Forum The Longship Bell gets a vacation

Bell gets a vacation

Vikergirl
Joined May 2013
2,907 posts
Rep: 678

You're only given a little spark of madness. You mustn't lose it. — Robin Williams

Liked:
#1 · Nov 13, 6:50 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Wow, that's a bold move.  Remember when guys just played for the love of the game?  Now, not so much.

Liked:
#2 · Nov 13, 7:02 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"HappyViking" said: Wow, that's a bold move.  Remember when guys just played for the love of the game?  Now, not so much.


One person's boldness is another person's stupidity.

Liked:
#3 · Nov 13, 7:03 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Wonder if his agent has finish reading the CBA yet...  :/

Liked:
#4 · Nov 13, 7:21 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

HE already has a deal in place I am sure.

Liked:
#5 · Nov 13, 9:07 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

What a dumbass. This is money he will never be able to regain in his career. Somebody will definitely get him paid next year, but the only money guaranteed will be Year 1. Wow.

Liked:
#6 · Nov 14, 3:53 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

How if he was under contract for this year and he fails to meet the terms of that contract does this season qualify towards him being a free agent?  Shouldn't he have to play or actually be available to play in a certain number of games to qualify this as a year of service?

Liked:
#7 · Nov 14, 5:20 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"JimmyinSD" said: How if he was under contract for this year and he fails to meet the terms of that contract does this season qualify towards him being a free agent?  Shouldn't he have to play or actually be available to play in a certain number of games to qualify this as a year of service?
i believe the Steelers have the option to franchise him again next year. Or sign him to a long term contract. I hope they don’t cave in and just let him go. 
Liked:
#8 · Nov 14, 6:40 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"BrickVike" said:
@"JimmyinSD" said: How if he was under contract for this year and he fails to meet the terms of that contract does this season qualify towards him being a free agent?  Shouldn't he have to play or actually be available to play in a certain number of games to qualify this as a year of service?
i believe the Steelers have the option to franchise him again next year. Or sign him to a long term contract. I hope they don’t cave in and just let him go. 
he should still owe them a year of service under this years franchise tag IMO.    of course I also think that teams should have to honor contracts that they sign players to with the only outs being if both the team and player agree to tear it up.  if its a 5 year deal its a 5 year deal IMO.
Liked:
#9 · Nov 14, 7:06 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"JimmyinSD" said: 
@"BrickVike" said:
@"JimmyinSD" said: How if he was under contract for this year and he fails to meet the terms of that contract does this season qualify towards him being a free agent?  Shouldn't he have to play or actually be available to play in a certain number of games to qualify this as a year of service?
i believe the Steelers have the option to franchise him again next year. Or sign him to a long term contract. I hope they don’t cave in and just let him go. 
he should still owe them a year of service under this years franchise tag IMO.    of course I also think that teams should have to honor contracts that they sign players to with the only outs being if both the team and player agree to tear it up.  if its a 5 year deal its a 5 year deal IMO.
I think since he never signed the franchise offer, it is different than a holdout.  So he didn't "owe" the team a year.

But I agree, teams play dirty as well.  With all that money, greed is rampant and loyalty gets the shaft.

Liked:
#10 · Nov 14, 7:11 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Shocking...

One of the best in the league - wonder if this sets some precedent?

Liked:
#11 · Nov 14, 8:42 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0


And the tweets, texts and oped's from around the league stating how Le'Veon's actions are a blow for player freedom and to the antiquated, "plantation" mentality of NFL owners  beginning in 3....2.....1....

Liked:
#12 · Nov 14, 10:07 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I bet next year Bell blows an ACL or an Achilles or
something shortly after he signs his new contract, just to double down on the
trainwreck factor.

Liked:
#13 · Nov 14, 10:13 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"medaille" said: I bet next year Bell blows an ACL or an Achilles or something shortly after he signs his new contract, just to double down on the trainwreck factor.


after a year of sitting out, one would wonder if the Dez factor may surface.  Dez is much older so the Achilles was more likely, but taking a year off is going to affect his body for sure.

Liked:
#14 · Nov 14, 10:20 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"greediron" said:
@"medaille" said: I bet next year Bell blows an ACL or an Achilles or something shortly after he signs his new contract, just to double down on the trainwreck factor.


after a year of sitting out, one would wonder if the Dez factor may surface.  Dez is much older so the Achilles was more likely, but taking a year off is going to affect his body for sure.


He could break a leg in a jet ski accident and be totally screwed. Hard to believe that he would leave 14.5 million on the table. That's gonna be hard to make back regardless of the contract he may sign.

Liked:
#15 · Nov 14, 10:28 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"SouthCarolinaViking" said:
@"greediron" said:
@"medaille" said: I bet next year Bell blows an ACL or an Achilles or something shortly after he signs his new contract, just to double down on the trainwreck factor.


after a year of sitting out, one would wonder if the Dez factor may surface.  Dez is much older so the Achilles was more likely, but taking a year off is going to affect his body for sure.


He could break a leg in a jet ski accident and be totally screwed. Hard to believe that he would leave 14.5 million on the table. That's gonna be hard to make back regardless of the contract he may sign.


And with the way Connor has performed, one has to question how much the system played into his stats. 

Liked:
#16 · Nov 14, 10:53 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Every year I read oped's and articles stating just how overvalued RB's are in today's NFL and why more and more teams opt in favor of multiple all-purpose backs and not the one bell-cow (no pun intended). 
Good luck, Le'Veon, with that one-year deal for 2019.

Liked:
#17 · Nov 14, 11:17 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I applaud Bell for taking this bold move.
The Steelers really grind up backs with all those touches and do not really want to pay beyond one year.

Connor already has 230 carries & receptions thru 8 games.

Bell would have had to carry that load if he was playing.
I think most fans only look at the 14 mil plus he turned down this year and use the same line of he will never get it back.

Bell won’t get back that money but maybe being able to walk without pain later in life is worth it?
The issue is that the Steelers wanted to use him up and spit him out.
Now they are doing it to Connor.
Bell will get a decent deal from a team that probably is not going to give him over 400 touches.
You give a player that many touches and they ain't gonna last long.

Liked:
#18 · Nov 14, 4:10 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

There are teams with insane cap room next year...he could get QB type money from a team like the Jets...

Liked:
#19 · Nov 14, 4:27 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/25276952/pittsburgh-steelers-players-raid-locker-teammate-leveon-bell

Liked:
#20 · Nov 14, 7:21 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MarkSP18" said:
I applaud Bell for taking this bold move. The Steelers really grind up backs with all those touches and do not really want to pay beyond one year.

Connor already has 230 carries & receptions thru 8 games.

Bell would have had to carry that load if he was playing.
I think most fans only look at the 14 mil plus he turned down this year and use the same line of he will never get it back.

Bell won’t get back that money but maybe being able to walk without pain later in life is worth it?
The issue is that the Steelers wanted to use him up and spit him out.
Now they are doing it to Connor.
Bell will get a decent deal from a team that probably is not going to give him over 400 touches.
You give a player that many touches and they ain't gonna last long.


Interesting perspective, but isn't a large number of carries just what comes with being a "feature back" - which is a prerequisite for getting a huge contract? Todd Gurley has 238 touches, Ezekiel Elliott and Kareem Hunt have over 200. Some feature backs might have 20% less than Conner, but it's not as if the Steelers are double the typical workload. If Bell wants half the number of touches - like Latavius Murray with 210 so far - he's going to be making a lot less.
No, RBs don't last long. Leveon should have been a QB if he wanted a long NFL career.

Liked:
#21 · Nov 14, 8:08 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Bell gets a vacation
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!