Forum The Longship Bad or wtf decision

Bad or wtf decision

PapaScott
Joined May 2013
2 posts
Rep: 0

The Vikings win the toss and elect to receive the opening kickoff.
That was a head scratcher.  Why would you do that?   your coming off an emotional improbable win, your 8-1 and your fan base is lubed up.  instead of making it a hostile environment ,you let the cowboys take control , silence the crowd and it was all down hill from there.    so quiet you could hear the music coming from the elevators  

#1 · Nov 20, 6:30 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

#2 · Nov 20, 6:37 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"PapaScott" said: The Vikings win the toss and elect to receive the opening kickoff. That was a head scratcher.  Why would you do that?   your coming off an emotional improbable win, your 8-1 and your fan base is lubed up.  instead of making it a hostile environment ,you let the cowboys take control , silence the crowd and it was all down hill from there.  
  so quiet you could hear the music coming from the elevators  
It wasn’t until Bill Belicheat kicked off in the SB if I remember correctly that teams always used to take the ball first. 
#3 · Nov 20, 6:43 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"AGRforever" said:
@"PapaScott" said: The Vikings win the toss and elect to receive the opening kickoff. That was a head scratcher.  Why would you do that?   your coming off an emotional improbable win, your 8-1 and your fan base is lubed up.  instead of making it a hostile environment ,you let the cowboys take control , silence the crowd and it was all down hill from there.  
  so quiet you could hear the music coming from the elevators  
It wasn’t until Bill Belicheat kicked off in the SB if I remember correctly that teams always used to take the ball first. 
I don't remember when it was, but it all switched. There was a pretty good article about it. Before the big switch, 90% of teams who won the toss elected to receive. Now, 80% of teams who win the toss elect to defer...which is the best decision if you ask me...especially at home. 
#4 · Nov 21, 6:52 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"PapaScott" said: The Vikings win the toss and elect to receive the opening kickoff. That was a head scratcher.  Why would you do that?   your coming off an emotional improbable win, your 8-1 and your fan base is lubed up.  instead of making it a hostile environment ,you let the cowboys take control , silence the crowd and it was all down hill from there.  
  so quiet you could hear the music coming from the elevators  
Agree. Not that this would've made a difference, but electing to receive...at home...was just stupid. And always will be. I couldn't believe it when I heard it. 
#5 · Nov 21, 6:55 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"PapaScott" said: The Vikings win the toss and elect to receive the opening kickoff. That was a head scratcher.  Why would you do that?   your coming off an emotional improbable win, your 8-1 and your fan base is lubed up.  instead of making it a hostile environment ,you let the cowboys take control , silence the crowd and it was all down hill from there.  
  so quiet you could hear the music coming from the elevators  
Agree. Not that this would've made a difference, but electing to receive...at home...was just stupid. And always will be. I couldn't believe it when I heard it. 
I think KOC is maybe as egotistical with his O as Zimmer was with his D,  I agree that taking that kick to start the game was just plain stupid,  you have a loud and rowdy fan base all jacked up from an extra long tailgate and you want them to sit down and be quiet to start the game?   Not to mention then Kirks fumble and you just lost the sober ones.

There is still a lot to be happy about with this team this year,  but the 2 losses and the fashion that they came are definitely going to cast a big shadow,  especially when you look at how they have struggled in their wins to really put teams away that they shouldnt be in 1 score games with.

I expect a better game Thursday,  but I will not be surprised at all if they take another L to Belicheat.

#6 · Nov 21, 7:20 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Pretty sure they elected to receive the opening KO earlier this season, but they drove the field and scored.  KOC mentioned he wanted an early lead.I see a bigger problem with having the team prepared and play calling on offense and defense as a way bigger issue than the opening KO.

#7 · Nov 21, 7:25 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"HappyViking" said:
Pretty sure they elected to receive the opening KO earlier this season, but they drove the field and scored.  KOC mentioned he wanted an early lead.I see a bigger problem with having the team prepared and play calling on offense and defense as a way bigger issue than the opening KO.
Of course. No one would argue that the coin toss was the reason, or even part of the reason, we lost. Just one among many head scratching decisions we made. 
#8 · Nov 21, 7:35 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

If Hockensen catches that pass they'd be up 7-3 with a decent stop on D after a fumble.  Not a bad position.  But they were physically dominated in the trenches all day and I think the outcome would have been the same.  To focus on who takes the opening kick is just, some sort of seeing a tree and missing the forest kinda deal.  It would have been 40-7 instead of 40-3, maybe.  It was not our day.

#9 · Nov 21, 10:37 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"comet52" said: If Hockensen catches that pass they'd be up 7-3 with a decent stop on D after a fumble.  Not a bad position.  But they were physically dominated in the trenches all day and I think the outcome would have been the same.  To focus on who takes the opening kick is just, some sort of seeing a tree and missing the forest kinda deal.  It would have been 40-7 instead of 40-3, maybe.  It was not our day.
nobody is focusing on that as some sort of turning moment in the loss,  just that in a game of inches, somethings that KOC is doing are head scratchers... you get your ass smoked like that and nothing is off the table for scrutiny.
#10 · Nov 21, 11:31 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"HappyViking" said:
Pretty sure they elected to receive the opening KO earlier this season, but they drove the field and scored.  KOC mentioned he wanted an early lead.I see a bigger problem with having the team prepared and play calling on offense and defense as a way bigger issue than the opening KO.
Actually, this was the first time we, or any of our opponents, elected to receive after winning the toss. 
#11 · Nov 21, 12:24 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"HappyViking" said:
Pretty sure they elected to receive the opening KO earlier this season, but they drove the field and scored.  KOC mentioned he wanted an early lead.I see a bigger problem with having the team prepared and play calling on offense and defense as a way bigger issue than the opening KO.
Actually, this was the first time we, or any of our opponents, elected to receive after winning the toss. 

I remembered thinking it was unusual the Vikes didn't defer after winning the coin toss against Chicago, and I remember KOC explaining the reasoning.  I found this article from that game.

https://www.dailynorseman.com/2022/10/9/23394716/chicago-bears-minnesota-vikings-first-quarter-recap-second-quarter-discussion

We’ve made it through the first fifteen minutes at U.S. Bank Stadium with your Minnesota Vikings leading the Chicago Bears by a score of 7-3.
The Vikings won the coin toss and, rather than defer like
they usually do, chose to receive the kickoff instead.
Minnesota wanted
to set the tone early, and they did that on an opening drive where Kirk
Cousins went 7-for-7 and the Vikings moved the ball at will. After
Justin Jefferson was ruled down just short of a touchdown, Dalvin Cook
went over from a yard out to make it 7-0 in favor of the purple.

#12 · Nov 21, 12:48 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"comet52" said: If Hockensen catches that pass they'd be up 7-3 with a decent stop on D after a fumble.  Not a bad position.  But they were physically dominated in the trenches all day and I think the outcome would have been the same.  To focus on who takes the opening kick is just, some sort of seeing a tree and missing the forest kinda deal.  It would have been 40-7 instead of 40-3, maybe.  It was not our day.
Yeah, not talking about the whole game, just the decision on the coin toss.  I'm certainly not blaming the shitshow on that decision.  That argument may have some merit although not a very strong argument.   All things considered I'm not sure why you take the ball in that situation, unless of course your hoping to save the fans energy/voices for the end of the game.  I said it to clients in the shop when it was announced that they would receive the ball instead of deferring.   Obviously there was a whole 58 mins to recover from the decision, but my point being.    It was a head scratcher to take the ball in that situation,  
#13 · Nov 21, 1:55 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Here's why, we were 6-0 when getting the first possession.

Week 1 Packers - got first possession and wonWeek 2 Eagles - got second possession and lostWeek 3 Lions - got second possession and wonWeek 4 Saints - got first possession and wonWeek 5 Bears - got first possession and wonWeek 6 Dolphins - got first possession and wonWeek 7 ByeWeek 8 Cardinals - got first possession and wonWeek 9 Commanders - got first possession and wonWeek 10 Bills - got second possession and wonWeek 11 Cowboys - got first possession and lost

#14 · Nov 21, 2:02 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Most of the games that I saw when the Vikings had their first offensive possession, they usually scored.  Disaster would come by later in the 3rd quarter.  KOC probably thought they could score first before Dallas made any adjustments.  Anyways, losing 40-3 this probably didn't affect the outcome of the game any.  A blowout is a blowout, if you can only muster 3 points.

#15 · Nov 21, 2:03 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"HappyViking" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"HappyViking" said:
Pretty sure they elected to receive the opening KO earlier this season, but they drove the field and scored.  KOC mentioned he wanted an early lead.I see a bigger problem with having the team prepared and play calling on offense and defense as a way bigger issue than the opening KO.
Actually, this was the first time we, or any of our opponents, elected to receive after winning the toss. 

I remembered thinking it was unusual the Vikes didn't defer after winning the coin toss against Chicago, and I remember KOC explaining the reasoning.  I found this article from that game.

https://www.dailynorseman.com/2022/10/9/23394716/chicago-bears-minnesota-vikings-first-quarter-recap-second-quarter-discussion

We’ve made it through the first fifteen minutes at U.S. Bank Stadium with your Minnesota Vikings leading the Chicago Bears by a score of 7-3.
The Vikings won the coin toss and, rather than defer like
they usually do, chose to receive the kickoff instead.
Minnesota wanted
to set the tone early, and they did that on an opening drive where Kirk
Cousins went 7-for-7 and the Vikings moved the ball at will. After
Justin Jefferson was ruled down just short of a touchdown, Dalvin Cook
went over from a yard out to make it 7-0 in favor of the purple.



Interesting. But the box score says otherwise. Guess it could be wrong. 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/202210090min.htm

#16 · Nov 21, 2:26 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"HappyViking" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"HappyViking" said:
Pretty sure they elected to receive the opening KO earlier this season, but they drove the field and scored.  KOC mentioned he wanted an early lead.I see a bigger problem with having the team prepared and play calling on offense and defense as a way bigger issue than the opening KO.
Actually, this was the first time we, or any of our opponents, elected to receive after winning the toss. 

I remembered thinking it was unusual the Vikes didn't defer after winning the coin toss against Chicago, and I remember KOC explaining the reasoning.  I found this article from that game.

https://www.dailynorseman.com/2022/10/9/23394716/chicago-bears-minnesota-vikings-first-quarter-recap-second-quarter-discussion

We’ve made it through the first fifteen minutes at U.S. Bank Stadium with your Minnesota Vikings leading the Chicago Bears by a score of 7-3.
The Vikings won the coin toss and, rather than defer like
they usually do, chose to receive the kickoff instead.
Minnesota wanted
to set the tone early, and they did that on an opening drive where Kirk
Cousins went 7-for-7 and the Vikings moved the ball at will. After
Justin Jefferson was ruled down just short of a touchdown, Dalvin Cook
went over from a yard out to make it 7-0 in favor of the purple.



Interesting. But the box score says otherwise. Guess it could be wrong. 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/202210090min.htm



It's wrong, and obviously PFR didn't watch the game like I did. B)
KOC Presser.  Go to the 2:55 mark as he explains his reasoning for wanting the ball.https://www.vikings.com/video/o-connell-addresses-the-media-following-sunday-s-up-and-down-win-over-chicago

#17 · Nov 21, 2:45 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"FLVike" said:
Here's why, we were 6-0 when getting the first possession.

Week 1 Packers - got first possession and wonWeek 2 Eagles - got second possession and lostWeek 3 Lions - got second possession and wonWeek 4 Saints - got first possession and wonWeek 5 Bears - got first possession and wonWeek 6 Dolphins - got first possession and wonWeek 7 ByeWeek 8 Cardinals - got first possession and wonWeek 9 Commanders - got first possession and wonWeek 10 Bills - got second possession and wonWeek 11 Cowboys - got first possession and lost



Pretty easy when you were 8-1

#18 · Nov 21, 2:47 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"HappyViking" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"HappyViking" said:
@"MaroonBells" said:
@"HappyViking" said:
Pretty sure they elected to receive the opening KO earlier this season, but they drove the field and scored.  KOC mentioned he wanted an early lead.I see a bigger problem with having the team prepared and play calling on offense and defense as a way bigger issue than the opening KO.
Actually, this was the first time we, or any of our opponents, elected to receive after winning the toss. 

I remembered thinking it was unusual the Vikes didn't defer after winning the coin toss against Chicago, and I remember KOC explaining the reasoning.  I found this article from that game.

https://www.dailynorseman.com/2022/10/9/23394716/chicago-bears-minnesota-vikings-first-quarter-recap-second-quarter-discussion

We’ve made it through the first fifteen minutes at U.S. Bank Stadium with your Minnesota Vikings leading the Chicago Bears by a score of 7-3.
The Vikings won the coin toss and, rather than defer like
they usually do, chose to receive the kickoff instead.
Minnesota wanted
to set the tone early, and they did that on an opening drive where Kirk
Cousins went 7-for-7 and the Vikings moved the ball at will. After
Justin Jefferson was ruled down just short of a touchdown, Dalvin Cook
went over from a yard out to make it 7-0 in favor of the purple.



Interesting. But the box score says otherwise. Guess it could be wrong. 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/202210090min.htm



It's wrong, and obviously PFF didn't watch the game like I did. B)
KOC Presser.  Go to the 2:55 mark as he explains his reasoning for wanting the ball.https://www.vikings.com/video/o-connell-addresses-the-media-following-sunday-s-up-and-down-win-over-chicago



Confirmed. PFR's box score is wrong. NFL.com's box score shows the Vikings winning and electing to receive. Still think it's stupid...especially at home. It's just such an advantage to try to work the clock at the end of the half so you get the last score, then get the ball again after the half. Two straight possessions. It's like getting a turnover. It's why over 80% of teams defer now. 

#19 · Nov 21, 2:52 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said:


Interesting. But the box score says otherwise. Guess it could be wrong. 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/202210090min.htm



I think the box score is wrong.

https://www.google.com/search?q=bears+vikings+2022+%22coin+toss%22&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS946US946&biw=1248&bih=916&sxsrf=ALiCzsYx3AXvU5VJPowbS89cQlxXA2Q_0w%3A1669067632865&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A10%2F8%2F2022%2Ccd_max%3A10%2F15%2F2022&tbm=

From the star trib:

They chose to take
the ball after winning the opening coin toss, with O'Connell opting to set a
forceful tone even if the Vikings' analytics staff "might get angry with
me at times for stuff like that." They traveled 86 yards on a 12-play
touchdown drive where Jefferson feasted on free releases and Cousins hit him
four times for 55 yards.

From Vikings.com:
Head Coach Kevin O'Connell opted to receive the ball after winning the coin toss, and the group was able to set the early tone.
"I just wanted to be aggressive, but there's no rule that says that you can't try to set the tone to play complementary football with your offense," O'Connell said. "We've got so much confidence in our quarterback, our group, our coaching staff on offense to help put together a great plan, that the easy part is really calling the plays and watching our guys have the plan come to life. I thought we were really good on third down. Kirk was dialed in from the jump, had a great rhythm to him." 

#20 · Nov 21, 3:01 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Something else to consider with this decision is the analytical data.  Dallas had not given up a touchdown in the first quarter yet this season, so Dallas was probably happy to go on defense first.  Exert their will and get the ball around midfield after a punt, hell ya we will kick off.

#21 · Nov 21, 3:26 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Bad or wtf decision

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!