Quote: @Mike Olson said:
I don’t have a trump derangement syndrome. I think the GOP in its present state is bad for the country. Pre-reagan republicans are a decent lot.
Keep on with these wacky conspiracy theories A1 they’re great!
State for the record what I am wrong about.
So we can look back and see who was right.
Blanket attacks aren’t sufficient.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@ Mike Olson said:
I don’t have a trump derangement syndrome. I think the GOP in its present state is bad for the country. Pre-reagan republicans are a decent lot.
Keep on with these wacky conspiracy theories A1 they’re great!
State for the record what I am wrong about.
So we can look back and see who was right.
Blanket attacks aren’t sufficient.
State what you are wrong about? Dude everything you say is "Just wait you'll see...." Are you wrong? I dunno but you are nutty for sure.
Quote: @Mike Olson said:
I am very much not concerned.
Why should you be? I'm just lil ol savvysav, harmless lovable little fuzzball.
I was out working last weeks game for our site.
Watch the expenses! Your allotted per diem only goes so far.
I played along for a while. Likely my only postings here will be political from now on.
Well...there ya go. I was just first to notice it, and take a good-natured jab in the OP. No-one noticed the wink emoji?
Meanwhile I pay the fucking bills.
Are you married?
So kiss my ass if you don’t like what I post.
Where did I say I didn't like what you posted?
I'm a big fan of your easily debunkable political predictions that don't come true.
(A sampling in this thread (https://vikefans.com/discussion/#/discus...bly-not/p1)
You choose to post here and I allow you to. That's the arrangement.
OK, Vladimir. 
Quote: @Mike Olson said:
Also do you really REALLY want me to dig up stats on past postings to show who has posted more political bullshit? Really?
Wow just wow (to borrow an earlier sentiment). Careful. Some would call that stalkerish. 
Because you’d be the biggest damn fraud on here. Don’t come at me with this bullshit. It makes you look like a fucking idiot.
Interesting facts: I've NEVER called anyone a fraud, or called any post bullshit, and certainly NEVER called anyone an idiot. Don't believe me? Find one.
Ya wanna hurt me? Go ahead if it makes you feel any better. I'm an easy target. Yeah, you're right...I post too much on here (ST)
But I read too much, too. I could be a cold-hearted cynic like you...but I don't like to hurt anyone's feelings.
Well, you think what you want of me; I'm not changing. I like me. My dog likes me. My wife likes me. Cause I'm the real deal.
What you see is what you get.
Quote: @Mike Olson said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ Mike Olson said:
I don’t have a trump derangement syndrome. I think the GOP in its present state is bad for the country. Pre-reagan republicans are a decent lot.
Keep on with these wacky conspiracy theories A1 they’re great!
State for the record what I am wrong about.
So we can look back and see who was right.
Blanket attacks aren’t sufficient.
State what you are wrong about? Dude everything you say is "Just wait you'll see...." Are you wrong? I dunno but you are nutty for sure.
LMAO Are you just trying to insult me?
1. Did the Bidens make millions off his office?
2. Did Obama illegally spy on the Trump campaign?
3. Did Comey and others mislead the FISA court?
4. Did Hillary and the DNC pay foreigners to create false dirt to influence the election?
5. Did Hillary make money selling her office in pay to play scams?
6. Were the MSM involved in framing the fake russian hoax narrative?
7. Did Russia hack podesta’s emails or was it someone else?
8. How did Assange get the emails?
9. Did CIA, FBI, and DOJ frame Trump campaign? Did they illegally leak material
to the media?
10. Did Bill Clinton, among others, have sex with underage girls?
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@ Mike Olson said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ Mike Olson said:
I don’t have a trump derangement syndrome. I think the GOP in its present state is bad for the country. Pre-reagan republicans are a decent lot.
Keep on with these wacky conspiracy theories A1 they’re great!
State for the record what I am wrong about.
So we can look back and see who was right.
Blanket attacks aren’t sufficient.
State what you are wrong about? Dude everything you say is "Just wait you'll see...." Are you wrong? I dunno but you are nutty for sure.
LMAO Are you just trying to insult me?
1. Did the Bidens make millions off his office?
2. Did Obama illegally spy on the Trump campaign?
3. Did Comey and others mislead the FISA court?
4. Did Hillary and the DNC pay foreigners to create false dirt to influence the election?
5. Did Hillary make money selling her office in pay to play scams?
6. Were the MSM involved in framing the fake russian hoax narrative?
7. Did Russia hack podesta’s emails or was it someone else?
8. How did Assange get the emails?
9. Did CIA, FBI, and DOJ frame Trump campaign? Did they illegally leak material
to the media?
10. Did Bill Clinton, among others, have sex with underage girls?
"Well...you're a nutty wacky crackpot. Don't take that, personally, he's concerned about you ".
(I think some of us need to share the PM's we've (conservatives) been sent, if Mike is truly worried about 'poster safety'. I never have, and I've been sent some 'scary' shit.
'Scary' yet I know these putzes are harmless, and I have a pair)
That's the best Mike would respond. Don't expect a response better than that.
Ignore all his previous Mueller-era mis-predictions. Ya yella-bellied shit heel.
Quote: @suncoastvike said:
Don't envy your job on this one Jimmy.
This thread has me embarrassed.
So.... curious to know where your 'embarrassment' lies?
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
LOL
The only thing you have to worry about is the truth coming out.
I stand by all of my posts. Your Trump Derangement Syndrome is hilarious.
Let’s see if I was right about the Russian hoax, the complicity and duplicity of the Obama administration, the money made by selling their offices by Kerry, Clinton, and Biden.
The MSM was involved. Shep Smith was escorted out for a reason. CNN is going to be exposed in the next few days. Durham and Barr are investigating treason for a reason.
Here's why nobody takes you seriously.
"The money made by selling the offices by Kerry, Clinton, Biden". All this is currently unproven. No charges, no arrests.
Yet meanwhile 2 Russians have been arrested for felony campaign finance violations. Huge donations to Trump's Super-PAC. In return they wanted access and influence in the White House. They wanted the ambassador to the Ukraine gone. And lo and behold, all of these things really happened. The Russians are bribing our administration for favors, proven facts.
But interestingly enough, you refuse to comment on real arrests, real corruption becauseit involves Republicans. It's like it never happened. All the corruption that you rail on and on and act so outraged by really happened, except it was the wrong team, so you don't bring it up.
Which means you really don't care about corruption, or crimes, or pedophilia or whatever is your outrage du jour. You only care that it was something a Democrat/liberal did. But if it's a Republican it doesn't matter. It's painfully obvious how your agenda is so biased.
And I find it hysterical you mentioned Ghouliani working on uncovering "the truth" a few days ago, yet his Russian buddies just got arrested and it sounds like he himself is under investigation. You can't make this stuff up.
And you don't find it the least bit strange that the Attorney General met with Rupert Murdoch? Why on Earth would an AG meet with Fox News?? You mean you wouldn't raise an eyebrow if Obama was under investigation, and Eric Holder met with CNN CEO? And the next day CNN fired a reporter who was critical of him? Oh you know you'd be salivating with conspiracy theories and outrage.
Quote: @SFVikeFan said:
And I find it hysterical you mentioned Ghouliani working on uncovering "the truth" a few days ago, yet his Russian buddies just got arrested and it sounds like he himself is under investigation. You can't make this stuff up.
And you don't find it the least bit strange that the Attorney General met with Rupert Murdoch? Why on Earth would an AG meet with Fox News?? You mean you wouldn't raise an eyebrow if Obama was under investigation, and Eric Holder met with CNN CEO? And the next day CNN fired a reporter who was critical of him? Oh you know you'd be salivating with conspiracy theories and outrage.
As you state, the SDNY arrested Giuliani's "buddies", right?
Do you know who the SDNY has to "sign off" with, in those indictments? AG Barr. He's their boss.
The same AG Barr whom you've professed would forever be a Trump stooge.
Fun to watch the pretzels you tie yourself up with.
Quote: @savannahskol said:
@ SFVikeFan said:
And I find it hysterical you mentioned Ghouliani working on uncovering "the truth" a few days ago, yet his Russian buddies just got arrested and it sounds like he himself is under investigation. You can't make this stuff up.
And you don't find it the least bit strange that the Attorney General met with Rupert Murdoch? Why on Earth would an AG meet with Fox News?? You mean you wouldn't raise an eyebrow if Obama was under investigation, and Eric Holder met with CNN CEO? And the next day CNN fired a reporter who was critical of him? Oh you know you'd be salivating with conspiracy theories and outrage.
As you state, the SDNY arrested Giuliani's "buddies", right?
Do you know who the SDNY has to "sign off" with, in those indictments? AG Barr. He's their boss.
The same AG Barr whom you've professed would forever be a Trump stooge.
Fun to watch the pretzels you tie yourself up with.
And exactly what does any of that have to do with Barr meeting with Fox News owner?
Way to avoid the obvious question genius.
So because Barr didn't obstruct in this particular routine indictment proves he's not a Trump protector?
LMAO
Hahahahahahaha
Really, that's one hell of an argument.
"Your Honor, you see I spoke to this one woman at a bar and was a perfect gentleman, so it's impossible for me to have raped those other women."
LOLOLOLOLOL
Do you come up with these all by yourself or do you have help?
|
