Login

supafreak84 · 03-10-2025, 02:14 PM

(03-10-2025, 01:54 PM)MaroonBells Wrote:

If we are using the mighty PFF on all these guys...Holland not so Bueno. 89th out of 170 graded safeties last year. Good run defender but struggled in coverage ranking 109th. How much more we paying him in this "bidding war" than just re-signing Bynum on a mid level contract?

Kentis · 03-10-2025, 02:49 PM

Don’t worry “bidding war” is Kwazy for “signing elsewhere” Cool

supafreak84 · Yesterday, 12:41 PM

Per Goessling, Cooper Kupp to Minnesota is a "real possibility"

Kentis · (This post was last modified: Yesterday, 01:09 PM by Kentis.)

Holland, ended up getting just a tick more than Bynum did, from the Giants.

AGRforever · Yesterday, 02:13 PM

(Yesterday, 12:41 PM)supafreak84 Wrote: Per Goessling, Cooper Kupp to Minnesota is a "real possibility"

That would be really interesting. You'd have to give him limited snaps for injury concerns, but the KOC connection is there.

JustInTime · Yesterday, 04:36 PM

(03-10-2025, 02:14 PM)supafreak84 Wrote: If we are using the mighty PFF on all these guys...Holland not so Bueno. 89th out of 170 graded safeties last year. Good run defender but struggled in coverage ranking 109th. How much more we paying him in this "bidding war" than just re-signing Bynum on a mid level contract?

If you’re aware of another source available to the public that 32 of 32 NFL teams subscribe to, let me know. I’m not a fan of, but let me know a better source and I’ll subscribe.

Kentis · Yesterday, 04:53 PM

Justin Reid to the Saints.

supafreak84 · Yesterday, 07:43 PM

(Yesterday, 04:36 PM)JustInTime Wrote: If you’re aware of another source available to the public that 32 of 32 NFL teams subscribe to, let me know. I’m not a fan of, but let me know a better source and I’ll subscribe.

It's fine as a source, but as the old adage goes "stats don't always tell the story" and it's not the end all when evaluating a player. I think it gets overblown to an extent

StickierBuns

(Yesterday, 07:43 PM)supafreak84 Wrote: It's fine as a source, but as the old adage goes "stats don't always tell the story" and it's not the end all when evaluating a player. I think it gets overblown to an extent

Agreed. It can't be all analytics and it can't be all statistical rankings. Just like 'Moneyball' in baseball....it worked until it didn't. It can't be the 100% end all. Its just one tool in the toolbox for player assessments, I see the value in analytics as complimentary, not primary. I think the main reason some fans put such high regard to it is twofold: they have access to the information like GMs do and they feel they can make educated opinions about who their favorite team should select and then compare how that stacks up in reality. There's the term 'armchair QB' for a reason....today it should be called 'armchair GM'.