|
So no collusion.
|
|
04-20-2019, 02:02 PM
Quote: @BlackMagic7 said:If anyone wants me to give my one conspiracy theory ... Carter Page was planted into the campaign. Former USNA grad, navy officer, contacts in Russia and Asia. He sure looked nervous on Tucker last year. And he met with FBI without an attorney - no charges. Sure he filed a lawsuit. part of the sham.
04-20-2019, 02:04 PM
Quote: @A1Janitor said: Derpderpderp Deep State! Derpderpderp Hilary's emails! Derpderpderp Hey here's my favorite - straight from FOX News so you know it must be true, right? LOLOLOL https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mueller-made-14-criminal-referrals-including-michael-cohen-and-greg-craig Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office made 14 referrals for investigation of "potential criminal activity" that fell outside the scope of its investigation into allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials, as well as potential obstruction of justice by the Trump administration. Among those referred for criminal investigation were Michael Cohen, Trump's onetime personal attorney, and Gregory Craig, a former White House counsel under President Barack Obama. The other 12 referrals were redacted, citing "Harm to Ongoing Matter." So 12 criminal referrals that were redacted. Who's it going to be A1? Is this going to be Comey, Brennan or is it going to be more Republicans linked to Trump? I know what my money's on ... Wait for it ... wait for it ....
04-20-2019, 02:16 PM
Mueller was a scam.
The real indictments will be from Barr. After Horowitz and Huber are done. Keep watching.
04-20-2019, 02:23 PM
https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/bill-binney-states-that-the-nsa-has-32-pages-of-communications-between-seth-rich-and-julian-54a2df5a0e5b
Bill Binney States that the NSA Has 32 Pages of Communications Between Seth Rich and Julian Assange, As Revealed by a FOIA RequestAbout six months ago, a blogpost by “Publius Tacitus” appeared regarding attorney Ty Clevenger’s FOIA request regarding Seth Rich: Quote:“But now there is new information that may corroborate what the human sources quoted in the Fox article claimed about Seth’s role in getting the DNC documents to Wikileaks. Borne from a FOIA request filed in November 2017 by attorney Ty Clevenger, who requested any information regarding Seth Rich and Julian Assange. The NSA informed Clevenger in a letter dated 4 October 2018 that: Quote:Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. Fifteen documents (32 pages) responsive to your request have been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and have found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. These documents meet the criteria for classification as set forth in Subparagraph © of Section 1.4 and remains classified TOP SECRET and SECRET. Quote:If NSA had come back and said, “No, we do not have anything pertaining to Seth Rich,” that would have been news. It would have been especially unwelcome news for those who believe that Seth was the source on the DNC emails. But now the opposite is true. The NSA says that it has documents that are classified TS and S. What do those documents say or prove? That remains to be seen.”
04-20-2019, 02:37 PM
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
04-20-2019, 02:41 PM
Investigative reporter James Rosen of Sinclair Broadcasting, reported that according to sources, with Mueller’s report now public, President Trump and key White House aides are said to be taking a fresh look at declassifying documentsthat will expose the FBI’s and DOJ’s criminal actions of spying taken against Trump’s 2016 campaign.
According to James Rosen, President Trump is planning on declassifying the documents around the same time Inspector General Michael Horowitz releases his report on FISA abuses. Horowitz is reportedly drafting his final report which is due to be made public within about six weeks. -REWIND- In September of 2018, President Trump issued an immediate declassification order of Carter Page FISA docs and all text messages relating to the Russia investigation, without redaction, of James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and Bruce Ohr. A few days later, President Trump walked back his promise to declassify the docs. According to ranking member of the House Intel Committee Devin Nunes there is exculpatory evidence in the 20 redacted pages of the Carter Page FISA docs. The first FISA warrant was issued on Carter Page in October of 2016, just weeks before election day. Obama’s corrupt FBI and DOJ obtained a FISA warrant and THREE subsequent renewals on Carter Page. It is also important to note that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Andrew McCabe signed the June 2017 FISA renewal –one month after Rosenstein appointed Robert Mueller as special counsel to investigate Trump-Russia collusion. According to Mueller’s report, the allegations against Carter Page used to justify the FISA spying campaign against him were FALSE. “The investigation did not establish that Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 presidential election,” the report stated. Under the law, the FBI must go back to the FISA court every 90 days and present the FISA judge with enough evidence that the subject may be acting as a foreign agent in order to obtain a renewal on the spy warrant. What evidence did the FBI present to the FISA judges on FOUR separate occasions that enabled the FBI to obtain a total of FOUR spy warrants on Carter Page if the allegations against him were false?? Trump hinted Friday that a storm is coming when he tweeted, “It is now finally time to turn the tables and bring justice to some very sick and dangerous people who have committed very serious crimes, perhaps even Spying or Treason. This should never happen again!”
04-20-2019, 02:44 PM
Assange never confirmed Rich was the source. He did strongly imply Rich was the source, and a lot of publications ran with it as fact based off how strongly it was implied.
Mueller's documents suggest WikiLeaks acquired information from DCLeaks 4 days after Rich's murder. Truthfully, I think this aspect is pretty interesting - for all of the insistence that Rich was the source I see something different emerging -> Rich was a Bernie guy, wasn't he? Put Rich in a position where he resents the DNC because of that, in the world at the time where WikiLeaks was emerging as a information heavyweight - why wouldn't he want to contact WikiLeaks from the position that Bernie was getting hosed? From what is documented as fact, I don't think the "conspiracy" theory around his death changes all that much if he wasn't "the source" yet was sneaking behind the DNC's back planning/attempting to. Just put the two together - we have documentation (emails) showing DCLeaks wanting to give WikiLeaks documents. We seemingly have records of Rich communicating with WikiLeaks. We have an Assange quote on "potential sources" that was given in the context of Seth Rich being "the source." I don't believe he needs to be "the source" for the theory to fly. It simply changes a theoretical motive of retribution into prevention...
04-20-2019, 02:50 PM
Quote: @BlackMagic7 said:We will find the truth! Your scenario seems plausible. They couldn’t let Trump win ... and if he did ... plan b jnsurance is in place. The deep state did some bad shit.
04-20-2019, 03:02 PM
There was a ton of talk about the DNC hack being an inside job. I recall a few technical articles talking about the file transfer speeds being too fast for a network transfer and that they resembled USB speeds.
I wonder who knew Rich was in contact with WikiLeaks in real time, and when they knew...
04-20-2019, 03:13 PM
Quote: @BlackMagic7 said:Suspicious timing to grab Assange! Either the white hats got him to protect him - or he will be killed. HRC and Comey and Obama and Brennan have been very quiet. But they have hired, apparently, SFVikeFan to speak for them. Not sure they are happy sith his feeble attenpts. |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 6 Guest(s) |
