7 hours ago 
		
	
	(8 hours ago)MaroonBells Wrote: I wouldn't call it "just as important." And while you might think the Vikings' only shot at a run is a year or two away, I can guarantee you teams this talented don't think that way. If the Vikings were winless, or even 2-6, maybe so, but this is a .500 team that just got its starting QB back and is starting to get healthy on both sides of the ball.
To suggest that this team should play lesser players in an attempt to prep them for '26 or '27 is a batshit-level kind of crazy to me. Good luck getting that one past Justin Jefferson, Darrisaw, Greenard, etc.
I'm with Jimmy here. You can't rely on Kelly moving forward and the chances of him being on the roster next year are extremely slim, so why would you not give Brandel the nod after he's shown potential at the position and will only improve with more reps? Kelly's job for this year should be helping to prepare Brandel every week for game day, how to make line calls and blitz pickups. Brandel excites me more from a continuity perspective moving forward then holding my breathe every week to see if Kelly, (who is likely a short timer) survives game day. Give me the younger, bigger player without the concussion worries. Much more important to see if he is "the guy" moving forward and I don't believe the difference in play is substantial. Outside of a couple bad plays against Philly, he's played well


![[-]](https://vikefans.com/forums/images/duende_v3_local/collapse.png)