Forum The Longship Tragedy in Kansas City

Tragedy in Kansas City

ST
Joined May 2013
0 posts
Rep: 1

https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article285484737.html

It never ends. Kansas City was my home for 17 years, I loved it there. Beyond saddened by this.

#1 · Feb 15, 9:34 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Prayers for the victims.

#2 · Feb 15, 12:55 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

There was a shooting at a place called The Gardens Mall which is right around West Palm Beach yesterday (25 miles north of me)....nobody hurt as it turns out. Here's what happens many times: its gang related. A friend of mine who's a cop says these kids can't shoot and it would be laughable how bad they are if there wasn't collateral damage. They try to look cool shooting a handgun and rarely hit their intended targets, they don't know how to shoot. But if they shoot enough bullets, they might hit what they are shooting at....and 6 other poor souls who happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. 

#3 · Feb 15, 1:14 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Its a sad reflection of our society when s hit like this continues to go down...

I dont know about you, but I've lost track long ago. 

Yah, lots of thoughts and prayers - again. 

#4 · Feb 15, 1:50 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

People need serious help. To be disturbed enough to do something like this to innocent people, I cannot imagine. Sickening. How these mentally ill people get access to weapons to do such damage in a short amount of time will never not confuse me.
We don't know anything about this instance but rarely are these shooters masterminds. Usually just incredibly disturbed individuals. I wish there was a way to prevent these people from access to weapons. Idk if that's possible but it's terrible something like this is possible.

#5 · Feb 15, 2:48 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I wouldn't be surprised if one of the three was a good guy with a gun, in a crowd of million. 

#6 · Feb 15, 3:07 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"BigAl99" said: I wouldn't be surprised if one of the three was a good guy with a gun, in a crowd of million. 

Mind elaborating? I don't follow your meaning.

#7 · Feb 15, 5:28 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
#8 · Feb 15, 6:15 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
#9 · Feb 15, 6:19 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"pattersaur" said:
@"BigAl99" said: I wouldn't be surprised if one of the three was a good guy with a gun, in a crowd of million. 

Mind elaborating? I don't follow your meaning.


Three folks are in custody with no explanation.  With the mainstreaming of CC and open carry culture, the situation will occur when someone accidentally gets shot by someone doing a good guy thing with his gun.  I think it is as inevitable as a car accident, Just speculating, say I won't be surprised when it happens..

#10 · Feb 15, 6:34 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

This is what happens when you put people with no morals to close together. 

#11 · Feb 15, 7:03 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"AGRforever" said: This is what happens when you put people with no morals to close together. 
I'm curious who you mean, in that crowd.
#12 · Feb 15, 7:16 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"BigAl99" said:
@"pattersaur" said:
@"BigAl99" said: I wouldn't be surprised if one of the three was a good guy with a gun, in a crowd of million. 

Mind elaborating? I don't follow your meaning.


Three folks are in custody with no explanation.  With the mainstreaming of CC and open carry culture, the situation will occur when someone accidentally gets shot by someone doing a good guy thing with his gun.  I think it is as inevitable as a car accident, Just speculating, say I won't be surprised when it happens..



Got it. Well time will tell regarding this parade tragedy. I agree the circumstance you mentioned will happen eventually. Thanks for expounding, I appreciate it.

#13 · Feb 15, 7:37 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Unfortunately it's not going to end because of how much division there is on the issue and the approach to take

#14 · Feb 15, 8:39 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Full disclosure I am about as far from a straight party ticket voter as they come. I'm fiscally a conservative and liberal on social issues. So this isn't your typical tribalism take on gun control. But pro gun citizens and pro gun politicians like to use mental illness as a rallying cry for the cause of gun violence in America. They then vote against increasing funding for mental health services. And in many states like Iowa go one step further and absolutely gut the system by making massive cuts to both mental illness and substance abuse services. Don't get me started on privatized Medicaid. 

I have worked in mental health for over 20 years and not only in that time span, but my time on Earth (43 years) no one entity has done more to set back accessibility to mental health in the country than the Republican party. It started with Regan dumping the Mental Health Systems act in 80 and opening the flood gates to institutions. Hasn't stopped since. So if Republicans dont believe ease of access to weapons is the problem. But rather mental illness is, cool Ill consider that hypothesis. But it sure would be nice if they stopped the empty "thoughts and prayers" reactions. And started to prove they actually believe it is a mental illness problem by voting as such. Otherwise it's simply lip service.   

#15 · Feb 15, 9:24 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

There are too many mentally ill who have access to guns
There is a big gang culture in the US 
There are too many people who have no regard for human life for whatever circumstance they've been subjected to or how they were reared. 

I'm hearing now this all stemmed from some dispute, so lets whip out the guns and start shooting at each other. Probably tennis shoes, some weed or someone was F'ing someone else's booty. 

#16 · Feb 16, 12:18 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

So when it's not mental illness,  can we agre that in a lot of cases it's a lack of law with teeth?  This happens all the time in an era of light on crime policy,  more and more we hear about criminal acting without fear of reprisal and then act outraged or confused when it escalates?

We have a society problem more than anything IMO,  can't point to one cause on a problem as diverse and complex as violence towards others.

#17 · Feb 16, 1:30 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"Zanary" said:
@"AGRforever" said: This is what happens when you put people with no morals to close together. 
I'm curious who you mean, in that crowd.
Gang members aren’t known for their morals. These shootings are predominantly being carried out by gang members. 
#18 · Feb 16, 1:32 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"JimmyinSD" said: So when it's not mental illness,  can we agre that in a lot of cases it's a lack of law with teeth?  This happens all the time in an era of light on crime policy,  more and more we hear about criminal acting without fear of reprisal and then act outraged or confused when it escalates?

We have a society problem more than anything IMO,  can't point to one cause on a problem as diverse and complex as violence towards others.

Glad you brought this up. I haven't had to speak on the topic yet this year so my presentation isn't updated from last year. But 60 plus % of those incarcerated have a DIAGNOSED severe mental health issue. Safe to say tens of thousands more are undiagnosed.

People with a severe mental health diagnosis are more likely to be the victim of a violent crime than the perpetrator. But "sane man commits mass shooting" doesn't have quite the same ring with news orgs trying to get views and clicks.

The largest provider of mental health in this country is not community mental health centers, hospitals, private practices or mental health walk-in clinics. It's jails and prisons. And by a wide margin. So you rally for being tougher on crime which is great and all.

But there are those so severely ill and under treated that no amount of "throwing the book at them" is going to put a dent in recidivism. You can't imprison mental illness away. Frankly you're going to increase it significantly by continued incarceration.

I will only speak on behalf of the many members of law enforcement I've joined on community mental health panels. But across the board they say yes they want more funding. Not for guns, tactical gear, tanks or specialized tactical training.

But rather for mental health first aid training and other trainings that give them the tools to deal with and deescalate mentally ill people they encounter. The use of mental health courts. More social workers to do ride alongs to deescalate and connect the mentally ill with the appropriate resources. Rather than taking up valuable jail cells and hospital beds.

Communities that have invested in rebuilding the community mental health approach stripped away in the 80's show incredible progress with reduced recidivism. Not to mention law enforcement spending less man hours dealing with disturbances by mentally ill and more time enforcing the law. And therefore being tougher on crime.

If anyone wants a high level few of what law enforcement deals with in terms of mental illness I strongly suggest the book  "Anyplace But Here: The Uncomfortable Convergence Between Mental Illness and the Criminal Justice System" by sheriff Tony Thompson.

#19 · Feb 16, 2:43 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"bigbone62" said:
@"JimmyinSD" said: So when it's not mental illness,  can we agre that in a lot of cases it's a lack of law with teeth?  This happens all the time in an era of light on crime policy,  more and more we hear about criminal acting without fear of reprisal and then act outraged or confused when it escalates?

We have a society problem more than anything IMO,  can't point to one cause on a problem as diverse and complex as violence towards others.

Glad you brought this up. I haven't had to speak on the topic yet this year so my presentation isn't updated from last year. But 60 plus % of those incarcerated have a DIAGNOSED severe mental health issue. Safe to say tens of thousands more are undiagnosed.

People with a severe mental health diagnosis are more likely to be the victim of a violent crime than the perpetrator. But "sane man commits mass shooting" doesn't have quite the same ring with news orgs trying to get views and clicks.

The largest provider of mental health in this country is not community mental health centers, hospitals, private practices or mental health walk-in clinics. It's jails and prisons. And by a wide margin. So you rally for being tougher on crime which is great and all.

But there are those so severely ill and under treated that no amount of "throwing the book at them" is going to put a dent in recidivism. You can't imprison mental illness away. Frankly you're going to increase it significantly by continued incarceration.

I will only speak on behalf of the many members of law enforcement I've joined on community mental health panels. But across the board they say yes they want more funding. Not for guns, tactical gear, tanks or specialized tactical training.

But rather for mental health first aid training and other trainings that give them the tools to deal with and deescalate mentally ill people they encounter. The use of mental health courts. More social workers to do ride alongs to deescalate and connect the mentally ill with the appropriate resources. Rather than taking up valuable jail cells and hospital beds.

Communities that have invested in rebuilding the community mental health approach stripped away in the 80's show incredible progress with reduced recidivism. Not to mention law enforcement spending less man hours dealing with disturbances by mentally ill and more time enforcing the law. And therefore being tougher on crime.

If anyone wants a high level few of what law enforcement deals with in terms of mental illness I strongly suggest the book  "Anyplace But Here: The Uncomfortable Convergence Between Mental Illness and the Criminal Justice System" by sheriff Tony Thompson.



Good stuff here. 

#20 · Feb 16, 9:08 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"bigbone62" said:
@"JimmyinSD" said: So when it's not mental illness,  can we agre that in a lot of cases it's a lack of law with teeth?  This happens all the time in an era of light on crime policy,  more and more we hear about criminal acting without fear of reprisal and then act outraged or confused when it escalates?

We have a society problem more than anything IMO,  can't point to one cause on a problem as diverse and complex as violence towards others.

Glad you brought this up. I haven't had to speak on the topic yet this year so my presentation isn't updated from last year. But 60 plus % of those incarcerated have a DIAGNOSED severe mental health issue. Safe to say tens of thousands more are undiagnosed.

People with a severe mental health diagnosis are more likely to be the victim of a violent crime than the perpetrator. But "sane man commits mass shooting" doesn't have quite the same ring with news orgs trying to get views and clicks.

The largest provider of mental health in this country is not community mental health centers, hospitals, private practices or mental health walk-in clinics. It's jails and prisons. And by a wide margin. So you rally for being tougher on crime which is great and all.

But there are those so severely ill and under treated that no amount of "throwing the book at them" is going to put a dent in recidivism. You can't imprison mental illness away. Frankly you're going to increase it significantly by continued incarceration.

I will only speak on behalf of the many members of law enforcement I've joined on community mental health panels. But across the board they say yes they want more funding. Not for guns, tactical gear, tanks or specialized tactical training.

But rather for mental health first aid training and other trainings that give them the tools to deal with and deescalate mentally ill people they encounter. The use of mental health courts. More social workers to do ride alongs to deescalate and connect the mentally ill with the appropriate resources. Rather than taking up valuable jail cells and hospital beds.

Communities that have invested in rebuilding the community mental health approach stripped away in the 80's show incredible progress with reduced recidivism. Not to mention law enforcement spending less man hours dealing with disturbances by mentally ill and more time enforcing the law. And therefore being tougher on crime.

If anyone wants a high level few of what law enforcement deals with in terms of mental illness I strongly suggest the book  "Anyplace But Here: The Uncomfortable Convergence Between Mental Illness and the Criminal Justice System" by sheriff Tony Thompson.



That's a great synopsis of the mental health issue,  I agree with much of what you say there,  but when I hear of the failures and holes in the rehab and treatment processes for all types of illnesses and the increase of rampant "self treament" ( drug use )  until there is a better solution I would prefer to keep those people locked up and off the streets.   It's at least once or twice a month we are hearing of those recently released turning right around and committing worse crimes than what they were just arrested for. 

Law enforcement job is to keep the streets safe,  once they do their job it should be turned over to qualified mental health professionals to evaluate the safety of the individual being released,  but I don't think it should be a numbers game,  housing for profit,  or releasing to show progress should somehow be eliminated from the equation.  It's a very slippery slope in either direction.  

I dont envy those in the profession as I am sure it's very difficult work to do correctly and the lack of resources makes it more challenging,  but I do think incarceration is a better approach than the catch and release we are seeing these days, especially in the more urban parts of the country where jails are more crowded.

Question,  is mental illness getting worse or are we creating more criteria to define poor judgement or actions as mental illness.   I often wonder if it's like obesity,  yes some people are genetically predisposed to carrying more weight,  but some of us it's an unhealthy choice,  it shouldn't be something that gets everyone a pass to disability,  how much of the massive mental health issue  come from things like drug use and other self inflicted issues versus people that were just born with issues or had problems arise from illness or trauma beyond their control,  or is it to big an issue to really identify?

What is your solution,  I know it needs more funding,  but as we have learned in this country typically more funding rarely leads to more positive results,  just to another bloated social program.

#21 · Feb 16, 12:29 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Tragedy in Kansas City

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!