Forum The Longship Whose departure hurts the most?

Whose departure hurts the most?

Vanguard83
Joined May 2013
430 posts
Rep: 410

So...with Richardson, Murray, Remmers (ok...maybe not so much Remmers) gone.
which one stings the most?

Liked:
#1 · Mar 12, 9:29 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Dejo....as a write in

me? I'm going with Murray...can't tell you how many times I've "thanked God" he picked up some tough first downs. Also...with him going to the Saints sickens me

Liked:
#2 · Mar 12, 9:33 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I am going with Murray. LMAO on the fact that you didn't even write Remmers full name. 

Liked:
#3 · Mar 12, 9:34 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Not a knock so much on Sheldon, but he was mediocre on run support.  One of the sites doing the post mortem on the signings are gushing how great he played for us and what a boon for the Browns. 

Meh. He's no Phat Pat. He's a good player but he disappeared way too often last year.

Murray was underrated, IMHO, for us.  Cook's frequent absences made him invaluable the last few seasons.

Liked:
#4 · Mar 12, 9:37 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

C'mon Monty Brewster, give us another option!

Liked:
#5 · Mar 12, 10:02 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

yup.  Murray.  Wish we could have kept him.  He did everything asked of him and did it well.  He was an alternative to Cook which is missing now. Late in the game he was frequently just awsome.  I hope there is a plan in place for his replacement.  Roc Thomas, Ameer Abdullah aint it.

Liked:
#6 · Mar 12, 10:16 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I don't think any of them hurt to be honest.

Liked:
#7 · Mar 12, 11:11 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I wouldn’t be surprised if we pick up a RB in the draft.

Liked:
#8 · Mar 13, 12:15 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Definitely Murray.  We already essentially replaced Richardson's Viking level of play by bringing back Stephen.  Remmers' RG performance could be replicated by just leaving empty space there.  Murray the last 2 years made the running game matter when Cook was so often injured.  If Cook goes down yet again, we are F'd (thanks Roc you idiot) unless/until the Vikings sign or draft an RB.

Liked:
#9 · Mar 13, 1:17 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Murray was a good player for us and always a likable guy, but Richardson is the bigger loss. The woes with our interior run defense were real, but how much was Richardson and how much was Joseph being hurt is up for debate. What is being underestimated right now is Richardson's ability to generate quick pressure up the middle. There definitely some games that stood out more than other, but in a league where teams are increasingly spreading the field and getting rid of the ball quickly, then the quickest way to the QB is up the middle, which also creates opportunities for the pass rushers on the edge. I know that Stephen isn't the same caliber of interior pass rusher and what Jaleel Johnson and Jalyn Holmes are capable of is still a bit of an unknown. I would not be shocked if the Vikings look for an interior pass rusher early in the draft.

As for replacing Murray. That is probably more of a 3rd-5th round priority. Cook was finally healthy and looking better, but with Roc Thomas messing up his career & Cook's propensity to be banged up so far, the Vikings would be wise to have a good backup in place. That player should also be more of a power back like Murray was, though I'm not sure the type of back we add will be more of a 1-cut runner that fits Kubiak's version of zone blocking.

Liked:
#10 · Mar 13, 1:42 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Murray
However none of these subtraction's really make us that much worse for wear. We are still about the same. Is that good or bad?

Liked:
#11 · Mar 13, 4:49 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Tyr" said: Murray was a good player for us and always a likable guy, but Richardson is the bigger loss. The woes with our interior run defense were real, but how much was Richardson and how much was Joseph being hurt is up for debate. What is being underestimated right now is Richardson's ability to generate quick pressure up the middle. There definitely some games that stood out more than other, but in a league where teams are increasingly spreading the field and getting rid of the ball quickly, then the quickest way to the QB is up the middle, which also creates opportunities for the pass rushers on the edge. I know that Stephen isn't the same caliber of interior pass rusher and what Jaleel Johnson and Jalyn Holmes are capable of is still a bit of an unknown. I would not be shocked if the Vikings look for an interior pass rusher early in the draft.

As for replacing Murray. That is probably more of a 3rd-5th round priority. Cook was finally healthy and looking better, but with Roc Thomas messing up his career & Cook's propensity to be banged up so far, the Vikings would be wise to have a good backup in place. That player should also be more of a power back like Murray was, though I'm not sure the type of back we add will be more of a 1-cut runner that fits Kubiak's version of zone blocking.


Not debatable. When Joseph drew two defenders and left Sheldon singled up he abandoned his gap time and time again to go after the QB, exposing the undersized Kendricks who struggles to get off blocks.

And Richardson definitely got doubled a number of times himself and instead of occupying his guys he got flipping blown out of his gap.

There are reams of tape of both happening a bunch last year.

If you are going to be that much of a liability against the run you need to get more consistent pressure that Sheldon did. 

This draft has 3T players that will replace enough of his pass rushing production at a fraction of the cost.

Liked:
#12 · Mar 13, 8:47 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I don't think any of those 3 leaving will have much of a negative impact at all. 

Liked:
#13 · Mar 13, 8:49 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

It's a little too early to call that list complete, but you could very easily include Griffin and/or a traded CB.  I think losing Richardson and Griffin together is a big loss.  Going from Richardson-TJohnson-Griffen-Weatherly to TJohnson-Stephen-Weatherly-Bower is a pretty massive hit to our starters and rotational depth at those positions.

Liked:
#14 · Mar 13, 10:29 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"FSUVike" said:
@"Tyr" said: Murray was a good player for us and always a likable guy, but Richardson is the bigger loss. The woes with our interior run defense were real, but how much was Richardson and how much was Joseph being hurt is up for debate. What is being underestimated right now is Richardson's ability to generate quick pressure up the middle. There definitely some games that stood out more than other, but in a league where teams are increasingly spreading the field and getting rid of the ball quickly, then the quickest way to the QB is up the middle, which also creates opportunities for the pass rushers on the edge. I know that Stephen isn't the same caliber of interior pass rusher and what Jaleel Johnson and Jalyn Holmes are capable of is still a bit of an unknown. I would not be shocked if the Vikings look for an interior pass rusher early in the draft.

As for replacing Murray. That is probably more of a 3rd-5th round priority. Cook was finally healthy and looking better, but with Roc Thomas messing up his career & Cook's propensity to be banged up so far, the Vikings would be wise to have a good backup in place. That player should also be more of a power back like Murray was, though I'm not sure the type of back we add will be more of a 1-cut runner that fits Kubiak's version of zone blocking.


Not debatable. When Joseph drew two defenders and left Sheldon singled up he abandoned his gap time and time again to go after the QB, exposing the undersized Kendricks who struggles to get off blocks.

And Richardson definitely got doubled a number of times himself and instead of occupying his guys he got flipping blown out of his gap.

There are reams of tape of both happening a bunch last year.

If you are going to be that much of a liability against the run you need to get more consistent pressure that Sheldon did. 

This draft has 3T players that will replace enough of his pass rushing production at a fraction of the cost.



Richardson did have issues with discipline in the running game. Joseph was also hurt and those two problems fed into eachother, which is where I had some doubt about how much of the interior run D struggles were on Richardson. That being said, I do agree that we should be able to find a cheap and adequate relacement for him in the draft. They may even feel that Johnson or Holmes can be that, but I suspect not. Either way I’m glad we are in the position of replacing Richardson instead of Barr. I’ll beed to start looking closer knto this year’s DT crop, but I know it’s supposed to be a good class.

Liked:
#15 · Mar 13, 2:02 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I think it's Murray as well - besides,  I think we'll get a comp pick for Richardson.
The only thing that compensates regarding Murray is that he is replaceable. There are still some decent veteran RBs on the market that the Vikings might pursue after the first rush of FA: CJ Anderson (Kubiak connection), Doug Martin, Spencer Ware. I would really like to see the Vikings sign TJ Yeldon, as he is still young and could replace Murray as a receiving back with some size to complement Cook.

Liked:
#16 · Mar 14, 7:57 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said: I don't think any of those 3 leaving will have much of a negative impact at all. 
That's what I was trying to say... but apparently no one got the "Monty Brewster" reference.   :'(
Liked:
#17 · Mar 15, 6:21 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Richardson by far. Backup backs are a dime a dozen. Whether you like what Richardson contributed to the team or not, starting-level 3Ts are much, much harder to find and infinitely more valuable. 

There are too many good backs in the NFL right now. You lose a guy like Jerrick McKinnon, you plug in an undrafted guy like Matt Brieda and he's a revelation. Chris Carson, a 7th rounder in Seattle, holds off 1st round pick Penny and finishes top 10 in rushing. Lose Melvin Gordon, Austin Ekeler steps in and you barely miss a beat. Todd Gurley goes down and you sign a guy right off the damn street (CJ Anderson) and actually improve your running game. 

Liked:
#18 · Mar 15, 6:50 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Whose departure hurts the most?
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!