Forum The Longship Oh, snap! Gruden: We’re better at QB without Cous...

Oh, snap! Gruden: We’re better at QB without Cousins

SF
Joined Dec 2013
45 posts
Rep: 17

Whatever you’ve got to tell yourself buddy.

https://sports.yahoo.com/jay-gruden-feels-redskins-definitely-improved-qb-alex-smith-kirk-cousins-131757646.html
Jay Gruden feels Redskins 'definitely' improved at QB with Alex Smith over Kirk CousinsDuring the Washington Redskins’ contract fiasco with quarterback Kirk Cousins the past few years, there was always a sense the team never really loved him as a franchise quarterback for whatever reason.
Cousins left via free agency, signing with the Minnesota Vikings for the largest contract on a per-year basis in NFL history. That was after the Redskins traded for his replacement, landing Alex Smith from the Kansas City Chiefs.
While that appears like a lateral move at quarterback for Washington, Redskins coach Jay Gruden said “without a doubt” that his team was better at quarterback with Smith replacing Cousins.

Cousins has a better career passer rating (93.7 to 87.4), yards per game (261.4 to 204.4), completion percentage (65.5 to 62.4), touchdown percentage (4.7 to 4.0) and yards per attempt (7.7 to 6.9) than Smith. To say you “definitely” improved based on Smith’s credentials fails to pass any sort of scrutiny.

More at the link above

Liked:
#1 · Mar 27, 5:17 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"AllBS" said:
  Every time I see Jay Gruden I'm somehow reminded of  Robin Hood Men in Tights.


Hey now, leave Cary Elwes alone.

Liked:
#22 · Mar 29, 3:08 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I don't know, right now there is a lot of accolades and praise for a QB that hasn't won.  We had the same excuses for Sam and Case(right or wrong) but I don't think KC or SF had any more talent on offense than Kirk worked with in DC.  This last season was the first one where KC actually had a better OL than Washington due to injuries mostly.  And according to PFF Washington had a better WR group most years also so I think the mantra of Kirk having a poor team doesn't hold water.  We could chalk it all up to a better defense in KC, but Washington wasn't garbage either.  Of course there are a lot of factors that lead to wins and losses so it's not necessarily on Kirk's shoulders but I do think there are valid concerns when a QB puts up big numbers on a team with a good receiving group and OL but can't seem to win.  

Snyder is a douche but they did move on from RG3 and hand Kirk the reigns and yet still wouldn't commit to Kirk.  His teammates are exactly outraged or distraught that he left.  You would some to be incredulous if he was well liked and regarded in the locker room

Vikings have a very good team around him and there is no reason he shouldn't be able to match his stats of the last few years, I sure hope he can win more than he has.  I think Smith will prove to be as effective in Washington as he was in KC.

Liked:
#23 · Mar 29, 4:36 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Oh, snap! Gruden: We’re better at QB without Cous...
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!