Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ANALYSIS. Why the Vikings’ Kyler Murray-Kevin O’Connell pairing is a good fit
#1
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7122822...l-vikings/

Ted Nguyen
Alec Lewis
By Ted Nguyen and Alec Lewis
March 17, 2026 6:00 am EDT

This football experiment features two fascinating ingredients. You have Minnesota Vikings head coach Kevin O’Connell, one of the league’s most respected passing game designers. And you have former No. 1 overall pick Kyler Murray, an undersized but electric quarterback talent.

Blend the two, and what will the end product look like? The results could go a long way toward defining the 2026 season.

Already, skepticism exists. Under O’Connell, the Vikings have taken an under-center, timing-based approach. Murray, meanwhile, is perceived to be primarily an out-of-structure playmaker. When Murray signed last Thursday, the first question posed to O’Connell was about how these two worlds planned to coalesce.

“When you actually dive in and really study Kyler’s experience at the position,” O’Connell said, “you do see a lot of really, really great qualities that fit into some of the things we ask quarterbacks to do.”

Our goal with this story? To take a clear-eyed look at this alliance by evaluating the tape, advanced metrics and conversations with staffers around the league.

The summary of findings supports O’Connell’s perspective. This coach and quarterback marriage makes sense when you dig beneath the surface — even if both sides will need to adapt some to maximize their partnership.

Deeper dive/Rest of article. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7122822...l-vikings/
[-] The following 2 users Like savannahskol's post:
  
Reply

#2
Obviously, we all hope for a fun and exciting year that carries us into the playoffs and breaking through with a win+. I think Murray, at his best, is a top 15 NFL QB, but probably no better than 12 to 15....has limitations. Excitement can be his game, but wins need to start being his game. Very interested to see how KOC gameplans for a QB that doesn't have downfield passing as his strong suit.

I can see the potential, hopefully it can be fulfilled. Both Murray and KOC are going to have to stretch to get a little better to get where the team would like to go this year.
[-] The following 1 user Likes StickierBuns's post:
  
Reply

#3
Im expecting Murray to be a better version of 2017 Case Keenum. Scrappy, clutch, and winning
[-] The following 1 user Likes Still Hurtn's post:
  
Reply

#4
The problem with off-schedule plays is that they are off-schedule. You can't plan them and can't sustain drives based on them. OCs need a plan, to build on their plays and call based off that. Off-schedule plays are exciting and make the fans happy, but they really aren't that great for a team.
Reply

#5
(Yesterday, 01:40 PM)greediron Wrote: The problem with off-schedule plays is that they are off-schedule.  You can't plan them and can't sustain drives based on them.  OCs need a plan, to build on their plays and call based off that.  Off-schedule plays are exciting and make the fans happy, but they really aren't that great for a team.

The plays don’t start off-schedule, they become that, of course. 

Isn’t another way to call them “extending the plays”? And usually referred to as a positive QB ability?

Also take heart that KM’s pocket efficiency ranked only behind DMaye last year.  Wink

Many here lamented the fact that defenses always knew where to find Cousins (easier to pass rush).  Those lamenters should be happy we have a QB with A+ extendability, when he’s not gimpy.
[-] The following 1 user Likes savannahskol's post:
  
Reply

#6
(Yesterday, 05:39 PM)savannahskol Wrote: The plays don’t start off-schedule, they become that, of course. 

Isn’t another way to call them “extending the plays”? And usually referred to as a positive QB ability?

Also take heart that KM’s pocket efficiency ranked only behind DMaye last year.  Wink

Many here lamented the fact that defenses always knew where to find Cousins (easier to pass rush).  Those lamenters should be happy we have a QB with A+ extendability, when he’s not gimpy.

having the ability to do that is great.  Having that be the majority of your offense is not.  But you knew that already.
[-] The following 1 user Likes greediron's post:
  
Reply

#7
Vikings OL is gonna love or hate blocking for Kyler...They aint used to someone so athletic back there, although McCarthy was hardly immobile (I.e. Kirko)

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 
[-] The following 1 user Likes purplefaithful's post:
  
Reply

#8
The Spread and Shred Offense.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Mattyman's post:
  
Reply

#9
(Yesterday, 05:39 PM)savannahskol Wrote: The plays don’t start off-schedule, they become that, of course. 

Isn’t another way to call them “extending the plays”? And usually referred to as a positive QB ability?

Also take heart that KM’s pocket efficiency ranked only behind DMaye last year.  Wink

Many here lamented the fact that defenses always knew where to find Cousins (easier to pass rush).  Those lamenters should be happy we have a QB with A+ extendability, when he’s not gimpy.

One of the more interesting comments I saw on Twitter during Kyler week was the fact that KOC-coached receivers are particularly good at breaking off or extending their routes when the pocket collapses and the QB has to improvise. There were a few examples of that with Darnold. Nobody's better at that than Murray.

But you're right. That isn't the goal; the goal is to execute the play. And given the fact that our surround is significantly better than what Kyler is used to, I'm guessing we see a little less of the toddler with a cellphone.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 Melroy van den Berg.