Forum The Longship Draft pick after Richardson signing.

Draft pick after Richardson signing.

TBro
Joined May 2013
96 posts
Rep: 7

Unless someone like Payne or Vea falls to us at 30, I don't see the Vikings taking an interior D Lineman with the 30th pick after picking up Richardson. 

With Price's injury, I really think he will drop a little bit and should be available for us in the 1st. Since the tear on his Pec was incomplete, he will be ready to go by training camp and would be a great addition next to Elflein. 

A couple of other options that may also be there for us to consider:
Maurice Hurst-Will his heart condition push him to the bottom of the first, or even into the 2nd round? Not sure I want to risk it. 
DJ1 and DJ2-DJ Moore and DJ Clark have steadily moved into the bottom of the first round in a lot of mocks. We definitely need receiver help. 
Dallas Goedert-It would be really tempting to grab him if he lasts until 30
Kolton Miller-Another riser who many feel just needs some NFL coaching to correct his technique. Can he play Right Tackle in the NFL?
Mike Hughes-Could be a nice replacement for Newman and Alexander in the slot. Great return skills as well. 
Arden Key-I'm not a fan even though a lot of mocks have us taking him in the first. I think Sam Hubbard is much better as a pass rusher. 
Sam Hubbard-The guy just makes plays off the edge. Very disruptive and seems to have more natural instincts to get to the QB compared to Key. 

Anyone else I'm overlooking? 

Liked:
#1 · Mar 17, 8:29 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Trade up and take the best OT possible.  We don't need alot of players (i.e. "depth").  We need great players at as many positions as possible.  And we have that.  Maybe I'm wrong- but where are we "thin"?  Not OL.  RBs are a dime a dozen.  WR?  Maybe.  But we had a couple on the bench last year that may be ready to contribute this year (or we can re-sign Wright).  Not DL.  Not LB.  Maybe at DB- but again, that's just for depth.  We already have our starters (with the possible exception of the Nickel CB).  Why worry about getting 7-10 players, when- at best- those draft picks are fighting for 2nd on the depth charts?  Might as well get the 1 or 2 players that we "need" to be great at all our positions.

Liked:
#42 · Mar 19, 9:46 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Sure, Price can play guard.
But, if Remmers is staying at RG, which I believe he will, and Easton is back at LG - he played well last year and after he got hurt the line was not nearly as good, then I do not see us taking a guard.  Isidora looked pretty good, too. We did not even tender Sirles so I suspect he will leave.  Hill did not play very good at RT last season.  So . . . the OL line need is at tackle.
CB is always a possibility. I heard the same about looking at the CB position in FA. I like Callahan in Chicago but Chicago has the right to match any contract - like they did with Fuller. I doubt they will let the Vikings take him. May need to trade for him.

Liked:
#43 · Mar 19, 9:53 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Here's what I'm thinking...

1. RT - Remmers and Hill competing there is OK, but I think we can potentially upgrade two positions by drafting the RT and moving Remmers inside to RG to compete with Isadora. And if we can keep Hill out of the starting lineup, we can keep his cost down next year when it comes time to pay him. Having him as tackle depth for both positions is huge. 

2. DE - We should have a really nice rotation inside with Joseph, Richardson and Jaleel. Now we need a better rotation outside. This would be slot corner, but we just drafted a 2nd round slot corner (Alexander) and if the Vikings don't think he's the answer, we should probably find a low-cost free agent to fill this. No hurry though. Maybe even after June 1st. 

3. LB - I'm intrigued by Eric Wilson, but outside of him we're woefully thin at LB and we were pretty lucky last year to go mostly injury free there. Plus, we may need to hedge our bets against the possibility of not being able to re-sign Barr. 

4. RB - You can almost bet on it. Rick will end up with a 4th. Maybe by trading down one of the above picks. But we need a new Jet. Recently heard there are 8 backs in this year's draft who were given higher grades than Christian McCaffrey, which is hard to believe, but whatever. Maybe one lands here. 

Liked:
#44 · Mar 19, 10:01 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"pumpf" said: Trade up and take the best OT possible.  We don't need alot of players (i.e. "depth").  We need great players at as many positions as possible.  And we have that.  Maybe I'm wrong- but where are we "thin"?  Not OL.  RBs are a dime a dozen.  WR?  Maybe.  But we had a couple on the bench last year that may be ready to contribute this year (or we can re-sign Wright).  Not DL.  Not LB.  Maybe at DB- but again, that's just for depth.  We already have our starters (with the possible exception of the Nickel CB).  Why worry about getting 7-10 players, when- at best- those draft picks are fighting for 2nd on the depth charts?  Might as well get the 1 or 2 players that we "need" to be great at all our positions.
Agree wholeheartedly. My one caution would be that draft picks don't always pan out and sometimes those picked lower work out better. I'm all for being aggressive for the ones you've identified as a potential starter; especially given the team we are fielding. 
Liked:
#45 · Mar 19, 10:08 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"PurplePastor" said:
@"pumpf" said: Trade up and take the best OT possible.  We don't need alot of players (i.e. "depth").  We need great players at as many positions as possible.  And we have that.  Maybe I'm wrong- but where are we "thin"?  Not OL.  RBs are a dime a dozen.  WR?  Maybe.  But we had a couple on the bench last year that may be ready to contribute this year (or we can re-sign Wright).  Not DL.  Not LB.  Maybe at DB- but again, that's just for depth.  We already have our starters (with the possible exception of the Nickel CB).  Why worry about getting 7-10 players, when- at best- those draft picks are fighting for 2nd on the depth charts?  Might as well get the 1 or 2 players that we "need" to be great at all our positions.
Agree wholeheartedly. My one caution would be that draft picks don't always pan out and sometimes those picked lower work out better. I'm all for being aggressive for the ones you've identified as a potential starter; especially given the team we are fielding. 
Yeah, but why trade up when you don't have to? Looks like the value at RT this year is between 30 and 40. We could feasibly trade DOWN and still get one of the top 3. Without a 4th, I don't see us trading up. 
Liked:
#46 · Mar 19, 10:28 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"PurplePastor" said:
@"pumpf" said: Trade up and take the best OT possible.  We don't need alot of players (i.e. "depth").  We need great players at as many positions as possible.  And we have that.  Maybe I'm wrong- but where are we "thin"?  Not OL.  RBs are a dime a dozen.  WR?  Maybe.  But we had a couple on the bench last year that may be ready to contribute this year (or we can re-sign Wright).  Not DL.  Not LB.  Maybe at DB- but again, that's just for depth.  We already have our starters (with the possible exception of the Nickel CB).  Why worry about getting 7-10 players, when- at best- those draft picks are fighting for 2nd on the depth charts?  Might as well get the 1 or 2 players that we "need" to be great at all our positions.
Agree wholeheartedly. My one caution would be that draft picks don't always pan out and sometimes those picked lower work out better. I'm all for being aggressive for the ones you've identified as a potential starter; especially given the team we are fielding. 
Yeah, but why trade up when you don't have to? Looks like the value at RT this year is between 30 and 40. We could feasibly trade DOWN and still get one of the top 3. Without a 4th, I don't see us trading up. 
Only if there is someone we really covet and see as a much better prospect/value than who is left. Then I think we are in the position to be aggressive. It's not like we need a bunch of later draft picks that won't make the team. I do realize that continuing to supply our prospects/practice squad is an annual need, but we are in a win now mode and finding a few contributors will only help. 
Liked:
#47 · Mar 19, 10:52 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I just want to go get some pro bowlers on OLine.  My ideal draft would be a OT in the first and a OG in the second, followed up by a DE in the 3rd.  I'm skeptical of just moving Remmers around.  Just get a stud at RG and RT and let the tackles battle it out and the guards battle it out.  I don't want us playing musical chairs whenever someone gets hurt.  You spend all season having Remmers get his feet down as a G, and then the rookie RT gets injured and now Remmers moves to RT and Isadora comes up at RG and you have changed two spots and one guy is relearning his feet on the fly.

Liked:
#48 · Mar 19, 11:29 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I would be fine with them combining all of our 5th round and later picks to move down in the draft to get the O line guys that they feel can contribute.

Liked:
#49 · Mar 19, 12:22 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

It seems like many posters are putting Remmers at RG after having to fill in for injuries last year and get Hill on the field.  Hill did not play RT better then Remmers had all season.  Has the team indicated switching Remmers to Guard?  I may have missed a reference to that but it seems to have become a common thought on here.

I would not mess with the successful fix of multiple positions along the line last year.  Reiff, fixed the biggest weakness.  Then Remmers fixed the RT position and then drafting Elflein fixed the Center/line call position.  We need Guards.  Berger might be done and Easton was just OK even when healthy.

Their seems to be around 3 first round graded Guards this year which is not too common.  I just looked up Elflein's teammate:
Notable: Price, who played guard for three seasons and moved to center as a senior, started 55 consecutive games at Ohio State to top Luke Fickell’s school record for starts and consecutive starts of 50, set between 1993-96. Price (along with teammate Tyquan Lewis) tied Pat Elflein’s school record for most games played by an Ohio State football player: 55.

Liked:
#50 · Mar 19, 3:01 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"minny65" said: It seems like many posters are putting Remmers at RG after having to fill in for injuries last year and get Hill on the field.  Hill did not play RT better then Remmers had all season.  Has the team indicated switching Remmers to Guard?  I may have missed a reference to that but it seems to have become a common thought on here.

I would not mess with the successful fix of multiple positions along the line last year.  Reiff, fixed the biggest weakness.  Then Remmers fixed the RT position and then drafting Elflein fixed the Center/line call position.  We need Guards.  Berger might be done and Easton was just OK even when healthy.

Their seems to be around 3 first round graded Guards this year which is not too common.  I just looked up Elflein's teammate:
Notable: Price, who played guard for three seasons and moved to center as a senior, started 55 consecutive games at Ohio State to top Luke Fickell’s school record for starts and consecutive starts of 50, set between 1993-96. Price (along with teammate Tyquan Lewis) tied Pat Elflein’s school record for most games played by an Ohio State football player: 55.


Its not just this board...

From the Strib: Whether the Vikings draft a tackle or guard — potentially with pick No. 30 — could determine what position Remmers plays in 2018, according to Zimmer. There might be an opening at right guard, with Joe Berger set to hit free agency, too."It gives us more options," Zimmer said. "If we find a tackle in the draft or if we find a guard in the draft," it could determine Remmers' position. It's worth noting Vikings coaches chose to play Rashod Hill over Remmers at right tackle in both playoff games.
Now that last statement is a little misleading, since the calculation was probably more about Remmers>Sirles than Hill>Remmers.

Liked:
#51 · Mar 19, 3:26 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"minny65" said: It seems like many posters are putting Remmers at RG after having to fill in for injuries last year and get Hill on the field.  Hill did not play RT better then Remmers had all season.  Has the team indicated switching Remmers to Guard?  I may have missed a reference to that but it seems to have become a common thought on here.

I would not mess with the successful fix of multiple positions along the line last year.  Reiff, fixed the biggest weakness.  Then Remmers fixed the RT position and then drafting Elflein fixed the Center/line call position.  We need Guards.  Berger might be done and Easton was just OK even when healthy.

Their seems to be around 3 first round graded Guards this year which is not too common.  I just looked up Elflein's teammate:
Notable: Price, who played guard for three seasons and moved to center as a senior, started 55 consecutive games at Ohio State to top Luke Fickell’s school record for starts and consecutive starts of 50, set between 1993-96. Price (along with teammate Tyquan Lewis) tied Pat Elflein’s school record for most games played by an Ohio State football player: 55.


Its not just this board...

From the Strib: Whether the Vikings draft a tackle or guard — potentially with pick No. 30 — could determine what position Remmers plays in 2018, according to Zimmer. There might be an opening at right guard, with Joe Berger set to hit free agency, too."It gives us more options," Zimmer said. "If we find a tackle in the draft or if we find a guard in the draft," it could determine Remmers' position. It's worth noting Vikings coaches chose to play Rashod Hill over Remmers at right tackle in both playoff games.
Now that last statement is a little misleading, since the calculation was probably more about Remmers>Sirles than Hill>Remmers.



I don't get the Remmers to guard talk because I don't think he played very well when filling in during the playoffs. The first round OT's will go before 30. McGlinchey was a possibility before the combine, but he raised his stock quite a bit and will go much earlier. IMO the top OLineman will all be selected before us and won't leave much to choose from. I think Kolton Miller will be an option at OT but I think he is more of a 2nd round prospect who is being over-hyped due to his sub 5.0 forty and record setting broad jump at the combine. Same with some mocks having the Vikings selecting Brian O'Neil from Pitt in the first because he ran 4.80 Forty. If you watch the tape on these guys, they are not first rounders and we would be reaching just to find a tackle so we can move Remmers inside. That's a flawed strategy and hopefully Rick learned his lesson after reaching for Ponder. Billy Price could possibly be available due to the injury and would be my choice at 30. Orlando Brown is falling out of the first round and should be avoided. Price is better than Miller and would be the logical pick. Leave Remmers where he is at until we have someone who isn't a questionable tackle prospect and upgrades the position.   

Liked:
#52 · Mar 19, 9:51 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

We have yet to re-sign Shamar Stephen, so if he signs elsewhere, then they could be in the market for more of a run stuffer. Hard to say what we should expect out of Jaleel Johnson. Maybe he materializes in his second year, but he didn't make much of an impact last season.

As for the draft, I think that DE is a fairly big need. Griffen and Robison are getting older, our pass rush clearly slowed down as the season wore on, and now would be a good time to replenish. We can't build our depth up to Philly's level, but it needs to be better than what it is. LB depth is also a concern since both Barr and Kendricks are nearing FA and we don't have anyone else near their level.

One offense, TE and depth at receiver are needs that have yet to be addressed. The OL still needs to be upgraded, especially since Cousins isn't as mobile as Keenum. I'd love an upgrade at G, but RT feels like a big need that is unresolved. We have options in Remmers and Hill, but feels like an area that can still be upgraded.

Liked:
#53 · Mar 20, 1:22 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"minny65" said: It seems like many posters are putting Remmers at RG after having to fill in for injuries last year and get Hill on the field.  Hill did not play RT better then Remmers had all season.  Has the team indicated switching Remmers to Guard?  I may have missed a reference to that but it seems to have become a common thought on here.

I would not mess with the successful fix of multiple positions along the line last year.  Reiff, fixed the biggest weakness.  Then Remmers fixed the RT position and then drafting Elflein fixed the Center/line call position.  We need Guards.  Berger might be done and Easton was just OK even when healthy.

Their seems to be around 3 first round graded Guards this year which is not too common.  I just looked up Elflein's teammate:
Notable: Price, who played guard for three seasons and moved to center as a senior, started 55 consecutive games at Ohio State to top Luke Fickell’s school record for starts and consecutive starts of 50, set between 1993-96. Price (along with teammate Tyquan Lewis) tied Pat Elflein’s school record for most games played by an Ohio State football player: 55.


Its not just this board...

From the Strib: Whether the Vikings draft a tackle or guard — potentially with pick No. 30 — could determine what position Remmers plays in 2018, according to Zimmer. There might be an opening at right guard, with Joe Berger set to hit free agency, too."It gives us more options," Zimmer said. "If we find a tackle in the draft or if we find a guard in the draft," it could determine Remmers' position. It's worth noting Vikings coaches chose to play Rashod Hill over Remmers at right tackle in both playoff games.
Now that last statement is a little misleading, since the calculation was probably more about Remmers>Sirles than Hill>Remmers.




Yea I figured the board was getting the inclination from somewhere.

Not to nit-pick but when your read the quote from Zimmer it needs context.  "It gives us more options" Zimmer said.  "If we find a tackle in the draft or if we find a guard in the draft".   Directly after the quote the writer interpret that as determining Remmers position.  

I don't read the direct quote from Zimmer as having anything to do with moving Remmers.  Remmers never played Guard at Carolina or in college from just a brief backgrounder.  He has played R and L Tackle (due to injury) up until filling in for an injured Easton that didn't work out so well.  

Liked:
#54 · Mar 20, 7:03 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I'm hoping for a guard, corner and linebacker in that order with Minnesota's first 3 picks....then more linemen (either offensive or defensive) for depth and receivers with the last 4 picks.

Liked:
#55 · Mar 20, 7:27 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Before we signed Richardson, I was intrigued with the idea of drafting DT Da'Shawn Hand from Alabama. He's 6'4", 297, ran a 4.83 at the combine - talent of a top 10 pick but was never more than a rotational player with sporadic impact in college, so he might be around at our #2 pick. If Zimmer and Patterson could motivate him, he could be a DT version of Danielle Hunter. Less likely now, but as Tyr noted, Shamar Stephen has not yet been re-signed, and Richardson is only on a one-year deal.
I think S is a dark horse possibility for round 1 - our secondary got exposed a bit in the NFCC. Justin Reid, Stanford,is Eric Reid's younger brother and a very smart player who might be able to step in as quickly as Kendricks did at MLB.
The love for Billy Price seems really strong on this board, and a lot of comments refer to "chemistry with Elflein" or such. Do Pro players really need that? Most seem to find their place without having a pal from the same college team. Price is good, but I wouldn't overvalue the Ohio State connection.

Liked:
#56 · Mar 20, 8:00 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Jor-El" said: Before we signed Richardson, I was intrigued with the idea of drafting DT Da'Shawn Hand from Alabama. He's 6'4", 297, ran a 4.83 at the combine - talent of a top 10 pick but was never more than a rotational player with sporadic impact in college, so he might be around at our #2 pick. If Zimmer and Patterson could motivate him, he could be a DT version of Danielle Hunter. Less likely now, but as Tyr noted, Shamar Stephen has not yet been re-signed, and Richardson is only on a one-year deal. I think S is a dark horse possibility for round 1 - our secondary got exposed a bit in the NFCC. Justin Reid, Stanford,is Eric Reid's younger brother and a very smart player who might be able to step in as quickly as Kendricks did at MLB. The love for Billy Price seems really strong on this board, and a lot of comments refer to "chemistry with Elflein" or such. Do Pro players really need that? Most seem to find their place without having a pal from the same college team. Price is good, but I wouldn't overvalue the Ohio State connection.


 we will be in great shape if we land Price,  great player, great flexibility, great future and the fact that he has a previous relationship with our young C is a huge plus.  I think Kendricks and Barr have been helped by their familiarity with each other.

Liked:
#57 · Mar 20, 8:10 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

I say we should turn our draft card in on time and draft somebody.  :)    Or not....last time it yielded us K Williams???

Liked:
#58 · Mar 20, 8:16 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"Wetlander" said:
@"GeorgiaVike" said: Wow! VF.com is still alive....Trade up for Roquan Smith. I know he’s got a medical red flag... but that kid is a stud.

He’d replace Barr when we cut ties or trade him and he’d slide in to a leadership role. 


Still alive and kickin'...  Glad to see you drop by GV.  Miss you around these parts, bro.

BOOM



where ya been GV?  welcome back!  missed you around the ol homestead.

Liked:
#59 · Mar 20, 12:23 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"AGRforever" said: I say we should turn our draft card in on time and draft somebody.  :)    Or not....last time it yielded us K Williams???


No, no...that was all part of the plan - lower picks got smaller contracts so Red saved a few bucks. Geez, talk about a snake...

Liked:
#60 · Mar 20, 12:34 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"StickyBun" said: Would love to see them go offensive line with their first 2 picks. Get talent in the O-line pipeline and on the cheap too for the next 4-5 years.
I think this would be key to building a dominant team for years to come.  Only thing that would make me consider something other than O-Line would be a top shelf DE.  But it seems 4th round DEs bring the best results.
Liked:
#61 · Mar 20, 12:52 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Draft pick after Richardson signing.
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!