Packer's QB Brett Hundley

[Guest]

@Wetlander said:
The Packer faithful are fully off the Hundley bandwagon after proclaiming he could start on half the teams in the league...  

Now they are on the Kizer bandwagon...  Good luck with that...  LMAO

You'd think they would be good judges of QB talent after watching Favre and Rodgers for the last 25+ years...

...and now that I think about it. What the hell were they thinking? Compare the two QB rooms. Behind Cousins Vikings have a guy in his 4th season who's started 26 NFL games. They did the same thing last year and look how it paid off. Siemian's no superstar, but he's not going to hurt you too much if you have to play him. That's the beauty of having your developmental QB (Sloter) in the 3rd slot.

Packers are gambling on their ability to develop Kizer. This is essentially their long term replacement for Rodgers. He's a former 2nd rounder with great size and arm. If they can keep developing him behind Rodgers for a couple of years, it could pay off, but if they have to play him before he's ready, they won't be able to compete.  

[Guest]

The Vikings did a very good deal in getting Siemian: young guy with many starts, easily digestible contract and upside. Once he hurt his shoulder behind that porous line in Denver, he was a different player. He's healthy now and I like him very much as this year's #2. If Sloter can move up to the #2 spot in 2019, this is a damn home run scenario.

[Guest]

The Packers team With Rodgers is a good strong team, if you take AR away their exposed for the shit show they are. Hundley looked rough but it wasn't all him.