Pardons

[Waterboy]

*yawn*
"AllSides was launched to the public in September 2012.[2][3] After working as a Republican political operative in the 1980s[4][5] in the southern United States (including for George H. W. Bush, Mitch McConnell and the Republican National Committee),[6] John Gable worked at internet firms in Silicon Valley where he recruited software developer Scott McDonald to help him launch AllSides and become his CTO.[4][7] Gable continues to identify as a Republican."

Literally, 5 second search.

You proved my point.  All are Never Trumpers, dude.  lol

[Zanary]

So...and let's remind everyone that you admitted that you're ok with misinformation sites, under the lame "sometimes they do..." defense(?), and you're saying your point was:

the Republican-founded and led site for bias checking says a rival site is left-leaning. Is that actually your..."point"?

Really?

Also...I gotta know...what is your resounding proof of their never-Trumper-ism?

[Waterboy]

I was almost able to figure out your question. What is a misinformation site in your opinion. I think the ones you think are misinformation have a much better track record than most of the mainstream sources like The NYT or CNN or ABC or other mainstream news. I think when you figure out that things tabbed as misinformation are often spot on you may stop mumbling like an incoherent drunk.

[Zanary]

I was almost able to figure out your question.  What is a misinformation site in your opinion.  I think the ones you think are misinformation have a much better track record than most of the mainstream sources like The NYT or CNN or ABC or other mainstream news.  I think when you figure out that things tabbed as misinformation are often spot on you may stop mumbling like an incoherent drunk.

Yet you, on all the boards I frequent, are the only one with the comprehension issues. Just you.

I'm already very aware of what that means, and find your sad little nips to be...well, nothing. It's always just you, and you choose to be inconsequential.

SO, back to the point: you can't defend it, as usual...am I right? No "never trumper" references, no proof, just more digital babble?

At least you're consistent.

[Waterboy]

Yet you, on all the boards I frequent, are the only one with the comprehension issues. Just you.

I'm already very aware of what that means, and find your sad little nips to be...well, nothing. It's always just you, and you choose to be inconsequential.

SO, back to the point: you can't defend it, as usual...am I right? No "never trumper" references, no proof, just more digital babble?

At least you're consistent.

I don't know what other kind of boards you frequent, but it's pretty obvious your ramblings have to be drug-induced, or at least I hope they are.  I honestly am lost what you're even trying to argue at this point.  I WILL take my track record on being able to read what's going on in this world over yours any day of the week.  The sites you say are misinformation have actually been amongst the most accurate sites on the net.  They were the ones that knew the media and libtards were in total collusion in brainwashing the American public.  And, it almost worked.

[Zanary]

I don't know what other kind of boards you frequent, but it's pretty obvious your ramblings have to be drug-induced, or at least I hope they are.  I honestly am lost what you're even trying to argue at this point.  I WILL take my track record on being able to read what's going on in this world over yours any day of the week.  The sites you say are misinformation have actually been amongst the most accurate sites on the net.  They were the ones that knew the media and libtards were in total collusion in brainwashing the American public.  And, it almost worked.

...so, more blind denial/defense, and still no actual proof of the "never Trumpers" behind that site?

Yep, totally on brand and consistent.

[Waterboy]

...so, more blind denial/defense, and still no actual proof of the "never Trumpers" behind that site?

Yep, totally on brand and consistent.

Oh okay, I understood a little piece of your question this time.  Your first link said your source leans left. The site that said it leans left was created by a guy with these credentials.

"AllSides was launched to the public in September 2012.[2][3] After working as a Republican political operative in the 1980s[4][5] in the southern United States (including for George H. W. Bush, Mitch McConnell and the Republican National Committee),[6] John Gable worked at internet firms in Silicon Valley where he recruited software developer Scott McDonald to help him launch AllSides and become his CTO.

So, the site saying that your source leans left with negative things to say about Trump was created by a Silicon Valley internet mogul that worked for George H.W. Bush, Mitch McConnell and the RNC pre-Lara Trump.  I think that spells out RINO any way you add it up. And the site they judged admittedly leans left.  Maybe you can figure out that article wasn't exactly fair and balanced.  lol

[Zanary]

Oh okay, I understood a little piece of your question this time.  Your first link said your source leans left. The site that said it leans left was created by a guy with these credentials.

"AllSides was launched to the public in September 2012.[2][3] After working as a Republican political operative in the 1980s[4][5] in the southern United States (including for George H. W. Bush, Mitch McConnell and the Republican National Committee),[6] John Gable worked at internet firms in Silicon Valley where he recruited software developer Scott McDonald to help him launch AllSides and become his CTO.

So, the site saying that your source leans left with negative things to say about Trump was created by a Silicon Valley internet mogul that worked for George H.W. Bush, Mitch McConnell and the RNC pre-Lara Trump.  I think that spells out RINO any way you add it up. And the site they judged admittedly leans left.  Maybe you can figure out that article wasn't exactly fair and balanced.  lol

Don't you regularly cite the "fair and balanaced" network that admitted to lying for the traitor-in-chief, and broke every record in fines at most of a billion dollars?

Of course you love confirmed liars, your defense of that type is ongoing. Like I said, totally on brand.

[Waterboy]

Don't you regularly cite the "fair and balanaced" network that admitted to lying for the traitor-in-chief, and broke every record in fines at most of a billion dollars?

Of course you love confirmed liars, your defense of that type is ongoing. Like I said, totally on brand.

The fair and balanced network had Hunter’s laptop, Covid nonsense, Russian illusion, Lawfare, Afghanistan withdrawal, Ukraine / Hunter dealings, media collusion with dem talking points, Joe’s mental state and just everything correct the last four years.   I guess that doesn’t matter in your world.  Whatever that is.  lol

[Zanary]

The fair and balanced network had Hunter’s laptop, Covid nonsense, Russian illusion, Lawfare, Afghanistan withdrawal, Ukraine / Hunter dealings, media collusion with dem talking points, Joe’s mental state and just everything correct the last four years.   I guess that doesn’t matter in your world.  Whatever that is.  lol

Which of that gives them to right to support, knowingly, a treasonous attempt by lying filth (and the drooling fan club) to subvert law in what was a shameless coup attempt?

That's treason, at all levels. No, I'm not surprised at the kinds of people that support it...but, again, ADMITTED their part in mass-scale deception.

I get that you have to deflect from that, as you're all about the lying filth. You've demonstrated this consistently.

However, the facts are plain and obvious, and defense of that kind of coup is thoroughly anti-American. No wonder ol' Trumplestilskin spoke so highly of Putin and Jong-Un, so often.