05-01-2022, 12:55 PM
Quote: @AGRforever said:
Depends upon the applicable statute of limitations (probably already passed). More likely he was told not to address the issue because if he said the two sisters lied, they could sue him for defamation and all the allegation would then become part of that litigation.@StickyBun said:
Correct me if im wrong. With charges dropped, couldn’t he be recharged with new evidence? I’m sure his lawyer told him exactly what to say when questioned.@AGRforever said:
Time will tell if he was the monster portrayed or a horny teenager or nothing at all.
The story will resurface if he was as shitty as the article made him out to be. If he owns it when questioned by the media, it will be fine. Hopefully he has matured greatly. I like his upside, he can be a starter.