@
Bullazin said:
@
JimmyinSD said:
well apparently Threads wants to be what Twitter was before it was cleaned up by Elon.
so, apparently news isnt allowed.
and you cant think for yourself without being questioned, but at least they are transparent about the bias. I would be curious if somebody tried following some of those from the other side of the coin who play fast and loose with the truth if they are warned about their reliability?
Lies are poison to democracy, no matter who is telling them.
What makes you think “Lies are poison to democracy”? I think if you were to say something like
that, the next logical solution is that “We need to stop the liars from lying,
so we’re going to make a Ministry of Truth which if not corrupted will let us
know who’s lying, but which in actuality will be run by the liars, because we
all know politicians are habitual liars, and it will actually prevent the truth-tellers
from telling the truth, rather than the liars from lying.
For me, I just don’t think you can outsource truth-seeking
into one singular group, because even if you start out with a perfect
trustworthy group, it’s not that hard to corrupt them. You can take away their livelihood. You can threaten their families. You can offer them a ton of money. There’s just so many options for them to fall
from grace.
I don’t think that “Lies are the poison to democracy” as
much as they are an inherent part of it, and more than anything, It’s not the
lie that’s the problem, it’s the actions that are the problem. If we had a functioning media, they would
highlight the corruption and we would vote out the bad actors. I think one tenant keeps coming up and that
has to do with Centralizing Power. Centralizing
power makes systems easily corruptible. So
while I don’t think it’s possible for Meta, to in good faith, act as a singular
Ministry of Truth, I do think there’s room for an ecosystem where many separate
organizations all act to highlight the truth because those that act in bad
faith are repeatedly shown for who they are and lose credibility in the market,
and I think that this pressure can provide us with the effect we’re looking
for.
I also think we have to be much more cognizant, not of lies,
but of missed opportunities to tell important facts. If liberal rags are missing key facts that
conservatives are bringing up, and vice versa, somehow that has to be made
visible to us.