Another Spider-Man Movie?
Really?
How about one Venom movie before a third different lead playing Peter Parker? Or Green Goblin?
C'mon!
They did have Venom. It was Spiderman 3 which was the worst one. But yeah I agree. It is strange that they are on the 3rd reboot in less than 2 decades.
It's REALLY good. Yes, there have been a lot of spiderman movies, but this one is the best I've seen. Well worth the time assuming you've enjoyed the other marvel universe movies so far.
I wish they wouldn't have fucked up the Fantastic Four franchise. The comic books were superb, but it hasn't translated onto film yet. They've consistently been the worst Marvel movie franchise which is really a shame if you read the comics.
I guess I should have clarified, if you enjoyed the other Marvel Comics Universe films (i.e. Iron Man, The Avengers, Captain America, Thor, Guardians of the Galaxy) which have all been really high quality, well written super hero movies. There are the other Marvel movies by another studio (can't remember which) i.e. X-Men, Fantastic Four, maybe those Hulk films? which have ranged anywhere from good (some of the X-Men films, and Logan) to terrible (the aforementioned Fantastic Four films).
This one is the Spiderman kid seen in the last Captain America movie, and Tony Stark is in it. It's funny and a good story and action packed. Definitely a must see if you're into these sorts of films.
There is a Venom movie in the works right now, according to IMDb.
I've seen a couple in the theater...seen a couple on demand.....seriously I don't even know how many there are.
Are there six? this one number seven?
All I know is I can't watch another superhero movie where buildings come crashing down. Buildings don't have a friggin' chance in these flicks. I go in thinking how many buildings are going to be destroyed?
I was watching one and thinking "Hey no buildings destroyed" That's when the evil guy or whatever levitated the entire city first....before it came crashing down.
Just once I want to see a superhero knocked toward a building when they stop themselves short....or they hit the glass hard enough for just a small crack...not shatter the entire thing
@"NoGoingBack" said: It's REALLY good. Yes, there have been a lot of spiderman movies, but this one is the best I've seen. Well worth the time assuming you've enjoyed the other marvel universe movies so far.Agreed..it's the best one I've seen...it's very funny and finally a Spider-man that is the right age...
If you enjoy the Avengers movies...you'll likely enjoy this...
Not at all excited about it and I love superhero movies. I loved the Spiderman series with Tobey Maguire. I will wait till it's on video.
@"NoGoingBack" said: I guess I should have clarified, if you enjoyed the other SONY Marvel Comics Universe films (i.e. Iron Man, The Avengers, Captain America, Thor, Guardians of the Galaxy) which have all been really high quality, well written super hero movies. There are the other Marvel movies by another studio (can't remember which) i.e. X-Men, Fantastic Four, maybe those Hulk films? which have ranged anywhere from good (some of the X-Men films, and Logan) to terrible (the aforementioned Fantastic Four films).This one is the Spiderman kid seen in the last Captain America movie, and Tony Stark is in it. It's funny and a good story and action packed. Definitely a must see if you're into these sorts of films.
The ones you listed (the Avengers franchise) are not Sony, they are Marvel Studios, owned by Disney.
Max, you are correct. I got thrown off because Spiderman is a Sony property that I guess they let Marvel Studios produce while they are still distributing it. Hard to keep up with the business side.
It's the stuff in the Marvel Comics Universe that's been pretty damn solid film after film.
Marvel has the formula down and even though DC has so much great material, most of the films don't work well on screen because the right people aren't working on them.
The movie was great. I took the family to see it on opening night.
The Sam Raining Spider-Man movies were fun (1 & 2 at least, with Doc Oc being the best super villain yet), but they didn't age well, and weren't in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
The last movies with Andrew Garfield were pretty awful. Garfield was way too mopey, and just came across a bit emo to be Peter Parker.
These were created by Sony after trying to ride the superhero wave. They sucked.
For Civil War, Sony cut a deal with Disney to include Spider-Man into the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU).
Smartest thing they've done. Tom Holland is the best Peter Parker by a long shot, and this is the best incarnation of Spider-Man yet. They took some liberties with his suit, etc, but it works well and integrates him further into the MCU.
I can tell you as a lifelong Spider-Man fan (I literally learned to read by reading both Spider-Man and Batman comics), that this is the best big screen version of him yet!
Also, Venom is being made, and will star Tom Hardy. I don't believe that Venom will be in the MCU (potential big mistake given that his history intertwines with Spider-Man's).
Just saw it this weekend and it is one of the best Spider Man movies to date.
My only minor complaint is the new Spidey suit. It's too Tony Stark. Tony needs all the gadgets and gizmo's, after all he's mortal. But Spider Man used to rely on his "spider sense tingling" to know when there was danger afoot or someone was being less than honest...not "Karen" chattering away in his ear asking him if he want the "death mode" activated!
But Holland is a much better Peter Parker than Garfield.
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.