Posts: 2,395
Threads: 879
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
1,494
Best offensive grades
Cam Akers 80.1
T.J. Hockenson 71.8
Dalton Risner 69.4
Worst offensive grades
Josh Oliver 47.4
David Quessenberry 49.5
Cam Robinson 51.2
Rushing grades
Sam Darnold 86.8
Cam Akers 80.2
Aaron Jones 68.5
Best run blocking grades
Jordan Addison 72.8
Dalton Risner 66
Justin Jefferson 62.5
Worst run blocking grades
Jalen Nailor 31.3
T.J. Hockenson 47.3
Josh Oliver 51.4
Best pass blocking grades
Aaron Jones 81.9
Garrett Bradbury 73.2
C.J. Ham 73.1
Worst pass blocking grades
Cam Robinson 39.5
David Quessenberry 42.6
Brian O’Neill 42.8
Best defensive grades
Harrison Smith 72.8
Andrew Van Ginkel 70.5
Jonathan Greeanrd 69.9
Worst defensive grades
Jerry Tillery 39.3
Josh Metellus 39.6
Jonathan Bullard 46
Best run defense grades
Ivan Pace Jr. 75.7
Andrew Van Ginkel 73.7
Worst run defense grades
Harrison Phillips 47.2
Camryn Bynum 48.6
Best pass rush grades
Harrison Smith 81.2
Blake Cashman 75.7
Jonathan Greenard 71.5
Worst pass rush grades
Ivan Pace Jr. 48.4
Jonathan Bullard 53.5
Jihad Ward 53.7
Best coverage grades
Jonathan Greenard 71.8
Byron Murphy Jr. 70
Harrison Smith 67.2
Worst coverage grades
Ivan Pace Jr. 34.3
Josh Metellus 39.7
Stephon Gilmore 49.7
The following 1 user Likes MaroonBells's post:1 user Likes MaroonBells's post
Posts: 52
Threads: 6
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation:
23
Thanks for posting the grades!
Posts: 360
Threads: 26
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation:
206
Lol, for as much as we have been complaining about the IOL, poor showing by our OTs. Not really a surprise.
Posts: 2,380
Threads: 402
Joined: Apr 2024
Reputation:
1,915
Sorry, but PFF is mostly horseshit.
Posts: 2,395
Threads: 879
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
1,494
(3 hours ago)StickierBuns Wrote: Sorry, but PFF is mostly horseshit.
LOL
Posts: 2,380
Threads: 402
Joined: Apr 2024
Reputation:
1,915
(3 hours ago)MaroonBells Wrote: LOL
Isn't it though? They don't know the play called and the assignments. So many former players in the media have said this. Yet so many fans take it as the Bible. Former coaches and players not being compensated by PFF.com have said its garbage ad nauseam.
So LOL really?
Posts: 2,395
Threads: 879
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
1,494
(3 hours ago)medaille Wrote: Lol, for as much as we have been complaining about the IOL, poor showing by our OTs. Not really a surprise.
That was my take as well. Bradbury was actually pretty good in pass pro. Risner was OK, Brandel was bad, O'Neill wasn't his usual self and Cam Robinson was flat awful. And when I went back to watch again, all of that seemed to hold true in my eyes.
I guess if there's good news to take from this it's that the worst of it (Robinson) isn't returning and will be replaced by Darrisaw next year.
Posts: 5,512
Threads: 3,676
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
1,421
Its the timing with Darrisaw and the start of a new season that is still cloudy...
Robinson will leave, so there will be some shuffling for a while? Unless they just put Rouse or Quisenberry out there to start the season if CD isnt ready yet
Posts: 2,395
Threads: 879
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
1,494
(3 hours ago)StickierBuns Wrote: Isn't it though? They don't know the play called and the assignments. So many former players in the media have said this. Yet so many fans take it as the Bible. Former coaches and players not being compensated by PFF.com have said its garbage ad nauseam.
So LOL really?
It's not the Bible. Like the Bible it's written by flawed human beings trying to make sense of their world. :-)
But you should look into their methodology. There's a reason every GM in the NFL uses it. One person reviews every single snap of each player, that eval is then reviewed again by a senior analyst for every single snap. It's not perfect, nothing is perfect except God and Wagyu dry-aged bone-in ribeye, but it's typically better than some twatwaffle drawing conclusions from his couch after 11 beers.
Posts: 2,380
Threads: 402
Joined: Apr 2024
Reputation:
1,915
(3 hours ago)MaroonBells Wrote: It's not the Bible. Like the Bible it's written by flawed human beings trying to make sense of their world. :-)
But you should look into their methodology. There's a reason every GM in the NFL uses it. One person reviews every single snap of each player, that eval is then reviewed again by a senior analyst for every single snap. It's not perfect, nothing is perfect except God and Wagyu dry-aged bone-in ribeye, but it's typically better than some twatwaffle drawing conclusions from his couch after 11 beers.
lol, they do? Listen, never heard that before. But I've seen plenty of people bashing it. I'm open to revision with my opinion but it doesn't appear to align with putting eyes on the games often. The people 'reviewing' is where the issue lies and that's where the skepticism resides from many.
|