Team looks promising but I still have concerns about the OL, what a shock
Quote: @1VikesFan said:
Team looks promising but I still have concerns about the OL, what a shock
Yes, me too. I think Darrisaw is not going to play much the first part of the season. They are being very cautious with him and that injury and that will set him back from a reps perspective. And being a rookie you can read the tea leaves and that means Hill starting the season at LT.
Quote: @StickyBun said:
@ 1VikesFan said:
Team looks promising but I still have concerns about the OL, what a shock
Yes, me too. I think Darrisaw is not going to play much the first part of the season. They are being very cautious with him and that injury and that will set him back from a reps perspective. And being a rookie you can read the tea leaves and that means Hill starting the season at LT.
Too early. I would say if Darrisaw isn't getting reps by the 1st preseason game (two weeks from today), then he probably won't be our starter week one. Word is he's exceptionally smart, so that will help him learn quickly.
I'm just stoked we have a guy like Hill who can play LT and play it fairly well until Darrisaw is ready.
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ 1VikesFan said:
Team looks promising but I still have concerns about the OL, what a shock
Yes, me too. I think Darrisaw is not going to play much the first part of the season. They are being very cautious with him and that injury and that will set him back from a reps perspective. And being a rookie you can read the tea leaves and that means Hill starting the season at LT.
Too early. I would say if Darrisaw isn't getting reps by the 1st preseason game (two weeks from today), then he probably won't be our starter week one. Word is he's exceptionally smart, so that will help him learn quickly.
I'm just stoked we have a guy like Hill who can play LT and play it fairly well until Darrisaw is ready.
No way Darrisaw starts Game 1.
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@ RS Express said:
@ FLVike said:
As a long time fan please forgive me as I expect something bad to happen that nobody could see coming.
You mean like the RG "competition" being rigged for Dozier before it started? Oh, sorry, you said something we couldn't see coming :p
Where is this Dozier shit coming from? I haven't seen his name mentioned this year except by you.
Who's Dozier ?
Quote: @StickyBun said:
@ MaroonBells said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ 1VikesFan said:
Team looks promising but I still have concerns about the OL, what a shock
Yes, me too. I think Darrisaw is not going to play much the first part of the season. They are being very cautious with him and that injury and that will set him back from a reps perspective. And being a rookie you can read the tea leaves and that means Hill starting the season at LT.
Too early. I would say if Darrisaw isn't getting reps by the 1st preseason game (two weeks from today), then he probably won't be our starter week one. Word is he's exceptionally smart, so that will help him learn quickly.
I'm just stoked we have a guy like Hill who can play LT and play it fairly well until Darrisaw is ready.
No way Darrisaw starts Game 1.
Attaboy. That's how we always assured a draft pick would fall to us. By saying "no way" player X will fall to pick Y. And damned if it didn't work half the time.
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ MaroonBells said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ 1VikesFan said:
Team looks promising but I still have concerns about the OL, what a shock
Yes, me too. I think Darrisaw is not going to play much the first part of the season. They are being very cautious with him and that injury and that will set him back from a reps perspective. And being a rookie you can read the tea leaves and that means Hill starting the season at LT.
Too early. I would say if Darrisaw isn't getting reps by the 1st preseason game (two weeks from today), then he probably won't be our starter week one. Word is he's exceptionally smart, so that will help him learn quickly.
I'm just stoked we have a guy like Hill who can play LT and play it fairly well until Darrisaw is ready.
No way Darrisaw starts Game 1.
Attaboy. That's how we always assured a draft pick would fall to us. By saying "no way" player X will fall to pick Y. And damned if it didn't work half the time.
Weird take. You be you, I'll be real. No way he's starting at LT game one. Want to bet? I like Darrisaw a bunch. He will be the LT in week 6 or 7 but not before.
Quote: @StickyBun said:
@ MaroonBells said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ MaroonBells said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ 1VikesFan said:
Team looks promising but I still have concerns about the OL, what a shock
Yes, me too. I think Darrisaw is not going to play much the first part of the season. They are being very cautious with him and that injury and that will set him back from a reps perspective. And being a rookie you can read the tea leaves and that means Hill starting the season at LT.
Too early. I would say if Darrisaw isn't getting reps by the 1st preseason game (two weeks from today), then he probably won't be our starter week one. Word is he's exceptionally smart, so that will help him learn quickly.
I'm just stoked we have a guy like Hill who can play LT and play it fairly well until Darrisaw is ready.
No way Darrisaw starts Game 1.
Attaboy. That's how we always assured a draft pick would fall to us. By saying "no way" player X will fall to pick Y. And damned if it didn't work half the time.
Weird take. You be you, I'll be real. No way he's starting at LT game one. Want to bet? I like Darrisaw a bunch. He will be the LT in week 6 or 7 but not before.
Don't forget that in my 53-man prediction, I predicted Hill would start week one, and I said that long before we knew about Darrisaw's injury. So yes, I agree, Hill starts week one.
Just saying....3 practices into a 40 practice prep is too early to make a definitive call either way...
And Boom the rona rears it's ugly head
|