic.
Yet, only drooling, treasonous filth would defend an openly boorish, misogynistic, lying blowhard that's been obvious about what he was for decades.
Nothing says "credibility" like a slew of bankruptcies, a fraud payout for his "university", and complete disdain for the truth.
Spineless and moronic.
In comparison to the Kennedys?
...and deflection, a nndatory tactic of Emperor Cheeto's fan club. He's indefensible, so drag someone else into it!
I have no use for that trash pile, either...see under "main parties".
Really?? Because for ALL 8 long years of Obuma. All we ever heard was "well Bush did this, Bush did that" But when we mention stuff that Obuma and Killary did we are deflecting??? Yeahhhhh. Hoookaaayyy......
Bobbo...buddy...when did I EVER defend Obama?
Take all the time you need for the answer.
But, it proves my point even more: when Trumplestilskin's piles of sh*t behaviors are brought up, the response is "uh, well, look at OBAMA! AND HILLARY! AND THE KENNEDYS!!".
The whole topic has to change, because our current prez is a truly horrid human being. Has he had good and generous moments? Yes. Has he also been a babbling, lying, embarrassment to this country? Often, and on bigger and bigger stages.
See if you can defend him without needing to deflect.
Depends on whether you want to stay an American or become a globalist slave under government control... Economy is doing great. Unemployment at a 40 year low. All time low for minorities and so on. Know this much. If you want to be a globalist your financial worth will be taken down to be redistributed but the banks will still want their full amount on your mortgage and when you can't afford it anymore the government will take that too. Good luck being a straight white Christian male in the new world. I will just stay here and pray for Trump to keep America great again and expose all the liberal corruption
We're over 22 Trillion in debt, and...when the f**k did I ever champion globalism?!?!?
Good GRIEF, I'm starting to wonder if you and A1J are posting from a pharm-party!
Christianity is great, when not cherry-picked by filth to be used for exclusion. As such, the separation of church and state should make it easy to punish deep-red states that refuse to recognize the rights of same-sex TAX PAYING AMERICAN couples. As there is no shred of legit, scientific proof that gay couples are worse parents than straight couples, using religion via legislation to deny adoption is NOT Christianity, it's shameless power-mongering.
Hence, the bible-thumpers that misuse political power to fuel their own vicious biases deserve every bit of derision that they get.
I'm happy about the lower unemployment, but I'm also having to pay into the IRS for the first time in ages. I'm happy that the rank-and-file of D.C. are shaken up, but I want to vomit that anyone attaches America's "greatness" to a dufus that's been all over shady deals for decades, and creates waves of wincing embarrassment along with any positive he achieves.
I am a straight, white male...and I was raised a Christian, but too many horrible people destroyed my faith in any religion. As much as I live near a city where straight, white, Christian males are berated (Seattle), I can also name states where so-called "Christian" values are manipulated to punish anyone else (Texas, most of the deep South).
Americans make America great. No one person in any office can possibly compete.
So I guess it’s not ok to disagree with Z about religion, adoption, or homosexuality.
Or he becomes triggered like a wilting snowflake.
Well ... there hasn’t been a whole lot of difference in gay rights under Trump vs. Obama. Name what Trump policy President that you disagree with against gays.
We can discuss blacks too. Why didn’t Obama institute prison reform to help blacks that were treated unfairly with sentences. Should Trump treat blacks as “super predators” like the Clintons?
Save the moral rantings for Pumpf. He at least earns that over you. (Not that he is right about our Dear Leader).
Glad Trump is looking into abortion. Go study Margaret Sanger and look where the planned parenthoods are located. When will the minorities wake up?
Study up on gays that support Trump. That list is growing too.
RUSSIA! CHEETO! ORANGEMAN BAD! RUSSIA!
What else can we add to this thread? We haven't gotten into global warming and cow farts yet have we? Maybe Bigfoot needs his time in the spotlight?
I agree with Zanary. Christians need to be darn careful in what they wish for and how they use "their power" it will get used against us in the future. It wont be long and Christians will be a minority group in America. As sad as that sounds its time now to really dive home the separation of church and state so that when another religion or non religious people are the majority it doesn't come back to bite us in the ass.
Quote: @AGRforever said:
What else can we add to this thread? We haven't gotten into global warming and cow farts yet have we? Maybe Bigfoot needs his time in the spotlight?
I agree with Zanary. Christians need to be darn careful in what they wish for and how they use "their power" it will get used against us in the future. It wont be long and Christians will be a minority group in America. As sad as that sounds its time now to really dive home the separation of church and state so that when another religion or non religious people are the majority it doesn't come back to bite us in the ass.
you mean like lets destroy the Constitution and go with Sharia Law. I wonder what all the women and gays will have to say then....
Quote: @Sir Viking Bob VWO said:
@ AGRforever said:
What else can we add to this thread? We haven't gotten into global warming and cow farts yet have we? Maybe Bigfoot needs his time in the spotlight?
I agree with Zanary. Christians need to be darn careful in what they wish for and how they use "their power" it will get used against us in the future. It wont be long and Christians will be a minority group in America. As sad as that sounds its time now to really dive home the separation of church and state so that when another religion or non religious people are the majority it doesn't come back to bite us in the ass.
you mean like lets destroy the Constitution and go with Sharia Law. I wonder what all the women and gays will have to say then....
Bob, tell me, exactly, where I've pushed for globalism and/or sharia law. Seriously, you're making up piles of bullshit strawmen and assigning them to anyone disagreeing with you.
When did I champion any of that, Bob? Again, take your time...but give me the examples.
Or, admit that you're lying...for what possible gain, I can't begin to imagine.
WTF are you talking about?!!?
|
