SUPER BOWL 53 - Odds to Win
How the Packers are #4 tied with the Vikings and Steelers is beyond my comprehension. And I even got me great respect for Rogers as a player...
@"purplefaithful" said: How the Packers are #4 tied with the Vikings and Steelers is beyond my comprehension. And I even got me great respect for Rogers as a player...
It really isnt about the odds of who will win but instead of where the money will go. Vegas tries to find the middle and just collect on the fees. So what they are saying is that there is a lot of idiots that despite reality, will still bet on the Packers.
@"purplefaithful" said: How the Packers are #4 tied with the Vikings and Steelers is beyond my comprehension. And I even got me great respect for Rogers as a player...
Because of the talking heads hard on for Aaron Rodgers. We know he is an elite qb (gag, vomit, barf, puke) but the team isn't. Regardless of that, the talking heads always find a way to raise up the Packers.
@"Vikergirl" said:@"purplefaithful" said: How the Packers are #4 tied with the Vikings and Steelers is beyond my comprehension. And I even got me great respect for Rogers as a player...
Because of the talking heads hard on for Aaron Rodgers. We know he is an elite qb (gag, vomit, barf, puke) but the team isn't. Regardless of that, the talking heads always find a way to raise up the Packers.
Well in today's protect the QB at all costs and promote the deep passing high scoring games no matter what.... a top level qb is half the team I guess.
@"purplefaithful" said: How the Packers are #4 tied with the Vikings and Steelers is beyond my comprehension. And I even got me great respect for Rogers as a player...
Before Rodgers was injured they were one of the favorites to go to the Super Bowl, having lost in the NFC championship the year before. They are still a dangerous team when healthy.
Wow, da Bears & the Jets are below the BROWNS! B) B) B)
@"Purplewhizz" said:@"purplefaithful" said: How the Packers are #4 tied with the Vikings and Steelers is beyond my comprehension. And I even got me great respect for Rogers as a player...
Before Rodgers was injured they were one of the favorites to go to the Super Bowl, having lost in the NFC championship the year before. They are still a dangerous team when healthy.
Only because at the time Seattle and Dallas were also overrated, so it was thought GB had some quality wins.
@"Kentis" said: Wow, da Bears & the Jets are below the BROWNS! B) B) B)I'm telling yall, they got a pretty good roster coming together over there, sooner or later it has to come together.
Just like if you gave enough monkeys on typewriters enough time, eventually they would bang out the king James bible.
@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"purplefaithful" said: How the Packers are #4 tied with the Vikings and Steelers is beyond my comprehension. And I even got me great respect for Rogers as a player...
Before Rodgers was injured they were one of the favorites to go to the Super Bowl, having lost in the NFC championship the year before. They are still a dangerous team when healthy.
Only because at the time Seattle and Dallas were also overrated, so it was thought GB had some quality wins.
Unfortunatelt, one of those quality wins was giving the Vikings a pretty bad beatdown.
@"Purplewhizz" said:@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"purplefaithful" said: How the Packers are #4 tied with the Vikings and Steelers is beyond my comprehension. And I even got me great respect for Rogers as a player...
Before Rodgers was injured they were one of the favorites to go to the Super Bowl, having lost in the NFC championship the year before. They are still a dangerous team when healthy.
Only because at the time Seattle and Dallas were also overrated, so it was thought GB had some quality wins.
Unfortunatelt, one of those quality wins was giving the Vikings a pretty bad beatdown.
We beat GB twice last year.
@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"purplefaithful" said: How the Packers are #4 tied with the Vikings and Steelers is beyond my comprehension. And I even got me great respect for Rogers as a player...
Before Rodgers was injured they were one of the favorites to go to the Super Bowl, having lost in the NFC championship the year before. They are still a dangerous team when healthy.
Only because at the time Seattle and Dallas were also overrated, so it was thought GB had some quality wins.
Unfortunatelt, one of those quality wins was giving the Vikings a pretty bad beatdown.
We beat GB twice last year.
Yes, I know but we were talking about the year before when Rodgers was healthy and they made it to the NFC championship game.
@"Purplewhizz" said:@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"purplefaithful" said: How the Packers are #4 tied with the Vikings and Steelers is beyond my comprehension. And I even got me great respect for Rogers as a player...
Before Rodgers was injured they were one of the favorites to go to the Super Bowl, having lost in the NFC championship the year before. They are still a dangerous team when healthy.
Only because at the time Seattle and Dallas were also overrated, so it was thought GB had some quality wins.
Unfortunatelt, one of those quality wins was giving the Vikings a pretty bad beatdown.
We beat GB twice last year.
Yes, I know but we were talking about the year before when Rodgers was healthy and they made it to the NFC championship game.
"Before Rodgers was injured they were one of the favorites to go to the Super Bowl, having lost in the NFC championship the year before." sounds like 2017 to me.
@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"purplefaithful" said: How the Packers are #4 tied with the Vikings and Steelers is beyond my comprehension. And I even got me great respect for Rogers as a player...v
Before Rodgers was injured they were one of the favorites to go to the Super Bowl, having lost in the NFC championship the year before. They are still a dangerous team when healthy.
Only because at the time Seattle and Dallas were also overrated, so it was thought GB had some quality wins.
Unfortunatelt, one of those quality wins was giving the Vikings a pretty bad beatdown.
We beat GB twice last year.
Yes, I know but we were talking about the year before when Rodgers was healthy and they made it to the NFC championship game.
"Before Rodgers was injured they were one of the favorites to go to the Super Bowl, having lost in the NFC championship the year before." sounds like 2017 to me.
Rodgers was injured in 2017. What was the year before 2017?
@"Purplewhizz" said:@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"purplefaithful" said: How the Packers are #4 tied with the Vikings and Steelers is beyond my comprehension. And I even got me great respect for Rogers as a player...v
Before Rodgers was injured they were one of the favorites to go to the Super Bowl, having lost in the NFC championship the year before. They are still a dangerous team when healthy.
Only because at the time Seattle and Dallas were also overrated, so it was thought GB had some quality wins.
Unfortunatelt, one of those quality wins was giving the Vikings a pretty bad beatdown.
We beat GB twice last year.
Yes, I know but we were talking about the year before when Rodgers was healthy and they made it to the NFC championship game.
"Before Rodgers was injured they were one of the favorites to go to the Super Bowl, having lost in the NFC championship the year before." sounds like 2017 to me.
Rodgers was injured in 2017. What was the year before 2017?
There was no year before 2017. Time is an illusion and the universe is a holographic projection. Only you are real. Well you and me. You are you and of course that makes me..... God.
@"Purplewhizz" said:@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"Scoog" said:@"Purplewhizz" said:@"purplefaithful" said: How the Packers are #4 tied with the Vikings and Steelers is beyond my comprehension. And I even got me great respect for Rogers as a player...v
Before Rodgers was injured they were one of the favorites to go to the Super Bowl, having lost in the NFC championship the year before. They are still a dangerous team when healthy.
Only because at the time Seattle and Dallas were also overrated, so it was thought GB had some quality wins.
Unfortunatelt, one of those quality wins was giving the Vikings a pretty bad beatdown.
We beat GB twice last year.
Yes, I know but we were talking about the year before when Rodgers was healthy and they made it to the NFC championship game.
"Before Rodgers was injured they were one of the favorites to go to the Super Bowl, having lost in the NFC championship the year before." sounds like 2017 to me.
Rodgers was injured in 2017. What was the year before 2017?
They lost the NFCC in 2016 not in 2015. As of April 2018, 2017 is the only year that 2016 can be the year before and in September of 2017 they were talking about GB being a favorite for the Superbowl.
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.