Forum The Longship I never want to hear Compton and Remmers's names a...

I never want to hear Compton and Remmers's names again

SC
Joined Oct 2017
2 posts
Rep: 0

I got a life time's supply today, thanks.

Liked:
#1 · Dec 30, 6:19 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

A-f******-men.  Every time I hear their names it's one or both giving up a sack or penalty.  They are horrible.

Liked:
#2 · Dec 30, 6:23 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

They tried. Good on em. But they gotta go. Best of luck 

Liked:
#3 · Dec 30, 6:29 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I think that Remmers should be gone for sure. Not sure what happens with Compton though. He shouldn't be a starter, but I could see them claiming he performed admirably as a backup. I'd prefer to part ways with both though.

Liked:
#4 · Dec 30, 6:34 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

They both need to be replaced with at least competent NFL Guards.  Saying Compton is an acceptable backup is bullshit, he proved that over and over this season.

Liked:
#5 · Dec 31, 9:20 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Isadora must be terrible if he can't beat either of these bums out.

Liked:
#6 · Dec 31, 9:31 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"kmillard" said: Isadora must be terrible if he can't beat either of these bums out.
...and we gave up a 7th round pick for Jones.  He must suck too.  Because neither one has seen the field of late.
Liked:
#7 · Dec 31, 9:39 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

.....even if you heard their names associated with "released"?????

Liked:
#8 · Dec 31, 9:46 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Vanguard83" said: .....even if you heard their names associated with "released"?????
It would be a joyous passing moment...
Liked:
#9 · Dec 31, 9:49 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Yeah, what is up with Isadora?  Is he really that bad?

Liked:
#10 · Dec 31, 3:59 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

How about if the name is followed by "released"?  Waived or released seems fitting for their style of play.

Liked:
#11 · Dec 31, 4:33 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Ponifan" said: Yeah, what is up with Isadora?  Is he really that bad?


Ever run chutes in football practice in high school? Ever see someone who couldn't?  That's Danny Isadora.

Liked:
#12 · Dec 31, 4:49 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Vanguard83" said: .....even if you heard their names associated with "released"?????
I stand corrected.  I want to only hear their names exactly 1 more time.
Liked:
#13 · Dec 31, 5:57 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Ponifan" said: Yeah, what is up with Isadora?  Is he really that bad?


He was another day 3 lineman drafted by the folks who selected David Yankey, Jeff Baca, and Willie Beavers. What did you expect?

Liked:
#14 · Dec 31, 6:29 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I will never understand why they moved Remmers (who was average at RT) to RG, where he flat-out sucked.  And then they replaced him with Hill, who was worse than Remmers at RT.  We saw that last year vs. New Orleans.  But rather than recognize their mistake, they doubled-down on it this year.  I have serious doubts about the coaching staff's ability to judge OL talent.

Liked:
#15 · Jan 2, 8:27 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"pumpf" said: I will never understand why they moved Remmers (who was average at RT) to RG, where he flat-out sucked.  And then they replaced him with Hill, who was worse than Remmers at RT.  We saw that last year vs. New Orleans.  But rather than recognize their mistake, they doubled-down on it this year.  I have serious doubts about the coaching staff's ability to judge OL talent.
I totally agree with you. Their history of drafting and development has been bad during Spielman's tenure, but how do you explain the play of O'Neil who everyone thought was a total panic pick because they missed out on all of the talented OLineman in last year's draft? He seems like a determined young man, but coaching and development has to play into it at some point. Then, someone like Gosset, our 6th round pick, couldn't crack our 53 and gets plucked from our practice squad to start for the Cardinals this year. All indications are that he performed well in his games for the Cardinals and may be the long term starter at LG. How did we let him get away? Was he even allowed to compete for a starting role or did the Head Coach dismiss the rookie in favor of the veterans in Remmers and Compton? Who the fuck knows. It makes zero sense yet this is where we find ourselves.  Lots of head scratching decisions by the coaching staff, scouts, and GM so you can't point the finger at just one person or thing that put us in this position.  
Liked:
#16 · Jan 2, 9:20 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"TBro" said:
@"pumpf" said: I will never understand why they moved Remmers (who was average at RT) to RG, where he flat-out sucked.  And then they replaced him with Hill, who was worse than Remmers at RT.  We saw that last year vs. New Orleans.  But rather than recognize their mistake, they doubled-down on it this year.  I have serious doubts about the coaching staff's ability to judge OL talent.
I totally agree with you. Their history of drafting and development has been bad during Spielman's tenure, but how do you explain the play of O'Neil who everyone thought was a total panic pick because they missed out on all of the talented OLineman in last year's draft? He seems like a determined young man, but coaching and development has to play into it at some point. Then, someone like Gosset, our 6th round pick, couldn't crack our 53 and gets plucked from our practice squad to start for the Cardinals this year. All indications are that he performed well in his games for the Cardinals and may be the long term starter at LG. How did we let him get away? Was he even allowed to compete for a starting role or did the Head Coach dismiss the rookie in favor of the veterans in Remmers and Compton? Who the fuck knows. It makes zero sense yet this is where we find ourselves.  Lots of head scratching decisions by the coaching staff, scouts, and GM so you can't point the finger at just one person or thing that put us in this position.  



IMHO, drafting any position is 30% (or more) pure blind luck.  Game film, bowl game film, combines, pro-day workouts...can only tell so much.  Adding workout ethics and locker-room chemistry gets you closer.  But how some guy that gets drafted as a compensatory pick in the 6th round will probably retire as the best QB ever in the game while QB's with Heisman trophys, NCAA records and college national championships wash out in the NFL in 3 years or less is a mystery on par with UFO's and Bigfoot.
O'Neil could be the next Anthony Munoz or the next Bryant McKinnie.  I just know that a team with the recent history at O line, needs far more talent...drafted and FA...to review before we break camp this year.

Liked:
#17 · Jan 2, 1:56 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"TBro" said:
@"pumpf" said: I will never understand why they moved Remmers (who was average at RT) to RG, where he flat-out sucked.  And then they replaced him with Hill, who was worse than Remmers at RT.  We saw that last year vs. New Orleans.  But rather than recognize their mistake, they doubled-down on it this year.  I have serious doubts about the coaching staff's ability to judge OL talent.
I totally agree with you. Their history of drafting and development has been bad during Spielman's tenure, but how do you explain the play of O'Neil who everyone thought was a total panic pick because they missed out on all of the talented OLineman in last year's draft? He seems like a determined young man, but coaching and development has to play into it at some point. Then, someone like Gosset, our 6th round pick, couldn't crack our 53 and gets plucked from our practice squad to start for the Cardinals this year. All indications are that he performed well in his games for the Cardinals and may be the long term starter at LG. How did we let him get away? Was he even allowed to compete for a starting role or did the Head Coach dismiss the rookie in favor of the veterans in Remmers and Compton? Who the fuck knows. It makes zero sense yet this is where we find ourselves.  Lots of head scratching decisions by the coaching staff, scouts, and GM so you can't point the finger at just one person or thing that put us in this position.  


I think O'Neill was just a blind squirrel occasionally finding a nut. The Vikes have been almost as poor at evaluating and choosing WRs, but got a fine one in the 5th. Both Diggs and O'Neill were kind of mis-identified by coaches, too: Diggs was inactive a few games, only grudgingly put into the lineup after injuries, and O'Neill similarly saw the field only after injuries and coaches tried to bench him for Hill when Reiff returned.
Zero confidence left in the decisions of Vikings' GM and staff. But still hope they surprise me.

Liked:
#18 · Jan 2, 3:06 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I like Remmers as a backup tackle if his contract can be
reduced to match the position downgrade. 
He’s a bad guard, but he’s a borderline starter at RT.  Would be perfect as the backup RT, who has
some capability to swing over to LT in an emergency.  Obviously he’s too expensive at his current
price to be a backup, but getting rid of him ends up being another hole to fill,
unless you want Hill there which is a downgrade.

Liked:
#19 · Jan 3, 8:30 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship I never want to hear Compton and Remmers's names a...
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!