Forum The Longship The Mock Draft Machine

The Mock Draft Machine

MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
4,317 posts
Rep: 4,499

Hey, so TDN has joined the mock draft simulation madness. It's far better than all the others. At least it's professionally designed. Only complaint is that you can only use their rankings and they don't sort best available by position, which is weird and stupid. But it runs beautifully. 

https://thedraftnetwork.com/mock-draft-machine

Here's a 4-rounder that I did this morning, with the caveat that I knew TDN was higher on Lindstrom than most and lower on Dillard than most. With that information I took Lindstrom knowing that I might be able to get Dillard at 50, which is exactly what happened. But this will NOT happen in the real draft. If it did, I'd take this draft a run like a thief in the night. 

1. Chris Lindstrom, G
2. Andre Dillard, LT
3. Khalen Saunders, DT
4. Devine Ozigbo, RB

“A gentleman is someone who can play the accordion, but doesn't." - Tom Waits

Liked:
#1 · Mar 20, 9:42 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Depending on how the draft unfolds, it might not be out of the question to get Dillard at 18 and Lindstrom at 50.  I have a feeling Lindstrom will go earlier than that though...  the Vikings may need to move up from their 2nd round pick if they go a different direction in the 1st round.  Either way, it's not entirely unrealistic that we could add those 2 players in the draft.
Great mock!
BOOM

Liked:
#2 · Mar 20, 10:58 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

That’s a very good looking simulator.  It’s too bad they don’t have more big boards
in there yet as it’s kind of repetitive.

I ran through the simulator 4 times, and they burned through
all the OL I liked by the time we got to 50, so I felt like I was reaching with
the 2nd and 3rd picks to take OL.  Dillard consistently went around our pick ± a
few spots.  Lindstrom was never available
at 50.

Liked:
#3 · Mar 20, 11:18 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Dillard is looking like the top O-lineman at this point.  I do not expect him to get to 18.

Liked:
#4 · Mar 20, 12:25 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"medaille" said: That’s a very good looking simulator.  It’s too bad they don’t have more big boards in there yet as it’s kind of repetitive.

I ran through the simulator 4 times, and they burned through
all the OL I liked by the time we got to 50, so I felt like I was reaching with
the 2nd and 3rd picks to take OL.  Dillard consistently went around our pick ± a
few spots.  Lindstrom was never available
at 50.


That's the thing with TDN. They are higher on Lindstrom than the consensus, frequently mocking him between 15 and 25, when I'd say consensus is probably 25 to 40. And they're much farther off on Dillard than the consensus. They recently ranked their top 5 tackles and he wasn't among them. Daniel Jeremiah, on the other hand, has Dillard as the best tackle in the draft.

It is repetitive and sorta forces you into their line of thinking, but one thing I did find refreshing was that it was more challenging to draft offensive linemen...and probably more realistic for a position that everyone needs. In other words, you don't see 1st round talents available in the 4th and 5th rounds like you do in some of these. 

Liked:
#5 · Mar 20, 1:02 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:

That's the thing with TDN. They are higher on Lindstrom than the consensus, frequently mocking him between 15 and 25, when I'd say consensus is probably 25 to 40. And they're much farther off on Dillard than the consensus. They recently ranked their top 5 tackles and he wasn't among them. Daniel Jeremiah, on the other hand, has Dillard as the best tackle in the draft.

It is repetitive and sorta forces you into their line of thinking, but one thing I did find refreshing was that it was more challenging to draft offensive linemen...and probably more realistic for a position that everyone needs. In other words, you don't see 1st round talents available in the 4th and 5th rounds like you do in some of these. 


If I was a team that ran a ZBS, I'd have him slotted between 15-25.  He has the size (height and arm length) and athleticism to be a Day 1 starter in that type of scheme.  If there are a run on OTs and DL, I would have no problem with the Vikings grabbing him at 18. 
Maybe they could slide back to 24 if the Raiders are looking to grab a falling pass rusher, but then you're dropping behind the Seahawks and Texans who could look to go OL early.  I don't think he'll make it out of the first round...  the Packers or Rams would definitely look at him hard given their needs (Rams just lost Saffold and this guy could plug right into his spot).

Liked:
#6 · Mar 20, 1:15 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Wetlander" said: Depending on how the draft unfolds, it might not be out of the question to get Dillard at 18 and Lindstrom at 50.  I have a feeling Lindstrom will go earlier than that though...  the Vikings may need to move up from their 2nd round pick if they go a different direction in the 1st round.  Either way, it's not entirely unrealistic that we could add those 2 players in the draft. Great mock! BOOM


If they decide Lindstrom is the guy you probably have to take him at #18. He will go somewhere between 21 & 32. I'm beginning to think that if MN is in love with a specific OT they will attempt to move up a few spots to grab them. If Miami would do #13 for #18 and a conditional 3rd (could be a comp pick) in 2019 that may be a good trade up partner. Unless something changes between now and draft day that would virtually lock you into either Taylor or Dillard.   

Liked:
#7 · Mar 20, 1:43 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

That simulator seems to be a step up in technology from the eight ball used by Rick, and the crystal ball used by Zim.!

Liked:
#8 · Mar 20, 2:40 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I'd rather draft a guy a bit too high than sit back in Day 2 and watch a run "that we didn't anticipate" occur again. 

Liked:
#9 · Mar 20, 4:16 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"BarrNone55" said: I'd rather draft a guy a bit too high than sit back in Day 2 and watch a run "that we didn't anticipate" occur again. 
Exactly.  The Vikings have painted themselves into a corner by keeping Barr and Griffen. 

If they really like a specific offensive lineman, they need to put aside any outdated draft rules that say you can't draft position "X" in these slots and just get their guy the first chance they get.

Don't screw around and hope a couple of the OGs you like drop to 50.  They need at least one Day 1 starter (and probably two) along the offensive line.

Liked:
#10 · Mar 20, 5:12 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Wetlander" said:
@"BarrNone55" said: I'd rather draft a guy a bit too high than sit back in Day 2 and watch a run "that we didn't anticipate" occur again. 
Exactly.  The Vikings have painted themselves into a corner by keeping Barr and Griffen. 

If they really like a specific offensive lineman, they need to put aside any outdated draft rules that say you can't draft position "X" in these slots and just get their guy the first chance they get.

Don't screw around and hope a couple of the OGs you like drop to 50.  They need at least one Day 1 starter (and probably two) along the offensive line.



Explain the part about painting themselves into a corner if you don't mind. Cuz other than Saffokd,.I'm not sure what guaranteed upgrade was available in FA.

Liked:
#11 · Mar 20, 5:21 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"FSUVike" said:
@"Wetlander" said:
@"BarrNone55" said: I'd rather draft a guy a bit too high than sit back in Day 2 and watch a run "that we didn't anticipate" occur again. 
Exactly.  The Vikings have painted themselves into a corner by keeping Barr and Griffen. 

If they really like a specific offensive lineman, they need to put aside any outdated draft rules that say you can't draft position "X" in these slots and just get their guy the first chance they get.

Don't screw around and hope a couple of the OGs you like drop to 50.  They need at least one Day 1 starter (and probably two) along the offensive line.



Explain the part about painting themselves into a corner if you don't mind. Cuz other than Saffokd,.I'm not sure what guaranteed upgrade was available in FA.


That's it.  Saffold was the blue chip FA the Vikings could have signed to address their most glaring need this off-season.  He fits our ZBS and unlike the other FA OL...  He actually has the pedigree and production to justify his price tag.

If Vikings would have let Barr leave or cut Griffen to give Weatherly more snaps, they would have had the money to make a run at him.

But they chose to pay Barr AND keep Griff so that pretty much ended any potential upgrade along the offensive line from FA. 

Liked:
#12 · Mar 20, 6:45 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I like weatherly, but he cant hold Griffs jock

Liked:
#13 · Mar 20, 9:46 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I’m just getting into the oline options. Any opinion on Bobby Evans out of Oklahoma? 

Liked:
#14 · Mar 21, 1:45 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I would not be a bit surprised if two rookies were starting at both guard positions this year...

Liked:
#15 · Mar 21, 10:28 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship The Mock Draft Machine
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!