Forum The Longship Where is your confidence level at with this organi...

Where is your confidence level at with this organization?

supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433

I'm just kind of curious as to where everyone is at now at seasons-end? Personally, my confidence level with the decision makers at the very top of this organization have not been this low since Red McCombs and Mike Tice were calling the shots:

- I think the Wilfs (while I admire their enthusiasm) don't have the slightest clue how to build a winning franchise.  They are fans and make decisions like fans, even if it's not in the best interest of the franchise. That goes from extending Brad Childress after one good season where Favre carried the team, to going all in on this season when the sensible thing to do after making wholesale changes was to rebuild. Instead, we are in no man's land essentially with roster holes everywhere and salary cap issues to once again juggle. Their decision to hire KAM was hugely questionable at best. 

- Speaking of KAM, I've been highly critical of him and the decisions he's made since being put in charge. His first draft was a disaster (not sure how else you classify it) and the lack of impact from this draft was a huge reason we didn't go any farther than we did. Not a single defensive draft pick made any sort of impact. His free agency additions fizzled down the stretch and this team won what we did on the fumes of what was left over from the Zimmer/Spielman era. I'll give him credit for Hockenson, but is anybody paying big money to any TE not named Kelce? That's a decision that will have to be weighed out this offseason or next. To me the verdict is still out on O'Connell and I'm not sure that hiring him over Harbaugh was ultimately the right decision. 

- KOC, while I like him and think he did a good job with some things on offense, I'm not sure he was the best choice as head coach. I think most anybody could have squeezed offensive production out of what we had left in the pantry, but he also felt Donatell was the guy he wanted to run the defense and oversee this transition to a new scheme. That was his hire and his decision to do so was the biggest reason we didn't advance. Donatell was a disaster, a historically bad disaster, and KOC can choke on that decision all offseason because it was his own. I think most everybody knew Ed Donatell was a shit coach when he was hired, so how that escaped KOC...I have no idea, but it doesn't inspire any confidence in his decision making going forward. 

My fear is we are prolonging an inevitable rebuild that really needed to start last offseason. We are going to try and squeeze every last ounce and mortgage the future to be competitive the next couple years to appease the Wilfs without ever being good enough to be legitimate contenders. This franchise is due for an overhaul. Laugh at Pace and the Bears all you want, but I can guarantee in two years they will have built it up the right way after tearing things down and will be long term contenders while the Vikings flounder because of decisions made at the top. 

#1 · Jan 16, 6:31 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Pretty high

One year in and they won the division. KAM and KOC will or at least should get better at decision making. I was honestly surprised by some of the cuts made this past offseason. Hard decisions will be made and I think KAM can make them. I don’t think there is a reason to think he wouldn’t want to put the best product out there. 
The Wilf family just needs to stay out of the way a little bit. I know they wanted a soft retooling instead of a complete rebuild, which I agree with. Blowing up a roster just because never made sense to me.

Pinning Donatell on KOC is fair, however you have to look at the big picture that is the NFL coaching tree. Sometimes coordinators want more control or freedom to do what they want, or see the personnel on a team and say, Nope!We don’t know who was talked to or who was considered besides Donatell. Maybe other coaches didn’t want to attach themselves to KOC, thinking he’s young and it could hurt their career. You never know all the details.

Depth is something that will probably be lacking for at least another year. The decisions that take place this off season will impact that. You can’t do wholesale cuts and expect to be deep. 
I hope this draft goes well, I hope they fix some of the problems on the defensive side of the ball, while still trying to add weapons and good depth on the O line. 
Speaking of the O line, they were good at times, and they were bad at times. But, they were better than the past and they did see some young players step up and contribute. Brandel has become a very good swing tackle IMO, and honestly Bradbury stepped up his game. They’ll need to resign or replace this offseason. Is the o line elite? No, but name the starting 5 O linemen for the 6 Super Bowls Belicheat won. 
I’m good with the path the Vikings are on. We’ll see in a few years who was right. 
We could both be wrong.

#2 · Jan 16, 7:10 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"Riphawkins" said: Pretty high

One year in and they won the division. KAM and KOC will or at least should get better at decision making. I was honestly surprised by some of the cuts made this past offseason. 

Hard decisions will be made and I think KAM can make them. I don’t think there is a reason to think he wouldn’t want to put the best product out there. 
The Wilf family just needs to stay out of the way a little bit. I know they wanted a soft retooling instead of a complete rebuild, which I agree with. Blowing up a roster just because never made sense to me.

Pinning Donatell on KOC is fair, however you have to look at the big picture that is the NFL coaching tree. Sometimes coordinators want more control or freedom to do what they want, or see the personnel on a team and say, Nope!We don’t know who was talked to or who was considered besides Donatell. Maybe other coaches didn’t want to attach themselves to KOC, thinking he’s young and it could hurt their career. You never know all the details.

Depth is something that will probably be lacking for at least another year. The decisions that take place this off season will impact that. You can’t do wholesale cuts and expect to be deep. 
I hope this draft goes well, I hope they fix some of the problems on the defensive side of the ball, while still trying to add weapons and good depth on the O line. 
Speaking of the O line, they were good at times, and they were bad at times. But, they were better than the past and they did see some young players step up and contribute. Brandel has become a very good swing tackle IMO, and honestly Bradbury stepped up his game. They’ll need to resign or replace this offseason. Is the o line elite? No, but name the starting 5 O linemen for the 6 Super Bowls Belicheat won. 
I’m good with the path the Vikings are on. We’ll see in a few years who was right. 
We could both be wrong.



to many moving parts and variables, you will never be able to say who is right or wrong,  thats the maddening part of these debates, there is rarely ever a definitive answer.

#3 · Jan 16, 7:18 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Personally, I like the approach of using some draft stock for proven players.

Rick frustrated me with his “quantity” of picks - had to get to ten......six of which wouldnt make the roster. I still dont like Kwesi trading within the division, its almost like he was trying to prove something (other than giving our rivals talent that we otherwise could be taking).  For all his posturing about “analytics” there are things that cannot be measured on a football field, heart, moxie, perseverance, work ethic, etc. what did analytics say about John Randle?  about Theilen ?  Now, Im not looking for boy scouts, but if there is a guy that you know is gonna tear up the league, why wait? Figure out a way to pull the trigger. 

where am I?  Ive flatlined after ‘09.  Im old and come to the realization I may not get there with all of you good people.

#4 · Jan 16, 7:26 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Going into year 2 I have more confidence in KOC than KAM

But as Jimmy posted, lots of moving parts and I have a lot more data points at this time on KOC than I do KAM. 

Agree with the OP, that first draft left too much to be desired - so far. 

Regular season was a wild ride and hard to de-cipher. But they did make the post-season and won the Norris. Those accomplishments are pretty good for year 1. 

Give em a day to pat themselves on the back for that. They we'll see how they can build a roster that can make a playoff run and not just get a tix to the dance. 

#5 · Jan 16, 7:29 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"Riphawkins" said: Pretty high

One year in and they won the division. KAM and KOC will or at least should get better at decision making. I was honestly surprised by some of the cuts made this past offseason. 

Hard decisions will be made and I think KAM can make them. I don’t think there is a reason to think he wouldn’t want to put the best product out there. 
The Wilf family just needs to stay out of the way a little bit. I know they wanted a soft retooling instead of a complete rebuild, which I agree with. Blowing up a roster just because never made sense to me.

Pinning Donatell on KOC is fair, however you have to look at the big picture that is the NFL coaching tree. Sometimes coordinators want more control or freedom to do what they want, or see the personnel on a team and say, Nope!We don’t know who was talked to or who was considered besides Donatell. Maybe other coaches didn’t want to attach themselves to KOC, thinking he’s young and it could hurt their career. You never know all the details.

Depth is something that will probably be lacking for at least another year. The decisions that take place this off season will impact that. You can’t do wholesale cuts and expect to be deep. 
I hope this draft goes well, I hope they fix some of the problems on the defensive side of the ball, while still trying to add weapons and good depth on the O line. 
Speaking of the O line, they were good at times, and they were bad at times. But, they were better than the past and they did see some young players step up and contribute. Brandel has become a very good swing tackle IMO, and honestly Bradbury stepped up his game. They’ll need to resign or replace this offseason. Is the o line elite? No, but name the starting 5 O linemen for the 6 Super Bowls Belicheat won. 
I’m good with the path the Vikings are on. We’ll see in a few years who was right. 
We could both be wrong.


Well, here is the situation. The Vikings are 7.4 million OVER the projected salary cap for 2023. We have a lot of older veteran players that we will need to make decisions on. There is not a single free agent on this roster I would bring back (including Bradbury) and what do we do with Cousins moving forward, who is once again going into the final year of his contract and will be 35 years old. We drafted 10 players last year and we have no idea if any of them can play or add any sort of quality depth. We have needs along the defensive line, at linebacker, we have no idea if any of the young corners on the roster are any good so does this also become a need? Thielen likely will be a salary cut in June, so finding a starting caliber receiver somewhere that can take the double and triple teams off JJ becomes a priority. We traded off draft picks for Reagor and Hockenson. 

This team has huge question marks up and down the roster and I simply do not trust this front office to make the right decisions when the right decision was to blow this thing up last offseason. I would have gladly taken a 5-12 season this year with Baker Mayfield at the helm (per say), salary cap room, extra draft picks, and a top 5 draft pick heading into next season. Instead, we blew our wads trying to piece this together with duct tape, got bounced in the first round of the playoffs, and once again have to address the same problems and issues as last offseason. 

#6 · Jan 16, 7:46 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Sounds like Harbaugh could land in Denver, they’re probably looking for new fans…  ;) B)  

#7 · Jan 16, 7:50 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I see both sides of the argument. I was for blowing things up last offseason but I also can’t overlook what a fun season this was and how we won 13 games. 

KAM’s first draft— to date, it’s early— looks really bad. But Z Smith was solid, affordable, and better than anyone else we have. Reagor stinks but didn’t cost much. And Hockenson is awesome and I don’t see how anyone can question that move while comparing KAM to Rick. RS is the reason we needed Hockenson!! Rudolph, John freaking Carlson, Irv Smith, Chris Herndon, not resigning Conklin… RS bungled the TE position numerous times over so I’m not going to complain that KAM brought in a guy who can actually play, at a pretty fair price.

KO was a first year HC who made mistakes and will hopefully improve. Some do, some don’t. But he is certainly no total stiff and I am excited about the future with him.

We might still need to blow things up because the defense is so bad, but considering that was apparently against the owner’s direct wishes, I’m not sure what else KAM could have done outside of hindsighting draft day. He fielded a good team that won the division for the first time in 5 years. Saying your confidence is at a 20 year low considering some of the years we’ve had in that timespan seems a bit hyperbolic. 

#8 · Jan 16, 7:55 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I will get back to y'all on this once a decision is made regarding the DC.

#9 · Jan 16, 7:59 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Riphawkins" said: Pretty high

One year in and they won the division. KAM and KOC will or at least should get better at decision making. I was honestly surprised by some of the cuts made this past offseason. 

Hard decisions will be made and I think KAM can make them. I don’t think there is a reason to think he wouldn’t want to put the best product out there. 
The Wilf family just needs to stay out of the way a little bit. I know they wanted a soft retooling instead of a complete rebuild, which I agree with. Blowing up a roster just because never made sense to me.

Pinning Donatell on KOC is fair, however you have to look at the big picture that is the NFL coaching tree. Sometimes coordinators want more control or freedom to do what they want, or see the personnel on a team and say, Nope!We don’t know who was talked to or who was considered besides Donatell. Maybe other coaches didn’t want to attach themselves to KOC, thinking he’s young and it could hurt their career. You never know all the details.

Depth is something that will probably be lacking for at least another year. The decisions that take place this off season will impact that. You can’t do wholesale cuts and expect to be deep. 
I hope this draft goes well, I hope they fix some of the problems on the defensive side of the ball, while still trying to add weapons and good depth on the O line. 
Speaking of the O line, they were good at times, and they were bad at times. But, they were better than the past and they did see some young players step up and contribute. Brandel has become a very good swing tackle IMO, and honestly Bradbury stepped up his game. They’ll need to resign or replace this offseason. Is the o line elite? No, but name the starting 5 O linemen for the 6 Super Bowls Belicheat won. 
I’m good with the path the Vikings are on. We’ll see in a few years who was right. 
We could both be wrong.


Well, here is the situation. The Vikings are 7.4 million OVER the projected salary cap for 2023. We have a lot of older veteran players that we will need to make decisions on. There is not a single free agent on this roster I would bring back (including Bradbury) and what do we do with Cousins moving forward, who is once again going into the final year of his contract and will be 35 years old. We drafted 10 players last year and we have no idea if any of them can play or add any sort of quality depth. We have needs along the defensive line, at linebacker, we have no idea if any of the young corners on the roster are any good so does this also become a need? Thielen likely will be a salary cut in June, so finding a starting caliber receiver somewhere that can take the double and triple teams off JJ becomes a priority. We traded off draft picks for Reagor and Hockenson. 

This team has huge question marks up and down the roster and I simply do not trust this front office to make the right decisions when the right decision was to blow this thing up last offseason. I would have gladly taken a 5-12 season this year with Baker Mayfield at the helm (per say), salary cap room, extra draft picks, and a top 5 draft pick heading into next season. Instead, we blew our wads trying to piece this together with duct tape, got bounced in the first round of the playoffs, and once again have to address the same problems and issues as last offseason. 



We cut/trade Z. Smith, Cook, and Kendricks and suddenly we're in the neighborhood of +22 million in cap space. Like you mentioned there's no way Harry and Theilen are going to be brought back at their current deals, and ISJ and Reagor and his 2.4 million will be gone. Money won't be the issue. Lack of draft capital and the ability to move up or down is. I also don't know if this team has the scouting to see defensive talent, or the patience to build from the trenches out. 

#10 · Jan 16, 8:33 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"mgobluevikes" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Riphawkins" said: Pretty high

One year in and they won the division. KAM and KOC will or at least should get better at decision making. I was honestly surprised by some of the cuts made this past offseason. 

Hard decisions will be made and I think KAM can make them. I don’t think there is a reason to think he wouldn’t want to put the best product out there. 
The Wilf family just needs to stay out of the way a little bit. I know they wanted a soft retooling instead of a complete rebuild, which I agree with. Blowing up a roster just because never made sense to me.

Pinning Donatell on KOC is fair, however you have to look at the big picture that is the NFL coaching tree. Sometimes coordinators want more control or freedom to do what they want, or see the personnel on a team and say, Nope!We don’t know who was talked to or who was considered besides Donatell. Maybe other coaches didn’t want to attach themselves to KOC, thinking he’s young and it could hurt their career. You never know all the details.

Depth is something that will probably be lacking for at least another year. The decisions that take place this off season will impact that. You can’t do wholesale cuts and expect to be deep. 
I hope this draft goes well, I hope they fix some of the problems on the defensive side of the ball, while still trying to add weapons and good depth on the O line. 
Speaking of the O line, they were good at times, and they were bad at times. But, they were better than the past and they did see some young players step up and contribute. Brandel has become a very good swing tackle IMO, and honestly Bradbury stepped up his game. They’ll need to resign or replace this offseason. Is the o line elite? No, but name the starting 5 O linemen for the 6 Super Bowls Belicheat won. 
I’m good with the path the Vikings are on. We’ll see in a few years who was right. 
We could both be wrong.


Well, here is the situation. The Vikings are 7.4 million OVER the projected salary cap for 2023. We have a lot of older veteran players that we will need to make decisions on. There is not a single free agent on this roster I would bring back (including Bradbury) and what do we do with Cousins moving forward, who is once again going into the final year of his contract and will be 35 years old. We drafted 10 players last year and we have no idea if any of them can play or add any sort of quality depth. We have needs along the defensive line, at linebacker, we have no idea if any of the young corners on the roster are any good so does this also become a need? Thielen likely will be a salary cut in June, so finding a starting caliber receiver somewhere that can take the double and triple teams off JJ becomes a priority. We traded off draft picks for Reagor and Hockenson. 

This team has huge question marks up and down the roster and I simply do not trust this front office to make the right decisions when the right decision was to blow this thing up last offseason. I would have gladly taken a 5-12 season this year with Baker Mayfield at the helm (per say), salary cap room, extra draft picks, and a top 5 draft pick heading into next season. Instead, we blew our wads trying to piece this together with duct tape, got bounced in the first round of the playoffs, and once again have to address the same problems and issues as last offseason. 



We cut/trade Z. Smith, Cook, and Kendricks and suddenly we're in the neighborhood of +22 million in cap space. Like you mentioned there's no way Harry and Theilen are going to be brought back at their current deals, and ISJ and Reagor and his 2.4 million will be gone. Money won't be the issue. Lack of draft capital and the ability to move up or down is. I also don't know if this team has the scouting to see defensive talent, or the patience to build from the trenches out. 


Yes, but that leaves you with big roster holes at rush end, running back, and middle linebacker. We have an out on Hicks's contract for next season and I'm assuming we use it, which would leave us having to replace both starting middle backers next season if you move Kendricks. There is just so much shit to try to figure out going into next season and we just don't have the cap space or draft picks to be able to address those roster holes. The first domino has to be a change at defensive coordinator then deciding what we are doing moving forward with scheme. Everything else has to be figured out after that first domino. 

#11 · Jan 16, 8:50 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"mgobluevikes" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Riphawkins" said: Pretty high

One year in and they won the division. KAM and KOC will or at least should get better at decision making. I was honestly surprised by some of the cuts made this past offseason. 

Hard decisions will be made and I think KAM can make them. I don’t think there is a reason to think he wouldn’t want to put the best product out there. 
The Wilf family just needs to stay out of the way a little bit. I know they wanted a soft retooling instead of a complete rebuild, which I agree with. Blowing up a roster just because never made sense to me.

Pinning Donatell on KOC is fair, however you have to look at the big picture that is the NFL coaching tree. Sometimes coordinators want more control or freedom to do what they want, or see the personnel on a team and say, Nope!We don’t know who was talked to or who was considered besides Donatell. Maybe other coaches didn’t want to attach themselves to KOC, thinking he’s young and it could hurt their career. You never know all the details.

Depth is something that will probably be lacking for at least another year. The decisions that take place this off season will impact that. You can’t do wholesale cuts and expect to be deep. 
I hope this draft goes well, I hope they fix some of the problems on the defensive side of the ball, while still trying to add weapons and good depth on the O line. 
Speaking of the O line, they were good at times, and they were bad at times. But, they were better than the past and they did see some young players step up and contribute. Brandel has become a very good swing tackle IMO, and honestly Bradbury stepped up his game. They’ll need to resign or replace this offseason. Is the o line elite? No, but name the starting 5 O linemen for the 6 Super Bowls Belicheat won. 
I’m good with the path the Vikings are on. We’ll see in a few years who was right. 
We could both be wrong.


Well, here is the situation. The Vikings are 7.4 million OVER the projected salary cap for 2023. We have a lot of older veteran players that we will need to make decisions on. There is not a single free agent on this roster I would bring back (including Bradbury) and what do we do with Cousins moving forward, who is once again going into the final year of his contract and will be 35 years old. We drafted 10 players last year and we have no idea if any of them can play or add any sort of quality depth. We have needs along the defensive line, at linebacker, we have no idea if any of the young corners on the roster are any good so does this also become a need? Thielen likely will be a salary cut in June, so finding a starting caliber receiver somewhere that can take the double and triple teams off JJ becomes a priority. We traded off draft picks for Reagor and Hockenson. 

This team has huge question marks up and down the roster and I simply do not trust this front office to make the right decisions when the right decision was to blow this thing up last offseason. I would have gladly taken a 5-12 season this year with Baker Mayfield at the helm (per say), salary cap room, extra draft picks, and a top 5 draft pick heading into next season. Instead, we blew our wads trying to piece this together with duct tape, got bounced in the first round of the playoffs, and once again have to address the same problems and issues as last offseason. 



We cut/trade Z. Smith, Cook, and Kendricks and suddenly we're in the neighborhood of +22 million in cap space. Like you mentioned there's no way Harry and Theilen are going to be brought back at their current deals, and ISJ and Reagor and his 2.4 million will be gone. Money won't be the issue. Lack of draft capital and the ability to move up or down is. I also don't know if this team has the scouting to see defensive talent, or the patience to build from the trenches out. 


Yes, but that leaves you with big roster holes at rush end, running back, and middle linebacker. We have an out on Hicks's contract for next season and I'm assuming we use it, which would leave us having to replace both starting middle backers next season if you move Kendricks. There is just so much shit to try to figure out going into next season and we just don't have the cap space or draft picks to be able to address those roster holes. The first domino has to be a change at defensive coordinator then deciding what we are doing moving forward with scheme. Everything else has to be figured out after that first domino. 


well the way things looked this year we need to replace both MLBs anyway.  Rush end is a coin toss, and RB... i think we can get similar production for a lot less money.

#12 · Jan 16, 8:54 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"mgobluevikes" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Riphawkins" said: Pretty high

One year in and they won the division. KAM and KOC will or at least should get better at decision making. I was honestly surprised by some of the cuts made this past offseason. 

Hard decisions will be made and I think KAM can make them. I don’t think there is a reason to think he wouldn’t want to put the best product out there. 
The Wilf family just needs to stay out of the way a little bit. I know they wanted a soft retooling instead of a complete rebuild, which I agree with. Blowing up a roster just because never made sense to me.

Pinning Donatell on KOC is fair, however you have to look at the big picture that is the NFL coaching tree. Sometimes coordinators want more control or freedom to do what they want, or see the personnel on a team and say, Nope!We don’t know who was talked to or who was considered besides Donatell. Maybe other coaches didn’t want to attach themselves to KOC, thinking he’s young and it could hurt their career. You never know all the details.

Depth is something that will probably be lacking for at least another year. The decisions that take place this off season will impact that. You can’t do wholesale cuts and expect to be deep. 
I hope this draft goes well, I hope they fix some of the problems on the defensive side of the ball, while still trying to add weapons and good depth on the O line. 
Speaking of the O line, they were good at times, and they were bad at times. But, they were better than the past and they did see some young players step up and contribute. Brandel has become a very good swing tackle IMO, and honestly Bradbury stepped up his game. They’ll need to resign or replace this offseason. Is the o line elite? No, but name the starting 5 O linemen for the 6 Super Bowls Belicheat won. 
I’m good with the path the Vikings are on. We’ll see in a few years who was right. 
We could both be wrong.


Well, here is the situation. The Vikings are 7.4 million OVER the projected salary cap for 2023. We have a lot of older veteran players that we will need to make decisions on. There is not a single free agent on this roster I would bring back (including Bradbury) and what do we do with Cousins moving forward, who is once again going into the final year of his contract and will be 35 years old. We drafted 10 players last year and we have no idea if any of them can play or add any sort of quality depth. We have needs along the defensive line, at linebacker, we have no idea if any of the young corners on the roster are any good so does this also become a need? Thielen likely will be a salary cut in June, so finding a starting caliber receiver somewhere that can take the double and triple teams off JJ becomes a priority. We traded off draft picks for Reagor and Hockenson. 

This team has huge question marks up and down the roster and I simply do not trust this front office to make the right decisions when the right decision was to blow this thing up last offseason. I would have gladly taken a 5-12 season this year with Baker Mayfield at the helm (per say), salary cap room, extra draft picks, and a top 5 draft pick heading into next season. Instead, we blew our wads trying to piece this together with duct tape, got bounced in the first round of the playoffs, and once again have to address the same problems and issues as last offseason. 



We cut/trade Z. Smith, Cook, and Kendricks and suddenly we're in the neighborhood of +22 million in cap space. Like you mentioned there's no way Harry and Theilen are going to be brought back at their current deals, and ISJ and Reagor and his 2.4 million will be gone. Money won't be the issue. Lack of draft capital and the ability to move up or down is. I also don't know if this team has the scouting to see defensive talent, or the patience to build from the trenches out. 


Yes, but that leaves you with big roster holes at rush end, running back, and middle linebacker. We have an out on Hicks's contract for next season and I'm assuming we use it, which would leave us having to replace both starting middle backers next season if you move Kendricks. There is just so much shit to try to figure out going into next season and we just don't have the cap space or draft picks to be able to address those roster holes. The first domino has to be a change at defensive coordinator then deciding what we are doing moving forward with scheme. Everything else has to be figured out after that first domino. 


well the way things looked this year we need to replace both MLBs anyway.  Rush end is a coin toss, and RB... i think we can get similar production for a lot less money.


If we were smart and moved back to a 4-3, you keep Kendricks because he is one of the best backers in the game in that style of defense. I also wouldn't be so quick to move on from Dalvin Cook, who still has elite burst and shiftiness. There is a noticable dropoff when he isn't in the game at running back. However, if O'Connell isn't interested in establishing a running game, then yes, we could basically put anybody back there. 

#13 · Jan 16, 9:06 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Its really hard to say after a single year. This off-season will be more telling since they have some tough decisions on how they want to reset the cap. Its inevitable if they want to have any competitive window with Jefferson, Darrisaw, Hockenson, etc.. 

KOC - I think there is good evidence he can build a strong culture. X's & O's I think the jury is still out. The scheme and offense they ran better fits the modern NFL but it really fell off down the stretch. The lack of a running game was deafening. 

KAM - Draft left a lot to be desired, it was his first go at it. I actually think outside of the draft class he deserves a lot of credit for his FA/trade moves considering the hand he was dealt. Za'Darius Smith, Harrison Phillips, retaining Pat Pete, adding Jesse Davis and flipping him for a pick, etc. List goes on. His trade for Hockenson was bar far the best in-season trade across the NFL this year. If he can nail the player evaluation piece I actually feel very good about his outlook. 

As for the Wilfs, sure, you can point out flaws. But they've made this an organization players want to play for. I wouldn't sell them short for that. 

#14 · Jan 16, 9:18 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said: Its really hard to say after a single year. This off-season will be more telling since they have some tough decisions on how they want to reset the cap. Its inevitable if they want to have any competitive window with Jefferson, Darrisaw, Hockenson, etc.. 

KOC - I think there is good evidence he can build a strong culture. X's & O's I think the jury is still out. The scheme and offense they ran better fits the modern NFL but it really fell off down the stretch. The lack of a running game was deafening. 

KAM - Draft left a lot to be desired, it was his first go at it. I actually think outside of the draft class he deserves a lot of credit for his FA/trade moves considering the hand he was dealt. Za'Darius Smith, Harrison Phillips, retaining Pat Pete, adding Jesse Davis and flipping him for a pick, etc. List goes on. His trade for Hockenson was bar far the best in-season trade across the NFL this year. If he can nail the player evaluation piece I actually feel very good about his outlook. 

As for the Wilfs, sure, you can point out flaws. But they've made this an organization players want to play for. I wouldn't sell them short for that. 


Well player evaluation is the biggest piece to being a GM and he clearly struggled in that department. My biggest gripe in his hire was his overall lack of experience. He fast tracked from being a day trader, to working in analytics, to NFL GM in a matter of 9 years. That's unheard of for a guy who never played football or was a scout. He's just a guy who thinks he is smarter than everybody else and tried playing "big baller" in his first draft only to look like a fool. He has as much to prove as anybody heading into next season in my opinion.

#15 · Jan 16, 9:37 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"JimmyinSD" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"mgobluevikes" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Riphawkins" said: Pretty high

One year in and they won the division. KAM and KOC will or at least should get better at decision making. I was honestly surprised by some of the cuts made this past offseason. 

Hard decisions will be made and I think KAM can make them. I don’t think there is a reason to think he wouldn’t want to put the best product out there. 
The Wilf family just needs to stay out of the way a little bit. I know they wanted a soft retooling instead of a complete rebuild, which I agree with. Blowing up a roster just because never made sense to me.

Pinning Donatell on KOC is fair, however you have to look at the big picture that is the NFL coaching tree. Sometimes coordinators want more control or freedom to do what they want, or see the personnel on a team and say, Nope!We don’t know who was talked to or who was considered besides Donatell. Maybe other coaches didn’t want to attach themselves to KOC, thinking he’s young and it could hurt their career. You never know all the details.

Depth is something that will probably be lacking for at least another year. The decisions that take place this off season will impact that. You can’t do wholesale cuts and expect to be deep. 
I hope this draft goes well, I hope they fix some of the problems on the defensive side of the ball, while still trying to add weapons and good depth on the O line. 
Speaking of the O line, they were good at times, and they were bad at times. But, they were better than the past and they did see some young players step up and contribute. Brandel has become a very good swing tackle IMO, and honestly Bradbury stepped up his game. They’ll need to resign or replace this offseason. Is the o line elite? No, but name the starting 5 O linemen for the 6 Super Bowls Belicheat won. 
I’m good with the path the Vikings are on. We’ll see in a few years who was right. 
We could both be wrong.


Well, here is the situation. The Vikings are 7.4 million OVER the projected salary cap for 2023. We have a lot of older veteran players that we will need to make decisions on. There is not a single free agent on this roster I would bring back (including Bradbury) and what do we do with Cousins moving forward, who is once again going into the final year of his contract and will be 35 years old. We drafted 10 players last year and we have no idea if any of them can play or add any sort of quality depth. We have needs along the defensive line, at linebacker, we have no idea if any of the young corners on the roster are any good so does this also become a need? Thielen likely will be a salary cut in June, so finding a starting caliber receiver somewhere that can take the double and triple teams off JJ becomes a priority. We traded off draft picks for Reagor and Hockenson. 

This team has huge question marks up and down the roster and I simply do not trust this front office to make the right decisions when the right decision was to blow this thing up last offseason. I would have gladly taken a 5-12 season this year with Baker Mayfield at the helm (per say), salary cap room, extra draft picks, and a top 5 draft pick heading into next season. Instead, we blew our wads trying to piece this together with duct tape, got bounced in the first round of the playoffs, and once again have to address the same problems and issues as last offseason. 



We cut/trade Z. Smith, Cook, and Kendricks and suddenly we're in the neighborhood of +22 million in cap space. Like you mentioned there's no way Harry and Theilen are going to be brought back at their current deals, and ISJ and Reagor and his 2.4 million will be gone. Money won't be the issue. Lack of draft capital and the ability to move up or down is. I also don't know if this team has the scouting to see defensive talent, or the patience to build from the trenches out. 


Yes, but that leaves you with big roster holes at rush end, running back, and middle linebacker. We have an out on Hicks's contract for next season and I'm assuming we use it, which would leave us having to replace both starting middle backers next season if you move Kendricks. There is just so much shit to try to figure out going into next season and we just don't have the cap space or draft picks to be able to address those roster holes. The first domino has to be a change at defensive coordinator then deciding what we are doing moving forward with scheme. Everything else has to be figured out after that first domino. 


well the way things looked this year we need to replace both MLBs anyway.  Rush end is a coin toss, and RB... i think we can get similar production for a lot less money.


If we were smart and moved back to a 4-3, you keep Kendricks because he is one of the best backers in the game in that style of defense. I also wouldn't be so quick to move on from Dalvin Cook, who still has elite burst and shiftiness. There is a noticable dropoff when he isn't in the game at running back. However, if O'Connell isn't interested in establishing a running game, then yes, we could basically put anybody back there. 


I dont know that there is a huge drop off from him to AM.  DC led the league in rushes for no gain or a loss, AM doesnt always get positive yards, but I think I would have liked to see him in a bigger role at times as his running style is more punishing and was often more affective in the short windows that he got.

as far as Kendricks,  maybe he hasnt lost his step,  but damn he sure looked slow all season and that isnt just a result of scheme.

#16 · Jan 16, 9:41 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said: Its really hard to say after a single year. This off-season will be more telling since they have some tough decisions on how they want to reset the cap. Its inevitable if they want to have any competitive window with Jefferson, Darrisaw, Hockenson, etc.. 

KOC - I think there is good evidence he can build a strong culture. X's & O's I think the jury is still out. The scheme and offense they ran better fits the modern NFL but it really fell off down the stretch. The lack of a running game was deafening. 

KAM - Draft left a lot to be desired, it was his first go at it. I actually think outside of the draft class he deserves a lot of credit for his FA/trade moves considering the hand he was dealt. Za'Darius Smith, Harrison Phillips, retaining Pat Pete, adding Jesse Davis and flipping him for a pick, etc. List goes on. His trade for Hockenson was bar far the best in-season trade across the NFL this year. If he can nail the player evaluation piece I actually feel very good about his outlook. 

As for the Wilfs, sure, you can point out flaws. But they've made this an organization players want to play for. I wouldn't sell them short for that. 


Well player evaluation is the biggest piece to being a GM and he clearly struggled in that department. My biggest gripe in his hire was his overall lack of experience. He fast tracked from being a day trader, to working in analytics, to NFL GM in a matter of 9 years. That's unheard of for a guy who never played football or was a scout. He's just a guy who thinks he is smarter than everybody else and tried playing "big baller" in his first draft only to look like a fool. He has as much to prove as anybody heading into next season in my opinion.


So is KAM the only reason the draft class flopped? What if the defensive coaching staff gave bad player recommendations based on the scheme? What if the training staff thought Booth was healthier than he was? Decision making is based on the inputs. 

#17 · Jan 16, 9:50 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said: Its really hard to say after a single year. This off-season will be more telling since they have some tough decisions on how they want to reset the cap. Its inevitable if they want to have any competitive window with Jefferson, Darrisaw, Hockenson, etc.. 

KOC - I think there is good evidence he can build a strong culture. X's & O's I think the jury is still out. The scheme and offense they ran better fits the modern NFL but it really fell off down the stretch. The lack of a running game was deafening. 

KAM - Draft left a lot to be desired, it was his first go at it. I actually think outside of the draft class he deserves a lot of credit for his FA/trade moves considering the hand he was dealt. Za'Darius Smith, Harrison Phillips, retaining Pat Pete, adding Jesse Davis and flipping him for a pick, etc. List goes on. His trade for Hockenson was bar far the best in-season trade across the NFL this year. If he can nail the player evaluation piece I actually feel very good about his outlook. 

As for the Wilfs, sure, you can point out flaws. But they've made this an organization players want to play for. I wouldn't sell them short for that. 


Well player evaluation is the biggest piece to being a GM and he clearly struggled in that department. My biggest gripe in his hire was his overall lack of experience. He fast tracked from being a day trader, to working in analytics, to NFL GM in a matter of 9 years. That's unheard of for a guy who never played football or was a scout. He's just a guy who thinks he is smarter than everybody else and tried playing "big baller" in his first draft only to look like a fool. He has as much to prove as anybody heading into next season in my opinion.


So is KAM the only reason the draft class flopped? What if the defensive coaching staff gave bad player recommendations based on the scheme? What if the training staff thought Booth was healthier than he was? Decision making is based on the inputs. 


One thing you can never do is draft against trends and history. HARD STOP. Booth supposedly has never been totally healthy or reliable player. You simply can't hang your team's future on guys like that. Same with stats that aren't trending significantly year to year throughout college. Third is maturity/character level that should show up on and off the field. 

The rest is a crapshoot.

#18 · Jan 16, 10:04 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said:
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Geoff Nichols" said: Its really hard to say after a single year. This off-season will be more telling since they have some tough decisions on how they want to reset the cap. Its inevitable if they want to have any competitive window with Jefferson, Darrisaw, Hockenson, etc.. 

KOC - I think there is good evidence he can build a strong culture. X's & O's I think the jury is still out. The scheme and offense they ran better fits the modern NFL but it really fell off down the stretch. The lack of a running game was deafening. 

KAM - Draft left a lot to be desired, it was his first go at it. I actually think outside of the draft class he deserves a lot of credit for his FA/trade moves considering the hand he was dealt. Za'Darius Smith, Harrison Phillips, retaining Pat Pete, adding Jesse Davis and flipping him for a pick, etc. List goes on. His trade for Hockenson was bar far the best in-season trade across the NFL this year. If he can nail the player evaluation piece I actually feel very good about his outlook. 

As for the Wilfs, sure, you can point out flaws. But they've made this an organization players want to play for. I wouldn't sell them short for that. 


Well player evaluation is the biggest piece to being a GM and he clearly struggled in that department. My biggest gripe in his hire was his overall lack of experience. He fast tracked from being a day trader, to working in analytics, to NFL GM in a matter of 9 years. That's unheard of for a guy who never played football or was a scout. He's just a guy who thinks he is smarter than everybody else and tried playing "big baller" in his first draft only to look like a fool. He has as much to prove as anybody heading into next season in my opinion.


So is KAM the only reason the draft class flopped? What if the defensive coaching staff gave bad player recommendations based on the scheme? What if the training staff thought Booth was healthier than he was? Decision making is based on the inputs. 


As the old sayings go, the "proof is in the pudding" and the "buck stops with him" so yes, he is the biggest reason for draft class flop. If he wants to blame his poor decisions on bad info then he needs to revamp his entire analytics, medical, and scouting departments. For someone who was an analytics specialist you'd think the "info" portion would be the one area that would be squared away. I doubt we'll see any changes, which to me would indicate the draft flops were his decisions alone. 

#19 · Jan 16, 10:06 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I was wondering if there is going to be any revisions to the scouting department since the transition in staff occurred so close to the draft. I feel like some things are positive and there is still work to do. It will be interesting now that the group has more time together. I am wondering about the plan for the defense. Obviously there are questions and decisions to be made and we'll see what happens next 

#20 · Jan 16, 10:20 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"supafreak84" said:
@"Riphawkins" said: Pretty high

One year in and they won the division. KAM and KOC will or at least should get better at decision making. I was honestly surprised by some of the cuts made this past offseason. 

Hard decisions will be made and I think KAM can make them. I don’t think there is a reason to think he wouldn’t want to put the best product out there. 
The Wilf family just needs to stay out of the way a little bit. I know they wanted a soft retooling instead of a complete rebuild, which I agree with. Blowing up a roster just because never made sense to me.

Pinning Donatell on KOC is fair, however you have to look at the big picture that is the NFL coaching tree. Sometimes coordinators want more control or freedom to do what they want, or see the personnel on a team and say, Nope!We don’t know who was talked to or who was considered besides Donatell. Maybe other coaches didn’t want to attach themselves to KOC, thinking he’s young and it could hurt their career. You never know all the details.

Depth is something that will probably be lacking for at least another year. The decisions that take place this off season will impact that. You can’t do wholesale cuts and expect to be deep. 
I hope this draft goes well, I hope they fix some of the problems on the defensive side of the ball, while still trying to add weapons and good depth on the O line. 
Speaking of the O line, they were good at times, and they were bad at times. But, they were better than the past and they did see some young players step up and contribute. Brandel has become a very good swing tackle IMO, and honestly Bradbury stepped up his game. They’ll need to resign or replace this offseason. Is the o line elite? No, but name the starting 5 O linemen for the 6 Super Bowls Belicheat won. 
I’m good with the path the Vikings are on. We’ll see in a few years who was right. 
We could both be wrong.


Well, here is the situation. The Vikings are 7.4 million OVER the projected salary cap for 2023. We have a lot of older veteran players that we will need to make decisions on. There is not a single free agent on this roster I would bring back (including Bradbury) and what do we do with Cousins moving forward, who is once again going into the final year of his contract and will be 35 years old. We drafted 10 players last year and we have no idea if any of them can play or add any sort of quality depth. We have needs along the defensive line, at linebacker, we have no idea if any of the young corners on the roster are any good so does this also become a need? Thielen likely will be a salary cut in June, so finding a starting caliber receiver somewhere that can take the double and triple teams off JJ becomes a priority. We traded off draft picks for Reagor and Hockenson. 

This team has huge question marks up and down the roster and I simply do not trust this front office to make the right decisions when the right decision was to blow this thing up last offseason. I would have gladly taken a 5-12 season this year with Baker Mayfield at the helm (per say), salary cap room, extra draft picks, and a top 5 draft pick heading into next season. Instead, we blew our wads trying to piece this together with duct tape, got bounced in the first round of the playoffs, and once again have to address the same problems and issues as last offseason. 



Well, we all know youre not a Cousins fan, but he will be hard to replace unless you trade up and use valuable picks and ignore the reat of the roster, or trade for or sign a guy that hasn’t made it elsewhere.

Ed Ingram, Brian Asamoah, and Akaleb Evans all look like they can play, and 2 of these got substantial playing time. I have faith Cine can and will play. 
Nailer looks like he can contribute, and Chandler could move up quickly if they move on from Cook and Mattison. which they probably will. 
Every paints gllom and doom from the ‘22 draft class. I see a ton of potential. Everyone thinks 7 to 10 guys drafted should come in and start and be all pro. Reality says otherwise.

While I know potential doesn’t mean squat, it's what we have on this team. I guess I’m a glass half full guy.

As far as addressing the same problems goes, the biggest one was Zimmer being an asshat! They took care of that and like it ir not you havr to trust the system in olace until it doesn’t work. it worked, the Vikings won the North.

Maybe that is all the Wilfs want. Be conpetitive, keep fans in the stands, get me a return on my investment. if so, we’re Fricked!

#21 · Jan 16, 10:24 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Where is your confidence level at with this organi...

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!