Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Parsons traded to the Pack...
#31
(Yesterday, 05:32 PM)rf54 Wrote: Dallas got fleeced, Clark had 1 or 2 sacks in '24 and 20 tackles.  He turns 30 in Oct.

Yah, I dont recall him being the disruptor I remember in yesteryears...

Parsons is the real deal and he's young. 

NFL D MVP caliber...

The question is Jordan Love. If Love pans out? Sticky might be right about GB vying for a Lombardi with this group.
Reply

#32
We don't play the Packers until week 12 so the division will be in hand by that time.
Reply

#33
   

FTP in the anal cavity eh…!   Cool Angel
[-] The following 3 users Like Kentis's post:
  
Reply

#34
(Yesterday, 05:32 PM)rf54 Wrote: Dallas got fleeced, Clark had 1 or 2 sacks in '24 and 20 tackles.  He turns 30 in Oct.

They got 2x 1sts and didn’t have to pay Parsons. This isn’t the catastrophe people think it is. Losing those 1sts hurt long term for the packers.
[-] The following 1 user Likes AGRforever's post:
  
Reply

#35
Well, shit. Anyway, best way to slow down Parsons: run right at him.
Reply

#36
The amount of rationalization and delusion in this thread is epic, lol. What was I thinking? Wink

The first round picks that Dallas gets in this trade will be gotten toward the end of the round, in the late 20s. Clark will be 30 in October, but still a force (occasionally) and a good player but descending. Parsons has averaged what each year, 12+ sacks annually? He's an All Pro player. Jerry Jones is an absolute idiot and moron and the only thing partially saving him is that the Cowpie fanbase are also idiots and morons. They'll still show up and spend $$$ even though the team has been mostly either garbage or underwhelming/overrated the last 30 years because the media hypes them up EVERY year. They still think Troy Aikman and Emmitt Smith are going to come out of the tunnel.

Jones lives and operates in his own deluded world:

"In Jones’s first post-trade press conference, which included an 11-minute monologue, he said the trade was made to improve the Cowboys’ run defense, citing Clark’s status as a Pro Bowl defensive tackle. Never mind the fact that run defense is not considered Clark’s strength or that Green Bay’s run defense wasn’t very good with him anchoring the line."

He's going to be 83 years old in a few months. If he wasn't the owner, he'd have been put out to pasture long ago. He likes to make deals without player agents and went past the point of no return alienating Parsons and his agent. He's got plenty of yes men around him telling him this was a 'Herschel Walker' trade and it wasn't even in the same zip code. Jones got fleeced. Mike Lynn and Jimmy Johnson were responsible for the Cowboys renaissance. This story nails it:

https://www.si.com/nfl/micah-parsons-tra...ad-cowboys

"There comes a time in the life of every senior citizen when large responsibilities, such as the operation of a motor vehicle, heavy machinery or even the lawnmower must be reevaluated with sobriety. It’s only natural that certain aspects of daily life be delegated to those who maintain the sharpness and reaction time of their youth. The problem comes when those entering their golden years don’t want to give up the often underappreciated thrill of taking a spin in the Cadillac to Dairy Queen for ice cream, or, in a case that was brought to our attention Thursday, maintaining a very serious role in running the Dallas Cowboys.

The Micah Parsons trade, which one league source wisely described as an “NBA-style salary dump” is like the Khalil Mack trade on steroids (in terms of stupidity—the Cowboys didn’t even get as much for Parsons as the Raiders did in return for Mack, despite the fact that Mack was older at the time of the trade). I thought it impossible to possess more hubris than an unchecked, all-powerful Jon Gruden and yet here we are dissecting a deal that sent arguably the pass rusher with the highest ceiling in the NFL to a conference rival for two first-round picks and a defensive tackle who will turn 30 before Halloween this year."
Reply

#37
I would be more concerned if Clark hadn't been part of the trade, and we didn't have one of the best sets of bookends in the business.

Parsons will get his on occasion, but I dont see him taking over a game for them without clark making a mess of the middle, but we will see.
Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?
[-] The following 2 users Like JimmyinSD's post:
  
Reply

#38
(5 hours ago)JimmyinSD Wrote: I would be more concerned if Clark hadn't been part of the trade,  and we didn't have one of the best sets of bookends in the business.

Parsons will get his on occasion,  but I dont see him taking over a game for them without clark making a mess of the middle,  but we will see.

Pack it in, its over:

[Image: GzeGKK_b0AAWoDT?format=jpg&name=900x900]
Reply

#39
Parsons will definitely improve their pass rush which has been lacking since Zadarius and Preston Smith got old and less effective (and left the team). Rashan Gary can't finish, but maybe he'll get more flushed to him with Parsons on the other side. Van Ness is largely a bust as a pass rusher.

This makes their defense more dangerous, but they have concerns in the secondary too. If anything this gets them closer to us (assuming JJ McCarthy is good), but they haven't passed us or Detroit IMO.

I think there is too much emotion going both ways. Green Bay got better, but I don't think this elevated them to NFC Elite. I mean look at Dallas with CeeDee, Dak, good OL, and a solid defense with Parsons. Is Green Bay set up any better than Dallas at key spots?
[-] The following 2 users Like MAD GAINZ's post:
  
Reply

#40
(5 hours ago)MAD GAINZ Wrote: Parsons will definitely improve their pass rush which has been lacking since Zadarius and Preston Smith got old and less effective (and left the team). Rashan Gary can't finish, but maybe he'll get more flushed to him with Parsons on the other side.  Van Ness is largely a bust as a pass rusher.

This makes their defense more dangerous, but they have concerns in the secondary too.  If anything this gets them closer to us (assuming JJ McCarthy is good), but they haven't passed us or Detroit IMO.

I think there is too much emotion going both ways. Green Bay got better, but I don't think this elevated them to NFC Elite.  I mean look at Dallas with CeeDee, Dak, good OL, and a solid defense with Parsons.  Is Green Bay set up any better than Dallas at key spots?

Our OL protection got much better with the four, count-em four upgrades.  Darrisaw who was gone most of the season, Fries, Jackson, and Kelly.   I have to believe line against line that we've won that improvement game and we beat them twice last year.   We improved at WR and probably broke even at QB.  Overall, our Defense improved immensely on paper and in versatility.  I have to believe we're still the better team.  They added WR help, but we added a fierce pass rush and will be much stouter against the run.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Waterboy's post:
  
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.