We Have No Answer For Chase Daniels?
JU
Joined Jan 2014
2,109 posts
Rep: 0
Joined Jan 2014
2,109 posts
Rep: 0
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"JimmyinSD" said:It goes both ways. The offense turned the ball over several times. Went 3 and out quite often. The D actually held up pretty well after that first drive. And as I said, except for a few times they had the bears in a 3rd and long and didn't get off the field.@"greediron" said:and them not getting off the field was resting the Bears D for their relentless attack on our OL. the D did the O no favors yesterday by letting a depleted Bears O chew up yardage and clock on them. IIRC the bears beat us in time of posession by about 11 minutes.@"MaroonBells" said: I actually felt a pang of dread when Trubisky went down. I didn't know who the backup was but I suspected he'd be better. Trubby is always good for 5 or 6 ridiculously inaccurate passes in a game. Yeah, I would like to think we had a plan for Trubisky. I think Daniels is probably a better QB for that team with their D. The only real issue with the D was they failed to get off the field on several 3rd downs.
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"greediron" said:the O didnt really stumble until the second half. they were putting points up but their drives were 4:42 and 6:31 in the first half, and despite it being a shit play for the O, that fumble coming out of half didnt really affect the D in that they were rested from half time and were only on the field for 2 minutes before the ensuing field goal.... it went down hill after that for sure, but by then the Bears O wasnt really doing much either.... ugly ugly game once again no matter what kind of football a fan likes to see.@"JimmyinSD" said:It goes both ways. The offense turned the ball over several times. Went 3 and out quite often. The D actually held up pretty well after that first drive. And as I said, except for a few times they had the bears in a 3rd and long and didn't get off the field.@"greediron" said:and them not getting off the field was resting the Bears D for their relentless attack on our OL. the D did the O no favors yesterday by letting a depleted Bears O chew up yardage and clock on them. IIRC the bears beat us in time of posession by about 11 minutes.@"MaroonBells" said: I actually felt a pang of dread when Trubisky went down. I didn't know who the backup was but I suspected he'd be better. Trubby is always good for 5 or 6 ridiculously inaccurate passes in a game. Yeah, I would like to think we had a plan for Trubisky. I think Daniels is probably a better QB for that team with their D. The only real issue with the D was they failed to get off the field on several 3rd downs.
Log in to reply.
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.