Quote: @pattersaur said:
Rodgers almost fits that.@medaille said:
Regardless of what you think of Lamar and how he compares to
Cousins, I just can’t think of a single plausible way to make this work in a
way that’s beneficial to us. If you get
Lamar to lower his asking price to a reasonable level, the Ravens get to keep
him. Cousins contract is already huge
and would have $38M+ dead cap hit if we trade him. Cousins has a no-trade you’d need to
negotiate with him, and he’d need to find a home he wanted to go to. If it all falls through, now your QB is
pissed off. His $50M/5 year fully
guaranteed contract desires doesn’t match his body’s ability to stay healthy, especially
with his playing style. I know the cap
is malleable, but how do you deal with Cousins dead cap, Jacksons salary demands,
losing some draft picks, and build a team that’s SB competitive around Jackson within
a year or two? It seems that the same
problems we currently have with not being able to put a team around him would
still be there but worse. Is Jackson better
enough to overcome the additional burden? Very good points and a valid question at the end.
Sorry to use a lame analagoy but I tend to think about ELITE quarterbacks a lot like Heisenberg meth. Walt's meth might've been only a few percentage points more pure than Gail or whoever else's, but that extra bit of difference equates to a LOT in practice. It's impossible to quantify but the list recent Super Bowl winning QBs doesn't lie. It's riddled with Hall of Famers with only a few exceptions. In fact, how many HOF-bound QBs in the NFL in the past 15 years HAVEN'T won a Super Bowl? Maybe Rivers? I'm probably blanking on a couple but not many come to mind.
And yes I would consider Lamar elite. Sounds like many here would disagree and that's okay.
Also, to @greediron's point... if the Vikings won a Super Bowl and sucked for 5 years afterwards hey, sign me up! Some would probably disagree with that too. Beauty of a forum.
And your list is pretty accurate
https://www.nbcsports.com/chicago/bears/...super-bowl
They have Vick, Ryan and Cam on their list, but those aren't HOF players IMO.
ESPN: Vikings in play for Lamar Jackson
|
03-21-2023, 08:11 PM
03-22-2023, 01:09 PM
03-22-2023, 01:27 PM
Quote: @MaroonBells said: The Rodgers trade isn't "official" but could this Schefter quote not apply to GB also? That would suck beyond words ha.
03-22-2023, 02:22 PM
Quote: @pattersaur said:
03-22-2023, 02:38 PM
03-22-2023, 09:07 PM
This is probably the Ravens trying to drum up an offer. They’re a perennial top 3 defense. They don’t need him as a QB nor his huge contract. They’d probably win more games with a top flight passer. He simply isn’t worth the contract he wants. It doesn’t help he’s missed 25% of the games the past two seasons.
I consider Jackson the most overrated QB in the NFL. If they wanted Cousins they’d have to give me Jackson and a 1st rounder
03-23-2023, 02:20 PM
03-27-2023, 02:51 PM
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
03-27-2023, 02:56 PM
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
03-27-2023, 02:56 PM
Quote: @MaroonBells said:I believe that's a parody/satire account. They basically just throw shit against the wall and see what sticks while also coming up with some really wild stuff. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |