Quote: @AGRforever said:
@ KingBash said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ KingBash said:
OH LOOK WHAT A SURPRISE I NEVER SAW THIS COMING:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html
You dont say? The NY times is still pushing a narative just like NBC, MSNBC, CNN etc? Could it be that some reporters have serious egg on tgeir face? All they need is something...anything to hang their hat on and it gives them clearance to run tge story so all the lefties give them some clicks.
Just go ahead and scream "fake news" because you don't like it... which is exactly what King Baby does.
... or maybe wait and see if there's something there.
Isn't that what you've been doing the ENTIRE TIME in this thread??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
The AG reports the preliminary findings and you freak the F*uck out???
Let me explain this to you, how we all view this, through a rational lens.
Mueller indicts LOTS AND LOTS of people connected to the Trump campaign/administration.
Trump installs a lackey as AG in Barr.
All of us call bullshit as we can see how this will play out.
NOT SURPRISINGLY, Barr gets the report and says there's not enough evidence of collusion but that TRUMP IS ALSO NOT EXONERATED (that part is lost a lot of the time on Fox News).
And now, we find out that those close to Mueller are saying they're disappointed in how Barr has handled their two years of hard work.
Wow... almost like I'd been saying ALL ALONG. GOD it feels so good to be so right all the time.
EDIT: Now quick! Call it fake news! Or pivot to "but Obama/Hillary/the Democrats did X, Y, Z!" Go ahead.
denial isn't just a river in Egypt. So a bunch of Dem's that pinned their hope on Mueller finding something, anything are disappointed and want to blame Barr.
But yes, you are correct. You and Maddow.
Quote: @KingBash said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ KingBash said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ KingBash said:
OH LOOK WHAT A SURPRISE I NEVER SAW THIS COMING:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html
You dont say? The NY times is still pushing a narative just like NBC, MSNBC, CNN etc? Could it be that some reporters have serious egg on tgeir face? All they need is something...anything to hang their hat on and it gives them clearance to run tge story so all the lefties give them some clicks.
Just go ahead and scream "fake news" because you don't like it... which is exactly what King Baby does.
... or maybe wait and see if there's something there.
Isn't that what you've been doing the ENTIRE TIME in this thread??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
The AG reports the preliminary findings and you freak the F*uck out???
Let me explain this to you, how we all view this, through a rational lens.
Mueller indicts LOTS AND LOTS of people connected to the Trump campaign/administration.
Trump installs a lackey as AG in Barr.
All of us call bullshit as we can see how this will play out.
NOT SURPRISINGLY, Barr gets the report and says there's not enough evidence of collusion but that TRUMP IS ALSO NOT EXONERATED (that part is lost a lot of the time on Fox News).
And now, we find out that those close to Mueller are saying they're disappointed in how Barr has handled their two years of hard work.
Wow... almost like I'd been saying ALL ALONG. GOD it feels so good to be so right all the time.
EDIT: Now quick! Call it fake news! Or pivot to "but Obama/Hillary/the Democrats did X, Y, Z!" Go ahead.
I was under the impression that no one has been indicted for
anything collusion related. They’ve only
been indicted for lying to the investigators.
Is that correct?
I’m also under the impression that collusion is not a crime
in a political context, that they would have to be charged with something like
Treason or whatever.
Curious: do people think Barr is a "lackey" because they don't like what he said... or because (prior to this) there was something in his career that showed he was- in some way- corrupt? Nothing that I can find in this guy's history says that he's been anything but a career lawyer for the gov't, after having served in the CIA. He's been a public servant since 1973. But now... he's a corrupt lackey. Hmmm...
Quote: @medaille said:
@ KingBash said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ KingBash said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ KingBash said:
OH LOOK WHAT A SURPRISE I NEVER SAW THIS COMING:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html
You dont say? The NY times is still pushing a narative just like NBC, MSNBC, CNN etc? Could it be that some reporters have serious egg on tgeir face? All they need is something...anything to hang their hat on and it gives them clearance to run tge story so all the lefties give them some clicks.
Just go ahead and scream "fake news" because you don't like it... which is exactly what King Baby does.
... or maybe wait and see if there's something there.
Isn't that what you've been doing the ENTIRE TIME in this thread??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
The AG reports the preliminary findings and you freak the F*uck out???
Let me explain this to you, how we all view this, through a rational lens.
Mueller indicts LOTS AND LOTS of people connected to the Trump campaign/administration.
Trump installs a lackey as AG in Barr.
All of us call bullshit as we can see how this will play out.
NOT SURPRISINGLY, Barr gets the report and says there's not enough evidence of collusion but that TRUMP IS ALSO NOT EXONERATED (that part is lost a lot of the time on Fox News).
And now, we find out that those close to Mueller are saying they're disappointed in how Barr has handled their two years of hard work.
Wow... almost like I'd been saying ALL ALONG. GOD it feels so good to be so right all the time.
EDIT: Now quick! Call it fake news! Or pivot to "but Obama/Hillary/the Democrats did X, Y, Z!" Go ahead.
I was under the impression that no one has been indicted for
anything collusion related. They’ve only
been indicted for lying to the investigators.
Is that correct?
Yeah you're right. Their lies have nothing to do with Russia at all. Mental gymnastics as usual.
I’m also under the impression that collusion is not a crime
in a political context, that they would have to be charged with something like
Treason or whatever.
It's not directly a crime, but there are certainly crimes that constitute collus- oh my god, WHY DO WE KEEP HAVING TO EXPLAIN THIS?! The President of the United States - whether ignorantly or not - has been in bed with Russia for a LONG time. And Russia - ADMITTEDLY - wanted him to win the election and conspired against the United States to put him in office. The last sentence is stone cold irrefutable fact.
Quote: @pumpf said:
Curious: do people think Barr is a "lackey" because they don't like what he said... or because (prior to this) there was something in his career that showed he was- in some way- corrupt? Nothing that I can find in this guy's history says that he's been anything but a career lawyer for the gov't, after having served in the CIA. He's been a public servant since 1973. But now... he's a corrupt lackey. Hmmm...
Why do you need this spoon-fed to you?
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/24/politics/...index.html
^ Pretend the source is Fox News or the bible so you'll pay attention. ^
THAT'S why I referred to him as Trump's lackey. Trump stacks the deck. Anything else I can spell out in black and white for you?
Quote: @greediron said:
denial isn't just a river in Egypt. So a bunch of Dem's that pinned their hope on Mueller finding something, anything are disappointed and want to blame Barr.
But yes, you are correct. You and Maddow.
You're making my point. Mueller's team just said Barr is fucking the American people out of the truth essentially, and you're screaming "fake news" as usual.
Meanwhile, the orange retard is busy posting Tweets like these.
This is why we all look down on and dismiss people like you for supporting him.
Quote: @KingBash said:
@ pumpf said:
Curious: do people think Barr is a "lackey" because they don't like what he said... or because (prior to this) there was something in his career that showed he was- in some way- corrupt? Nothing that I can find in this guy's history says that he's been anything but a career lawyer for the gov't, after having served in the CIA. He's been a public servant since 1973. But now... he's a corrupt lackey. Hmmm...
Why do you need this spoon-fed to you?
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/24/politics/barr-memo-mueller/index.html
^ Pretend the source is Fox News or the bible so you'll pay attention. ^
THAT'S why I referred to him as Trump's lackey. Trump stacks the deck. Anything else I can spell out in black and white for you?
Dude I covered this already, thank you for finding the link to the article about the Barr memo a YEAR AGO to Trump's lawyers basically saying Mueller had no case.
The outcome was already predetermined Pumpf. I explained this already. Either you're all just painfully unaware of a pretty major story about Barr's memo to Trump's legal team, or you need some serious hand-holding to connect the dots of common sense.
The greatest tragedy of America is that we operate in two different orbits of information. Conservatives are in some kind of bubble of "fake news", conspiracy theories, half truths and blatant falsehoods because that's all Trump spews is factless bullshit that anyone can google and verify, and the rest of the world is scratching their heads wondering how the fuck did America get so dumb so fast.
And really, you think it's the left operating on conspiracy theories? Hmmm ... let me take a shot at some zingers from right-wingers. Nearly every single one of these are directly from Donald Trump himself, the original king of fake news and conspiracy theories, and ALL have been debunked as fucking nonsense. P.S. If at any point you believed any of these stories, I pity you ... unfortunately a major portion of Trump's base believed a lot of this crap at some point:
- Birther conspiracy about Obama and his birth certificate being a forgery
- Obama was born "Barry Sotero"
- Obama is a Muslim
- Hillary sold uranium to Russians in Uranium One deal
- Obama wire-tapped Trump Tower
- Ted Cruz's father Rafael was involved in the JFK assassination
- After 9/11, Trump watched Muslims dancing in the streets in NJ
- 5 Million illegal immigrants voted for Dems in 2016 election
- Voter fraud is widespread
- There is a war on Christmas
- Obama and the left want to confiscate your guns
- Immigrants are mostly criminals and rapists
- Trump claimed that wasn't his voice on the Access Hollywood tape, after admitting earlier it was
- Obama's unemployment statistics were manipulated, it was as high as 42%
- The same unemployment statistics for Trump were not manipulated
- Vaccines cause autism
- Climate change is a hoax
- Seth Richards murder was orchestrated by Hillary
- A fake dossier was the source of the FISA warrant for the surveillance of Carter Page when he was in the Trump campaign
- "Pizzagate" - Hillary and Podesta were running a child trafficking ring in the basement of a pizza parlor in D.C.
...... and our most recent, and my favorite: wind turbines cause cancer
Now as for some facts:
- Trump lied about his contacts with Russia, as did Don Jr., Manafort, Flynn, Papadopolous, Page and nearly his entire campaign staff
- Trump denied the meeting in Trump Tower, then changed the story to it was about adoptions, then agreed it was to get dirt on Hillary
- Manafort had met a Russian agent and given voter polling data to them, revealing what geographic areas to target
- Russians engaged in a widespread attack through social media to help Trump win
- Trump asked, "Russia if you're listening, there's some emails ..."
- Within 24 hrs of Trump's request on live TV, Russian hackers had breeched the DNC email system and stolen information
- Stolen information by Russia was transferred to Wikileaks
- Roger Stone - Trump ally - had communicated with Guccifer and and Wikileaks to obtain hacked emails from Russia
- Shortly after the election, Trump moved to drop sanctions vs. Russia and Russian oligarchs that were put in place by Obama as penalty for the election interference
- NSA, FBI, CIA and all US intelligence agencies agreed Russians were helping Trump through social media attacks
- Collusion is not a crime. Conspiracy on the other hand most definitely is.
Quote: @KingBash said:
Let me explain this to you, how we all view this, through a rational lens.
lol
Mueller indicts LOTS AND LOTS of people connected to the Trump campaign/administration.
Trump installs a lackey as AG in Barr.
LOL. The only Barr you knew about was Anthony.
You made 0 posts re: William Barr whilst he was being nominated/confirmed by the US Senate.
(FTR, Mike Olson made 1 post re: the next AG)
But yeah, you're a sage. lmaoooooo
All of us call bullshit as we can see how this will play out.
NOT SURPRISINGLY, Barr gets the report and says there's not enough evidence of collusion but that TRUMP IS ALSO NOT EXONERATED (that part is lost a lot of the time on Fox News).
Fire down, Obi-Wan.
Thought I schooled you earlier on an "exoneration" by a prosecutor, but I guess you need to be schooled, yet again.
PROSECUTORS DO NOT EXONERATE. THEY INDICT... OR THEY DON'T.
And now, we find out that those close to Mueller are saying they're disappointed in how Barr has handled their two years of hard work.
LMAO. Because of your NYSlimes link earlier? The one that quoted NO ONE (source) by name?
THAT's the journalism that impresses you? And we're the rubes?
Wow... almost like I'd been saying ALL ALONG. GOD it feels so good to be so right all the time.
You've been "right" about 0.
EDIT: Now quick! Call it fake news! Or pivot to "but Obama/Hillary/the Democrats did X, Y, Z!" Go ahead.
Quote: @savannahskol said:
@ KingBash said:
Let me explain this to you, how we all view this, through a rational lens.
lol
Mueller indicts LOTS AND LOTS of people connected to the Trump campaign/administration.
Trump installs a lackey as AG in Barr.
LOL. The only Barr you knew about was Anthony.
You made 0 posts re: William Barr whilst he was being nominated/confirmed by the US Senate.
(FTR, Mike Olson made 1 post re: the next AG)
But yeah, you're a sage. lmaoooooo
All of us call bullshit as we can see how this will play out.
NOT SURPRISINGLY, Barr gets the report and says there's not enough evidence of collusion but that TRUMP IS ALSO NOT EXONERATED (that part is lost a lot of the time on Fox News).
Fire down, Obi-Wan.
Thought I schooled you earlier on an "exoneration" by a prosecutor, but I guess you need to be schooled, yet again.
PROSECUTORS DO NOT EXONERATE. THEY INDICT... OR THEY DON'T.
And now, we find out that those close to Mueller are saying they're disappointed in how Barr has handled their two years of hard work.
LMAO. Because of your NYSlimes link earlier? The one that quoted NO ONE (source) by name?
THAT's the journalism that impresses you? And we're the rubes?
Wow... almost like I'd been saying ALL ALONG. GOD it feels so good to be so right all the time.
You've been "right" about 0.
EDIT: Now quick! Call it fake news! Or pivot to "but Obama/Hillary/the Democrats did X, Y, Z!" Go ahead.
Because I didn't post about his nomination on a message board to a bunch of red hats means I wasn't paying attention at all?
I'm right again just by default because your post was such a complete and utter waste of time. Be off with you, now, you silly tard.
EDIT: By the way, thanks for the Mark Levin clip that I won't click on. As if I'm gonna spend an hour+ and drink your Kool-Aid. You're the one that supports the con artist. I can't be bought that easily.
|
