Forum The Longship What is being said about the trade for TJ Hockenso...

What is being said about the trade for TJ Hockenson

ST
Joined May 2013
0 posts
Rep: 1

NFL Next Gen Stats: “T.J. Hockenson (+117) trails only Christian McCaffrey (+163) in yards after the catch over expected this season. The dynamic tight end is a welcome addition to a Vikings TE group that ranked 30th in YAC over expected (-13) through the first 8 weeks of 2022.”

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2022-nfl-trade-deadline-grades-tracker-dolphins-get-bradley-chubb-vikings-acquire-t-j-hockenson-from-lions/

https://theathletic.com/3751952/2022/11/01/tj-hockenson-trade-vikings-lions/

#1 · Nov 2, 9:47 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

It's been said elsewhere, but right now the Vikings are in line to pick 30th. Right now the Lions pick 1st. Our 2nd round pick is low at #61 (3 picks from the 3rd round) and the Lions 4th rounder is very high at #102 (1 pick from the 3rd round)

It's not too much of a stretch to say the Vikings got TJH for a top to bottom 3rd round downgrade. 

#2 · Nov 2, 10:38 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"MaroonBells" said: It's been said elsewhere, but right now the Vikings are in line to pick 30th. Right now the Lions pick 1st. Our 2nd round pick is low at #61 (3 picks from the 3rd round) and the Lions 4th rounder is very high at #102 (1 pick from the 3rd round)

It's not too much of a stretch to say the Vikings got TJH for a top to bottom 3rd round downgrade. 



@"MaroonBells" said:
It's been said elsewhere, but right now the Vikings are in line to pick 30th. Right now the Lions pick 1st. Our 2nd round pick is low at #61 (3 picks from the 3rd round) and the Lions 4th rounder is very high at #102 (1 pick from the 3rd round)

It's not too much of a stretch to say the Vikings got TJH for a top to bottom 3rd round downgrade. 


Yea we got a 25 yr old former Pro Bowl TE for less than 500,000 this year and 9.4 million next season after a CAP increase.  All for an estimated 3rd round pick (value).  I'll take that all day long.
The 9.4 next season puts him as the 10th highest CAP hit for a TE which is in-line IMO.  Hopefully he outperforms!

This guy moves the chains and run blocks he is an all around TE that will help the whole offense and keep the defense off the field.  I did not see this coming but all the smoke was around finding an offensive weapon WR/TE and where there is smoke there is fire!  

Shout-out to the Wilf's who always provide the cabbage for this roster to improve!!

#3 · Nov 2, 11:41 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

There sure was a lot of smoke out there Minny! Surprised there wasn't more talk about helping any level on our D. It is the achilles heel of the team in 22. 

I dont know what kind of player TJH will be here - but the smart $$ says he has a far better chance of reaching a higher plateau here than in motown. 

Thats whats exciting to me - his potential here in this system and surround. Something tells me KOC knows a thing or two about getting the most out of an exemplary TE. 

#4 · Nov 2, 12:16 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"purplefaithful" said: There sure was a lot of smoke out there Minny! Surprised there wasn't more talk about helping any level on our D. It is the achilles heel of the team in 22. 

I dont know what kind of player TJH will be here - but the smart $$ says he has a far better chance of reaching a higher plateau here than in motown. 

Thats whats exciting to me - his potential here in this system and surround. Something tells me KOC knows a thing or two about getting the most out of an exemplary TE. 


Yes, I was convinced that the WR/TE was just smoke and that we would sign a second level CB/DL or maybe a G.  

Bottom line - our offense is loaded and experienced - so they need to continue to put the points on the board to force the other teams Off to chase us and make mistakes like the Cards.  

#5 · Nov 2, 12:23 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"minny65" said:
@"MaroonBells" said: It's been said elsewhere, but right now the Vikings are in line to pick 30th. Right now the Lions pick 1st. Our 2nd round pick is low at #61 (3 picks from the 3rd round) and the Lions 4th rounder is very high at #102 (1 pick from the 3rd round)

It's not too much of a stretch to say the Vikings got TJH for a top to bottom 3rd round downgrade. 



@"MaroonBells" said:
It's been said elsewhere, but right now the Vikings are in line to pick 30th. Right now the Lions pick 1st. Our 2nd round pick is low at #61 (3 picks from the 3rd round) and the Lions 4th rounder is very high at #102 (1 pick from the 3rd round)

It's not too much of a stretch to say the Vikings got TJH for a top to bottom 3rd round downgrade. 


Yea we got a 25 yr old former Pro Bowl TE for less than 500,000 this year and 9.4 million next season after a CAP increase.  All for an estimated 3rd round pick (value).  I'll take that all day long.
The 9.4 next season puts him as the 10th highest CAP hit for a TE which is in-line IMO.  Hopefully he outperforms!

This guy moves the chains and run blocks he is an all around TE that will help the whole offense and keep the defense off the field.  I did not see this coming but all the smoke was around finding an offensive weapon WR/TE and where there is smoke there is fire!  

Shout-out to the Wilf's who always provide the cabbage for this roster to improve!!



If ever Cousins needed a safety blanket...this is the GUY!

#6 · Nov 2, 12:40 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

According to ESPN wide receiver ratings (https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/nfl-receiver-rankings/), Hockenson is the 37th best receiver (for comparison Thielen is # 32 and JJ is #8) and he is replacing Irv who is #86 of 98.
  

#7 · Nov 2, 1:24 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Colin Cowherd went gaga over the trade on the Herd today.  Gave the Vikings an "A plus plus plus" for filling (and upgrading) a need position while not actually giving up picks just moving down.

#8 · Nov 3, 4:10 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"RS Express" said: Colin Cowherd went gaga over the trade on the Herd today.  Gave the Vikings an "A plus plus plus" for filling (and upgrading) a need position while not actually giving up picks just moving down.
That's the best part. It's just a downgrade. No lost picks. If season ended today, the Vikings would be trading pick 61 for pick 102. It's not a huge downgrade.

For example, Alexander Mattison was picked at #102. That year, Taylor Rapp was #61. Big diff? Not really. 

#9 · Nov 3, 12:12 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"RS Express" said: Colin Cowherd went gaga over the trade on the Herd today.  Gave the Vikings an "A plus plus plus" for filling (and upgrading) a need position while not actually giving up picks just moving down.
Yea you get a 25 year old (signed through next season) former Pro Bowl TE for moving down a round in the draft.  It is a STEAL and Hock seems like the perfect fit in the offense plus he looks like our logo if he just grows out the mustache more ad does the handlebar:) 
#10 · Nov 3, 12:29 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

Hock is going to be an edge lineman who will be a monster for not only the running game but also play action roll out opportunities either as the drop down in the flat or using his speed and size to come across the field on the second level.  

His role will hide the preference to run or pass vs having either Mundt or Irv on the field

Get him up to speed ASAP, he could be an X factor that draws attention opening up the deep ball and lessening team's abilities to double JJ.

#11 · Nov 3, 2:22 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

The Vikings arguably took on little risk in the deal even if Hockenson isn't in their long-term plans. But there are few things I've thought on the past few days. 

Arguably the Vikings were looking for a 'weapon' regardless if that was a TE or WR. The cost to add Hockenson, who is still on a rookie deal, was far less than the WR market. Look at Claypool going for a top 40 pick. Cooks who isn't on a rookie deal would have gone for a higher price (if traded) too. So the Vikings end up saying heck with it needing to be a WR and add a TE they can use in multiple ways for a fraction of a cost. They move down about 60 spots in 2023 and a round in 2024 for a guy who will be here both years. 

Without the deal the Vikings were likely spending a pick in rounds 1-4 on a TE anyways so it also relieves that constraint too. 

The analytics side of the deal is around the exploding WR2 market. League-wide WR2 salaries are exploding while TE pay is not. So there is a level of inefficiency here. The likes of Christian Kirk, Diontae Johnson, and Chris Godwin are making $18M, $18.35M, and $20M respectively. A comparable TE who recently signed an extension (Dallas Goedert) is making $14M/year on a long-term deal. The very top of the TE market only sits at $17M a year. So they are likely saving $5M or so by going to the TE vs. WR2 route. 

Long-term how they handle Hockenson will be interesting. He fits the now and future but they do have the option of letting him play on his $9M 5th year option next year followed by a franchise tag in the neighborhood of $12.5M. A long-term deal end up helping them massage the cap a bit. But even that would likely be palatable for a guy who is only 25 years old. 

Detroit's FO can make the case that they thought the value was reasonable or that paying a TE big money isn't worth it at the beginning of a rebuild. But trading him for what effectively the value of a 3rd round pick to a division rival is questionable. Just playing out the next two seasons would have net them a 4th round comp pick at minimum, assuming they don't play in FA. Bad teams stay bad by trading 25 year old core pieces regardless of position. The Vikings gain I suppose.  

#12 · Nov 3, 3:39 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"Geoff Nichols" said: The Vikings arguably took on little risk in the deal even if Hockenson isn't in their long-term plans. But there are few things I've thought on the past few days. 

Arguably the Vikings were looking for a 'weapon' regardless if that was a TE or WR. The cost to add Hockenson, who is still on a rookie deal, was far less than the WR market. Look at Claypool going for a top 40 pick. Cooks who isn't on a rookie deal would have gone for a higher price (if traded) too. So the Vikings end up saying heck with it needing to be a WR and add a TE they can use in multiple ways for a fraction of a cost. They move down about 60 spots in 2023 and a round in 2024 for a guy who will be here both years. 

Without the deal the Vikings were likely spending a pick in rounds 1-4 on a TE anyways so it also relieves that constraint too. 

The analytics side of the deal is around the exploding WR2 market. League-wide WR2 salaries are exploding while TE pay is not. So there is a level of inefficiency here. The likes of Christian Kirk, Diontae Johnson, and Chris Godwin are making $18M, $18.35M, and $20M respectively. A comparable TE who recently signed an extension (Dallas Goedert) is making $14M/year on a long-term deal. The very top of the TE market only sits at $17M a year. So they are likely saving $5M or so by going to the TE vs. WR2 route. 

Long-term how they handle Hockenson will be interesting. He fits the now and future but they do have the option of letting him play on his $9M 5th year option next year followed by a franchise tag in the neighborhood of $12.5M. A long-term deal end up helping them massage the cap a bit. But even that would likely be palatable for a guy who is only 25 years old. 

Detroit's FO can make the case that they thought the value was reasonable or that paying a TE big money isn't worth it at the beginning of a rebuild. But trading him for what effectively the value of a 3rd round pick to a division rival is questionable. Just playing out the next two seasons would have net them a 4th round comp pick at minimum, assuming they don't play in FA. Bad teams stay bad by trading 25 year old core pieces regardless of position. The Vikings gain I suppose.  


NFL economics suggests that you are generally better off spending a high draft pick on a WR than trying to get an established WR in a trade or via FA. If you have both the draft capital and the salary cap space to pull off a deal like Miami did for Tyreke Hill or Philly did with AJ Brown, then OK. But most teams, including the Vikings, are not there. We need to extend JJ soon and he will break the bank. Thielen is well past his prime and KJ is just OK but nothing more.  My guess is that neither Reagor (despite being a first round pick) nor Nailor will ever be difference makers. (Note: if your first round WR selection causes other teams to laugh maybe you should just trade for an established star.)

The opposite appears to be true for TEs. Few TEs really make a difference and even the good ones can be had fairly cheap compared to WRs. It's OK even for cap-strapped teams to trade for productive TEs rather than waste a relatively high pick on just a guy - looking at you ISM.

#13 · Nov 3, 6:30 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I guess the Vikes looked at the trade and felt that the offense is maybe one really good player away from making it elite, while the defense is what it is (although appears to be improving).

The O-Line seems set, or at least the best we've seen in quite a long time. You have front line playmakers in JJ, Dalvin, and now TJ. You have great secondary weapons in AT, KJ, and Mattison. Once Kirk gets into a groove, watch out. This is going to be something fun to watch down the stretch.

PS - With an offensive minded head coach, I really wish they'd find a way to incorporate Reagor into the offense. Don't make the same mistake that Zimmer admitted to with CP. Throw him out there for a few plays here and there like jet sweeps, bubble screens, some slants, backfield, etc.

#14 · Nov 3, 9:27 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"PurpleCrush" said: I guess the Vikes looked at the trade and felt that the offense is maybe one really good player away from making it elite, while the defense is what it is (although appears to be improving).

The O-Line seems set, or at least the best we've seen in quite a long time. You have front line playmakers in JJ, Dalvin, and now TJ. You have great secondary weapons in AT, KJ, and Mattison. Once Kirk gets into a groove, watch out. This is going to be something fun to watch down the stretch.

PS - With an offensive minded head coach, I really wish they'd find a way to incorporate Reagor into the offense. Don't make the same mistake that Zimmer admitted to with CP. Throw him out there for a few plays here and there like jet sweeps, bubble screens, some slants, backfield, etc.


They seem to be using him.  He was in on Dalvin's TD up the gut.  Ran motion and it seems the D respected him because they hustled to keep up with him.

#15 · Nov 3, 10:44 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"greediron" said:
@"PurpleCrush" said: I guess the Vikes looked at the trade and felt that the offense is maybe one really good player away from making it elite, while the defense is what it is (although appears to be improving).

The O-Line seems set, or at least the best we've seen in quite a long time. You have front line playmakers in JJ, Dalvin, and now TJ. You have great secondary weapons in AT, KJ, and Mattison. Once Kirk gets into a groove, watch out. This is going to be something fun to watch down the stretch.

PS - With an offensive minded head coach, I really wish they'd find a way to incorporate Reagor into the offense. Don't make the same mistake that Zimmer admitted to with CP. Throw him out there for a few plays here and there like jet sweeps, bubble screens, some slants, backfield, etc.


They seem to be using him.  He was in on Dalvin's TD up the gut.  Ran motion and it seems the D respected him because they hustled to keep up with him.


They have, but it seems sparingly to me. It feels like they could do a bit more. 

#16 · Nov 4, 12:02 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"PurpleCrush" said:
@"greediron" said:
@"PurpleCrush" said: I guess the Vikes looked at the trade and felt that the offense is maybe one really good player away from making it elite, while the defense is what it is (although appears to be improving).

The O-Line seems set, or at least the best we've seen in quite a long time. You have front line playmakers in JJ, Dalvin, and now TJ. You have great secondary weapons in AT, KJ, and Mattison. Once Kirk gets into a groove, watch out. This is going to be something fun to watch down the stretch.

PS - With an offensive minded head coach, I really wish they'd find a way to incorporate Reagor into the offense. Don't make the same mistake that Zimmer admitted to with CP. Throw him out there for a few plays here and there like jet sweeps, bubble screens, some slants, backfield, etc.


They seem to be using him.  He was in on Dalvin's TD up the gut.  Ran motion and it seems the D respected him because they hustled to keep up with him.


They have, but it seems sparingly to me. It feels like they could do a bit more. 


I wonder if Reagor has the CP problem....politely.....not the brightest bulbs.  It took the "run Forrest run" approach after about 10 years in the league for the light to turn on (results) for CP. He seems to hit the right hole in the run game.  But I suspect the gadget plays came as a shock to CP (maybe Reagor) as they do to the defenses.  From a QB perspective your WR's need to be at the right place at the right time and CP has struggled with that his whole career.  

#17 · Nov 4, 9:26 AM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

It's interesting listening to some Detroit writers on TJH...

Give Lions a B grade for the trade 
TJH is not a good run blocker; more 1 dimensional player
TJH has been good, but not great as you'd expect a top 10 pick to be

I said it the day of the trade; the excitement about getting TJH is not because of what's he's done, but the potential for what he can be here with this system, KOC calling plays and his offensive surround. 

#18 · Nov 4, 1:10 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"purplefaithful" said: It's interesting listening to some Detroit writers on TJH...

Give Lions a B grade for the trade 
TJH is not a good run blocker; more 1 dimensional player
TJH has been good, but not great as you'd expect a top 10 pick to be

I said it the day of the trade; the excitement about getting TJH is not because of what's he's done, but the potential for what he can be here with this system, KOC calling plays and his offensive surround. 


Writers/Fans look at it in a vacuum. He is not a good gap-scheme blocker, he was a top 5-10 blocking TE in a zone scheme more similar to what MN runs. From an all-around perspective MN is betting on the fact that he was good not great because of the supporting cast. In an offense surrounded by weapons they should find up more ways to get him yards after the catch, which is his greatest skillset in the passing game. TE is also a position that takes awhile to develop so all of the traits are still there. Detroit is misguided thinking they got out from paying him. If it works out KOC is going to use him exactly how Shannahan leverages Kittle. 

#19 · Nov 4, 1:16 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0
@"purplefaithful" said: It's interesting listening to some Detroit writers on TJH...

Give Lions a B grade for the trade 
TJH is not a good run blocker; more 1 dimensional player
TJH has been good, but not great as you'd expect a top 10 pick to be

I said it the day of the trade; the excitement about getting TJH is not because of what's he's done, but the potential for what he can be here with this system, KOC calling plays and his offensive surround. 


After looking into it further, he's not quite the run blocker that I thought he was. At the very least I think he's an upgrade from Irv in that department. 

As a top 10 pick? No. HELL NO. Don't get me going AGAIN on the stupidity of taking tight ends in the 1st round. Top 10? Madness. 

#20 · Nov 4, 1:18 PM
DE
Joined Apr 2026
206,342 posts
Rep: 0

I guess with regards to blocking, I wonder if he’s good
enough that you escape the problem of having a blocking TE and a receiving TE
that get swapped out depending on what the situation calls for.

#21 · Nov 4, 3:01 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship What is being said about the trade for TJ Hockenso...

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!