“The truth is upon us”

[Guest]

@A1Janitor said:

You are just fucking nuts.  Just stop.  

The evidence is out there. The WaPo and NY Times were complicit.  They are lying now to lessen the blow. 

The idiot you posted has next to no followers and just made shit up based on a foolish WaPo article - his twitter feed is filled with anti-Trump nonsense.  

The IG doesn’t give Durham questions to investigate.  He gives criminal referrals.  Durham doesn’t clear anyone.  He indicts and prosecutes.

Is it so hard for you to just wait for the real report and Durham indictments?  There is only one person who has seen the whole report outside the IG office.  Not one of the leakers has.  

I waited for the real report.

zip.  zilch.  nada.

THE TRUTH IS UPON US!!


And it’s a fucking nothingburger, just like I said.  Just like the articles said, that you said they were both “lying to lessen the blow.”

LMAO

I guess safe to say they weren’t lying and you are just proving over and over and over you are a gullible cultist. 

Do you cancel Xmas now?  What happens if Durham doesnt deliver?  Should we have social workers do a welfare check on you?

Suuuuuccccckkkkeerrrrrr

[Guest]

@SFVikeFan said:

@PSBLAKE said:

@mblack said:

@PSBLAKE said:

@mblack said:

@PSBLAKE said:
nothing ever come of  these investigations its alway a waste of time.

We were told to wait for the IG Report...now we are told to wait for the Durham investigation. So please direct your comment to those asking the rest of us to wait.

Didnt direct anything to you.  Just a general comment on all these reports Mueller, Impeachment, IG, IRS, Email etc.  all political nothing ever happens the only thing that might happen is the house of reps will Impeach a sitting president for a non crime that would never hold up in court and didnt even hold up in their kangaroo slanted nonsense.   So it is purely a political  stunt that sets a terrible precedent.  

At the bold....
Isnt that the whole issue under discussion? You think the "crime" is a non crime. Others think it is a crime. I am trying not to notice your obvious bias (kangaroo slanted nonsense)
If there is a none crime why not let the process play out? Provide the actual call transcripts, provide requested documents, let the actual first hand witnesses testify.
Lastly even if you forget all whats going on....
Trump has been president since 2017. That means he has allowed aid to Ukraine (under a very corrupt regime even his people said that the regime under the former president was very corrupt). So why did he not fight corruption then? This also makes the excuse that Trump does not  like giving aid laughable.

Nothing you have continued to post is impeachable only reasons not to vote for him.  And yes it is a show trial with no first hand evidence that is the definition of a kangaroo court.  You cannot convict of a crime on this evidence and you are looking for a  high crime.  sigh.  And yes I am biased against the obvious nonsense that these politicians keep rolling out there.  

plenty of evidence you are ignoring... the biggest being that the White House is refusing to follow subpoenas, allow Mulvaney, Bolton, Pence and others testify.  That right there is obstruction of justice.


Poor A1 .... had to move his goalposts AGAIN.  

Wait for Dec 9th!   IG Report!   Arrests coming!  Washington Post, NY Times are LYING AND COMPLICIT!!!

No actually they were spot on, you were wrong AGAIN.  

But wait!!

Now let’s change it to “Wait for Durham!!”. Surely he will prove my conspiracy theories ...


LMAO

The desperation is both utterly predictable and pathetic.

no evidence of an impeachable crime sorry I have not ignored anything.  I get it you dont like him you did not like the call but nothing in the direct actual evidence proved a crime.  

[Guest]

LOL

Read the fucking report!  It is damning.  They all are going down.  

They were spying on Trump campaign BEFORE first FISA application.  Let that sink in.  That is illegal!

They used fake info (Steele Dossier) and pretended it was verified.  It was all fake. 

The spies used against Carter Page, George P - were the same ones used against Flynn. 

All illegal.  And they had 17 fuckups with FISA applications.  

Barr and Durham - read their recent statements.  They went to Italy and interviewed Mifsud.  Confiscated his phones etc.  

Have fun.  Keep watching the fake news.  

[Guest]

@PSBLAKE said:

@SFVikeFan said:

@PSBLAKE said:

@mblack said:

@PSBLAKE said:

@mblack said:

@PSBLAKE said:
nothing ever come of  these investigations its alway a waste of time.

We were told to wait for the IG Report...now we are told to wait for the Durham investigation. So please direct your comment to those asking the rest of us to wait.

Didnt direct anything to you.  Just a general comment on all these reports Mueller, Impeachment, IG, IRS, Email etc.  all political nothing ever happens the only thing that might happen is the house of reps will Impeach a sitting president for a non crime that would never hold up in court and didnt even hold up in their kangaroo slanted nonsense.   So it is purely a political  stunt that sets a terrible precedent.  

At the bold....
Isnt that the whole issue under discussion? You think the "crime" is a non crime. Others think it is a crime. I am trying not to notice your obvious bias (kangaroo slanted nonsense)
If there is a none crime why not let the process play out? Provide the actual call transcripts, provide requested documents, let the actual first hand witnesses testify.
Lastly even if you forget all whats going on....
Trump has been president since 2017. That means he has allowed aid to Ukraine (under a very corrupt regime even his people said that the regime under the former president was very corrupt). So why did he not fight corruption then? This also makes the excuse that Trump does not  like giving aid laughable.

Nothing you have continued to post is impeachable only reasons not to vote for him.  And yes it is a show trial with no first hand evidence that is the definition of a kangaroo court.  You cannot convict of a crime on this evidence and you are looking for a  high crime.  sigh.  And yes I am biased against the obvious nonsense that these politicians keep rolling out there.  

plenty of evidence you are ignoring... the biggest being that the White House is refusing to follow subpoenas, allow Mulvaney, Bolton, Pence and others testify.  That right there is obstruction of justice.


Poor A1 .... had to move his goalposts AGAIN.  

Wait for Dec 9th!   IG Report!   Arrests coming!  Washington Post, NY Times are LYING AND COMPLICIT!!!

No actually they were spot on, you were wrong AGAIN.  

But wait!!

Now let’s change it to “Wait for Durham!!”. Surely he will prove my conspiracy theories ...


LMAO

The desperation is both utterly predictable and pathetic.

no evidence of an impeachable crime sorry I have not ignored anything.  I get it you dont like him you did not like the call but nothing in the direct actual evidence proved a crime.  

So you are saying that obstruction of justice is not an impeachable crime?


LOOOOOOOOOOOL

Ok then

[Guest]

@A1Janitor said:
LOL

Read the fucking report!  It is damning.  They all are going down.  

They were spying on Trump campaign BEFORE first FISA application.  Let that sink in.  That is illegal!

They used fake info (Steele Dossier) and pretended it was verified.  It was all fake. 

The spies used against Carter Page, George P - were the same ones used against Flynn. 

All illegal.  And they had 17 fuckups with FISA applications.  

Barr and Durham - read their recent statements.  They went to Italy and interviewed Mifsud.  Confiscated his phones etc.  

Have fun.  Keep watching the fake news. 

I think I already mentioned I read the report. Maybe this is your version of "read the Transcript". By the way the colorful language is uncalled for. We can all do better.

We agree in the screw ups on the FISA. Everything else you are peddling are the same bogus claims that the IG just said are not valid. He said there was no political bias and all was done appropriately even though he found some mistakes with how the FISA was administered NOT why it was needed. He also refuted the nonsense that there were many FISA warrants... there was one.

They did not base this on the Steele dossier. Your own IG said that. Makes me wonder if you did read the report. You know Steele and "princess" Ivanka had a friendship that started long before 2016 right?.
As for my source on the "no bias" outcome... check again. I used fox news (unless you mean fox is fake news).


Since the IG report did not support your bogus claims, now it's on to the next... Durham.
Anyway, it is clear you are a believer of "alternate" facts even when the truth slaps you in the face. So based on your history here in asking others to "wait" I am not surprised it's on to the next "investigation" (note the quotes).


The FBI said there was no foul play, bi-partisan Congress said there was no foul play, The IG said there was no foul play yet you are still fishing even though all these bodies were either under Trump appointed leadership or Republican leadership. But guess what? The fishing must continue no matter how baseless it is.
It's clear you have a desired outcome and would not stop till you get ut no matter how much evidence slaps you in the face as to how troubling what trump and his cronies were doing.

It is just sad that..

@"GreggJarrett" said and I quote:
It turns out that the most revealing aspect of the long-awaited Justice Department’s inspector general’s report on the origins of the Russia collusion hoatwitter.comes from Attorney General William Barr’s damning assessment of it.


Source: Gregg Jarrett of Fox News

Yes that's not me. That's from one of yours at Fox news.

Lastly, it's clear you can't stop spinning nor stop moving the goal post so I'll leave you to it and the so called "objective" AG Bill Barr.

[Guest]

On a lighter note... in the IG report page 94 Steele said he had a personal relationship with Ivanka before all this happened. He visited her at Trump tower. He and Ivanka had dinner in London in 2007. He said he even gave her a sentimental gift, "a family tartan from Scotland" — the homeland of Trump's late mother.
We should note that in 2007 (as of April 25th) Ivanka and Jaret were still just friends.

The choice of a family tartan is quite interesting cos it carries with it sentimental value/gesture. It's not your typical present or gift.
So are we going to ask Ivanka to testify? Just kidding
Anyway,  lets keep digging. :-)

[Guest]

Read the report.  The IG spells it out.  

I can’t help you with this.  Barr said the report shows what I am saying.  

Don’t rely in CNN or the crooks.  

[Guest]

@mblack said:

They did not base this on the Steele dossier. Your own IG said that. Makes me wonder if you did read the report. 

???

From the OIG review of FISA applications & FBI Crossfire Hurricane investigation.  
page 7  https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf


“Decision to Seek FISA AuthorityWe determined that the Crossfire Hurricane team's receipt of Steele's election reporting on September 19, 2016 played a central and essential role in the FBI's and Department's decision to seek the FISA order.”

^^ This was the first approved FISA request (spying) on Carter Page, immediately after the FBI got 
     an updated Steele dossier.  

-------------------------------------------------------

Maybe you meant 'they (FBI) did not base this on the Steele dossier' as predicate for the beginning of 'Crossfire Hurricane'?  

Well that is correct.  They used the equally (more?) flimsy Papadopolous set-up encounters with Mifsud and Halper, for the supposed basis for beginning CH.

--------------------------------------------------------

So OIG found 'no political bias', eh?  And that's your 'big win'?
Well, ok I posted earlier that I would abide that he's (Horowitz) an honest broker.  

My gosh, tho.  17 identified glaring errors, on the FISA apps, alone? A FBI attorney doctoring the application?  Exculpatory evidence withheld?
And every error...was an error on the side of  the FBI over Trump et al?
That doesnt give you pause?  shouldnt some errors have favored Trump, but not one did?
And all the text messages revealed (Strzok & Page)... and Comey's/Clapper's/Brennan's 
   on the record  interviews subsequent, expressing their 
    contempt for Trump?

No political bias?   Dohkay.
I  think Barr and Durham are going to make Horowitz look foolish on that point.  

[Guest]

@A1Janitor said:
Read the report.  The IG spells it out.  

I can’t help you with this.  Barr said the report shows what I am saying.  

Don’t rely in CNN or the crooks.  

You couldn’t be bothered to read the Mueller report for details of misdeeds, only to celebrate the no collusion outcome.

Yet now you expect us to not do the same as you?  Ignore the result, look at what it says on page 190?


LOL

Still the same hypocrite

[Guest]

@SFVikeFan said:

@A1Janitor said:
Read the report.  The IG spells it out.  

I can’t help you with this.  Barr said the report shows what I am saying.  

Don’t rely in CNN or the crooks.  

You couldn’t be bothered to read the Mueller report for details of misdeeds, only to celebrate the no collusion outcome.

Yet now you expect us to not do the same as you?  Ignore the result, look at what it says on page 190?


LOL

Still the same hypocrite

I wish you would clean up your act.  I was “moderated” because I grew tired of the passive aggressive bullshit from some on the left.

Read the fucking report.  They started unmasking Trump campaign officials.  BEFORE FISA applications.  Think that through.  

They withheld exculpatory info.  Carter Page worked for the CIA. They knew he wasn’t colluding with Russians.

Mifsud set Flynn, George P and Carter P up.  Mueller pretended he was a Russian asset. He was CIA (and outside the scope of IG ... but not Barr and Durham).

At point should they have closed the spying down?  They continued after Trump took office.  Why didn’t they stop?  Why did they leak a false narrative to the fake news, and then use that news as a basis for spying?

Why didn’t they brief Trump?

Bottom line ... the incidents in IG will be evidence for indictments.  

Watch Barr and Durham. 

And explain why Schiff lied to America about proof of collusion between Trump and Russia.  It was all a hoax.