Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NFL Draft Talk
Quote: @supafreak84 said:
I think the problem with taking Hooker for the Vikings in the first round is our limited pick supply with huge areas of need still to fill on the roster. You can take Hooker who is recovering from a knee injury, and plant him on IR for the year, or you can take a player that hopefully pays immediate dividends. There would have to be real conviction to use our first round pick on him. 

We don't take players that pay immediate dividends.  Thats not the Kwesi way!!!
Reply

Quote: @MaroonBells said:
In DJ's latest mock, the Vikings take Hooker in the 1st. 

https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah...kings-pick-
Vikings need to trade back and get another pick. If Hooker is still there fine. If not there are plenty of other needs this year. If they really like Hooker and take him at the end of the first to get the fifth year option, I could understand that. But to take him outright at 23 doesn't make sense to me.
Reply

Quote: @AGRforever said:
@supafreak84 said:
I think the problem with taking Hooker for the Vikings in the first round is our limited pick supply with huge areas of need still to fill on the roster. You can take Hooker who is recovering from a knee injury, and plant him on IR for the year, or you can take a player that hopefully pays immediate dividends. There would have to be real conviction to use our first round pick on him. 

We don't take players that pay immediate dividends.  Thats not the Kwesi way!!!
Lol touche and agreed
Reply

Quote: @jargomcfargo said:
@MaroonBells said:
In DJ's latest mock, the Vikings take Hooker in the 1st. 

https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah...kings-pick-
Vikings need to trade back and get another pick. If Hooker is still there fine. If not there are plenty of other needs this year. If they really like Hooker and take him at the end of the first to get the fifth year option, I could understand that. But to take him outright at 23 doesn't make sense to me.
The problem is more specifically the lack of a second round pick. Trading back from 23 is a tough spot to gain much. It would have to be a unique situation and a very limited number of the 6 remaining teams in the 1st rd. interested to trade up into that spot. That leaves teams willing to give up 2, 2nd rounders (if they have them), or their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th this year, or this year's 2nd with next year's 2nd, or next year's 1st and conditional pick based on their record.

The value this year (maybe most years), is in the second round.   
Reply

Quote: @jargomcfargo said:
@MaroonBells said:
In DJ's latest mock, the Vikings take Hooker in the 1st. 

https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah...kings-pick-
Vikings need to trade back and get another pick. If Hooker is still there fine. If not there are plenty of other needs this year. If they really like Hooker and take him at the end of the first to get the fifth year option, I could understand that. But to take him outright at 23 doesn't make sense to me.
I would rather they take him at 23 this year,  than piss away multiple first rounders to make a big move up for a guy that is just as likely to need at least a year sitting and watching and still has likely the same chance of making it as a pro.  I dont think Hooker is likely a very high ceiling guy, but I think he could be a fair QB in the right system,   not sure if thats KOCs system,  but he's got some good tools to work with until we find that high ceiling guy,  and the cap savings would allow for a better rebuild next offseason. 

1 more day two draft pick isn't going to fix much IMO in terms of helping make the 23 team a contender,  I think that ship has already sailed.
Reply

It’s difficult to contemplate with the 2023 NFL Draft five weeks away because Hooker is recovering from a torn ACL suffered last November and is an “old” rookie quarterback at age 25. 
By the time he’s ready to play for the Vikings — or any team — he’ll be 26 years old and 27 if he reaches the playoffs in 2024.
But put those reservations away, as NFL.com’s Daniel Jeremiah envisions Hooker to Minnesota with the Vikings 23rd pick. Jeremiah explained in his latest mock draft, “The Vikings have been doing their homework on this quarterback class. Hooker is well-liked around the league and he could sit for a year behind Kirk Cousins before taking over and ushering in a new era for Kevin O’Connell.”
Cousins has led the Vikings for five seasons, reached the postseason twice, won one playoff game, and ranks fourth leaguewide in touchdown passes since 2018. He’ll get at least one more shot in Minnesota with head coach Kevin O’Connell in charge (barring a shocking trade). And when it’s time to move on, Hooker could apparently be the Vikings solution, albeit at an incredibly high draft price. 

If Hooker were 21 with healthy knees, he’d fly off the board in Round 1 — undoubtedly. Yet, he fits neither criterion, age nor health, and accordingly is sourced by most NFL draft brains as a 3rd-Round pick, with a team possibly reaching into Round 2 for his services. 
Vikings general manager Kwesi Adofo-Mensah routinely preaches “value” every time he steps in front of a microphone, and Hooker in Round 1 emphatically does not spell value. However, if he and head coach Kevin O’Connell absolutely adore Hooker, then the 23rd overall pick is a reasonable price to pay. 
Jeremiah did this last year, too, sneaking a would-be 3rd Rounder in the 1st Round of a mock draft. One day before the 2022 NFL Draft commenced, Jeremiah plopped Malik Willis into Round 1 with the 32nd pick to the Detroit Lions and wrote, “I could see Willis going in the top 10 or he could land all the way down here at No. 32. His draft range is a great example of what we can be certain about in this draft: absolutely nothing.”
Almost every team in the NFL draft passed on Wilis, the Tennessee Titans took a flyer, and then Willis played horribly as a rookie. He wasn’t even trusted to start a meaningless regular season game down the stretch of the season when Ryan Tannehill was hurt. 
Overall, Hooker has all the tools to become a franchise quarterback, rest assured. His list of weaknesses is microscopic. But the age and injuries have frightened general managers and draft pundits to date — until Jeremiah went bold on Tuesday
https://vikingsterritory.com/2023/draft/draft-2023/drops-mock-draft
Reply

I couldn't care less about the knee or the age. He's either an NFL QB or he's not. Three, four years from now nobody's going to give a shit about his college knee injury, or the fact that he's 30 with ONLY 6, 7 more years left to play. They will only care if he's a good NFL QB or not. 

I'd take Hooker over Richardson.

But I think a bigger story to watch is Levis dropping. If he drops into the middle teens, that is a gift the Vikings should not pass up. Moving from 23 to, say, 15 is not an expensive move and it could pay off huge. 


Reply

One player I haven't seen discussed much here is Bijan Robinson.
Any chance the Vikings shock the world and take him if he's there at 23? Mattison is making backup money so I don't think his new deal would preclude a Bijan pick and the guys behind AM are unproven at best.
Our defense has holes everywhere so this would be the definition of a luxury pick, but so was AD at the time and that worked out okay. Moving on from Dalvin and his contract would be one way of saving money.
Just a wild thought and maybe it's just me being a fan and thinking of some kind of "splash".
Reply

Quote: @AGRforever said:
@supafreak84 said:
I think the problem with taking Hooker for the Vikings in the first round is our limited pick supply with huge areas of need still to fill on the roster. You can take Hooker who is recovering from a knee injury, and plant him on IR for the year, or you can take a player that hopefully pays immediate dividends. There would have to be real conviction to use our first round pick on him. 

We don't take players that pay immediate dividends.  Thats not the Kwesi way!!!
He's been on the job a whole year now.....not sure what we know about KAM yet. He's still manuevering in a financial construct he had no prior part of. When he gets a little elbow room then we'll see what kind of GM he is.
Reply

I really like Hooker and would love seeing him in purple 
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
4 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.