Forum The Longship OK I am going to say it. Adam Theilen is a #1.

OK I am going to say it. Adam Theilen is a #1.

PS
Joined Oct 2013
45 posts
Rep: 0

This kid is not a number two reciever he is a legitimate number one target and WR on this team.  With Diggs out you still see him getting open and catching everything against a very good Ravens defense.  

Liked:
#1 · Oct 22, 1:34 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

If you're saying that Adam Thielen is a great receiver, fully capably of being a #1 receiver on most NFL teams, I would agree completely. He's money. He's clutch. But if you're saying he's better than Diggs, no, he's not. 

Liked:
#22 · Oct 23, 6:15 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Maybe not, but he's definitely more consistent and dependable than Diggs.

Liked:
#23 · Oct 23, 7:04 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0
@"SFVikingFan" said: Maybe not, but he's definitely more consistent and dependable than Diggs.
No doubt more dependable. 
Liked:
#24 · Oct 23, 7:06 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

The actual depth chart and player position designations not withstanding, what makes a receiver a #1 in a "general" sense? Great route running? Great hands? Great feet? Unselfish play? Durability? Consistency? Flexibility? Dependability? Rare turnovers? Thielen has all of these qualities. I don't care about position designations. I care about productivity and wins. Thielen is our best receiver, whether you call him a #1 or a #2.  
I'm a BIG Diggs fan. Love that guy. Love his fire, love his hands, love his route running, his competitiveness. But until he can consistently stay on the field he isn't OUR #1 receiver. He has the skillset but not the durability. He needs to be on the field to show off his skills and have his play vault our offense forward, like he did against the Saints and Bucs.

Liked:
#25 · Oct 23, 7:30 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

Seems like people are confusing the term #1 and #2 position. Between production and position. 

I think that's the big disconnect here. 

Liked:
#26 · Oct 23, 10:04 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,512 posts
Rep: 0

In my book, the #1 or X is the guy that lines up outside, on the line, often faces the defenses best CB.  Because he is outside, on the line he often faces press coverage.  The other positions are more flexible, but typically the #2 or Y lines up outside but off the line as the TE is on his side.  The #3 or Z is the slot guy.

Wallace couldn't handle being the X and wouldn't play it.  So when Diggs was playing, he had to play that position and started struggling later in the year with the press coverage.  IIRC, he acknowledged that and worked on it and is much better against it now.  Last year I doubted Thielen could handle the X.  I thought he was too small, not physical enough.  But he played it and even thrived allowing Diggs to thrive as well. 

Now our offense has changed, I think we run more 3 wides and actually Treadwell plays the X spot with Diggs at Y and Thielen at slot.

But as far as being the go to guy, Thielen is getting it done without Diggs drawing attention.  But he is playing slot, and likely facing the nickle CB rather than the top guy. 

Liked:
#27 · Oct 23, 10:35 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship OK I am going to say it. Adam Theilen is a #1.
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!