Quote: @BlackMagic7 said:
There was a ton of talk about the DNC hack being an inside job. I recall a few technical articles talking about the file transfer speeds being too fast for a network transfer and that they resembled USB speeds.
I wonder who knew Rich was in contact with WikiLeaks in real time, and when they knew...
You and Havoc ... like 2 peas in a pod.
Already debunked from the Mueller report, not that you believe that part of the Mueller report anyway, when deep state conspiracy theories are far more fun to believe in. But keep it up, you really belong on a reddit site.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@ BlackMagic7 said:
There was a ton of talk about the DNC hack being an inside job. I recall a few technical articles talking about the file transfer speeds being too fast for a network transfer and that they resembled USB speeds.
I wonder who knew Rich was in contact with WikiLeaks in real time, and when they knew...
Suspicious timing to grab Assange!
Either the white hats got him to protect him - or he will
be killed.
HRC and Comey and Obama and Brennan have been very quiet. But they have hired, apparently, SFVikeFan to speak for them. Not sure they are happy sith his feeble attenpts.
Tell me more about the part of "no Russian contacts" .... I had such a good laugh the first time it's worth a response from you.
Quote: @BlackMagic7 said:
Assange never confirmed Rich was the source. He did strongly imply Rich was the source, and a lot of publications ran with it as fact based off how strongly it was implied.
Mueller's documents suggest WikiLeaks acquired information from DCLeaks 4 days after Rich's murder.
Truthfully, I think this aspect is pretty interesting - for all of the insistence that Rich was the source I see something different emerging -> Rich was a Bernie guy, wasn't he? Put Rich in a position where he resents the DNC because of that, in the world at the time where WikiLeaks was emerging as a information heavyweight - why wouldn't he want to contact WikiLeaks from the position that Bernie was getting hosed? From what is documented as fact, I don't think the "conspiracy" theory around his death changes all that much if he wasn't "the source" yet was sneaking behind the DNC's back planning/attempting to.
Just put the two together - we have documentation (emails) showing DCLeaks wanting to give WikiLeaks documents. We seemingly have records of Rich communicating with WikiLeaks. We have an Assange quote on "potential sources" that was given in the context of Seth Rich being "the source."
I don't believe he needs to be "the source" for the theory to fly. It simply changes a theoretical motive of retribution into prevention...
Aaaaand the Mueller report puts another conservative nutjob conspiracy theory to rest ....
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/20/us/mueller-report-seth-rich-assange.html
By Sarah Mervosh
The special counsel’s report confirmed this week that Seth Rich, a young Democratic National Committee employee whose unsolved killing became grist for a right-wing conspiracy theory, was not the source of thousands of internal D.N.C. emails that WikiLeaks released during the 2016 presidential race, officially debunking a notion that had persisted without support for years.
Tucked amid hundreds of pages of the report’s main findings, the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, took aim at WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange, for falsely implying that Mr. Rich was somehow involved in the dissemination of the emails, an act that aided President Trump’s campaign. “WikiLeaks and Assange made several public statements apparently designed to obscure the source of the materials that WikiLeaks was releasing,” according to the report, which showed that WikiLeaks corresponded with the true source of the leaked emails — Russian hackers — after Mr. Rich’s death.
The confirmation comes after years of anguish for Mr. Rich’s family, who fought attempts to politicize and spread misinformation about his killing, which is believed to have happened during a bungled robbery attempt.
The theory linking Mr. Rich to the email leak took root in conservative circles and was cited by prominent conservatives like Newt Gingrich and right-wing commentators like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Alex Jones of Infowars. WikiLeaks offered a $20,000 reward for information about Mr. Rich’s killing, fueling speculation that he was the source. Fox News also published an article, which the network later retracted, suggesting that Mr. Rich was killed in retaliation for having leaked the emails.
In a statement, Mr. Rich’s brother, Aaron Rich, responded to the special counsel’s report, saying it provided “hard facts that demonstrate this conspiracy is false.”
“I hope that the people who pushed, fueled, spread, ran headlines, articles, interviews, talk and opinion shows, or in any way used my family’s tragedy to advance their political agendas — despite our pleas that what they were saying was not based on any facts — will take responsibility for the unimaginable pain they have caused us,” he said.
Mr. Rich was 27 when he died after being shot on the streets of Washington on July 10, 2016.
On July 14, WikiLeaks received an encrypted file from Russian hackers, according to the report. The organization published thousands of internal D.N.C. emails later that month, just days aheadof the Democratic convention.
“That chronology is damning,” Mike Gottlieb, a lawyer for Aaron Rich, said, pointing out that Mr. Rich had already been killed when the file was sent.
Even after intelligence officials announced that Russia was behind the email hacking, Mr. Assange continued to deny Russian involvement and told a congressman that the D.N.C. hack was an “inside job,” according to the report.
“Assange did untold damage to a grieving family in order to try and hide his work with Russian intelligence,” Brad Bauman, a former spokesman for Mr. Rich’s family, said in a statement after the release of the report.
“He is a monster, not a journalist,” he added.
Mr. Assange, whose release of secret government documents has spurred debate about press freedom issues, spent seven years holed up in the Ecuadorean Embassy in Britain before he was arrested this month on a charge of conspiring to hack into a Pentagon computer network in 2010. The charge is not related to WikiLeaks’ role in Russia’s operations to sabotage the election.
BOOOOOOM
The report is...well, junk...and exposes everyone involved to be classless s**t.
The investigations in Trumplestilskin's campaign by Obama-na...the ongoing behavior of our blathering, lying, spineless filth of a cheez-dusted assclown...the press dividing the country along imaginary lines...
...could you main-party voters PLEASE skip the next election, and quit butt-surfing the country? PLEASE?
Quote: @Zanary said:
The report is...well, junk...and exposes everyone involved to be classless s**t.
The investigations in Trumplestilskin's campaign by Obama-na...the ongoing behavior of our blathering, lying, spineless filth of a cheez-dusted assclown...the press dividing the country along imaginary lines...
...could you main-party voters PLEASE skip the next election, and quit butt-surfing the country? PLEASE?
Doesn’t it get tiring for you to hold such sophomoric hatred?
Anyone with half a brain would look at his campaign promises and look at his results.
Idiotic.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@ Zanary said:
The report is...well, junk...and exposes everyone involved to be classless s**t.
The investigations in Trumplestilskin's campaign by Obama-na...the ongoing behavior of our blathering, lying, spineless filth of a cheez-dusted assclown...the press dividing the country along imaginary lines...
...could you main-party voters PLEASE skip the next election, and quit butt-surfing the country? PLEASE?
Doesn’t it get tiring for you to hold such sophomoric hatred?
Anyone with half a brain would look at his campaign promises and look at his results.
Idiotic.
Yet, only drooling, treasonous filth would defend an openly boorish, misogynistic, lying blowhard that's been obvious about what he was for decades.
Nothing says "credibility" like a slew of bankruptcies, a fraud payout for his "university", and complete disdain for the truth.
Spineless and moronic.
Quote: @Zanary said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ Zanary said:
The report is...well, junk...and exposes everyone involved to be classless s**t.
The investigations in Trumplestilskin's campaign by Obama-na...the ongoing behavior of our blathering, lying, spineless filth of a cheez-dusted assclown...the press dividing the country along imaginary lines...
...could you main-party voters PLEASE skip the next election, and quit butt-surfing the country? PLEASE?
Doesn’t it get tiring for you to hold such sophomoric hatred?
Anyone with half a brain would look at his campaign promises and look at his results.
Idiotic.
Yet, only drooling, treasonous filth would defend an openly boorish, misogynistic, lying blowhard that's been obvious about what he was for decades.
Nothing says "credibility" like a slew of bankruptcies, a fraud payout for his "university", and complete disdain for the truth.
Spineless and moronic.
In comparison to the Kennedys?
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/bill-binney-states-that-the-nsa-has-32-pages-of-communications-between-seth-rich-and-julian-54a2df5a0e5b
Bill Binney States that the NSA Has 32 Pages of Communications Between Seth Rich and Julian Assange, As Revealed by a FOIA RequestAbout six months ago, a blogpost by “Publius Tacitus” appeared regarding attorney Ty Clevenger’s FOIA request regarding Seth Rich:
“But now there is new information that may corroborate what the human sources quoted in the Fox article claimed about Seth’s role in getting the DNC documents to Wikileaks. Borne from a FOIA request filed in November 2017 by attorney Ty Clevenger, who requested any information regarding Seth Rich and Julian Assange. The NSA informed Clevenger in a letter dated 4 October 2018 that:
Quote:Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. Fifteen documents (32 pages) responsive to your request have been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and have found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. These documents meet the criteria for classification as set forth in Subparagraph © of Section 1.4 and remains classified TOP SECRET and SECRET.
Quote:If NSA had come back and said, “No, we do not have anything pertaining to Seth Rich,” that would have been news. It would have been especially unwelcome news for those who believe that Seth was the source on the DNC emails. But now the opposite is true. The NSA says that it has documents that are classified TS and S. What do those documents say or prove? That remains to be seen.”
I got laughed at back on like page 6 trying to say Seth Rich was the DNC leak.
Quote: @SFVikeFan said:
@ A1Janitor said:
LMAO She deleted 33k emails, destroyed devices.
I bet there was pay to play and damning info against the Obama administration in the 33k!
How many picture of Chelsea would you want to keep?!?
Lets get real here. the deep state was caught. they tried to protect the evidence from getting out.
And they failed!
Derpderpderp
Deep State!
Derpderpderp
Hilary's emails!
Derpderpderp
Hey here's my favorite - straight from FOX News so you know it must be true, right? LOLOLOL
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mueller-made-14-criminal-referrals-including-michael-cohen-and-greg-craig
Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office made 14 referrals for investigation of "potential criminal activity" that fell outside the scope of its investigation into allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials, as well as potential obstruction of justice by the Trump administration.
Among those referred for criminal investigation were Michael Cohen, Trump's onetime personal attorney, and Gregory Craig, a former White House counsel under President Barack Obama. The other 12 referrals were redacted, citing "Harm to Ongoing Matter."
So 12 criminal referrals that were redacted. Who's it going to be A1? Is this going to be Comey, Brennan or is it going to be more Republicans linked to Trump? I know what my money's on ...
Wait for it ... wait for it ....
Viking Jepordy, Above...
what is the sound of liberals grasping at straws.
Trump has been cleared. But if you want to spending energy worrying about Russia I’m sure the GOP wont mind getting him reelected.
Quote: @AGRforever said:
@ A1Janitor said:
https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/bill-binney-states-that-the-nsa-has-32-pages-of-communications-between-seth-rich-and-julian-54a2df5a0e5b
Bill Binney States that the NSA Has 32 Pages of Communications Between Seth Rich and Julian Assange, As Revealed by a FOIA Request About six months ago, a blogpost by “Publius Tacitus” appeared regarding attorney Ty Clevenger’s FOIA request regarding Seth Rich:
“But now there is new information that may corroborate what the human sources quoted in the Fox article claimed about Seth’s role in getting the DNC documents to Wikileaks. Borne from a FOIA request filed in November 2017 by attorney Ty Clevenger, who requested any information regarding Seth Rich and Julian Assange. The NSA informed Clevenger in a letter dated 4 October 2018 that:
Quote:Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. Fifteen documents (32 pages) responsive to your request have been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and have found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. These documents meet the criteria for classification as set forth in Subparagraph © of Section 1.4 and remains classified TOP SECRET and SECRET.
Quote:If NSA had come back and said, “No, we do not have anything pertaining to Seth Rich,” that would have been news. It would have been especially unwelcome news for those who believe that Seth was the source on the DNC emails. But now the opposite is true. The NSA says that it has documents that are classified TS and S. What do those documents say or prove? That remains to be seen.”
I got laughed at back on like page 6 trying to say Seth Rich was the DNC leak.
Not by me.
|
