Forum The Longship Well, at least Kirk has another...

Well, at least Kirk has another...

NJ
Joined Mar 2014
19 posts
Rep: 0

....opportunity to pad his stats!!

Meaningless yards and points have been his strength!! Whoo-hoo!!!

Liked:
#1 · Dec 10, 8:58 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

until we have a gm that understand the importance of the oline I am not willing to say anything about the people that have to go to work behind that oline

Liked:
#2 · Dec 10, 9:14 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Looks like you've finally come over to the "dark side", aka REALITY.

RICKY GOTTA GO.

Liked:
#3 · Dec 10, 9:16 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Its just stupid now. What a waste of potential and a season. Typical Vikings.

Liked:
#4 · Dec 10, 9:18 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said: Its just stupid now. What a waste of potential and a season. Typical Vikings.
What's worse, is that they'll stumble into the playoffs anyway, but get their asses kicked in the postseason for yet ANOTHER Schpielman Special, aka a playoff winless season. 

Just enough to keep St. Ricky in his Ivory Tower and allow him to identify his latest scapegoats, most likely Flipper and Priefer.

Wash, rinse, repeat. 

Liked:
#5 · Dec 10, 9:24 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Mike Olson" said: until we have a gm that understand the importance of the oline I am not willing to say anything about the people that have to go to work behind that oline
Mike, I agree wholeheartedly.  It all begins with the O line.  Our pennypinching attitude in that area has to stop or we're gonna get someone killed. 
Liked:
#6 · Dec 10, 9:33 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Mike Olson" said: until we have a gm that understand the importance of the oline I am not willing to say anything about the people that have to go to work behind that oline
This. 
Liked:
#7 · Dec 10, 9:36 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

great OL or not, our guy doesnt have that clutch ability 

i have zero doubt (and i was a Kirk believer) that this team would be better with Case and maybe just maybe, based off thr preseason, maybe teddy too

Liked:
#8 · Dec 10, 10:34 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Skodin" said: great OL or not, our guy doesnt have that clutch ability 

i have zero doubt (and i was a Kirk believer) that this team would be better with Case and maybe just maybe, based off thr preseason, maybe teddy too


Keenum has 15 TDs and 10 INTs this year while passing for less yards and a much lower completion percentage. 
He has taken 30 sacks (the same as Cousins) and rushed for less yards.He got all of the INTs before they traded Thomas and while Sanders was still healthy.
Not sure why it is believed he would do better here.  Their line is ranked better than the Vikings by multiple sites.It is a strange phenomenon that folks believe he would do better here based on last year.I think defenses have caught up to his act and it showed last year in the playoffs.  Keep him in the pocket.

Liked:
#9 · Dec 11, 6:29 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MarkSP18" said:
@"Skodin" said: great OL or not, our guy doesnt have that clutch ability 

i have zero doubt (and i was a Kirk believer) that this team would be better with Case and maybe just maybe, based off thr preseason, maybe teddy too


Keenum has 15 TDs and 10 INTs this year while passing for less yards and a much lower completion percentage. 
He has taken 30 sacks (the same as Cousins) and rushed for less yards.He got all of the INTs before they traded Thomas and while Sanders was still healthy.
Not sure why it is believed he would do better here.  Their line is ranked better than the Vikings by multiple sites.It is a strange phenomenon that folks believe he would do better here based on last year.I think defenses have caught up to his act and it showed last year in the playoffs.  Keep him in the pocket.



Den was 5-11 last season
MN was 13-3

Which QB this year was handed a better team??????????

Liked:
#10 · Dec 11, 7:32 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

The thing that concerns me is that it doesn't look like Cousins plays well when the lights are at their brightest.  Case seemed to have that fight in him where you rarely felt like the game was unwinnable.  It wasn't always pretty but he scratched and clawed and could bring the team back from a deficit.  Then you have QBs like Cousins who can look like All-Pros in certain situations but they stumble and wilt under a little bit of adversity.  I really thought I was wrong about Kirk after the GB comeback in week 2 but now I'm not so sure.

The weird thing is that Cousins threw for 200 yards and 1 TD last night, while Wilson threw for only 72 yards with 0 TDs and 1 INT, but yet Wilson looked so much more in command during the game and I never really doubted that he was going to make a huge play at some point in the game to get his team the win.  (And I can't stand Seattle or Wilson, so it bothers me to say that, but it's the truth.)

And yes, the O line and everyone involved in that disaster can suck my balls as well.

Liked:
#11 · Dec 11, 7:48 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"SFVikingFan" said: The thing that concerns me is that it doesn't look like Cousins plays well when the lights are at their brightest.  Case seemed to have that fight in him where you rarely felt like the game was unwinnable.  It wasn't always pretty but he scratched and clawed and could bring the team back from a deficit.  Then you have QBs like Cousins who can look like All-Pros in certain situations but they stumble and wilt under a little bit of adversity.  I really thought I was wrong about Kirk after the GB comeback in week 2 but now I'm not so sure.

The weird thing is that Cousins threw for 200 yards and 1 TD last night, while Wilson threw for only 72 yards with 0 TDs and 1 INT, but yet Wilson looked so much more in command during the game and I never really doubted that he was going to make a huge play at some point in the game to get his team the win.  (And I can't stand Seattle or Wilson, so it bothers me to say that, but it's the truth.)

And yes, the O line and everyone involved in that disaster can suck my balls as well.


But how many yards came after the game was over? And wasn't Kirky's fumble returned for a TD the coup de grace on another patented Vikings/Cousins primetime chokejob? We certainly know his lone TD came with @ 1 minute left in the game, while the Seahawks were celebrating their win. I'd put a big ol' asterisk on THAT TD pass for sure.

Liked:
#12 · Dec 11, 7:57 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"njvike" said:
@"SFVikingFan" said: The thing that concerns me is that it doesn't look like Cousins plays well when the lights are at their brightest.  Case seemed to have that fight in him where you rarely felt like the game was unwinnable.  It wasn't always pretty but he scratched and clawed and could bring the team back from a deficit.  Then you have QBs like Cousins who can look like All-Pros in certain situations but they stumble and wilt under a little bit of adversity.  I really thought I was wrong about Kirk after the GB comeback in week 2 but now I'm not so sure.

The weird thing is that Cousins threw for 200 yards and 1 TD last night, while Wilson threw for only 72 yards with 0 TDs and 1 INT, but yet Wilson looked so much more in command during the game and I never really doubted that he was going to make a huge play at some point in the game to get his team the win.  (And I can't stand Seattle or Wilson, so it bothers me to say that, but it's the truth.)

And yes, the O line and everyone involved in that disaster can suck my balls as well.


But how many yards came after the game was over? And wasn't Kirky's fumble returned for a TD the coup de grace on another patented Vikings/Cousins primetime chokejob? We certainly know his lone TD came with @ 1 minute left in the game, while the Seahawks were celebrating their win. I'd put a big ol' asterisk on THAT TD pass for sure.


No, I agree, most of Kirk's production came in garbage time.  I guess my main point was that even with Wilson's completely crap stat line, he still looked like the better QB last night.

Liked:
#13 · Dec 11, 8:11 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"SFVikingFan" said:
@"njvike" said:
@"SFVikingFan" said: The thing that concerns me is that it doesn't look like Cousins plays well when the lights are at their brightest.  Case seemed to have that fight in him where you rarely felt like the game was unwinnable.  It wasn't always pretty but he scratched and clawed and could bring the team back from a deficit.  Then you have QBs like Cousins who can look like All-Pros in certain situations but they stumble and wilt under a little bit of adversity.  I really thought I was wrong about Kirk after the GB comeback in week 2 but now I'm not so sure.

The weird thing is that Cousins threw for 200 yards and 1 TD last night, while Wilson threw for only 72 yards with 0 TDs and 1 INT, but yet Wilson looked so much more in command during the game and I never really doubted that he was going to make a huge play at some point in the game to get his team the win.  (And I can't stand Seattle or Wilson, so it bothers me to say that, but it's the truth.)

And yes, the O line and everyone involved in that disaster can suck my balls as well.


But how many yards came after the game was over? And wasn't Kirky's fumble returned for a TD the coup de grace on another patented Vikings/Cousins primetime chokejob? We certainly know his lone TD came with @ 1 minute left in the game, while the Seahawks were celebrating their win. I'd put a big ol' asterisk on THAT TD pass for sure.


No, I agree, most of Kirk's production came in garbage time.  I guess my main point was that even with Wilson's completely crap stat line, he still looked like the better QB last night.


That's the grand illusion of Cousins. If you look at the stats you think he's a top 10 QB easily. But the production doesn't translate to consistently WINNING games. I know several die hard Redskins fans, and not 1 was upset that he was leaving. The MO for him was a lot of garbage time stats and a propensity for big mistakes at crucial times. Seems balls-on accurate thus far, OL, coaching and all the rest of the typical Vikings "excuses" not withstanding.

Liked:
#14 · Dec 11, 8:22 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I've been a Cousin's supporter....still am to a large extent, but he's a slow mover. He looks downfield in the pocket with noise around him, which is admirable, but he doesn't feel the pressure from behind. Horrible fumbler. But I certainly feel with a better offensive line, you can win with him. Especially with this defense. At the same time, its time to look for Kirk's replacement after his 3 year contract is up because no way will they resign him. They won't be winning a Superbowl. And the team needs to look at the new-age NFL QB types that are given every offensive rule advantage in today's NFL: draft a guy next year. Hell, draft another one in 2020 also. 

Liked:
#15 · Dec 11, 8:33 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Well at least one person on the board is happy.

Liked:
#16 · Dec 11, 9:40 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"njvike" said:
@"StickyBun" said: Its just stupid now. What a waste of potential and a season. Typical Vikings.
What's worse, is that they'll stumble into the playoffs anyway, but get their asses kicked in the postseason for yet ANOTHER Schpielman Special, aka a playoff winless season. 

Just enough to keep St. Ricky in his Ivory Tower and allow him to identify his latest scapegoats, most likely Flipper and Priefer.

Wash, rinse, repeat. 



I'm not so sure about that. Rick may have brought the free agent QB that will ultimately cost him his job! I've seen 5 games where Cousins has played poorly. Bad offensive line aside, he has been what the Redskins thought he was. 
He may get the whole lot them fired if he can't improve; including Rick.

Liked:
#17 · Dec 11, 12:04 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Cousins...like any QB...has holes in his game that were well known prior to his contract.  But he was and is far better than any QB we had on our roster and the money is what it is. 
Yes Cousins is not as mobile as (fill in you favorite mobile QB name).  And the fumbles when getting hit are clearly a problem.  His INT's are below the top 10 passers so it's not like he's a chucker. So all the good and bad facts about Kirk were well known.
The error in RS's calculation was the quality of the patchwork OL that was hobbled together to protect this investment.  A pocket passer needs a pocket and to think Kirk now needs to become Russell Wilson is silly.  RS needed to build up what was already a glaring weakness from 2017.

Liked:
#18 · Dec 11, 2:45 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

And how has that been working out? So you are suggesting Rick didn't make a mistake bringing him here.
Seriously, I keep hearing this offensive line excuse, but seem to recall Favre coming in in 2009 and making a very poor offensive line better.
Interceptions may be ok, but what about turnovers?
And even if Rick's mistake is the offensive line, it's still Rick's mistake.
This team was considered a superbowl contender before the season by most people. And though there is plenty of blame to go around, Cousins has not looked like any better than the journeyman QB we had last year. 
He's not a winner and neither is Spielman,nor the Vikings!

Liked:
#19 · Dec 11, 7:50 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Well, at least Kirk has another...
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!