Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Would you give a 2nd rounder for Fields?
#11
I would. He's 24 years old and the most dynamic runner I've seen in the NFL since Michael Vick. All the arm talent you'd want. Has some issues, but maybe they could be worked through. 
Reply

#12
Chicago must feel like he's not their QBOF and they've marched him out as their starter for three seasons now.  No way would I want him for a high draft pick.  If the QB needy bears toss him aside, there's red flags everywhere - no thanks.  I say O'Connell needs to find his own QBOF from the draft.
Reply

#13
He would look a helluva lot better in our offense. It's something I would consider only if we're unable to trade up and the other QBs don't fall the way we need them to. It could be a trade that happens on the clock on day two. 
Reply

#14
He's a running back disguised as a quarterback.  We can get a running back in the later rounds of the draft who won't want to get paid quarterback money.  Hard pass.
Reply

#15
Never!
Reply

#16
They can have our 3rd…!!!  Wink B)  
Reply

#17
No way!
Reply

#18
Quote: @Kentis said:
They can have our 3rd…!!!  Wink B)  
I think the Bears go for that. 
Reply

#19
Quote:  
Especially if the goal is to improve next year then I think adding Fields + DT in 1st, EDGE/CB later might work. Resign Hunter, JJ, and Hicks this offseason and let’s get to work! Next offseason we have all our picks, a ton of cash, and possibly a longterm answer at QB. 
Hicks  turns 32 in June.

Resigning him could happen, but this is the year to draft his replacement.

This roster has   many holes.
Reply

#20
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@purplefaithful said:
@pattersaur said:
I posted in another thread about Fields shortly before you made this one. My answer is yes.

Of the people saying hell no, what if- hypothetically- Kirk is gone. Signs somewhere else, retires, whatever. He’s out. Does that change your answer?

My first move would be trying to trade up for Maye or Daniels but now let’s say that’s not an option either (Very likely).

That leaves us with Russell Wilson, a dude off the scrap heap, or Mccarthy/Nix/Penix as starter for next season.

Frankly Fields sounds a heckuva lot safer to me than any of those guys. The one thing that would give me pause on Fields isn’t him, it’s actually us. We have weapons but can KO tailor his offense to a QB like Fields? 3 months ago I’d have said definitely but after how this season went now I’m not as certain. 

I like McCarthy a lot and will be happy if the Vikings draft him. But most of what this franchise has done for the past 20 years tells me they won’t start a rookie at QB Week 1. The Vikings will choose the safer option almost every time. So I think Fields is very much in play for us if Chicago will do it. He’s a fun player. 
Or you could end-up with a guy like Minshew and let a tier 2 rook QB marinate a for a season.

That'll have to be the case if Kirko leaves in March. 

That'll sell a lot of tickets. 
You think selling tickets is an issue, or even really much of a concern?  I haven't heard of the threat of a black out in years in MN.
well it’s been years since we’ve gone into a season starting a wet fart like Minshew at QB
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.